Abstract
Objective
To present mid-term outcomes from an international, multi-institutional cohort of patients undergoing vessel-sparing excision and primary anastomosis urethroplasty for the reconstruction of the anterior urethra.
Materials and methods
From June 2003 to December 2011, 68 patients underwent vessel-sparing anterior urethral reconstruction at five different international institutions using the vessel-sparing technique described by Jordan et al. (J Urol 177(5):1799–1802, 2007).
Results
Patients’ age range was from 3 to 82 years (mean 51.2). Stricture length ranged from 1 to 3 cm (mean 1.78). After a mean follow-up of 17.6 months, 95.6 % of patients had a widely patent urethral lumen. Three patients failed the procedure, requiring either direct vision internal urethrotomy or urethral dilation, after which all were free of symptoms and did not require further instrumentation. Complications were minimal and as expected following open urethroplasty.
Conclusion
Preservation of blood supply is a noble pursuit in surgery; however, it can be technically difficult and often requires more time and effort. This vessel-sparing technique for anterior urethral reconstruction is reproducible and appears to be reliable in this international cohort. Larger studies and longer follow-up are needed to support these encouraging results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrich DE, Dunglison N, Greenwell TJ, Mundy AR (2003) The long-term results of urethroplasty. J Urol 170(1):90–92
Eltahawy EA, Virasoro R, Schlossberg SM, McCammon KA, Jordan GH (2007) Long-term followup for excision and primary anastomosis for anterior urethral strictures. J Urol 177(5):1803–1806
Micheli E, Ranieri A, Peracchia G, Lembo A (2002) End-to-end urethroplasty: long-term results. BJU Int 90(1):68–71
Morey AF, Kizer WS (2006) Proximal bulbar urethroplasty via extended anastomotic approach–what are the limits? J Urol 175(6):2145–2149 discussion 9
Santucci RA, Mario LA, McAninch JW (2002) Anastomotic urethroplasty for bulbar urethral stricture: analysis of 168 patients. J Urol 167(4):1715–1719
Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Campbell MF. Campbell-Walsh urology/editor-in-chief, Alan J. Wein; [editors, Louis R. Kavoussi… et al.]. 10th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2012
Jordan GH, Eltahawy EA, Virasoro R (2007) The technique of vessel sparing excision and primary anastomosis for proximal bulbous urethral reconstruction. J Urol 177(5):1799–1802
Gur U, Jordan GH (2008) Vessel-sparing excision and primary anastomosis (for proximal bulbar urethral strictures). BJU Int 101(9):1183–1195
DeCastro BJ, Anderson SB, Morey AF (2002) End-to-end reconstruction of synchronous urethral strictures. J Urol 167(3):1389
DeLong J, Buckley J (2013) Patient-reported outcomes combined with objective data to evaluate outcomes after urethral reconstruction. Urology 81(2):432–436
Blaschko SD, Sanford MT, Cinman NM, McAninch JW, Breyer BN (2013) De novo erectile dysfunction after anterior urethroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int 112(5):655–663
Andrich DE, Mundy AR (2012) Non-transecting anastomotic bulbar urethroplasty: a preliminary report. BJU Int 109(7):1090–1094
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Consultant and proctor American Medical System (McCammon).
Ethical standard
Institutional review board approval was obtained prior to performing this chart review and has therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Virasoro, R., Zuckerman, J.M., McCammon, K.A. et al. International multi-institutional experience with the vessel-sparing technique to reconstruct the proximal bulbar urethra: mid-term results. World J Urol 33, 2153–2157 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1512-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1512-9