Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contemporary practice patterns of transurethral therapies for benign prostate hypertrophy: results of a worldwide survey

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To perform a global survey to identify contemporary practice patterns of transurethral therapies for benign prostatic hypertrophy.

Methods

A REDCap survey was distributed to the ~ 3500 members of the Endourological Society. Surgeons completed demographic information and then selected the BPH therapies they perform 10 cases/year. There were four categories of BPH therapies: ablation, enucleation, resection/vaporization, and MIST (minimally invasive surgical technique). Within each category, there were subcategories to account for different energy modalities. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4.

Results

A total of 175 surgeons responded to our survey. Prostate resection/vaporization remained the most commonly utilized technique (51.9%, n = 147/283) followed by enucleation (22.6%, n = 64/283). Bipolar TURP (bTURP) was the most common modality for prostate resection (69.4%, n = 102/147). Holmium laser enucleation (HoLEP) was the most common modality for enucleation (46.9%, n = 30/64). Urolift® was performed more often than Rezūm™ (55.9% vs. 44.1%, n = 19/34 vs. 15/34, respectively). Among surgeons performing ablation, country of practice was a significantly associated with length of stay (LOS), p < 0.0001. For surgeons performing enucleation, academic institution and completion of a fellowship were associated with postoperative day (POD) 1 catheter removal (p = 0.0240 and p = 0.020, respectively).

Conclusions

In this contemporary, global survey of the Endourology Society, resection/vaporization techniques were the most commonly performed. Rates of MISTs remained relatively low at 12.1%. Academic institution and fellowship status were associated with shorter catheterization times and LOS for certain surgical categories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parsons JK, Barry MJ, Dahm P (2019) Benign prostatic hyperplasia: surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia/lower urinary tract symptoms. AUA Guidelines

  2. Smith RD, Patel A (2011) Transurethral resection of the prostate revisited and updated. Curr Opin Urol 21(1):36–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0b013e3283411455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Das AK (2019) Techniques and innovative technologies for the treatment of BPH. Can J Urol 4(Suppl 1):1

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gravas S, Cornu JN, Gacci M (2020) EAU Guidelines on Management non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), including Benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). EAU Guidelines Office

  5. Malaeb BSYX, McBean M, Elliot SP (2012) National trends in surgical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia in the United States (2000–2008). Urology 79(5):1111–1117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sosnowski R, De Nunzio C, Ahyai S et al (2015) Surgical management of benign prostatic obstruction: current practice patterns and attitudes in Europe. Neurourol Urodyn 34(4):395–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22727

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Christidis D, McGrath S, Perera M, Manning T, Bolton D, Lawrentschuk N (2017) Minimally invasive surgical therapies for benign prostatic hypertrophy: the rise in minimally invasive surgical therapies. Prostate Int 5(2):41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2017.01.007

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhojani N, Bidair M, Zorn KC et al (2019) Aquablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia in large prostates (80–150 cc): 1-year results. Urology 129:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.04.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gilling P, Barber N, Bidair M et al (2018) WATER: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of aquablation® vs transurethral resection of the prostate in benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 199(5):1252–1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McNicholas TA (2016) Benign prostatic hyperplasia and new treatment options—a critical appraisal of the UroLift system. Med Devices 9:115–123. https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S60780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Das AKLJ, Roehrborn CG (2019) Office-based therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review and update. Can J Urol 26(Supp 1):2–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roehrborn CBJ, Gange SN, Shore ND et al (2017) Five year results of the prospective randomized controlled prostatic urethral L.I.F.T. study. Can J Urol 24(3):8802–8813

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. DA Kelly DC (2012) Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate technique for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Can J Urol 19(1):6131–6134

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Raber M, Buchholz NNP, Vercesi A et al (2018) Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP): results, complications, and risk factors in 139 consecutive cases. Arab J Urol 16(4):411–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2018.05.004

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Enikeev D, Glybochko P, Rapoport L et al (2018) Impact of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate with thulium fiber laser on the erectile function. BMC Urol 8(1):87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0400-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Regenbogen SE, Cain-Nielsen AH, Norton EC, Chen LM, Birkmeyer JD, Skinner JS (2017) Costs and consequences of early hospital discharge after major inpatient surgery in older adults. JAMA Surg 152(5):e170123. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0123

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Magistro G, Weinhold P, Stief CG, Gratzke C (2018) The new kids on the block: prostatic urethral lift (Urolift) and convective water vapor energy ablation (Rezum). Curr Opin Urol 28(3):294–300. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to extend a special thanks to Michele Paoli for her assistance with survey distribution to the Endourological Society.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MSL: project development, data collection, manuscript writing, and data analysis. MA: data collection and manuscript writing. DA: manuscript writing. TL: manuscript writing. AK: project development, manuscript writing, and data analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew S. Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Amy Krambeck is a consultant for Ambu, Boston Scientific, Lumenis, and Virtuoso Surgical. She is a board member of Sonomotion.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

Not applicable.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not required as this study did not involve patients or any protected health information.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, M.S., Assmus, M., Agarwal, D. et al. Contemporary practice patterns of transurethral therapies for benign prostate hypertrophy: results of a worldwide survey. World J Urol 39, 4207–4213 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03760-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03760-z

Keywords

Navigation