Skip to main content
Log in

Evolution of Bcl-2 Anthogenes (BAG) as the Regulators of Cell Death in Wild and Cultivated Oryza Species

  • Published:
Journal of Plant Growth Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bcl-2-associated anthogenes (BAGs), chaperone regulators are known to regulate programmed cell death in plants. In the present study, we have identified eight BAG genes in the rice (Oryza sativa) genome. Subsequently, to understand the evolution, 78 BAG homologs were identified in other nine Oryza species. In addition to the signature ubiquitin-like domain, an additional conserved sequence of 12 amino acids was found in all the class I BAG genes except few exceptions in wild species. A significantly variable number of BAG genes was identified in different Oryza species indicates the expansion of BAG genes due to segmental duplication. Based on whole genome resequencing information available for 4726 rice genotypes, haplotype diversity and the functional effect of variations in BAG genes were predicted. Transcriptomic analyses further suggested the multifunctional roles of BAG genes during both developmental and defense response in Oryza species. Differential expression of BAG genes particularly BAG3 and BAG5 was observed under heavy metal stress. Similarly, higher expression of OsBAG1 and OsBAG2 were found in resistant rice cultivar in response to Magnaporthe oryzae infection and OsBAG2 showed upregulation in response to Xanthomonas oryzae infection as well. A similar expression of BAG genes was observed in the qRT-PCR analysis. Furthermore, heterologous transient expression of OInBAG6 protein tagged with yellow fluorescent protein in tobacco leaves showed the subcellular localization in both nucleus and plasma membrane. This study will help to understand the evolution of BAG genes and their role in cell death under stress conditions in rice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References:

  • Alberti S et al (2002) Ubiquitylation of BAG-1 suggests a novel regulatory mechanism during the sorting of chaperone substrates to the proteasome. J Biol Chem 277(48):45920–45927

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arif M et al (2020) The BAG2 and BAG6 genes are involved in multiple abiotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Int J Mol Sci 22(11):5856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvidsson S et al (2008) QuantPrime–a flexible tool for reliable high-throughput primer design for quantitative PCR. BMC Bioinform 9(1):465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey TL et al (2009) MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res 37(suppl_2):W202–W208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal R et al (2020) Evolutionary understanding of metacaspase genes in cultivated and wild Oryza species and its role in disease resistance mechanism in rice. Genes 11(12):1412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Briknarová K et al (2001) Structural analysis of BAG1 cochaperone and its interactions with Hsc70 heat shock protein. Nat Struct Biol 8(4):349–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callis J (2014) The ubiquitination machinery of the ubiquitin system. Arabidopsis Book/am Soc Plant Biol 12:e0174

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi Y et al (2012) Predicting the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. PLoS ONE 7(10):e46688

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doukhanina EV et al (2006) Identification and functional characterization of the BAG protein family in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Biol Chem 281(27):18793–18801

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Gebali S et al (2018) The Pfam protein families database in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res 47(D1):D427–D432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang S et al (2013) Structural insight into plant programmed cell death mediated by BAG proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 69(6):934–945

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic acids symposium series. Information Retrieval Ltd., London, c1979-c2000

  • Hershko A, Ciechanover A (1998) The ubiquitin system. Annu Rev Biochem 67(1):425–479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Higo K et al (1999) Plant cis-acting regulatory DNA elements (PLACE) database: 1999. Nucleic Acids Res 27(1):297–300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hirokawa T et al (1998) SOSUI: classification and secondary structure prediction system for membrane proteins. Bioinformatics (oxf, Engl) 14(4):378–379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Höhfeld J et al (2001) From the cradle to the grave: molecular chaperones that may choose between folding and degradation. EMBO Rep 2(10):885–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hruz T et al (2008) Genevestigator V3: a reference expression database for the meta-analysis of transcriptomes. Adv Bioinform 2008:420747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu B et al (2014) GSDS 2.0: an upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics 31(8):1296–1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabbage M, Dickman M (2008) The BAG proteins: a ubiquitous family of chaperone regulators. Cell Mol Life Sci 65(9):1390–1402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kabbage M et al (2016) A plant Bcl-2-associated athanogene is proteolytically activated to confer fungal resistance. Microbial Cell 3(5):224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski LP (2016) IPC—isoelectric point calculator. Biol Direct 11(1):55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krogh A et al (2001) Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 305(3):567–580

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krzywinski M et al (2009) Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Res 19(9):1639–1645

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S et al (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35(6):1547–1549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lockshin RA et al (1998) When cells die: a comprehensive evaluation of apoptosis and programmed cell death. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu S et al (2020) CDD/SPARCLE: the conserved domain database in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res 48(D1):D265–D268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monaco MK et al (2013) Gramene 2013: comparative plant genomics resources. Nucleic Acids Res 42(D1):D1193–D1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nawkar GM et al (2017) In silico study on Arabidopsis BAG gene expression in response to environmental stresses. Protoplasma 254(1):409–421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pagliuca MG et al (2003) Regulation by heavy metals and temperature of the human BAG-3 gene, a modulator of Hsp70 activity. FEBS Lett 541(1–3):11–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rana RM et al (2012) Identification and characterization of the Bcl-2-associated athanogene (BAG) protein family in rice. Afr J Biotechnol 11(1):88–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues CHM et al (2018) DynaMut: predicting the impact of mutations on protein conformation, flexibility, and stability. Nucleic Acids Res 46(W1):W350–W355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sato Y et al (2012) RiceXPro Version 3.0: expanding the informatics resource for rice transcriptome. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D1206–D1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sievers F, Higgins DG (2018) Clustal Omega for making accurate alignments of many protein sequences. Protein Sci 27(1):135–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Takayama S, Reed JC (2001) Molecular chaperone targeting and regulation by BAG family proteins. Nat Cell Biol 3(10):E237–E241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Takayama S et al (1995) Cloning and functional analysis of BAG-1: a novel Bcl-2-binding protein with anti-cell death activity. Cell 80(2):279–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Bel M et al (2017) PLAZA 4.0: an integrative resource for functional, evolutionary and comparative plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 46(D1):D1190–D1196

    Google Scholar 

  • Voorrips R (2002) MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J Hered 93(1):77–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waese J et al (2017) ePlant: visualizing and exploring multiple levels of data for hypothesis generation in plant biology. Plant Cell 29:1806–1821

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams B et al (2010) AtBAG7, an Arabidopsis Bcl-2–associated athanogene, resides in the endoplasmic reticulum and is involved in the unfolded protein response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(13):6088–6093

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xia L et al (2017) Rice expression database (RED): an integrated RNA-Seq-derived gene expression database for rice. J Genet Genomics 44:235–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan J et al (2003) The BAG-family proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci 165(1):1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J et al (2015) The I-TASSER suite: protein structure and function prediction. Nat Methods 12(1):7–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J et al (2019) The crosstalks between jasmonic acid and other plant hormone signaling highlight the involvement of jasmonic acid as a core component in plant response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Front Plant Sci 10:1349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu CS et al (2006) Prediction of protein subcellular localization. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform 64(3):643–651

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H et al (2015) RiceVarMap: a comprehensive database of rice genomic variations. Nucleic Acids Res 43(D1):D1018–D1022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, for the Ramalingaswami Fellowship Award to H.S. and R.D., and for grants BT/PR32853/AGIII/103/1159/2019 and BTINIGPER/Flagship-Prog/2018-19 to H.S., R.D., and T.R.S.; Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) for granting senior research fellowship to R.B.; and the Department of Science and Technology for JC Bose Fellowship to T.R.S., and research grant (CRG/2019/006599) to R.D., H.S., and T.R.S.; authors are also thankful to Ganesh Prakashan, Division of Plant Pathology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India for sharing Magnaporthe oryzae isolate and valuable inputs.

Funding

This research was funded by the Department of Biotechnology (DBT) and Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Department of Science and Technology, Government of India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Data curation: RB and SK; Cloning and Transient expression analysis: RJ; Formal analysis: RB, PD, and SK; Funding acquisition: HS, RD, and TRS; Methodology: RB, SK, PD, SS, and AK; Software: AK and SS; Supervision: HS, RD, and TRS; Validation: RB and PD; Visualization: RB, AK, PD, and SK; Writing—original draft: RB; Writing—review & editing: HS, RD, and TRS. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tilak Raj Sharma or Rupesh Deshmukh.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Anket Sharma.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 20 kb)

Supplementary file2 (XLSX 21 kb)

Supplementary file3 (XLSX 16 kb)

Supplementary file4 (DOCX 16 kb)

Supplementary file5 (DOCX 17 kb)

Supplementary file6 (DOCX 1372 kb)

Supplementary file7 (DOCX 525 kb)

Supplementary file8 (DOCX 233 kb)

Supplementary file9 (DOCX 380 kb)

Supplementary file10 (DOCX 459 kb)

Supplementary file11 (DOCX 140 kb)

Supplementary file12 (DOCX 637 kb)

Supplementary file13 (DOCX 23 kb)

344_2021_10552_MOESM14_ESM.txt

Supplementary File 1 The Multiple sequence alignment file of 78 BAG genes retrieved by clustal omega (clustal O (1.2.4) multiple sequence alignment) online tool in both wild and cultivated Oryza species. (TXT 93 kb)

344_2021_10552_MOESM15_ESM.docx

Supplementary File 2 Gene expression of OsJaBAGs genes under different stress conditions constructed by Bio-Analytic Resource for Plant Biology (https://ricexpro.dna.affrc.go.jp/data-set.html) (DOCX 2389 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bansal, R., Kumawat, S., Dhiman, P. et al. Evolution of Bcl-2 Anthogenes (BAG) as the Regulators of Cell Death in Wild and Cultivated Oryza Species. J Plant Growth Regul 42, 348–364 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-021-10552-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-021-10552-7

Keywords

Navigation