Skip to main content
Log in

A Mutation in Mediator Subunit MED16A Suppresses Nodulation and Increases Arbuscule Density in Medicago truncatula

  • Published:
Journal of Plant Growth Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nodulation in legumes is regulated to maintain carbon–nitrogen homeostasis. A systemic negative feedback pathway, Autoregulation of Nodulation (AON) controls nodule number by suppressing further nodulation as early as 48–72 h post inoculation. In order to identify new genes involved in AON, a screen for suppressors of sunn-1, a Medicago truncatula AON mutant with a hypernodulation phenotype, was performed and identified a gene not previously associated with signaling in the legume-rhizobia symbiosis. We discovered that sunn-1 plants carrying the mutation suppressor of sunn-1 (sos1) displayed wild-type nodule numbers. At 3 days post inoculation (dpi), sos1 sunn-1 plants make many nodulation foci and infection threads but lack the emerging nodules observed in wild-type and sunn-1 mutants. At 10 dpi, in contrast to sunn-1, no significance in nodule number was observed between wildtype and the sos1 sunn-1plants. Using grafting, we showed that sos1 suppression of the sunn-1 nodule phenotype is dependent on the genotype of the root. The lesion a C to T transition resulting in an R to H a change mapped to Mediator 16A (MED16A) and expression of this gene in composite hairy roots led to recovery of hypernodulation in sos1 sunn-1plants. Induction of expression of the MtNIN transcription factor involved in regulating nodulation is reduced in sos1 sunn-1compared to sunn-1. Furthermore, sos1 plants display fewer nodules than wild-type but higher arbuscular density when colonized by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus, and shorter roots in the absence of rhizobia. Collectively, our findings show that effects of mutation of Mediator 16A are not specific for symbiosis but involve multiple root response pathways, making the sos1 mutant an important tool for dissection of regulons controlling rhizobial and mycorrhizal responses, root growth and possibly other response pathways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Science Foundation (USA) Integrative Organismal Systems proposals # 1733470 and 1444461 to JF and USDA-NIFA 2022−67013−36881 to LMM. We acknowledge CyVerse (URL: www.cyverse.org) supported by the National Science Foundation under Award Numbers DBI-0735191, DBI-1265383, and DBI-1743442 for providing genomic sequence data storage and analysis platform. We thank Dr. Rooksana Noorai at Clemson University Genomics and Bioinformatics Facility for providing insightful suggestions on genomic data analysis. The facility is supported by Grant P20GM109094 an Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DC, ES, AC and JF contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by DC, ES, AC, SB, LM, and JF. The first draft of the manuscript was written by DC as part of a PhD dissertation, revised by JF and all authors commented on and contributed to versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Frugoli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This work was funded by NSF IOS 1733470 and 1444461 to Frugoli and USDA-NIFA 2022 − 67013 − 36881 to Müller. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Charitha Jayasinghege.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PPTX 128 kb)—Fig. 1 Physical location of markers tested on chromosome 4 and BSA analysis

Supplementary file2 (PPTX 309 kb)—Fig. 2 Simplified diagram of MutMap approach

344_2023_10993_MOESM3_ESM.pptx

Supplementary file3 (PPTX 709 kb)—Fig. 3 SNP index plots for the 8 chromosomes of M. truncatula in the sos1 sunn-1mutant identify a region of interest on Chromosome 4

Supplementary file4 (PDF 265 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chaulagain, D., Schnabel, E., Crook, A. et al. A Mutation in Mediator Subunit MED16A Suppresses Nodulation and Increases Arbuscule Density in Medicago truncatula. J Plant Growth Regul 42, 7004–7022 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-023-10993-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-023-10993-2

Keywords

Navigation