Abstract
In this study, a comparative analysis between two grapevine rootstocks was carried out to characterize their salt sensibility in terms of growth, Na+ and Cl– exclusion from shoots, and K+/Na+ selectivity in the whole plant level associated with photosynthesis efficiency. In the first greenhouse experiment, the ‘IAC 313’ and ‘Paulsen’ grapevine rootstocks were subjected to salinity (80 mM NaCl) for 15 d followed by a salt recovery period (10 d). Later, a second assay was performed using plants incubated in a liquid medium to evaluate the kinetics of root K+ uptake in the absence and presence of NaCl. Salinity affected dry weight (DW) in both rootstocks, but this effect was more severe for ‘Paulsen’ rootstock. Better DW of ‘IAC 313’ under salinity was associated with higher restriction of Na+ and Cl– flux for shoots due to better retention capacity of these ions in roots. In addition, ‘IAC 313’ also showed higher K+/Na+ selectivity in both root uptake and partitioning processes at the whole plant. Under salinity, maximum CO2 assimilation (PNmax), maximum electron transport (Jmax), and Rubisco carboxylation (Vcmax) were also affected more in the ‘Paulsen’ than in ‘IAC 313.’ Our findings show that the characteristic of more favorable ionic homeostasis presented by ‘IAC 313’ rootstock was associated with higher growth, water balance, and carbon assimilation under salinity. In summary, this suggest that the ‘IAC 313’ rootstock is clearly more acclimated to salinity compared to ‘Paulsen’ rootstock.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbaspour N, Kaiser B, Tyerman S (2014) Root apoplastic transport and water relations cannot account for differences in Cl− transport and Cl−/NO3− interactions of two grapevine rootstocks differing in salt tolerance. Acta Physiol Plant 36:687–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-013-1447-y
Alam A, Ullah H, Attia A, Datta A (2019) Effects of salinity stress on growth, mineral nutrient accumulation and biochemical parameters of seedlings of three citrus rootstocks. Internat J Fruit Sci 20:786–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2019.1674762
Albacete A, Martínez-Andújar C, Martínez-Pérez A, Thompson AJ, Dodd IC, Pérez-Alfocea F (2015) Unravelling rootstock×scion interactions to improve food security. J Exp Bot 66:2211–2226. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv027
Alizadeh M, Singh SK, Patel VB, Bhattacharya RC, Yadav BP (2010) In vitro responses of grape rootstocks to NaCl. Biol Plant 54:381–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-010-0069-0
Alsaeedi A, El-Ramady H, Alshaal T, El-Garawani M, Elhawat N, Al-Otaibi A (2018) Exogenous nanosilica improves germination and growth of cucumber by maintaining K+/Na+ ratio under elevated Na+ stress. Plant Physiol Biochem 125:164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.02.006
Benabderrahim MA, Guiza M, Haddad M (2020) Genetic diversity of salt tolerance in tetraploid alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Acta Physiol Plant 42:5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-019-2993-8
Charfeddine S, Charfeddine M, Hanana M, Gargouri-Bouzid R (2019) Ectopic expression of a grape vine vacuolar NHX antiporter enhances transgenic potato plant tolerance to salinity. J Plant Biochem Biotech 28:50–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13562-018-0462-x
Chen Z, Pottosin II, Cuin TA, Fuglsang AT, Tester M, Jha D, Zepeda-Jazo I, Zhou M, Palmgren MG, Newman IA, Shabala S (2007) Root plasma membrane transporters controlling K+/Na+ homeostasis in salt-stressed barley. Plant Physiol 145:1714–1725. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.107.110262
Colmenero-Flores JM, Martinez G, Gamba G, Vázquez N, Iglesias DJ, Brumós J (2007) Identification and functional characterization of cation chloride cotransporters in plants. The Plant J 50:278–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03048.x
Cuin TA, Shabala S (2005) Exogenously supplied compatible solutes rapidly ameliorate NaCl-induced potassium efflux from barley roots. Plant Cell Physiol 46:1924–1933. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pci205
Demidchik V, Maathuis FJM (2007) Physiological roles of nonselective cation channels in plants: from salt stress to signalling and development. New Phytol 175:387–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02128.x
Edelstein M, Plaut Z, Ben-Hur M (2011) Sodium and chloride exclusion and retention by non-grafted and grafted melon and Cucurbita plants. J Exp Bot 62:177–184. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq255
Estañ MT, Martinez-Rodriguez MM, Perez-Alfocea F, Flowers TJ, Bolarin MC (2005) Grafting raises the salt tolerance of tomato through limiting the transport of sodium and chloride to the shoot. J Exp Bot 56:703–712. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri027
Ferreira-Silva SL, Silveira JAG, Voigt EL, Soares LSP, Viégas RA (2008) Changes in physiological indicators associated with salt tolerance in two contrasting cashew rootstocks. Braz J Plant Physiol 20:51–59. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-04202008000100006
Ganie SA, Molla KA, Henry RJ, Bhat KV, Mondal TK (2019) Advances in understanding salt tolerance in rice. Theor Appl Gen 132:851–870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-019-03301-8
Garg N, Bhandari P (2016) Silicon nutrition and mycorrhizal inoculations improve growth, nutrient status, K+/Na+ ratio and yield of Cicerarietinum L. genotypes under salinity stress. Plant Growth Regul 78:371–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-015-0099-x
Gouiaa S, Khoudi H (2015) Co-expression of vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter and H+-pyrophosphatase with an IRES-mediated dicistronic vector improves salinity tolerance and enhances potassium biofortification of tomato. Phytochemistry 117:537–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2015.05.016
Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1950) The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. California Agric Exp Stn Circ 347:32
Jeschke WD, Stelter W (1983) Ionic relations of gardenorache, triplex hortensis: growth and ion distribution at moderate salinity and the function of bladderhair. J Exp Bot 34:795–810. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/34.7.795
Kan X, Ren J, Chen T, Cui M, Li C, Zhou R, Zhang Y, Liu H, Deng D, Yin Z (2017) Effects of salinity on photosynthesis in maize probed by prompt fluorescence, delayed fluorescence and P700 signals. Environ Exp Bot 140:56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.05.019
Keller M, Kummer M, Vasconcelos MC (2001) Soil nitrogen utilization for growth and gas exchange by grapevines in response to nitrogen supply and rootstock. Aust J Grape Wine Res 7:2–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2001.tb00187.x
Liang W, Ma X, Wan P, Liu L (2018) Plant salt-tolerance mechanism: a review. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 495:286–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.11.043
Maathuis FJM, Amtmann A (1999) K+ nutrition and Na+ toxicity: the basis of cellular K+/Na+ ratios. Ann Bot 84:123–133. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1999.0912
Marshall B, Biscoe PV (1980) A model for C-3 leaves describing the dependence of net photosynthesis on irradiance: I Derivation. J Exp Bot 31:29–39
Martin L, Vila H, Bottini R, Berli F (2020) Rootstocks increase grapevine tolerance to NaCl through ion compartmentalization and exclusion. Acta Physiol Plant 42:145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-020-03136-7
Martínez-Cordero MA, Martínez V, Rubio F (2005) High-affinity K+ uptake in pepper plants. J Exp Bot 56:1553–1562. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri150
Massai R, Remorini D, Tattini M (2004) Gas exchange, water relations and osmotic adjustment in two scion/rootstock combinations of Prunus under various salinity concentrations. Plant Soil 259:153–162. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000020954.71828.13
Maswada HF, Djanaguiraman D, Prasad PVV (2018) Response of photosynthetic performance, water relations and osmotic adjustment to salinity acclimation in two wheat cultivars. Acta Physiol Plant 40:105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-018-2684-x
Munns R, Passioura JB, Colmer TD, Byrt CS (2020) Osmotic adjustment and energy limitations to plant growth in saline soil. New Phytol 225:1091–1096. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15862
Pehlivan N, Sun L, Jarrett P, Yang X, Mishra N, Chen L, Kadioglu A, Shen G, Zhang H (2016) Co-overexpressing a plasma membrane and a vacuolar membrane sodium/proton antiporter significantly improves salt tolerance in transgenic arabidopsis plants. Plant Cell Physiol 57:1069–1084. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcw055
Penella C, Nebauer SG, López-Galarza S, Quiñones A, Bautista AS, Calatayud A (2017) Grafting pepper onto tolerant rootstocks: An environmental-friendly technique overcome water and salt stress. Sci Hortic 226:33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.08.020
Rodrigues CRF, Silva EM, Ferreira-Silva SL, Voigt EL, Viégas RA, Silveira JAG (2013) High K+ supply avoids Na+ toxicity and improves photosynthesis by allowing favorable K+:Na+ ratios through the inhibition of Na+ uptake and transport to the shoots of Jatropha curcas plants. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 176:157–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201200230
Saleh B, Alshehada E (2018) Gene expression profiling in Halwani and Baladi grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars under saline conditions. J Plant Biochem Physiol 6:222. https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-9029.1000222
Sarabi B, Fresneau C, Ghaderi N, Bolandnazar S, Streb P, Badeck FW, Citerne S, Tangama M, David A, Ghashghaie J (2019) Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations are responsible in down-regulation of photosynthesis in melon plants grown under the saline condition: application of carbon isotope discrimination as a reliable proxy. Plant Physiol Biochem 141:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.05.010
Scholander PF, Hammel HT, Hemingsen EA, Bradstreet ED (1964) Hydrostatic pressure and osmotic potentials in leaves of mangroves and some other plants. PNAS 51:119–125. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.52.1.119
Sharkey TD, Bernacchi CJ, Farquhar GD, Singsaas EL (2007) Fitting photosynthetic carbon dioxide response curves for C3 plants. Plant Cell Environ 30:1035–1040. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01710.x
Sharma J, Upadhyay AK, Bande D, Patil SD (2011) Susceptibility of thompsonseedlessgrapevinesraised on different rootstocks to leaf blackening and necrosis under saline irrigation. J Plant Nutr 34:1711–1722. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2011.592566
Singh H, Kumar P, Kumar A, Kyriacou MC, Colla G, Rouphael Y (2020) Grafting tomato as a tool to improve salt tolerance. Agronomy 10:263. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10020263
Storey R, Schachtman DP, Thomas M (2003) Root structure and cellular chloride, sodium and potassium distribution in salinized grapevine. Plant Cell Environ 26:789–800. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01005.x
Talebnejad R, Sepaskhah AR (2016) Physiological characteristics, gas exchange, and plant ion relations of quinoa to different saline ground water depths and water salinity. Arch Agron Soil Sci 62:1347–1367. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2016.1144925
Teakle NL, Tyerman SD (2010) Mechanisms of Cl− transport contributing to salt tolerance. Plant Cell Environ 33:566–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02060.x
Upadhyay A, Upadhyay AK, Bhirangi RA (2012) Expression of Na+/H+ antiporter gene in response to water and salinity stress in grapevine rootstocks. Biol Plant 56:762–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-012-0240-x
Voigt EL, Caitano RF, Maia JM, Ferreira-Silva SL, Macêdo CEC, Silveira JAG (2009) Involvement of cation channels and NH4+-sensitive K+ transportes in Na+ uptake by cowpea roots under salinity. Biol Plant 53:764–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-009-0140-x
Wang N, Qi H, Qiao W, Shi J, Xu Q, Zhou H, Yan G, Huang Q (2017) Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L) genotypes with contrasting K+/Na+ ion homeostasis: implications for salinity tolerance. Acta Physiol Plant 39:77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-017-2381-1
Welbank PJ (1962) The effects of competition with Agropyron repens and of nitrogen-and water supply on the nitrogen content of Impatiens parviflora. Ann Bot 26:361–373. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a083800
Xu G, Magen H, Tarchitzky J, Kafkafi U (2000) Advances in chloride nutrition of plants. Adv Agron 68:97–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60844-5
Zhou Y, Laia Z, Yin X, Yu S, Xu Y, Wang X, Cong X, Luo Y, Xu H, Jiang X (2016) Hyperactive mutant of a wheat plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter improves the growth and salt tolerance of transgenic tobacco. Plant Sci 253:176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.09.016
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) – (Processes—423583/2018-2; 311429/2018-1 and 435508/2018-0), and Foundation for the Support of Science and Technology of the State of Pernambuco (FACEPE) for financial support. HRBS is supported by FACEPE/CAPES (Proc 0300-5.01/19).
Funding
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior,Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico,Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MMAS carried out experiments and performed gas exchanges and chemical measurements. HRBS performed photosynthesis measurements. ENS interpreted the data and contributed with writing. JBN performed photochemical measurements. PJH , TLR, and VGN conducted the experiments. ANS interpreted the data and contributed with writing. ES performed water potential measurements. SLFS performed manuscript writing and supervised the research. All of the authors read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Handling Editor: T. Casey Barickman.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Silva, M.M.A., Santos, H.R.B., Silva, E.N. et al. Higher Control of Na+ and Cl− Transport to the Shoot Along With K+/Na+ Selectivity is Determinant for Differential Salt Resistance in Grapevine Rootstocks. J Plant Growth Regul 42, 5713–5726 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-023-10952-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-023-10952-x