Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is a wider angle of the membranous urethra associated with incontinence after radical prostatectomy?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate whether differences in the anatomy and dynamics of the pelvic floor (PF) in patients after radical prostatectomy (RP) depicted on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are associated with continence status.

Methods

In the prospective designed study, 24 patients with post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence were enrolled. Additionally, 10 continent patients after RP were matched for age, body mass index and perioperative parameters. All patients underwent continence assessment and MRI (TrueFISP sequence; TR 4.57 ms; TE 2.29 ms; slice thickness 7 mm; FOV 270 mm) 12 months after RP. Images were analyzed for membranous urethra length (MUL), angle of the membranous urethra (AMU), severity of periurethral/urethral fibrosis, lifting of the levator ani muscle, lowering of the posterior bladder wall (BPW), bladder neck (BN) and external urinary sphincter (EUS), and symphyseal rotation of these structures during the Valsalva maneuver and voiding.

Results

Compared to continent controls, incontinent patients showed a significant wider AMU during voiding (p = 0.002) and more pronounced lowering of the BN and EUS (p < 0.001). No differences between the groups were found in symphyseal rotation of the analyzed structures, MUL and severity of periurethral/urethral fibrosis.

Conclusions

The angle of the membranous urethra as a result of anchoring of the BN and EUS in the PF appears to be an important functional factor with an essential impact on continence after RP. Functional MRI seems to be a helpful imaging tool for morphologic and dynamic evaluation of the PF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bauer RM, Gozzi C, Hübner W et al (2011) Contemporary management of postprostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol 59:985–996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Walz J, Burnett AL, Costello AJ et al (2010) A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates or radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 57:179–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Milsom I, Altman D, Lapitan MC, Nelson R, Sillen U, Thom D (2009) Epidemiology of urinary (UI) and faecal (FI) incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse (POP). In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (eds) Incontinence: 4th International Consultation on Incontinence, 4th edn. Health Publication, Plymouth, UK, pp 35–111

    Google Scholar 

  4. Loughlin KR, Prasad MM (2010) Post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: a confluence of 3 factors. J Urol 183:871–877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kirschner-Hermanns R, Najjari L, Brehmer B et al (2011) Two- and three-/four dimensional perineal ultrasonography in men with urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 109:46–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Song C, Doo CK, Hong JH, Choo MS, Kim CS, Ahn H (2007) Relationship between the integrity of the pelvic floor muscles and early recovery of continence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 178:208–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hocaoglu Y, Roosen A, Herrmann K, Tritschler S, Stief C, Bauer RM (2012) Real-time magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): anatomical changes during physiological voiding in men. BJU Int 109:234–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hocaoglu Y, Herrmann K, Walther S et al (2013) Contraction of the anterior prostate is required for the initiation of micturition. BJU Int 111:1117–1123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. von Bodman C, Matsushita K, Savage C et al (2012) Recovery of urinary function after radical prostatectomy: predictors of urinary function on preoperative prostate magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 187:945–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Allen SD, Thompson A, Sohaib SA (2008) The normal post-surgical anatomy of the male pelvis following radical prostatectomy as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 18:1281–1291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Soljanik I, Bauer RM, Becker A et al (2013) Morphology and dynamics of the male pelvic floor before and after retrourethral transobturator sling: first insight using MRI. World J Urol 31:629–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Paparel P, Akin O, Sandhu JS et al (2009) Recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: association with urethral length and urethral fibrosis measured by preoperative and postoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Urol 55:629–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bauer RM, Herrmann K, Karl A, Stief CG, Hocaoglu Y (2011) Real-time MRI of continent and stress incontinent male patients after orthotopic ileal neobladder. Urol Int 87:325–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dubbelman YD, Bosch JL (2013) Urethral sphincter function before and after radical prostatectomy: systematic review of the prognostic value of various assessment techniques. Neurourol Urodyn. doi:10.1002/nau.22355

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Coakley FV, Eberhardt S, Kattan MW, Wei DC, Scardino PT, Hricak H (2002) Urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: relationship with membranous urethral length on preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 168:1032–1035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mendoza PJ, Stern JM, Li AY et al (2011) Pelvic anatomy on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging can predict early continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 25:51–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tuygun C, Imamoglu A, Keyik B, Alisir I, Yorubulut M (2006) Significance of fibrosis around and/or at external urinary sphincter on pelvic magnetic resonance imaging in patients with postprostatectomy incontinence. Urology 68:1308–1312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee SE, Byun SS, Lee HJ et al (2006) Impact of variations in prostatic apex shape on early recovery of urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 68:137–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schlomm T, Heinzer H, Steuber T et al (2011) Full functional-length urethral sphincter preservation during radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 60:320–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schwalenberg T, Neuhaus J, Dartsch M, Weissenfels P, Löffler S, Stolzenburg JU (2010) Functional anatomy of the male continence mechanism. Urol A 49:472–480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rehder P, von Gleissenthall GF, Pichler R, Glodny B (2009) The treatment of postprostatectomy incontinence with the retroluminal transobturator repositioning sling (Advance®): lessons learnt from accumulative experience. Arch Esp Urol 62:860–870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rehder P, Gozzi C (2007) Transobturator sling suspension for male urinary incontinence including post-radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 52:860–866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rehder P, Mitterberger MJ, Pichler R, Kerschbaumer A, Glodny B (2010) The 1 year outcome of the transobturator retroluminal repositioning sling in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int 106:1668–1672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dorschner W, Stolzenburg JU, Neuhaus J (2001) Anatomic principles of urinary incontinence. Urol A 40:223–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M et al (2003) The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology 61:37–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bauer RM, Mayer ME, Gratzke C et al (2009) Prospective evaluation of the functional sling suspension for male postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: results after 1 year. Eur Urol 56:928–933

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lienemann A, Sprenger D, Janssen U et al (2004) Assessment of pelvic organ descent by use of functional cine-MRI: which reference line should be used? Neurourol Urodyn 23:33–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tunn R, Schaer G, Peschers U et al (2005) Updated recommendations on ultrasonography in urogynecology. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16:236–241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Burnett AL, Mostwin JL (1998) In situ anatomical study of the male urethral sphincteric complex: relevance to continence preservation following major pelvic surgery. J Urol 160:1301–1306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irina Soljanik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soljanik, I., Bauer, R.M., Becker, A.J. et al. Is a wider angle of the membranous urethra associated with incontinence after radical prostatectomy?. World J Urol 32, 1375–1383 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1241-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1241-5

Keywords

Navigation