Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Real-world data comparing minimally invasive surgeries for benign prostatic hyperplasia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the differences in surgical outcomes between the prostatic urethral lift (PUL) and previous thermal energy procedures for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Methods

We present an observational population-based study of 2694 men with BPH in New York State and California who received PUL, transurethral needle ablation (TUNA), or transurethral microwave therapy (TUMT) in outpatient and ambulatory surgery settings from 2005 to 2018. For these surgical procedures, short-term outcomes were reported and compared using a Chi-square test and mixed-effect logistic regressions. Long-term outcomes were described using Kaplan–Meier failure curves and compared using a Log-rank test and Cox regressions.

Results

A significant portion of PUL patients had a comorbidity count ≥ 2 (n = 838, 37.0%). PUL exhibited the lowest 30 day and 90-day inpatient or ER readmission rates among all surgical techniques except for 90-day ER readmission (p < 0.05). No differences were observed for 1- and 3-year risks of reoperation between PUL [5.5% (95% CI 4.4–6.8%) and 14.9% (95% CI 10.9–20.1%)], TUNA [7.4% (95% CI 5.0–10.9%) and 11.3% (95% CI 8.3–15.4%)] and TUMT [8.5% (95% CI 4.7–15.2%) and 15.3% (95% CI 9.5–24.0%)]. 1- and 3-year risks of stricture development for PUL were 0.2% (95% CI 0.0–0.7%) and 0.2% (95% CI 0.0–0.07%), respectively.

Conclusion

In a patient population with chronic conditions, patients treated with PUL exhibited similar 30- and 90-day inpatient or ER readmission rates when compared to previous reports. However, 1- and 3-year reoperation risks for PUL closely resembled previous thermal energy surgical procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Foo KT (2019) What is a disease? What is the disease clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)? World J Urol 37(7):1293–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02691-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Asseldonk B, Barkin J, Elterman DS (2015) Medical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review. Can J Urol 22(Suppl 1):7–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mayer EK, Kroeze SG, Chopra S, Bottle A, Patel A (2012) Examining the “gold standard”: a comparative critical analysis of three consecutive decades of monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) outcomes. BJU Int 110(11):1595–1601. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11119.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Parsons JK, Dahm P, Köhler TS, Lerner LB, Wilt TJ (2020) Surgical management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia: AUA Guideline Amendment 2020. J Urol 204(4):799–804. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Magistro G, Stief CG, Woo HH (2018) Mini-review: what is new in urolift? Eur Urol Focus 4(1):36–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2018.01.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eure G, Gange S, Walter P et al (2019) Real-world evidence of prostatic urethral lift confirms pivotal clinical study results: 2-year outcomes of a retrospective multicenter study. J Endourol 33(7):576–584. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0167

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Roehrborn CG, Gange SN, Shore ND et al (2013) The prostatic urethral lift for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms associated with prostate enlargement due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: the LIFT study. J Urol 190(6):2161–2167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McVary KT, Roehrborn CG, Avins AL et al (2011) Update on AUA guideline on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 185(5):1793–1803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.01.074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM (1998) Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care 36(1):8–27. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199801000-00004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. World Health Organization (1977) Manual of the International Classification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death, Ninth Revision. Geneva: World Health Organization. Accessed April 19th 2021

  11. World Health Organization (1977) International Statistical Classification of Disease and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) Geneva: World Health Organization. Accessed April 19th 2021

  12. Kim HS, Lee S, Kim JH (2018) Real-world evidence versus randomized controlled trial: clinical research based on electronic medical records. J Korean Med Sci 33(34):e213. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e213 (Published 2018 Jun 26)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gaffney CDK, Basourakos SP, Al-Hussein Al-Awamlh B et al (2021) Adoption, safety, and retreatment rates of prostatic urethral lift for benign prostatic enlargement. J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001757 (published online ahead of print, 2021 Apr 1)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Palmisano F, Boeri L, Fontana M et al (2018) Incidence and predictors of readmission within 30 days of transurethral resection of the prostate: a single center European experience. Sci Rep 8(1):6575. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25069-5 (Published 2018 Apr 26)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Garden EB, Shukla D, Ravivarapu KT et al (2021) Rezum therapy for patients with large prostates (≥ 80 g): initial clinical experience and postoperative outcomes. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03548-7 (published online ahead of print, 2021 Jan 3)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Gratzke C, Barber N, Speakman MJ et al (2017) Prostatic urethral lift vs transurethral resection of the prostate: 2-year results of the BPH6 prospective, multicentre, randomized study. BJU Int 119(5):767–775. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Roehrborn CG, Barkin J, Gange SN et al (2017) Five year results of the prospective randomized controlled prostatic urethral LIFT study. Can J Urol 24(3):8802–8813

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Roehrborn CG (2016) Prostatic urethral lift: a unique minimally invasive surgical treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urol Clin N Am 43(3):357–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2016.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hill B, Belville W, Bruskewitz R et al (2004) Transurethral needle ablation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: 5-year results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial. J Urol 171(6 Pt 1):2336–2340. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000127761.87421.a0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mynderse LA, Roehrborn CG, Partin AW, Preminger GM, Coté EP (2011) Results of a 5-year multicenter trial of a new generation cooled high energy transurethral microwave thermal therapy catheter for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 185(5):1804–1810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Roehrborn CG, Rukstalis DB, Barkin J et al (2015) Three year results of the prostatic urethral LIFT study. Can J Urol 22(3):7772–7782

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shah BB, Tayon K, Madiraju S, Carrion RE, Perito P (2018) Prostatic urethral lift: does size matter? J Endourol 32(7):635–638. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McConnell JD, Barry MJ, Bruskewitz RC (1994) Benign prostatic hyperplasia: diagnosis and treatment. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Clin Pract Guidel Quick Ref Guide Clin 8:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  24. Guiding principles for the care of older adults with multimorbidity: an approach for clinicians. Guiding principles for the care of older adults with multimorbidity: an approach for clinicians: American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on the Care of Older Adults with Multimorbidity. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(10):E1–E25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04188.x

  25. Elterman D, Shepherd S, Saadat SH et al (2021) Prostatic urethral lift (UroLift) versus convective water vapor ablation (Rezum) for minimally invasive treatment of BPH: a comparison of improvements and durability in 3-year clinical outcomes. Can J Urol 28(5):10824–10833

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BLR data collection, manuscript writing. XZ data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing. JM data collection, data analysis, manuscript editing. KCZ manuscript editing. AC manuscript editing. DE manuscript editing. NB manuscript editing. AS project development. BC project development, manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bilal Chughtai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

NB is a consultant and investigator for Boston Scientific, Olympus, and PROCEPT BioRobotics. BC is a consultant and investigator for Boston Scientific, Olympus and Prodeon. KCZ is a consultant for Boston Scientific, and PROCEPT BioRobotics. DE is consultant and investigator for Boston Scientific, PROCEPT BioRobotics, Prodeon, Olympus, Urotronic, and Zenflow. All other authors report no relevant conflicts of interest.

Compliance with ethical standards research involving human participants

The data used to produce this publication was provided by the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH). However, the conclusions derived, and views expressed therein are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the conclusions or views of NYSDOH. NYSDOH, its employees, officers, and agents make no representation, warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy, completeness, currency, or suitability of the information provided here.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 14 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 14 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raizenne, B.L., Zheng, X., Mao, J. et al. Real-world data comparing minimally invasive surgeries for benign prostatic hyperplasia. World J Urol 40, 1185–1193 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03926-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03926-9

Keywords

Navigation