Abstract
Rapid recovery of coral cover following acute disturbance has been documented on many reefs. Yet measuring coverage alone can mask shifts in community and demographic structure. Here, we quantify long-term changes in population size structure for three common genera (Acropora, Pocillopora, and Stylophora) at an eastern outer reef in Palau, Micronesia, following catastrophic loss of corals due to typhoon Bopha in 2012, based on size measurements from 3648 coral colonies. Mean colony size returned to pre-disturbance levels within 4 and 6 years for Stylophora and Pocillopora, respectively. By 2020, Pocillopora colony density far exceeded pre-disturbance levels, with rapid successful recruitment following typhoon Bopha. Despite recovery of Acropora colony density by 2020, populations remained dominated by smaller colonies. We demonstrate that full demographic recovery can occur more rapidly for pocilloporids (within 6 years) compared to Acropora which had not fully recovered by 8 years post-disturbance, possibly due to fewer annual recruitment events and larger maximum colony sizes. Our results highlight the value of demographic metrics as early indicators of recovery.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Coral reefs are increasingly vulnerable to climate disturbances such as destructive storms (Cheal et al. 2017) and marine heatwaves (Oliver et al. 2018), which are both predicted to worsen under climate change. To persist, coral populations need sufficient time for recovery following disturbances (Gilmour et al. 2013), yet recovery intervals are becoming shorter (Cheal et al. 2017; Oliver et al. 2018) due to a greater frequency of disturbance events. Recovery rates following disturbance vary greatly among reefs, but can be extremely rapid (e.g., 5–10 years) (Doropoulos et al. 2015). Most studies documenting recovery focus on total coral cover or taxonomic community structure (Adjeroud et al. 2018; Gouezo et al. 2019). However, it is also critical to quantify demographic structure (Edmunds and Riegl 2020), because certain coral colonies and taxa, particularly those that reach large sizes, can have a disproportionate influence on aspects of coral reef function (Ortiz et al. 2021). Demographic recovery to pre-disturbance levels or beyond can be measured using various metrics, including population size (or proxies like coral density) and the mean, skewness, or kurtosis of coral size-frequency distributions.
Assessing the demographic structure of populations, or the distribution of individuals of different sizes (Capdevila et al. 2020), can provide insights into coral population dynamics (Bak and Meesters 1998), including recruitment events (Doropoulos et al. 2015) and size-dependent growth and mortality rates (Madin et al. 2014, 2020). Understanding long-term changes in population size structure can aid in monitoring population recovery, as they provide insights into new arrival rates, cohort growth, and mortality rates (Gilmour 2004; Lachs et al. 2021), which are much harder to detect in coral coverage data. For instance, high skewness of the size distribution and high density of small colonies can indicate recruitment, provided that small colonies have not come about through fragmentation. Although many long-term datasets on benthic coverage are collected for coral reefs, most assessments of population size-frequency distributions focus on single surveys (e.g. Anderson and Pratchett 2014; Victor et al. 2009), with few published long-term studies (e.g., Babcock 1991; Gilmour 2004; Zhao et al. 2014; Lachs et al. 2021), despite the potential insights that can be obtained from time series of population-level data (Gonzalez et al. 2016).
The eastern barrier reef of Palau suffered unprecedented damage in December 2012 as super typhoon Bopha moved westward toward the Philippines (Gouezo et al. 2015, 2019; Roff et al. 2015), with a second super typhoon, Haiyan, causing further damage in November 2013 (Gouezo et al. 2015). Almost the entire shallow coral community was lost, including Acropora, Montipora, Porites, Merulinidae, Pocillopora, and Agaraciidae (Gouezo et al. 2019). These reefs had approximately 30% coral coverage before Bopha and near 0–1% coverage afterwards. This catastrophic mortality event provided a unique opportunity to quantify the duration required for demographic recovery in a coral population (Tomascik et al. 1996).
Here, we apply a recently-developed demographic image analysis workflow to a long-term benthic monitoring dataset to assess the demographic recovery of the most-dominant branching corals in the aftermath of typhoons Bopha and Hayian. We focus on branching corals given their key role in the establishment of structural complexity in coral reef habitats. Specifically, we test whether population mean colony size recovers to pre-disturbance levels or beyond, with additional consideration of other demographic metrics including colony density, and population size structure skewness and kurtosis. By comparing benthic coverage against colony density we aim to test whether demographic metrics can be used as early signs of recovery.
Materials and methods
Field surveys
In this note, we document the demographic recovery of the three most common branching coral genera at Ngetngod reef, surveyed every two years from 2012 to 2020, and in 2013 after super typhoon Bopha. On each occasion, five 50 m transects were laid consecutively at 10 m depth, and downward-facing 0.5 m × 0.5 m quadrat photos were taken every metre using a Canon G16 camera mounted to a PVC quadrat frame. All colonies of the most dominant branching taxa (Acropora, Pocillopora, and Stylophora) were outlined following the SizeExtractR workflow determining colony size as the geometric mean diameter (GMD) (Lachs et al. 2022). Dead portions of colonies were excluded, while partial mortality and paling or bleaching were recorded as binary variables. Only colonies which were > 90% inside each quadrat were included. Notably, we included a number of large colonies that were only partially in the quadrat and thus have a downward biased size estimation, however, these were extremely rare (16 colonies, < 1% of total). The detected occurrence of colonies less than 2 cm GMD (approaching the detection size limit for image-based methods) was very low (4% of colonies).
Statistical analysis
Size frequency distributions were visualised using density kernels. Shifts in GMD among years (categorical fixed effect) and genera (fixed effect) were tested using a generalised linear mixed effect model (GLMM) (glmmTMB package, Brooks et al. 2017) with a gamma error distribution under log link. Quadrat, and transect within year were included as nested random effects to account for non-independence of observations. As large coral colonies contribute disproportionately to populations, we reran this GLMM based on only the colonies greater than the 90th percentile colony size (determined by genus and year).
Coral density was calculated for each quadrat (colonies/m2), and differences in density among years and genera were tested with a GLMM, using transect within year as a nested random effect, applying negative binomial error distribution under log link, and testing for overdispersion and ability to predict zeros (Zuur et al. 2013). To test size-specific trends, an additional colony density GLMM was fitted using size class as a fixed effect (small: < 5 cm, medium: 5–15 cm, large: > 15 cm).
Results and discussion
We analysed a total of 1466 photo quadrats, and measured the size of 3648 coral colonies (781 Acropora of 1–65 cm GMD, 2367 Pocillopora of 1–32 cm GMD, 500 Stylophora of 1–41 cm GMD). Partial mortality and bleaching were very rare across all colonies (4% and 3%, respectively). Catastrophic loss of corals occurred on Ngetngod reef between 2012 and 2013 due to typhoon Bopha (Fig. 1b, 2012 vs. 2013). However, after a pulse of small coral colonies visible on photos in 2014 (1–4 cm GMD), the subsequent years showed successive increases in colony size (Figs. 1b, 2a), indicating that successful recruitment, cohort growth, and low mortality have occurred across all genera.
Coral population size structure trends. a Scaled coral colonies of Acropora (red), Pocillopora (green), and Stylphora (blue). b Shifts in size structure (density kernels) from 2012 to 2020 with severe coral loss in November 2012 due to typhoon Bopha, showing the total number of colonies corrected to 62.5m2 reef area (numbers, left) and years without significant differences in colony size (letters, right) based on a GLMM Tukey test (see Fig. 2a). c Comparison of size distributions before (2012, pale) and after (2020, dark) Bopha and Haiyan, with size cutoffs at 5 and 15 cm (grey dashed lines), showing differences in mean colony size from the same Tukey test and associated P values, with P < 0.001 (***) and P > 0.05 without any asterisk
Demographic time series for Acropora (red), Pocillopora (green), and Stylphora (blue) populations. Shifts in a colony size (GMD), b overall coral density, and c density of different size classes (small: < 5 cm GMD, medium: 5-15 cm GMD, and large: > 15 cm GMD) are as mean ± 95% confidence intervals. Shared capital letters denote years with no statistically significant differences in response (tested with GLMMs and post-hoc Tukey tests by genus)
Mean colony size for Stylophora and Pocillopora recovered to pre-Bopha levels by 2018 and 2020, respectively (Fig. 1b, Tukey test with P > 0.05). In comparison, the size of Acropora colonies remained smaller than that of the pre-disturbance population throughout the study (Fig. 1b, c, P< 0.001). The same genera-specific trends were also found for the largest corals (those greater than the 90th percentile), highlighting that recovery of size structure can occur faster for pocilloporid populations (see Gouezo et al. 2020a) than for Acropora, which have fewer annual recruitment events and include species that can reach larger colony sizes several metres in diameter.
Colony density also increased steadily in the years after typhoon Bopha and Haiyan (Fig. 2b), recovering to pre-disturbance levels by 2016 and 2020 for Acropora and Stylophora, respectively. Notably, Pocillopora colony density rebounded remarkably quickly, with 9–13 individuals/m2 recorded only 3 years after the two typhoons (in 2016), and the maximum density in a single quadrat of 48 individuals/m2. This also represents a shift toward Pocillopora dominance during the study.
Distinct size-dependent patterns in coral density emerged among genera (Fig. 2c). A large pulse in the density of small Pocillopora colonies visible on photos in 2016 was followed by a shift to larger size classes over the coming years, suggesting a short-lived post-disturbance recruitment pulse with high survival and cohort growth. A similar but lagged recovery trajectory was present for Acropora, with small colony dominance in 2018 (Fig. 2c) shifting toward large colony dominance by 2020, again indicating cohort growth. Comparatively, Stylophora showed a slower recovery of colony density, with successful recruitment pulses in 2016 and 2020 indicated by high densities of small colonies in those years (Fig. 2c). Notably, the recovery of pocilloporids was characterised by rapid shift to positive skewness in the first years post-disturbance (2014) followed by a shift to negative skewness (Fig. S1a). This represents successful cohort growth and lower concurrent recruitment, with more abundant larger-than-average-sized corals. Comparatively, skewness for Acropora remained closer to zero throughout, suggesting that size classes were more evenly distributed throughout recovery (Fig. S1a, Fig. 2c). Leptokurtic peaked size distributions across taxa and years (Fig. S1b) show that average-sized coral colonies were more dominant than larger or smaller colonies, characteristic of slow recovery of large coral sizes.
Reef monitoring typically focuses on measuring benthic coverage and taxonomic community structure, not demographic coral metrics. However, it is not known whether demographic recovery trajectories correspond to changes in coral coverage. By comparing benthic coverage of each studied genus against their colony density, a clear ‘r-shaped’ response pattern emerges over the duration of the recovery period (Fig. 3, 2013 onward). Rapid increases in colony density in the years after typhoon disturbance (i.e., by 2016) predate subsequent increases in coral coverage, suggesting that such demographic approaches can provide early indications of population recovery. By the end of this study in 2020, the benthic coverage of Acropora had still not returned to pre-disturbance levels. However, by qualitatively extrapolating the Acropora trend for an additional 2–4 years (Fig. 3) we could expect the small Acropora colonies present in 2020 to grow and lead to subsequent increases in Acropora coverage toward pre-disturbance levels or beyond, provided mortality remains low. Comparably, the coverage of Pocillopora by 2020 far exceeded pre-disturbance levels. Notably, the genera studied here accounted for a small proportion (8–10%) of pre-disturbance total coral coverage, but by 2020 have become the most dominant coral genera (> 80% of total coral cover) (personal observation).
Benthic coverage versus mean coral density through time. Coverage is calculated as total colony area for each genus divided by total sampled area. Temporal trajectories from 2012 (pale) to 2020 (dark) highlight an r-shaped recovery trajectory from 2013 onwards, with recovery detectable in coral density earlier than coral coverage
Here, we document the decadal recovery trajectories of three common coral genera on a reef that suffered catastrophic coral loss from super typhoon Bopha in 2012. For pocilloporids, average colony size and colony density had both recovered to or exceeded pre-disturbance levels within 7 years. However, Acropora showed a slower recovery response; although colony densities recovered within 5 years, colonies remained smaller than the pre-disturbance population throughout the duration of this study. Given that the 2020 Acropora size structure still contained a large proportion of small- to medium-sized colonies, it is possible that large Acropora colonies will start emerging over the coming years.
Differences in reproductive biology among genera may have influenced recovery rates (see Doropoulos et al. 2015, and Edmunds et al. 2010). Acropora colonies are broadcast spawners, releasing egg sperm bundles during mass spawning events that occur predominantly in March/April in Palau (Gouezo et al. 2020b). Non-favourable oceanographic and weather conditions during this window could lead to low larval supply, for instance, if wind, waves or currents transport coral larvae to the western reefs and open ocean, a common phenomenon for the eastern outer reefs of Palau (Gouezo et al. 2020c). In contrast, the family Pocilloporidae comprises a mix of spawning and brooding species (Edmunds et al. 2010), and their spat are typically found settling year-round (Edmunds et al. 2010; Gouezo et al. 2020a), increasing their opportunity for successful recruitment. All genera seemed to be growing at much the same rates, but densities of Pocillopora increased earlier than Acropora or Stylophora, indicating that recruitment was driving the differences in demographic recovery. Why post-disturbance recruitment would be fastest for Pocillopora (compared to other taxa) remains unresolved given our dataset, but factors related to reproductive biology and larval ecology for these taxa could have played a role (Baird, et al. 2009; Connolly and Baird 2010). In addition, recovery can take longer for taxa that reach very large colony sizes, such as tabular Acropora, which have a critical ecological importance yet are more vulnerable to disturbances (Ortiz et al. 2021). It is likely that healthy populations of stress-tolerant coral genera, such as massive Porites, may take several decades for recovery of population size structure in the case of catastrophic disturbances (Zhao et al. 2014), unless remnant tissue can rapidly regenerate and reskin dead skeletons of large colonies (Roff et al. 2014). As such, further demographic analysis of slower-growing massive coral taxa could prove insightful into how recovery potential in Palau varies across life history strategies.
Our study highlights the greater mechanistic insights that can be gained using demographic techniques on historic long-term monitoring data. While coral coverage can suggest that recovery is slow or non-existent, demographic features like size frequency distributions or coral colony density can provide early signs of population recovery. Under climate change, disturbance events are increasing in magnitude, and recovery intervals are becoming progressively shorter. Here we documented complete loss of corals at an east Palauan outer reef, and subsequent population recovery within 5–7 years for more rapidly recruiting pocilloporids, and over 8 years for broadcast-spawning Acropora that have fewer annual recruitment events. As other reef habitats within the reef system of Palau escaped the impacts of typhoon Bopha and Haiyan (Gouezo et al. 2019), larval supply from these reefs to typhoon damaged reefs likely promoted their recovery. Yet recovery may be much slower for reef systems with impaired recruitment, for example, following widespread mass mortality events. Understanding how contemporary coral communities may change in the future will require further research on the recovery potential of different coral taxa and on disentangling the combined effects of environmental impacts and ecological interactions on population dynamics.
Data availability
All original data and R code is available on figshare at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25405/data.ncl.22153790.
References
Adjeroud M, Kayal M, Iborra-Cantonnet C, Vercelloni J, Bosserelle P, Liao V, Chancerelle Y, Claudet J, Penin L (2018) Recovery of coral assemblages despite acute and recurrent disturbances on a South Central Pacific reef. Sci Rep 8:1–8
Anderson KD, Pratchett MS (2014) Variation in size-frequency distributions of branching corals between a tropical versus sub-tropical reef. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 502:117–128
Babcock R (1991) Comparative demography of three species of scleractinian corals using age- and size-dependent classifications. Ecol Monogr 61:225–244
Baird AH, Guest JR, Willis BL (2009) Systematic and biogeographical patterns in the reproductive biology of scleractinian corals. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:551–571
Bak RPM, Meesters EH (1998) Coral population structure: the hidden information of colony size-frequency distributions. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 162:301–306
Brooks ME, Kristensen K, van Benthem KJ, Magnusson A, Berg CW, Nielsen A, Skaug HJ, Mächler M, Bolker BM (2017) glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J 9:378–400
Capdevila P, Stott I, Beger M, Salguero-Gómez R (2020) Towards a comparative framework of demographic resilience. Trends Ecol Evol 35:776–786
Cheal AJ, MacNeil MA, Emslie MJ, Sweatman H (2017) The threat to coral reefs from more intense cyclones under climate change. Glob Chang Biol 23:1511–1524
Connolly SR, Baird AH (2010) Estimating dispersal potential for marine larvae: dynamic models applied to scleractinian corals. Ecology 91:3572–3583
Doropoulos C, Ward S, Roff G, González-Rivero M, Mumby PJ (2015) Linking demographic processes of juvenile corals to benthic recovery trajectories in two common reef habitats. PLoS ONE 10:1–23
Edmunds PJ, Leichter JJ, Adjeroud M (2010) Landscape-scale variation in coral recruitment in Moorea, French Polynesia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 414:75–89
Edmunds P, Riegl B (2020) Urgent need for coral demography in a world where corals are disappearing. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 635:233–242
Gilmour JP (2004) Size-structures of populations of the mushroom coral Fungia fungites: the role of disturbance. Coral Reefs 23:493–504
Gilmour JP, Smith LD, Heyward AJ, Baird AH, Pratchett MS (2013) Recovery of an isolated coral reef system following severe disturbance. Science 340:69–71
Gonzalez EJ, Martorell C, Bolker BM (2016) Inverse estimation of integral projection model parameters using time series of population-level data. Methods Ecol Evol 7(2):147–156
Gouezo M, Golbuu Y, Van Woesik R, Rehm L, Koshiba S, Doropoulos C (2015) Impact of two sequential super typhoons on coral reef communities in Palau. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 540:73–85
Gouezo M, Olsudong D, Fabricius K, Harrison P, Golbuu Y, Doropoulos C (2020a) Relative roles of biological and physical processes influencing coral recruitment during the lag phase of reef community recovery. Sci Rep 10:2471
Gouezo M, Doropoulos C, Fabricius K, Olsudong D, Nestor V, Kurihara H, Golbuu Y, Harrison P (2020b) Multispecific coral spawning events and extended breeding periods on an equatorial reef. Coral Reefs 39:1107–1123
Gouezo M, Golbuu Y, Fabricius K, Olsudong D, Mereb G, Nestor V, Wolanski E, Harrison P, Doropoulos C (2019) Drivers of recovery and reassembly of coral reef communities. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 286:20182908
Gouezo M, Wolanski E, Critchell K, Fabricius K, Harrison P, Golbuu Y, Doropoulos C (2020c) Modelled larval supply predicts coral population recovery potential following disturbance. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 661:127–145
Lachs L, Chong F, Beger M, East H, Guest J, Sommer B (2022) SizeExtractR: a workflow for rapid reproducible extraction of object size metrics from scaled images. Ecol Evol 12:e8724
Lachs L, Sommer B, Cant J, Hodge J, Malcolm H, Pandolfi J, Beger M (2021) Linking population size structure, heat stress and bleaching responses in a subtropical endemic coral. Coral Reefs 40:777–790
Madin JS, Baird AH, Dornelas M, Connolly SR (2014) Mechanical vulnerability explains size-dependent mortality of reef corals. Ecol Lett 17:1008–1015
Madin JS, Baird AH, Baskett ML, Connolly SR, Dornelas MA (2020) Partitioning colony size variation into growth and partial mortality. Biol Lett 16:20190727
Oliver ECJ, Donat MG, Burrows MT, Moore PJ, Smale DA, Alexander LV, Benthuysen JA, Feng M, Sen Gupta A, Hobday AJ, Holbrook NJ, Perkins-Kirkpatrick SE, Scannell HA, Straub SC, Wernberg T (2018) Longer and more frequent marine heatwaves over the past century. Nat Commun 9:1–12
Ortiz JC, Pears RJ, Beeden R, Dryden J, Wolff NH, del Gomez Cabrera M (2021) Important ecosystem function, low redundancy and high vulnerability: the trifecta argument for protecting the Great Barrier Reef’s tabular Acropora. Conserv Lett 14:1–18
Roff G, Bejarano S, Bozec YM, Nugues M, Steneck RS, Mumby PJ (2014) Porites and the Phoenix effect: unprecedented recovery after a mass coral bleaching event at Rangiroa Atoll, French Polynesia. Mar Biol 161:1385–1393
Roff G, Chollett I, Doropoulos C, Golbuu Y, Steneck RS, Isechal AL, van Woesik R, Mumby PJ (2015) Exposure-driven macroalgal phase shift following catastrophic disturbance on coral reefs. Coral Reefs 34:715–725
Tomascik T, Van Woesik R, Mah AJ (1996) Rapid coral colonization of a recent lava flow following a volcanic eruption, Banda Islands, Indonesia. Coral Reefs 15:169–175
Victor S, Golbuu Y, Yukihira H, Van Woesik R (2009) Acropora size-frequency distributions reflect spatially variable conditions on coral reefs of Palau. Bull Mar Sci 85:149–157
Zhao MX, Yu KF, Zhang QM, Shi Q, Roff G (2014) Age structure of massive Porites lutea corals at Luhuitou fringing reef (northern South China Sea) indicates recovery following severe anthropogenic disturbance. Coral Reefs 33:39–44
Zuur AF, Hilbe JM, Ieno EN (2013) Beginner’s Guide to GLM and GLMM with R: a Frequentist and Bayesian Perspective for Ecologists. Highland Statistics Limited
Acknowledgements
We thank researchers at the Palau International Coral Reef Center who contributed to the long-term monitoring programme over the time period of the study and funding agencies who support this ongoing programme. We also thank Prof. John Bythell and Dr. Adriana Humanes for helpful discussions, and the suggestions from two anonymous reviewers which greatly improved our manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by a Natural Environment Research Council studentship (Grant No. NE/S007512/1) to LL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LL and PB contributed equally to this work and can therefore each list this publication as first author in their curriculum vitae. LL, PB, JG, and YG conceived the study, MG, VN, and DO conducted field surveys, LL and PB wrote the first draft, and all authors contributed to writing of the final draft.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lachs, L., Biondi, P., Gouezo, M. et al. Demographic recovery of corals at a wave-exposed reef following catastrophic disturbance. Coral Reefs 43, 193–199 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-024-02464-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-024-02464-1