Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of light quality on growth rates and pigments of Chaetoceros gracilis (Bacillariophyceae)

  • Biology
  • Published:
Journal of Oceanology and Limnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Light is an important parameter in algal culturing. In this work, the effects of different light qualities on growth of the marine diatom Chaetoceros gracilis are evaluated. The cells were cultured under light quantum flux density of 60 µmol photons/(m2·s) with nine light qualities: LED red light (LR), LED blue light (LB), LED red plus LED blue light (LR+LB), LED white light (LW), fluorescent white light (FW), and combinations of LW and FW lights with increased proportions of red or blue light (FW+LR, FW+LB, LW+LR, and LW+LB). Blue light promoted the growth of C. gracilis largely. Three light qualities, FW+LR, LW+LR, and LR, resulted in the lowest growth rate. Both chlorophyll and carotenoids reached the highest level under LB and the lowest level under LR among monochromatic light sources; however, increasing of the proportion of blue or red light in the white light induced an increase of the chlorophyll and carotenoid concentrations. Light absorption ability of microalgae was critical for the growth of these organisms, as we observed a positive correlation between the extinction coefficient at different wavelengths and the specific growth rate. These findings are of importance to improve the culturing of this alga in bioreactors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

Full information developed from this study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Aidar E, Gianesella-Galvão S M F, Sigaud T C S, Asano C S, Liang T H, Rezende K R V, Oishi M K, Aranha F J, Milani G M, Sandes M A L. 1994. Effects of light quality on growth, biochemical composition and photo synthetic production in Cyclotella caspia Grunow and Tetraselmis gracilis (Kylin) Butcher. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 180 (2): 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avalos J, Pardo-Medina J, Parra-Rivero O, Ruger-Herreros M, Rodríguez-Ortiz R, Hornero-Méndez D, Limón M C. 2017. Carotenoid biosynthesis in Fusarium Journal of Fungi, 3 (3): 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber J. 2009. Photosynthetic energy conversion: Natural and artificial. Chemical Society Reviews, 38 (1): 185–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C Y, Yeh K L, Aisyah R, Lee D J, Chang J S. 2011. Cultivation, photobioreactor design and harvesting of microalgae for biodiesel production: a critical review. Bioresource Technology, 102 (1): 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S F, Tan G Y, Pan Y Y. 1982. The effect of temperature, light intensity and photoperiod on the growth of Chaetoceros sp. Marine Sciences, (2): 38–40. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui H W, Meng F P, Li Y F, Wang Y J, Duan W Y. 2016. Effects of artificial light source and light quality on the growth of two species of microalgae. Science Discovery4 (2): 129–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui H W, Meng F P, Li F, Wang Y J. 2017. Application of sodium erythorbate to promote the growth of Chlorella vulgaris Journal of Applied Phycology29 (3): 1 135–1 144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao X B, Kong B, Vigil R D. 2018. Simulation of algal photobioreactors: recent developments and challenges. Biotechnology Letters, 40 (9-10): 1 311–1 327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon J M, Polle J E W. 2007. Ultrahigh bioproductivity from algae. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology76 (5): 969–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillard R R L, Ryther J H. 1962. Studies of marine planktonic diatoms: I. Cyclotella nana hustedt, and Detonula confervacea (Cleve) Gran. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 8 (2): 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen A. 1978. Chlorophylls and carotenoids. In: Hellebust J, Craigie J S, eds. Handbook of Phycological Methods; Physiological and Biochemical Methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. p.61–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmuskero A, Chauton M S, Boström T. 2018. Light and photosynthetic microalgae: a review of cellular- and molecular-scale optical processes. Progress in Oceanography, 168: 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y F, Liu J G, Zhang L T, Pang T. 2016. Changes of photosynthetic performances in mature thalli of the red alga Gelidium amansii (gelidiaceae) exposed to different salinities. Marine Biology Research, 12 (6): 631–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang Y, Liang L X, Yin C L, Cao C H. 2006. Effects of high temperature stress on the chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics of Phaeodactylum tricornutum and Chaetoceros gracilis Periodical of Ocean University of China36 (3): 427–433. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre H L, Kana T M, Anning T, Geider R J. 2002. Photoacclimation of photosynthesis irradiance response curves and photosynthetic pigments in microalgae and cyanobacteria. Journal of Phycology, 38 (1): 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti J, Bougaran G, Jauffrais T, Lefebvre S, Rouxel C, Saint-Jean B, Lukomska E, Robert R, Cadoret J P. 2013. Effects of blue light on the biochemical composition and photosynthetic activity of Isochrysis sp. (T-iso). Journal of Applied Phycology, 25 (1): 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moberg L, Karlberg B, Sørensen K, Källqvist T. 2002. Assessment of phytoplankton class abundance using absorption spectra and chemometrics. Talanta56 (1): 153–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohsenpour S F, Richards B, Willoughby N. 2012. Spectral conversion of light for enhanced microalgae growth rates and photosynthetic pigment production. Bioresource Technology, 125: 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouget J L, Rosa P, Tremblin G. 2004. Acclimation of Haslea ostrearia to light of different spectral qualities-confirmation of ‘chromatic adaptation’ in diatoms. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology75 (1-2): 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouget J L, Rosa P, Vachoux C, Tremblin G. 2005. Enhancement of marennine production by blue light in the diatom Haslea ostrearia Journal of Applied Phycology17 (5): 437–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez L, Salgueiro J L, González J, Parralejo A I, Maceiras R, Cancela Á. 2017. Scaled up from indoor to outdoor cultures of Chaetoceros gracilis and Skeletonema costatum microalgae for biomass and oil production. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 127: 180–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polaino S, Villalobos-Escobedo J M, Shakya V P S, Miralles-Durán A, Chaudhary S, Sanz C, Shahriari M, Luque E M, Eslava A P, Corrochano L M, Herrera-Estrella A, Idnurm A. 2017. A Ras GTPase associated protein is involved in the phototropic and circadian photobiology responses in fungi. Scientific Reports, 7: 44790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prézelin B B, Tilzer M M, Schofield O, Haese C. 1991. The control of the production process of phytoplankton by the physical structure of the aquatic environment with special reference to its optical properties. Aquatic Sciences53 (2-3): 136–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie R J. 2008. Universal chlorophyll equations for estimating chlorophylls a b c, and d and total chlorophylls in natural assemblages of photosynthetic organisms using acetone, methanol, or ethanol solvents. Photosynthetica46 (1): 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shu C H, Tseng K, Jaiswal R. 2018. Effects of light intensity and wavelength on the production of lactobionic acid from whey by Pseudomonas taetrolens in batch cultures. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology93 (6): 1 595–1 600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang H, Abunasser N, Garcia M E D, Chen M, Ng K Y S, Salley S O. 2011. Potential of microalgae oil from Dunaliella tertiolecta as a feedstock for biodiesel. Applied Energy, 88 (10): 3 324–3 330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner I, Steinweg C, Posten C. 2016. Mono- and dichromatic LED illumination leads to enhanced growth and energy conversion for high-efficiency cultivation of microalgae for application in space. Biotechnology Journal11 (8): 1 060–1 071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C L, Yang H, Chen M H, Wang Y R, Li F J, Luo C, Zhao S Y, He D. 2012. Real-time quantitative analysis of the influence of blue light on citrinin biosynthetic gene cluster expression in Monascus Biotechnology Letters34 (9): 1 745–1 748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang C Y, Fu C C, Liu Y C. 2007. Effects of using light-emitting diodes on the cultivation of Spirulina platensis Biochemical Engineering Journal, 37 (1): 21–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan C, Luo X Z, Zheng Z. 2013. Effects of various LED light qualities and light intensity supply strategies on purification of slurry from anaerobic digestion process by Chlorella vulgaris International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 79 (2): 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh N, Chung J P. 2009. High-brightness LEDs-Energy efficient lighting sources and their potential in indoor plant cultivation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13 (8): 2 175–2 180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yim S K, Ki D W, Doo H S, Kim H, Kwon T H. 2016. Internally illuminated photobioreactor using a novel type of light-emitting diode (LED) bar for cultivation of Arthrospira platensis Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering21 (6): 767–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshioka M, Yago T, Yoshie-Stark Y, Arakawa H, Morinaga T. 2012. Effect of high frequency of intermittent light on the growth and fatty acid profile of Isochrysis galbana Aquaculture, 338-341: 111–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Dr. MENG Fanping of the Ocean University of China for providing LED light sources. We thank Dr. LI Xian, Key Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, for her kind help in measuring the light spectra. The authors also thank Dr. John van der Meer of the Pan-American Marine Biotechnology Association for his assistance with proofreading.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongfu Li.

Additional information

Supported by the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (No. ZR2017QC008) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U1706209)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Li, R. & Yi, X. Effects of light quality on growth rates and pigments of Chaetoceros gracilis (Bacillariophyceae). J. Ocean. Limnol. 38, 795–801 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-019-9171-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-019-9171-0

Keyword

Navigation