Abstract
Purpose
There is no consensus on which items of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) should and should not be implemented in radical cystectomy (RC). The aim of this study is to report current practices across European high-volume RC centers involved in ERAS.
Methods
Based on the recommendations of the ERAS society, we developed a survey with 17 questions that were validated by the Young Academic Urologists–urothelial group. The survey was distributed to European expert centers that implement ERAS for RC. Only one answer per-center was allowed to keep a representative overview of the different centers.
Results
70 surgeons fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Of note, 28.6% of surgeons do not work with a referent anesthesiologist and 25% have not yet assessed the implementation of ERAS in their center. Avoiding bowel preparation, thromboprophylaxis, and removal of the nasogastric tube were widely implemented (> 90%application). On the other hand, preoperative carbohydrate loading, opioid-sparing anesthesia, and audits were less likely to be applied. Common barriers to ERAS implementation were difficulty in changing habits (55%), followed by a lack of communication across surgeons and anesthesiologist (33%). Responders found that performing a regular audit (14%), opioid-sparing anesthesia (14%) and early mobilization (13%) were the most difficult items to implement.
Conclusion
In this survey, we identified the ERAS items most and less commonly applied. Collaboration with anesthesiologists as well as regular audits remain a challenge for ERAS implementation. These results support the need to uniform ERAS for RC patients and develop strategies to help departments implement ERAS.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Witjes JA, Bruins HM, Cathomas R et al (2021) European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2020 Guidelines. Eur Urol 79:82–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.055
Parekh DJ, Reis IM, Castle EP et al (2018) Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (RAZOR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 391:2525–2536. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30996-6
Zhang JH, Ericson KJ, Thomas LJ et al (2020) Large single institution comparison of perioperative outcomes and complications of open radical cystectomy, Intracorporeal Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy and Robotic Extracorporeal Approach. J Urol 203:512–521. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000570
Minnella EM, Carli F, Kassouf W (2020) Role of prehabilitation following major uro-oncologic surgery: a narrative review. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03505-4
Hollenbeck BK, Miller DC, Taub D et al (2005) Identifying risk factors for potentially avoidable complications following radical cystectomy. J Urol 174:1231–1237. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000173923.35338.99
Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M et al (2019) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colorectal surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations: 2018. World J Surg 43:659–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y
Williams SB, Cumberbatch MGK, Kamat AM et al (2020) Reporting Radical cystectomy outcomes following implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Eur Urol 78:719–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.039
Patel HRH, Cerantola Y, Valerio M et al (2014) Enhanced recovery after surgery: are we ready, and can we afford not to implement these pathways for patients undergoing radical cystectomy? Eur Urol 65:263–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.011
Brooks NA, Kokorovic A, McGrath JS et al (2020) Critical analysis of quality of life and cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for patient’s undergoing urologic oncology surgery: a systematic review. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03341-6
Cerantola Y, Valerio M, Persson B et al (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) society recommendations. Clin Nutr 32:879–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2013.09.014
Llorente C, Guijarro A, Hernández V et al (2020) Outcomes of an enhanced recovery after radical cystectomy program in a prospective multicenter study: compliance and key components for success. World J Urol 38:3121–3129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03132-z
Wessels F, Lenhart M, Kowalewski KF et al (2020) Early recovery after surgery for radical cystectomy: comprehensive assessment and meta-analysis of existing protocols. World J Urol 38:3139–3153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03133-y
Hanna P, Zabell J, Osman Y et al (2020) Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) following radical cystectomy: is it worth implementing for all patients? World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03435-1
Karl A, Buchner A, Becker A et al (2014) A new concept for early recovery after surgery for patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: results of a prospective randomized study. J Urol 191:335–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.08.019
Pang KH, Groves R, Venugopal S et al (2018) Prospective implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols to radical cystectomy. Eur Urol 73:363–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.031
Pignot G, Brun C, Tourret M et al (2020) Essential elements of anaesthesia practice in ERAS programs. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03410-w
Engel D, Furrer MA, Wuethrich PY, Löffel LM (2020) Surgical safety in radical cystectomy: the anesthetist’s point of view—how to make a safe procedure safer. World J Urol 38:1359–1368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02839-y
Minnella EM, Awasthi R, Bousquet-Dion G et al (2021) Multimodal prehabilitation to enhance functional capacity following radical cystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Urol Focus 7:132–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2019.05.016
Rollins KE, Lobo DN (2021) The controversies of mechanical bowel and oral antibiotic preparation in elective colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 273:e13–e15. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003985
Violette PD, Cartwright R, Briel M et al (2016) Guideline of guidelines: thromboprophylaxis for urological surgery. BJU Int 118:351–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13496
Kiechle JE, Gonzalez CM (2018) The Opioid Crisis and Urology Urology 112:27–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.10.009
Audenet F, Attalla K, Giordano M et al (2019) Prospective implementation of a nonopioid protocol for patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy with extracorporeal urinary diversion. Urol Oncol 37:300.e17-300.e23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.02.002
Katims AB, Eilender BM, Pfail JL et al (2020) Tips and tricks in achieving zero peri-operative opioid used in onco-urologic surgery. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03305-w
Chu CE, Law L, Zuniga K et al (2021) Liposomal bupivacaine decreases postoperative length of stay and opioid use in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Urology 149:168–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.11.036
Pfail JL, Garden EB, Gul Z et al (2021) Implementation of a nonopioid protocol following robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion. Urol Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.01.002
Syed JS, Abello A, Nguyen J et al (2020) Outcomes for urologic oncology procedures: are there differences between academic and community hospitals? World J Urol 38:1187–1193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02902-8
Acknowledgements
EL is supported by the EUSP Scholarship of the European Association of Urology (EAU).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Contributions
Albisinni: project development, Data collection or management, Data analysis, Manuscript writing. Moschini: project development, Manuscript editing. Di Trapani: project development, Data collection or management, Manuscript editing. Soria: project development, Data collection or management, Manuscript editing. Mari: project development, Data collection or management. Aziz: Data collection or management. Jeremy Teoh: project development, Data collection or management. Ekaterina Laukhtina: Data collection or management. Keiichiro Mori: Data collection or management. D’Andrea: project development, Data collection or management, Manuscript editing. Carrion: project development, Data collection or management. Krajewski: project development, Data collection or management. Abufaraj: Data collection or management.
Cimadamore: Data collection or management. Wei Shen Tan: Data collection or management, Manuscript editing. Flippot: Data collection or management. Khalifa Data collection or management. Gonsette: project development. Pradere: project development, Data collection or management, Data analysis, Manuscript editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
The current research did not involve human or animal participants. The participants in the survey consented to the publishment of the survey’s results.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Albisinni, S., Moschini, M., Di Trapani, E. et al. Current application of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for patients undergoing radical cystectomy: lessons learned from European excellence centers. World J Urol 40, 1317–1323 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03746-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03746-x