Abstract
We propose an experimental scheme to show that the nonlinear magnetic solitary excitations can be achieved in an atomic spinor Bose–Einstein condensate confined in a blue-detuned optical lattice. Through exact theoretical calculations, we find that the magnetic solitons can be generated by the static magnetic dipole–dipole interaction (MDDI), of which the interaction range can be well controlled. We derive the existence conditions of the magnetic solitons under the nearest-neighboring, the next-nearest-neighboring approximations as well as the long-range consideration. It is shown that the long-range feature of the MDDI plays an important role in determining the existence of magnetic solitons in this system. In addition, to facilitate the experimental observation, we apply an external laser field to drive the lattice, and the existence regions for the magnetic soliton induced by the anisotropic light-induced dipole–dipole interaction are also investigated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
E.S. Kevin, G.B. Partridge, A.G. Truscott, R.G. Hulet, Nature 417, 150 (2002)
L. Khaykovich, F. Schreck, G. Ferrari, T. Bourdel, J. Cubizolles, L.D. Carr, Y. Castin, C. Salomon, Science 296, 1290 (2002)
K.E. Strecker, G.B. Partridge, A.G. Truscott, R.G. Hulet, New J. Phys. 5, 73 (2003)
E.A. Ostrovskaya, J. Abdullaev, A.S. Desyatnikov, M.D. Fraser, Y.S. Kivshar, Phys. Rev. A 86, 013636 (2012)
D. Poletti, T.J. Alexander, E.A. Ostrovskaya, B. Li, Y.S. Kivshar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 150403 (2008)
R. Dum, J.I. Cirac, M. Lewenstein, P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2972 (1998)
S. Burger, K. Bongs, S. Dettmer, W. Ertmer, K. Sengstock, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5198 (1999)
J. Denschlag et al., Science 287, 97 (2000)
B.P. Anderson, P.C. Haljan, C.A. Regal, D.L. Feder, L.A. Collins, C.W. Clark, E.A. Cornell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2926 (2001)
O. Zobay, S. Pötting, P. Meystre, E.M. Wright, Phys. Rev. A 59, 643 (1999)
S. Pötting, P. Meystre, E.M. Wright, arXiv: cond-mat/0009289v2
G.L. Alfimov, V.V. Konotop, M. Salerno, Europhys. Lett. 58, 7 (2002)
X. Yang, L. Dong, G. Yin, Appl. Phys. B 95, 179 (2009)
P. Rose, T. Richter, B. Terhalle, J. Imbrock, F. Kaiser, C. Denz, Appl. Phys. B 89, 521 (2007)
T.J. Alexander, Y.S. Kivshar, Appl. Phys. B 82, 203 (2006)
J.K. Kjems, M. Steiner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 1137 (1978)
K.M. Leung, D.W. Hone, D.L. Mills, P.S. Riseborough, S.E. Trullinger, Phys. Rev. B 21, 4017 (1980)
H.J. Mikeska, J. Phys. C 13, 2913 (1980)
S. Rakhmanova, D.L. Mills, Phys. Rev. B 54, 9225 (1996)
A.M. Kosevich, B.A. Ivanoy, A.S. Kovalev, Phys. Rep. 194, 117 (1990)
J. Tjon, J. Wright, Phys. Rev. B 15, 3470 (1977)
Z.D. Li, L. Li, W.M. Liu, J.Q. Liang, T. Ziman, Phys. Rev. E 68, 036102 (2003)
N.N. Huang, Z.Y. Chen, Z.Z. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1395 (1995)
H. Pu, W.P. Zhang, P. Meystre, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 140405 (2001)
W.P. Zhang, H. Pu, C. Search, P. Meystre, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 060401 (2002)
K. Gross, C.P. Search, H. Pu, W.P. Zhang, P. Meystre, Phys. Rev. A 66, 033603 (2002)
S. Inouye, M.R. Andrews, J. Stenger, H.-J. Miesner, D.M. Stamper-Kurn, W. Ketterle, Nature 392, 151 (1998)
G.P. Zheng, J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 40, 4493 (2007)
Z.D. Li, P.B. He, L. Li, J.Q. Liang, W.M. Liu, Phys. Rev. A 71, 053611 (2005)
Z.W. Xie, W.P. Zhang, S.T. Chui, W.M. Liu, Phys. Rev. A 69, 053609 (2004)
B.J. Da̧browska-Wüster, E.A. Ostrovskaya, T.J. Alexander, Y.S. Kivshar, Phys. Rev. A 75, 023617 (2007)
Z. Li, A.-X. Zhang, J. Ma, J.-K. Xue, Phys. Lett. A 374, 1401 (2010)
T. Akatsuka, M. Takamoto, H. Katori, Nat. Phys. 4, 954 (2008)
X.D. Zhao, Z.W. Xie, W.P. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 76, 214408 (2007)
S. Giovanazzi, A. Giovanazzi, T. Pfau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 130401 (2002)
A. Griesmaier, J. Stuhler, T. Koch, M. Fattori, T. Pfau, S. Giovanazzi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 250402 (2006)
A. Maluckov, G. Gligorić, L. Hadžievski, B.A. Malomed, T. Pfau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 140402 (2012)
A. Maluckov, G. Gligorić, L. Hadžievski, B.A. Malomed, T. Pfau, Phys. Rev. A 87, 023623 (2013)
D. Donnelly, Phys. Rev. B 52, 1042 (1995)
V.V. Konotop, M. Salerno, S. Takeno, Phys. Rev. E 56, 7240 (1997)
R. Lai, A.J. Sievers, Phys. Rep. 314, 147 (1999)
R. Lai, S.A. Kiselev, A.J. Sievers, Phys. Rev. B 56, 5345 (1997)
B.J. Eggleton, R.E. Slusher, de C.M. Sterke, P.A. Krug, J.E. Sipe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1627 (1996)
M.J. Steel, W.P. Zhang, arXiv: cond-mat/9810284
S. Pötting, O. Zobay, P. Meystre, E.M. Wright, J. Mod. Opt. 47, 2653 (2000)
Z.L. Duan, M.J. Steel, A.T. Xu, W.P. Zhang, Chin. Sci. Bull. 54, 4182 (2009)
J. Javanainen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2375 (1994)
Z.W. Xie, W.P. Zhang, S.T. Chui, W.M. Liu, Phys. Rev. A 69, 053609 (2004)
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 10588402 and 11104075, 11104076, 11374003, the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) under Grant No. 2011CB921604, the Educational Commission of Henan Province of China under Grant No. 01026631082, the Postdoctoral Research Foundation of Henan Province under Grant No. 01026500201, the PhD Start-up Fund 01026500103 Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project under Grant No. B480, the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education No. 20110076120004, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, and the ‘Chen Guang’ project supported by Shanghai Municipal Education Commission and Shanghai Education Development Foundation under Grant No. 10CG24 and sponsored by Shanghai Rising-Star Program under Grant No. 12QA1401000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
-
(1)
For the NN approximation, the nonlinear equation of motion for ϕ n can be written as
$$\begin{aligned} i\frac{\hbox{d}\phi_{n}}{\hbox{d}t} &=\gamma_{B}B_{z}\phi_{n}+\underset{j=n\pm1}{\sum }2SJ_{nj}^{{\rm mag}}\sqrt{1-\left\vert \phi_{j}\right\vert ^{2}}\phi_{n}\\ &\quad+\underset{j=n\pm1}{\sum}4SJ_{nj}\sqrt{1-\left\vert \phi_{n}\right\vert ^{2}}\phi_{j}. \end{aligned}$$(24)In above equation, the terms \(\sqrt{1-\left\vert \phi_{j}\right\vert ^{2}}\approx1-\frac{1}{2}\left\vert \phi_{j}\right\vert ^{2}\) for small distortion from the ground state. Using the slowly varying envelope approximation or long wavelength limit, we have
$$\frac{\hbox{d}^{2}\phi(y,t)}{\hbox{d}y^{2}}|_{y=y_{n}}\approx\frac{\phi_{n+1}+\phi _{n-1}-2\phi_{n}}{a^{2}}.$$(25)where a is the lattice constant. Then, we can obtain the continuum limit NLSE for ϕ(y, t), namely
$$\begin{aligned} i\frac{\hbox{d}\phi(y,t)}{\hbox{d}t} &=4SJ_{01}a^{2}\frac{\hbox{d}^{2}\phi(y,t)}{\hbox{d}y^{2}}\\ &\quad+\left( \gamma_{B}B_{z}+4SJ_{01}^{{\rm mag}}+8SJ_{01}\right) \phi (y,t)\\ &\quad-2S\left( J_{01}^{{\rm mag}}+2J_{01}\right) \left\vert \phi(y,t)\right\vert ^{2}\phi(y,t). \end{aligned}$$(26) -
(2)
For the NNN approximation, we set \(\alpha_{j}=J_{0j}^{{\rm mag}}/J_{0j}, A_{2}=J_{02}/J_{01}, \eta=\gamma_{B}B_{z}+4S\left(J_{01}^{{\rm mag}}+2J_{01}+J_{02}^{{\rm mag}}-2J_{02}\right).\) Additionally, another second-order spatial derivative is introduced
$$\frac{\hbox{d}^{2}\phi(y,t)}{\hbox{d}y^{2}}|_{y=y_{n}}\approx\frac{\phi_{n+2}+\phi _{n-2}-2\phi_{n}}{(2a)^{2}}.$$(27)We can easily get
$$\begin{aligned} i\frac{\hbox{d}\phi(y,t)}{\hbox{d}t} &=4SJ_{01}\left( 1-4A_{2}\right) a^{2}{\frac{\hbox{d}^{2}\phi(y,t)}{\hbox{d}y^{2}}}+\eta\phi(y,t)\\ &\quad-2SJ_{01}\left(\alpha_{1}+A_{2}\alpha_{2}+2-2A_{2}\right) \left\vert \phi(y,t)\right\vert ^{2}\phi(y,t). \end{aligned}$$(28)In the first case, i.e., the spinor condensate is loaded into a blue-detuned optical lattice and the external laser used to induce the LDDI is absent, we have
$$J_{01}^{{\rm opt}}=0,J_{01}=\frac{1}{2}J_{01}^{{\rm mag}}\Longrightarrow\alpha_{1} =\alpha_{2}=2.$$(29)Then, Eq. (28) can be rewritten as
$$\begin{aligned} i\frac{\hbox{d}\phi(y,t)}{\hbox{d}t} &=2SJ_{01}^{{\rm mag}}\left( 1-4A_{2}\right) a^{2} \frac{\hbox{d}^{2}\phi(y,t)}{\hbox{d}y^{2}}+\eta\phi(y,t)\\ &\quad-4SJ_{01}^{{\rm mag}}\left\vert \phi(y,t)\right\vert ^{2}\phi(y,t). \end{aligned}$$(30)Second, the external laser is present and strong enough, so that
$$J_{01}^{{\rm opt}}\gg J_{01}^{{\rm mag}}\Longrightarrow\alpha_{1}=\alpha_{2}\approx0.$$(31)Then, we can obtain
$$\begin{aligned} i\frac{\hbox{d}\phi(y,t)}{\hbox{d}t} &=4SJ_{01}\left( 1-4A_{2}\right) \frac{\hbox{d}^{2} \phi(y,t)}{\hbox{d}y^{2}}a^{2}+\eta\phi(y,t)\\ &\quad-4SJ_{01}\left( 1-A_{2}\right) \left\vert \phi(y,t)\right\vert ^{2} \phi(y,t). \end{aligned}$$(32) -
(3)
For the long-range case, it is a little complicated. First, using \(\sqrt{1-\left\vert \phi_{j}\right\vert ^{2}}\approx1-\frac{1}{2}\left\vert \phi_{j}\right\vert ^{2}\) we can rewrite the nonlinear motion equation of ϕ n as
$$\begin{aligned} i\frac{\hbox{d}\phi_{n}}{\hbox{d}t} &=\left[ \gamma_{B}B_{z}+\underset{j\neq n}{\sum }2SJ_{nj}^{{\rm mag}}\right] \phi_{n}-\underset{j\neq n}{\sum}SJ_{nj}^{z}\left\vert \phi_{j}\right\vert ^{2}\phi_{n}\\ &\quad-\underset{j\neq n}{\sum}4SJ_{nj}\phi_{j}(-1)^{j-n}+\underset{j\neq n} {\sum}2SJ_{nj}\left\vert \phi_{n}\right\vert ^{2}\phi_{j}(-1)^{j-n}. \end{aligned}$$(33)Then, we set \(\phi_{n}\rightarrow\phi(y,t), J_{nj}^{{\rm mag}}\rightarrow J^{{\rm mag}}(y-y^{^{\prime}}), J_{nj}\rightarrow J(y-y^{^{\prime}}), \gamma _{B}B_{z}+\underset{j\neq n}{\sum}2SJ_{nj}^{{\rm mag}}\rightarrow\omega(y).\) Consider the discreteness of the optical lattice, we can treat the symbolic terms as below
$$(-1)^{j-n}=\cos\left[(j-n)\pi\right] =\cos\left[\frac{2\pi}{\lambda_{L}}\left( y-y^{^{\prime}}\right) \right].$$(34)After changing the sum to integration, we get
$$\begin{aligned} i\frac{\hbox{d}\phi(y,t)}{\hbox{d}t}&=\omega(y)\phi(y,t) \\ &\quad-\frac{2S}{\lambda_{L}}\phi(y,t)\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty} J^{{\rm mag}}(y-y^{^{\prime}})\phi^{2}(y^{^{\prime}},t)\hbox{d}y^{^{\prime}}\\ &\quad-\frac{8S}{\lambda_{L}}\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty}J(y-y^{^{\prime} })\phi(y^{^{\prime}},t)\cos\left[ \frac{2\pi}{\lambda_{L}}\left( y-y^{^{\prime}}\right) \right] \hbox{d}y^{^{\prime}}\\ &\quad+\frac{4S}{\lambda_{L}}\phi^{2}(y,t)\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty }J(y-y^{^{\prime}})\phi(y^{^{\prime}},t)\cos\left[ \frac{2\pi}{\lambda_{L} }\left( y-y^{^{\prime}}\right) \right] \hbox{d}y^{^{\prime}}. \end{aligned}$$(35)Denoting \(y-y^{^{\prime}}=\xi\), the \(\phi(y^{^{\prime}},t)\) can be expanded as
$$\phi(y^{^{\prime}},t)=\phi(y,t) +\frac{\partial\phi( y,t) }{\partial y}\xi+\frac{1}{2!}\frac{\partial^{2}\phi(y,t) }{\partial y^{2}}\xi^{2}+\cdots.$$(36)Taking above series into Eq. (35) (the integration variable is changed, i.e., \(\hbox{d}y^{\prime}\rightarrow-{\rm d}\xi\)) and using the assumption ∂ ϕ(y,t)/∂ y≪ 1, finally we get
$$\begin{aligned} i\frac{\hbox{d}\phi(y,t)}{\hbox{d}t}&=-2\beta_{1}\frac{\partial^{2} \phi\left( y,t\right)}{\partial y^{2}}+\left[\omega(y)-4\beta_{0}\right] \phi(y,t)\\ &\quad+\left(2\beta_{0}-\gamma\right) \left\vert \phi(y,t)\right\vert ^{2} \phi(y,t), \end{aligned}$$(37)where the coefficients are defined as below
$$\beta_{n}=\frac{2S}{\lambda_{L}}\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty}J(\xi)\xi^{2n} \cos\left(\frac{2\pi}{\lambda_{L}}\xi\right)\hbox{d}\xi, \quad n=0,1,$$(38)$$\gamma=\frac{2S}{\lambda_{L}}\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty}J^{{\rm mag}}(\xi)\hbox{d}\xi.$$(39)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, XD., Geng, Z., Zhao, X. et al. Controllable magnetic solitons excitations in an atomic chain of spinor Bose–Einstein condensates confined in an optical lattice. Appl. Phys. B 115, 451–460 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-013-5625-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-013-5625-9