# Tomographic imaging of reacting flows in 3D by laser absorption spectroscopy

- 841 Downloads
- 3 Citations

**Part of the following topical collections:**

## Abstract

This paper describes the development of an infrared laser absorption tomography system for the 3D volumetric imaging of chemical species and temperature in reacting flows. The system is based on high-resolution near-infrared tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS) for the measurement of water vapour above twin, mixed fuel gas burners arranged with an asymmetrical output. Four parallel laser beams pass through the sample region and are rotated rapidly in a plane to produce a wide range of projection angles. A rotation of 180° with 0.5° sampling was achieved in 3.6 s. The effects of changes to the burner fuel flow were monitored in real time for the 2D distributions. The monitoring plane was then moved vertically relative to the burners enabling a stack of 2D images to be produced which were then interpolated to form a 3D volumetric image of the temperature and water concentrations above the burners. The optical transmission of each beam was rapidly scanned around 1392 nm and the spectrum was fitted to find the integrated absorbance of the water transitions and although several are probed in each scan, two of these transitions possess opposite temperature dependencies. The projections of the integrated absorbances at each angle form the sinogram from which the 2D image of integrated absorbance of each line can be reconstructed by the direct Fourier reconstruction based on the Fourier slice theorem. The ratio of the integrated absorbances of the two lines can then be related to temperature alone in a method termed, two-line thermometry. The 2D temperature distribution obtained was validated for pattern and accuracy by thermocouple measurements. With the reconstructed temperature distribution, the temperature-dependent line strengths could be determined and subsequently the concentration distribution of water across the 2D plane whilst variations in burner condition were carried out. These results show that the measurement system based on TDLAS can be used for 2D temporal or 3D volume imaging of temperature and chemical species concentration in reacting flows.

## Keywords

Particle Image Velocimetry Line Strength Projection Angle Optical Plane Tunable Diode Laser Absorption Spectroscopy## 1 Introduction

The ability to measure non-invasively the spatial distribution of chemical species concentrations and temperature distributions in reacting flows is of importance in a range of application areas but particularly in combustion and plasma science and engineering where it can contribute to designing systems to improve energy efficiency and reduce pollutant species by increased understanding of chemical kinetics, fluid dynamics as well as heat and mass transfer. For practical applications it could be beneficial for the detection of faulty or blocked burners in multi-burner engines such as in some aero-engines. For non-invasive methods, optical diagnostics have been proven to be the most beneficial and these can be categorised as: point measurements, line of sight (LOS) measurements, planar imaging and finally tomographic imaging. Point measurements require successive measurements to build up a volume image. Examples include laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) [1], coherent anti-Stokes Raman spectroscopy (CARS) [2] and two-line atomic fluorescence thermometry (TLAF) [3]. LOS measurements have benefitted from tremendous advances in IR laser absorption spectroscopy with new semiconductor laser sources and many new application areas. An example is tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS) [4] but more recently quantum cascade lasers have been employed for mid-infrared detection of key chemical species [5]. Cavity-enhanced spectroscopic methods such as cavity-ring down spectroscopy (CRDS) and cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy (CEAS) [6] have enabled trace chemical species to be measured.

Planar imaging involves the detection of radiation intensity and has been used to obtain 2D profile information on temperature [7], velocity [8] and mixture fractions [9]. When sequential images are produced in parallel planes then volumetric information can also be extracted [10]. Examples of planar imaging techniques includes Rayleigh scattering [11] and particle imaging velocimetry (PIV) [12]. Planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF) [13] uses a laser sheet instead of a beam for measuring 2D species distribution, gas temperature and flow velocity. An example in combustion is the study of water vapour fluorescence at 417 nm that was investigated using two-photon excitation using a KrF laser at 248 nm [14].

Tomographic imaging is not restricted to measuring the distribution of light intensity as in planar imaging. Examples of tomographic studies in combustion science include tomographic X-ray imaging of fuel mass distributions [15] and the use of particle image velocimetry (PIV) for 3D velocity measurements of particles [16]. Tomographic absorption spectroscopy (TAS) uses the absorption or extinction coefficients of absorbing species to reconstruct information on temperature and species concentration [17]. TAS using tunable diode lasers (TDL) has been previously reported for 1D and 2D reconstructions in combustion applications. For example, in-cylinder tomography has been demonstrated by McCann’s group with fixed frequency TDL sources [18]. Generally, either direct absorption spectroscopy (DAS) or wavelength modulation spectroscopy (WMS) with tunable diode lasers is proven to be an effective method of signal detection at high molecular specificity with minimal interference from other species [19]. More recently, absorption based non-linear tomography (ABNT) has been proposed which uses widely tunable laser sources such as supercontinuum lasers providing information on several chemical species simultaneously [20]. It has been shown that this approach requires fewer projections to achieve good quality reconstructions so that applications with limited optical access become possible.

There have been limited volumetric or 3D tomographic reconstructions for combustion applications as a function of time using infrared laser absorption tomography therefore the aim of this work was to develop a system for 3D temporal monitoring of temperature and gas concentration of asymmetrical combustion sources using TDLAS. Two-line thermometry was the approach used to extract temperature distributions based on the knowledge of accurate temperature-dependent line strengths over the temperature range expected in combustion applications. Species concentrations can then be extracted from the integrated line absorbance combined with the knowledge of the temperature field and absorption pathlength. In this work, vibration–rotation transitions of water as a product of combustion in the near-infrared spectral region were probed for the temperature distribution and for the determination of water concentration H_{2}O [19, 21, 22, 23].

The paper first describes the background theory of two-line thermometry building our previous work [24] followed by a description of the tomographic reconstruction algorithm used. The experimental setup of the tomography system and reconstruction methodology is described in Sect. 3 followed by the results and discussion on both time-dependent 2D measurements and 3D volumetric measurements in Sect. 4. Finally, Sect. 5 concludes with a discussion of potential improvements.

## 2 Theoretical background

### 2.1 Two-line thermometry

*I*(

*ν*) with frequency

*ν*as a monochromatic beam passes through a weakly absorbing medium of length

*L*:

*I*

_{0}(

*ν*) is the initial light intensity and

*α*(

*ν*) is the absorption coefficient. The latter can be expressed in terms of the absorption cross section

*σ*(

*ν*) and the number density of absorbing species

*N*:

*A*is defined by the area under the absorbance peak:

*S*is:

*ν*

_{0}is the absorption line centre. Typical units for infrared measurements using wavenumbers (cm

^{−1}) are

*L*(cm),

*N*(molecule cm

^{−3}),

*σ*(

*ν*) (cm

^{2}molecule

^{−1}),

*α*(

*ν*) (cm

^{−1}),

*g*(cm) and

*S*[cm

^{−1}/(molecule cm

^{−2})] or (cm molecule

^{−1}). The integrated absorbance in terms of line strength is then given by:

*S*(

*T*) and for a reference temperature of 296 K this is given by

*Q*(

*T*) is the partition function of the absorbing molecule at temperature

*T*,

*E*″ (cm

^{−1}) is the lower state energy level of the transition,

*h*is Planck’s constant (J s),

*c*is the speed of light (cm s

^{−1}) and

*k*is Boltzmann’s constant (J K

^{−1}). For two absorption lines 1 and 2, the ratio

*R*of their integrated absorbances is:

These are often tabulated in databases such as HITRAN [25]. This has been described previously in several papers [24]. When the temperature is determined then the line strength *S*(*T*) can be calculated from (7) and the number density *N* or concentration by the rearrangement of (6).

The sensitivity or precision of the temperature determination is very much dependent on d*R*/d*T* and the ability to accurately measure the ratio *R*. Selection of appropriate line pairs is therefore a critical part of the process and different pairs will be required depending on the temperature range of interest. For the precise measurement of integrated absorbance, it is important to have well isolated absorption lines without any spectral interferences and with good signal to noise ratios (large *S*) but without being optically thick. It is also beneficial to measure both lines on the same sweep of the laser wavelength so that instrumental effects can be ratioed out. For some lasers such as DFB diode lasers used here, the spectral region accessible in a single current scan is often only a few cm^{−1} [26].

Water is commonly used as a probe molecule for two-line thermometry as there are a vast number of absorption lines across the infrared spectrum. The combination band *ν* _{1} + *ν* _{3} and overtone bands 2*ν* _{1} and 2*ν* _{3} are used in this work [19, 21, 22, 23, 27].

*l*, the integrated absorbance for the

*i*th transition is given by

*i*th transition at temperature

*T*on the

*x*,

*y*grid. The pressure is assumed constant. The aim is to reconstruct

*T*(

*x*,

*y*) followed by

*N*(

*x*,

*y*) using a tomographic reconstruction algorithm.

### 2.2 Reconstruction algorithms

*f*(

*x*,

*y*). In this work the image to be reconstructed is based on the spatial variation of absorption coefficient at each optical frequency of the laser

*α*

_{ ν }(

*x*,

*y*) from which the image of the integrated absorbance

*A*

_{ i }(

*x*,

*y*) can be determined for each absorption transition,

*i*. Several parallel beams probe the sample to produce projections of absorption coefficient at different angles,

*θ*. The beams or line integrals shown in Fig. 1 are defined by a unique equation based on the angle (

*θ*) in relation to the sample object as well as its coordinates as shown in (11). These line integrals are also represented as functions of (

*θ*,

*t*) [28]:

A combination of laser beams or line integrals from *t* _{1} to *t* _{ n } at a set angle *θ* _{ i } will form a singular parallel projection represented by *P* _{ θ }(*t*) in Fig. 1, where *t* is the location of the line integral along an arbitrary line on *θ* [28].

*P*

_{ θ }(

*t*), also known as the Radon transform of the measured optical plane

*f*(

*x*,

*y*) can be expressed in (12), where

*l*specifies an integration path [28].

*P* _{ θ }(*t*) is two dimensional making up all the projection slices at different angles *θ* into a 2D format called the sinogram. There are then two distinct approaches to carrying out the inversion to obtain *f*(*x*, *y*) from *P* _{ θ }(*t*), these are transform-based or analytical approaches such as filtered back-projection (FBP) or algebraic iterative methods such as the algebraic reconstruction technique (ART) used in our previous work [24]. In this work we use the analytical transform-based approach because it is better suited to parallel beam sampling with unrestricted optical access to the object. This approach is also generally used for X-ray tomography such as in CT scans [28].

*F*of the object function

*f*(

*x*,

*y*) is given in (13), where

*u*and

*v*are the axes in the frequency domain [28].

*P*

_{ θ }(

*t*), can be likewise given by:

*F*(

*u*,

*v*) is only known along a finite number of radial lines in frequency space. In order that the inverse 2D Fourier transform can be applied, it is necessary to interpolate from these radial points onto a Cartesian grid. However, there are fewer radial points further away from the centre of the grid making the interpolation error larger and leading to a greater error in the high frequency components and image degradation (blurring). This can be mitigated by multiplication with a 2D ramp filter before the inverse 2D Fourier transform step. The object image is therefore given by:

*w*| giving rise to the term ‘filtered projection’ [28]. This procedure is carried out for the two sinograms produced by integrated absorbances of the two absorption lines to produce

*A*

_{1}(

*x*,

*y*) and

*A*

_{2}(

*x*,

*y*) from which the temperature distribution

*T*(

*x*,

*y*) and chemical species concentration distribution

*N*(

*x*,

*y*) can be determined.

### 2.3 Computer implementation

The Fourier transform can be implemented with a FFT (fast Fourier transform) algorithm, by bandlimiting the Fourier transformed slices. A band-limited Fourier transform assumes components over a certain frequency to be negligible (zero) and suitable for an FFT algorithm to be a good approximate to the Fourier transform in (14). Filters are used to suppress high frequencies, which tend to be caused by observation noise. These filters are usually convoluted to the projection slices, either in the spatial domain or in the frequency domain. Zero padding consists of adding a trail of zeros to the projection slices and this will decrease the step size/cell size of the data points in the Fourier domain. Adequate zero padding reduces the overall formation of artefacts caused by inter-period interference present in the reconstruction images by producing smoother individual spectra.

## 3 Experimental

### 3.1 Design and construction of 3D tomography system

The rotator held the moving cage, which was located inside the bottom half of the external frame. It was placed on a 38-cm diameter circular bearing, which was made up of a stationary half and a rotating half. This circular bearing also had a hollow inner hole of diameter 28 cm as shown in Fig. 3. The stationary half of the bearing was mounted to the bottom of the external frame to secure the bearing to a stationary object whilst the rotator was screwed onto the rotating other half of the bearing. The rotating half was connected to a 6 V motor (SpringRC Sm-S4303R) located at the bottom of the circular bearing and fixed onto the external frame. This motor was connected via a cable to a printed circuit board (PCB) (Phidgets AdvanceServo-1061), which was controlled directly from the laptop via LabVIEW. The motor with no load had a technical specified maximum rotational speed of 54 rpm. However, the motor behaved differently under additional load from the rotator. With this current setup, the maximum rotation speed was 16.6 rpm, and the slowest speed was 5.7 rpm. This was calculated from the fastest speed per single rotation during the experiment to be at 1.8 s and the slowest speed to be at 5.2 s (lowest speed possible to break inertia from weight). The final cage is the burner carrier. This is the cage that holds the burners that are lowered into the rotator. It was fitted with two 3-cm diameter pulleys on the top. Two similar pulleys were also installed below the external frame central bar. Each of the individual pulleys on the carrier was connected to the external frame central pulley with their individual rope. A final similar pulley was installed in the middle of the external frame front where both ropes were fed to ensure equal force during height adjustment.

A camera (Olympus E-P2 with a 14–42 mm zoom lens) was also attached to the central bar of the external frame to record throughout the course of the experiments.

In order to prevent cable tangling the rotator platform only rotated 180° before returning back to the starting position. A program written using LabVIEW 2010 was used to control the laser and motor, as well as to receive the attenuated laser signals from the detector. The detector received signals at a rate of 10 ms per spectrum. However, the rotator does not stop for data acquisition at each projection angle, which means that the recorded spectrum is actually not at a single projection angle, but at a small range of projection angles. The range of projection angle depends both on acquisition rate, as well as the speed of rotation. Assuming that the acquisition rate is fixed at 10 ms/av. spectrum, then the faster the speed of rotation and the larger the range of projection angle, Δ*θ*°. The minimum time duration for the collection of spectra for a 2D tomographic image was 1.8 s corresponding to Δ*θ*° = 1° whereas the slower speed of 5.7 rpm corresponds to Δ*θ*° = 0.34°. As shown in Sect. 5.2 later a compromise of speed and spatial resolution of 360 projections over 180° with Δ*θ*° = 0.5° was used for the measurements described here.

#### 3.1.1 Burners

Each burner had jets around the circumference of the flat 9 cm diameter head and the isobutane/propane fuel mix was controlled by a valve on top of the mixed fuel canister (Jetpower Isobutane/Propane fuel mix 100 g). The total height of the burner, inclusive of the fuel canister, was 11 cm. The exact composition of the mixed fuel was unknown, but it is typical for these types of fuel canister to be approximately 20–30% weight propane and the remainder to be isobutane. A non-symmetrical flame distribution for each burner was achieved by covering half the jets with aluminium foil (as shown in Fig. 15 in Sect. 3.5). Two adjacent burners with the jets partially covered with metal foil were used during the experiments, resulting in two asymmetrical shapes. The burners were adjusted manually in quick succession during the temporal experiments. To ensure that the burner was operating in steady state after each adjustment and before the next sequential image acquisition, a high frame rate video capture camera was used. The camera used was a 12 MP GoPro HERO4, recording video at 32 frames per second.

To enable 3D volumetric studies of the flames, the position of the optical plane was adjusted by moving the burner carrier instead of the optical plane by means of a pulley system (shown in Fig. 3).

### 3.2 Line selection

^{−1}(Fig. 4). A stick plot showing the line strengths at 296 K of the measured transitions is shown in Fig. 5. Figure 6 shows a simulated absorption spectral plot of this region for a temperature range from 296 to 1096 K for a pressure of 1013.25 mbar, an absorption pathlength of 10 cm and an H

_{2}O mixing ratio of 0.1 in air. Most of the absorption features reduce in intensity as the temperature increases such as the intense line at 7181.156 cm

^{−1}(line 1). However, there is a line at 7179.752 cm

^{−1}(line 2) which shows the opposite temperature dependence with the intensity increasing with temperature. Figure 7 shows this more clearly for the temperature dependence of these two lines along with the ratio,

*R*(given by (8)). The temperature dependence of

*R*was then used in the reconstruction of temperature and water concentration. The tabulated data for the measured lines from the HITRAN 2008 database [29] are given in Table 1.

Line data from HITRAN 2008 [29]

Line | Line centre, | Line strength, | Einstein A-coefficient, | Air broadened half-width (cm | Self-broadened half-width (cm | Lower energy level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

1 | 7179.752 | 2.30 | 12.83 | 0.0456 | 0.265 | 1216.195 |

2 | 7180.400 | 5.61 | 0.5419 | 0.098 | 0.500 | 224.838 |

3 | 7180.613 | 3.04 | 4.764 | 0.0582 | 0.295 | 1477.297 |

4 | 7181.095 | 6.86 | 3.829 | 0.0442 | 0.384 | 1216.195 |

5 | 7181.156 | 1.51 | 13.27 | 0.0997 | 0.488 | 136.762 |

6 | 7182.156 | 1.37 | 0.01816 | 0.0894 | 0.439 | 382.517 |

7 | 7182.209 | 1.54 | 1.432 | 0.107 | 0.375 | 42.372 |

8 | 7182.950 | 3.75 | 10.2 | 0.097 | 0.51 | 142.278 |

9 | 7183.016 | 4.12 | 0.3598 | 0.101 | 0.492 | 134.902 |

### 3.3 Laser absorption spectroscopy setup with four channels

The laser was a pig-tailed distributed feedback (DFB) diode laser in a butterfly mount (Thorlabs LM14S2) and centred around 7178 cm^{−1} (1392 nm) with a maximum output power of 10 mW (Eblana Photonics EP1392-DM-B01-FA). The laser temperature was controlled by a temperature controller (Thorlabs TED 200C) and the current ramp was controlled by the laser current controller (Thorlabs LDC 205C). These in turn were controlled by a LabView program (National Instruments) on a laptop computer with an 18-bit data acquisition board (DAQ) (National Instruments NI-USB 6281) with an aggregate maximum sampling rate of 500 kS s^{−1}. By a combination of temperature and current adjustments the laser output ranged from 7155 to 7185 cm^{−1}. The output of the laser diode was divided by a 1 × 4 fibre splitter (Topfibre tech S/N AA002048) and the four single mode fibres were fed through the bottom of the external frame through the central hole within the circular bearing and the bottom of the rotator and finally mounted on top of the rotator. Collimating lenses (ThorLabs F230SMA-C) were used to collimate the laser beams to a diameter of approximately 1.5 mm over a path length of 37 cm. The emitters were centred in the middle of the rotator and placed 4 cm apart as shown in Fig. 4.

Four InGaAs switchable-gain photo detectors (Thorlabs PDA10CS-CS) with 2 mm diameter active area were mounted 4 cm apart from each other on the rotator opposite the laser transmitters as shown in Fig. 4.

The wired electrical and data cables were also similarly fed through under the external frame, through both the circular bearing and the bottom of the rotator. The detectors received the attenuated signals from the lasers and feed the data back to the DAQ and then recorded in the computer via LabView. The data of each detector channel were received by the DAQ simultaneously through multiple analogue channels on the DAQ.

#### 3.3.1 Waveform modulation, peak selection and analysis

*I*(

*ν*) was fitted to a function comprising a Lorentzian line shape function for each of the nine absorption lines (see Table 1) combined with a third-order polynomial to describe the varying background intensity produced by the laser current ramp:

*ν*

_{0}is the line centre of the

*i*th line,

*w*

_{i}is the full width at half maximum (FWHM) and

*A*

_{ i }is the area of the peak or integrated absorbance. Non-linear least squares fit to the transmission spectrum using initial parameters from the previous fit. As the temperature was unknown then the

*A*

_{ i }values were all floated within each fit subject to constraints such as

*ν*

_{0i }and

*w*

_{ i }as well as no negative values. The effect of temperature on the line widths would have the effect of producing small errors due to fixing the widths during the fitting process. Figure 9 shows the results of the fitting process including the observed minus calculated residual. The integrated absorbances for the two selected lines (7181.156 cm

^{−1}line 1 and 7179.752 cm

^{−1}line 2) were then saved and used to form the sinogram.

### 3.4 Tomographic reconstruction

The reconstruction program was written in MATLAB 2013 [30] and works by separately analysing the integrated absorbance (*A* _{1} and *A* _{2}) of each of the two selected absorption lines for each projection and then reconstructing the spatial distribution of each integrated absorbance. Values in the two grids were then ratioed to extract the temperature distribution following the two-line thermometry approach (Sect. 2.1) followed by extraction of the water concentration distribution from the temperature-dependent line strengths.

### 3.5 3D and time-dependent experiments

3D measurements were made by taking ten successive 2D sinograms at different heights above the burner with a step size of 1 cm between measurement planes. The 3D experiment was conducted at an ambient temperature of 19.3 °C, an ambient pressure of 101 kPa and a relative humidity of 87%. Time-dependent measurements were conducted by successively measuring the same 2D plane. Each experimental scenario involved adjustment of the fuel flow thus affecting the temperature variation. The experiment was conducted in a series of 16 back-to-back experiments, with a camera installed above the setup to provide a visual pictorial of the actual flame response to gas output manipulation. The time required for a single measurement (sinogram acquisition) to complete, was set at 3.6 s with 360 projections at a 0.5° step size. 16 sinograms were therefore acquired in approximately 1 min (57.6 s). The gas flow was manipulated manually, and additional time was allocated for the user to adjust the fuel gas regulators in between experiments. A total time of 50 s (approximately 3 s per change for 16 settings) was added to the overall experiment run time, raising it to 107.6 s. However, because the time to adjust the fuel was allocated for fuel adjustment, and not the performance of the system itself, it was not added into the results presentation itself as shown.

### 3.6 Validation

Validation of the reconstructed temperature distribution was carried out by thermocouple measurements. It was essential that the thermocouple sampling was undertaken as rapidly as possible to ensure that flame intensity variations did not influence the validation. The thermocouple sensor used for the validation process was Tenma 72-2065A. Its technical specification includes a measuring range between −50 and 1300 °C with an accuracy (non-inclusive of the thermocouple error) of ±0.3% of the final reading +1 °C. A Type K nickel-based thermocouple was used, however the accompanying alloy is unknown, but is usually either chromium or aluminium. The accuracy of this thermocouple is usually between ±2.2 °C and ±0.75%. The thermocouple images were constructed out of 10 × 10 grid cells, acquired on an average of 5 min. The reason for the crude sampling of the thermocouple was because it took too much time to create a denser thermocouple grid. The burner gas output fluctuated over time even at the same opening of the fuel regulator due to the decreasing pressure in the gas canister. The lighter fuel also tends to burn first resulting in a change of fuel composition over time and affecting the intensity of the flame.

The cells were sampled individually using the thermocouple and guides were installed at the top and sides of the external frame to aid accurate placement of the tip of the thermocouple to the correct cells and to distance away from the burner surface. The measurement plane was located 1 cm above the surface of the burner plates.

## 4 Results and discussion

### 4.1 3D reconstructions

^{3}. Vertical slices along both

*x*-axis and

*y*-axis were then generated from this 3D matrix up to a height of 11 cm above the burners. These vertical slice images were interpolated using MATLAB function ‘interp2’ and were scaled with a factor of 4 using the “linear” method. Figure 19 represents the full range of the temperature vertical slices along the

*x*-axis, from the left to right,

*x*-axis (−17 cm) to

*x*-axis (17 cm).

*x*-axis and

*y*-axis are compiled over the base slice to form Fig. 20. A total of 51 slices (vertical axis step size of 0.25 cm) were used from each axis to create a “translucent” volume of spatial temperature distribution.

The two views from both the *x*-axis and the *y*-axis are each presented in Fig. 20. The view from the *x*-axis shows only 1 flame, whilst the *y*-axis shows two flames.

### 4.2 Time-dependent experiments

The objective of the time-dependent measurements was to use the system as a diagnostic tool to track temperature and concentration changes of a system during operation. This would be particularly useful in terms of monitoring changes in flow or heating patterns across a period of time at a particular section of a pipe, engine or reactor. Ideally, the deployment of lasers sources and detectors should be numerically sufficient to allow the full capture of a full set of projections at different angles without the need for any other form of rotary movements which would allow ‘instant’ data acquisition. However, an alternative would be to project in a parallel fashion at different angles facilitated by the rotary motor.

## 5 Discussion

### 5.1 Pixel resolution

From Fig. 22 it is clear that low pixel resolutions from 6 × 6 to 32 × 32 not only appear heavily pixelated, but also inaccurate (significantly lower temperature reconstruction by a few hundred degrees celsius). This is because the information present within the high spatial resolution image is averaged into larger cells, thus reducing not only the sharpness but also the numerical accuracy of the image. 64 × 64 begins to show the correct numerical accuracy of the image but still exhibits pixelated edges. 128 × 128 exhibits similar smoothness to 256 × 256 and it can be seen that for the spatial resolution of the original image, a 128 × 128 pixel resolution representation is sufficient.

### 5.2 Spatial resolution and number of projections

Using just one or two projections resembles a single or dual back-smearing process of a filtered back-projection (FBP) method. However with only five projections, a rough representation of the correct image can already be observed. From 11 to 45 projections, an image similar to an FBP reconstruction could be observed. These images, due to the lack of projections, resembled a certain degree of blurring on the reconstruction from back-smearing of the data in the FBP process. The temperature values were also substantially suppressed. Most of the streak artefacts in projections from 5 to 45 are no longer present at projection 90. The image has already sharpened significantly and appears to match the visual representation of the flame pattern. However, at this point the temperatures are still not at very accurate. There is not much difference between the reconstructed images of 180–360 projections, yielding similar sharpness. However, at 360 projections, the temperatures are now matching the correct validation values. It can be concluded that a lack of projection data would affect both image quality (blurring) and numerical accuracy. The final image if given the size of 4 cm × 4 cm large, using 360 projections is 81 pixels per inch (PPI).

## 6 Conclusions

In conclusion, a tomographic system has been designed and built for imaging reacting flows in 3D. It uses four parallel laser beams scanning around 1392 nm to probe direct absorption transitions in water produced from an asymmetrical twin burner arrangement. The four parallel beams were rapidly rotated around the object to generate projection data at different observation angles. A reconstruction algorithm based on the FST followed by a 2D ramp filter and inverse Fourier transformation was used to determine firstly the distribution of integrated absorbance for two water transitions and then the temperature distribution by two-line thermometry and finally the water concentration distribution produced from combustion in a 2D plane. Time-dependent measurements of the distributions were demonstrated with a time resolution of 3.6 s (or 0.28 frames per second) as the air/fuel ratio was varied. The burners were moved incrementally to probe successive heights above the burners so that linear interpolation could be made between the ten 2D reconstructed planes to produce a 3D volumetric image of the temperature and chemical species concentrations. However, this is not strictly 3D tomography as only 2D reconstructions are carried out and so it is sometimes called 2.5D. This method provided accurate ±5 °C reconstructed images with respect to thermocouple validation studies. The pixel resolution of the results were presented in 128 × 128 pixels and the spatial resolution was recorded using projection intervals at every 0.5°, from 0° to 179.5°, with a total of 360 projections is 81 PPI for a 4 × 4 cm size image.

There are several approaches that could be taken to improve on the system described here. For example, instead of mechanically raising the object or the optical plane, several optical planes could be sampled simultaneously by fibre-splitting the tunable diode laser beam into further emitter/detector pairs. The laser could be amplified by fibre amplifier systems so that the laser power on each channel is sufficient to avoid detector noise limitations. This would enable temporal 3D measurements to be carried out which were currently only possible in 2D in this work. An alternative would be to use the laser beams with divergent outputs instead of collimated and to use multiple point detectors or array detectors. Probing upwards and downwards through the object would then enable a full 3D tomographic reconstruction without the need to interpolate between slices. The use of array detectors and sheet laser beams would enable denser sampling of the object leading to a much higher spatial resolution than that obtained here with only four parallel beams [31].

The effects of angular smearing could be reduced by increasing the laser scan rate across the absorption lines. In this case it was limited by the sampling rate of the data acquisition card but faster acquisition is possible. Alternatively, multiplexing fixed wavelength lasers could be used whereby two are employed to monitor the peak amplitude of the two absorption lines used for two-line thermometry and the third is used as a reference to monitor the baseline. However without a wavelength dispersing device the three signals would need to be time-division multiplexed [32]. Measuring multiple species at different wavelengths would also be of great interest. If short tuning range DFB diode lasers are used, as here, then several lasers would have to be multiplexed and scanned in order to detect other species such as CO, CO_{2}, NO, NO_{2} in the flame. The use of supercontinuum lasers has made this much easier with rapid scanning over a wide spectral range [7, 33] but the data quantities generated for tomography may become prohibitive. The detection of species in low concentrations such as free radicals and excited states would be feasible by using cavity-enhanced methods [6] on a stable rotating mount.

The 3D tomography system and result described here demonstrate that such a system can be used for temperature and chemical species concentration distributions in reacting gas flows with applications in combustion systems, plasma reactors and for monitoring stationary or mobile, air pollution.

## Supplementary material

## References

- 1.C. Schulz, V. Sick, Prog. Energ. Combust. Sci.
**31**, 75–121 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 2.S. Roy, J.R. Gord, A.K. Patnaik, P. Taged, Prog. Energ. Combust. Sci.
**36**, 280–306 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 3.J. Engstrom, J. Nygren, M. Alden, C.F. Kaminski, Opt. Lett.
**25**, 1469–1471 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 4.P.A. Martin, Chem. Soc. Rev.
**31**, 201–210 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 5.R.F. Curl, F. Capasso, C. Gmachl, A.A. Kosterev, B. McManus, R. Lewicki, M. Pusharsky, G. Wysocki, F.K. Tittel, Chem. Phys. Let.
**487**, 1–18 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 6.G. Berden, R. Engeln,
*Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy: Techniques and Applications*(Wiley, Chichester, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 7.X. An, T. Kraetschmer, K. Takami, S.T. Sanders, L. Ma, W. Cai, X. Li, S. Roy, J.R. Gord, Appl. Opt.
**50**, 29–37 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 8.B. Coriton, A.M. Steinberg, J.H. Frank, Exp. Fluids
**55**, 1743 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 9.R.L. Gordon, C. Heeger, A. Dreizler, Appl. Phys. B
**96**, 745–748 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 10.J. Nygren, J. Hult, M. Richter, M. Aldén, M. Christensen, A. Hultqvist, B. Johansson, Proc. Combust. Inst.
**29**, 679–685 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 11.D. Hoffman, K.U. Münch, A. Leipertz, Opt. Lett.
**21**, 525–527 (1996)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 12.R.D. Keane, R.J. Adrian, Y. Zhang, Meas. Sci. Technol.
**6**, 754–768 (1995)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 13.K.Y. Cho, A. Satija, T.L. Pourpoint, S.F. Son, R.P. Lucht, Appl. Opt.
**53**, 316–326 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 14.H. Neij, M. Aldén, Appl. Opt.
**33**(1994)Google Scholar - 15.B.R. Halls, T.J. Heindel, A.L. Kastengren, T.R. Meyer, Int. J. Multiph. Flow
**59**, 113–120 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 16.R. Hain, C.J. Kähler, D. Michaelis, Exp. Fluids
**45**, 715–724 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 17.W. Cai, C. Kaminski, Prog. Energ. Combust. Sci.
**59**, 1–31 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 18.P. Wright, N. Terzija, J.L. Davidson, S. Garcia-Castillo, C. Garcia-Stewart, S. Pegrum, S. Colbourne, P. Turner, S.D. Crossley, T. Litt, S. Murray, K.B. Ozanyan, H. McCann, Chem. Eng. J.
**158**, 2–10 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 19.C. Smith, C.S. Goldenstein, R.K. Hanson, Meas. Sci. Technol.
**25**(2014)Google Scholar - 20.W. Cai, C.F. Kaminski, Appl. Phys. Lett. 104 (2014)Google Scholar
- 21.M.P. Arroyo, T.P. Birbeck, D.S. Baer, R.K. Hanson, Opt. Lett.
**19**, 1091–1093 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 22.X. Liu, X. Zhou, J.B. Jeffries, R.K. Hanson, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf.
**103**, 565–577 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 23.X. Zhou, X. Liu, J.B. Jeffries, R.K. Hanson, Meas. Sci. Technol.
**14**, 1459–1468 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 24.V.L. Kasyutich, P.A. Martin, Appl. Phys. B
**102**, 149–162 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 25.http://www.hitran.com. Accessed 31 Jan 2017
- 26.X. Ouyang, P.L. Varghese, Appl. Opt.
**29**, 4884–4890 (1990)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 27.X. Zhou, J.B. Jeffries, R.K. Hanson, Appl. Phys. B Lasers Opt.
**81**, 711–722 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 28.A.C. Kak, M. Slaney,
*Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging*(IEEE Press, New York, 2001)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 29.L.S. Rothman, I.E. Gordon, A. Barbe et al., J. Quant. Spec. Rad. Trans.
**110**, 533–572 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 30.http://www.mathworks.com. Accessed 31 Jan 2017
- 31.M.N.A. tSaoir, D.L.A. Fernandes, J. Sa, M. McMaster, K. Kitagawa, C. Hardacre, F. Aiouache, Chem. Eng. Sci.
**66**, 6407–6423 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 32.Y. Gérard, R.J. Holdsworth, P.A. Martin, Appl. Opt.
**46**, 3937–3945 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 33.C.F. Kaminski, R.S. Watt, A.D. Elder, J.H. Frank, J. Hult, Appl. Phys. B
**92**, 367–378 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

## Copyright information

**Open Access**This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.