Abstract
Purpose
To investigate whether differences in the anatomy and dynamics of the pelvic floor (PF) in patients after radical prostatectomy (RP) depicted on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are associated with continence status.
Methods
In the prospective designed study, 24 patients with post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence were enrolled. Additionally, 10 continent patients after RP were matched for age, body mass index and perioperative parameters. All patients underwent continence assessment and MRI (TrueFISP sequence; TR 4.57 ms; TE 2.29 ms; slice thickness 7 mm; FOV 270 mm) 12 months after RP. Images were analyzed for membranous urethra length (MUL), angle of the membranous urethra (AMU), severity of periurethral/urethral fibrosis, lifting of the levator ani muscle, lowering of the posterior bladder wall (BPW), bladder neck (BN) and external urinary sphincter (EUS), and symphyseal rotation of these structures during the Valsalva maneuver and voiding.
Results
Compared to continent controls, incontinent patients showed a significant wider AMU during voiding (p = 0.002) and more pronounced lowering of the BN and EUS (p < 0.001). No differences between the groups were found in symphyseal rotation of the analyzed structures, MUL and severity of periurethral/urethral fibrosis.
Conclusions
The angle of the membranous urethra as a result of anchoring of the BN and EUS in the PF appears to be an important functional factor with an essential impact on continence after RP. Functional MRI seems to be a helpful imaging tool for morphologic and dynamic evaluation of the PF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bauer RM, Gozzi C, Hübner W et al (2011) Contemporary management of postprostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol 59:985–996
Walz J, Burnett AL, Costello AJ et al (2010) A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates or radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 57:179–192
Milsom I, Altman D, Lapitan MC, Nelson R, Sillen U, Thom D (2009) Epidemiology of urinary (UI) and faecal (FI) incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (eds) Incontinence: 4th International Consultation on Incontinence, 4th edn. Health Publication, Plymouth, UK, pp 35–111
Loughlin KR, Prasad MM (2010) Post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: a confluence of 3 factors. J Urol 183:871–877
Kirschner-Hermanns R, Najjari L, Brehmer B et al (2011) Two- and three-/four dimensional perineal ultrasonography in men with urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 109:46–51
Song C, Doo CK, Hong JH, Choo MS, Kim CS, Ahn H (2007) Relationship between the integrity of the pelvic floor muscles and early recovery of continence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 178:208–211
Hocaoglu Y, Roosen A, Herrmann K, Tritschler S, Stief C, Bauer RM (2012) Real-time magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): anatomical changes during physiological voiding in men. BJU Int 109:234–239
Hocaoglu Y, Herrmann K, Walther S et al (2013) Contraction of the anterior prostate is required for the initiation of micturition. BJU Int 111:1117–1123
von Bodman C, Matsushita K, Savage C et al (2012) Recovery of urinary function after radical prostatectomy: predictors of urinary function on preoperative prostate magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 187:945–950
Allen SD, Thompson A, Sohaib SA (2008) The normal post-surgical anatomy of the male pelvis following radical prostatectomy as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 18:1281–1291
Soljanik I, Bauer RM, Becker A et al (2013) Morphology and dynamics of the male pelvic floor before and after retrourethral transobturator sling: first insight using MRI. World J Urol 31:629–638
Paparel P, Akin O, Sandhu JS et al (2009) Recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: association with urethral length and urethral fibrosis measured by preoperative and postoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Urol 55:629–637
Bauer RM, Herrmann K, Karl A, Stief CG, Hocaoglu Y (2011) Real-time MRI of continent and stress incontinent male patients after orthotopic ileal neobladder. Urol Int 87:325–329
Dubbelman YD, Bosch JL (2013) Urethral sphincter function before and after radical prostatectomy: systematic review of the prognostic value of various assessment techniques. Neurourol Urodyn. doi:10.1002/nau.22355
Coakley FV, Eberhardt S, Kattan MW, Wei DC, Scardino PT, Hricak H (2002) Urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: relationship with membranous urethral length on preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 168:1032–1035
Mendoza PJ, Stern JM, Li AY et al (2011) Pelvic anatomy on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging can predict early continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 25:51–55
Tuygun C, Imamoglu A, Keyik B, Alisir I, Yorubulut M (2006) Significance of fibrosis around and/or at external urinary sphincter on pelvic magnetic resonance imaging in patients with postprostatectomy incontinence. Urology 68:1308–1312
Lee SE, Byun SS, Lee HJ et al (2006) Impact of variations in prostatic apex shape on early recovery of urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 68:137–141
Schlomm T, Heinzer H, Steuber T et al (2011) Full functional-length urethral sphincter preservation during radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 60:320–329
Schwalenberg T, Neuhaus J, Dartsch M, Weissenfels P, Löffler S, Stolzenburg JU (2010) Functional anatomy of the male continence mechanism. Urol A 49:472–480
Rehder P, von Gleissenthall GF, Pichler R, Glodny B (2009) The treatment of postprostatectomy incontinence with the retroluminal transobturator repositioning sling (Advance®): lessons learnt from accumulative experience. Arch Esp Urol 62:860–870
Rehder P, Gozzi C (2007) Transobturator sling suspension for male urinary incontinence including post-radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 52:860–866
Rehder P, Mitterberger MJ, Pichler R, Kerschbaumer A, Glodny B (2010) The 1 year outcome of the transobturator retroluminal repositioning sling in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int 106:1668–1672
Dorschner W, Stolzenburg JU, Neuhaus J (2001) Anatomic principles of urinary incontinence. Urol A 40:223–233
Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M et al (2003) The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology 61:37–49
Bauer RM, Mayer ME, Gratzke C et al (2009) Prospective evaluation of the functional sling suspension for male postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: results after 1 year. Eur Urol 56:928–933
Lienemann A, Sprenger D, Janssen U et al (2004) Assessment of pelvic organ descent by use of functional cine-MRI: which reference line should be used? Neurourol Urodyn 23:33–37
Tunn R, Schaer G, Peschers U et al (2005) Updated recommendations on ultrasonography in urogynecology. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16:236–241
Burnett AL, Mostwin JL (1998) In situ anatomical study of the male urethral sphincteric complex: relevance to continence preservation following major pelvic surgery. J Urol 160:1301–1306
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Soljanik, I., Bauer, R.M., Becker, A.J. et al. Is a wider angle of the membranous urethra associated with incontinence after radical prostatectomy?. World J Urol 32, 1375–1383 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1241-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1241-5