Advertisement

Coral Reefs

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 581–584 | Cite as

First record of a trophonema in black corals (Cnidaria: Antipatharia)

  • Daniel Lauretta
  • Daniel Wagner
  • Pablo E. Penchaszadeh
Note

Abstract

The gametes of many groups of anthozoans contain a funnel-shaped cluster of specialized cells that facilitate the transport of nutritive substances, known as the trophonema. This structure has been found within all orders of anthozoans, with the exception of pennatulaceans, scleractinians, and antipatharians, the latter of which are commonly known as black corals. Based on the histological study of eight specimens of the black coral Dendrobathypathes grandis Opresko (Zool Med Leiden 76(22):411–442, 2002) from the southwestern Atlantic, we report for the first time the presence of a trophonema within the order Antipatharia. A trophonema was found only in oocytes from one of the seven female specimens studied. Since D. grandis contains the largest oocytes among antipatharians that have been studied to date, it remains unknown whether the presence of a trophonema is an exceptional case, or whether these structures have simply been overlooked in other black corals.

Keywords

Argentina Histology Oocyte Reproduction Southwestern Atlantic 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to the captain and crew of the O/V Puerto Deseado for their assistance and to the anonymous rewires for their valuable comments. This work was supported by a PICT 2013-2504 Grant to PP and a PADI foundation Grant to DL. Many thanks to Cristina Damborenea and Florencia Arrighetti for comments on the histology interpretation.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cairns SD (2007) Deep-water corals: an overview with special reference to diversity and distribution of deep-water scleractinian corals. Bull Mar Sci 81:311–322Google Scholar
  2. Couch R (1842) An essay on the zoophytes of Cornwall. Annu Rep R Cornwall Polytech Soc 9:27–91Google Scholar
  3. Dunn DF (1975) Reproduction of the externally brooding sea anemone Epiactis prolifera Verrill, 1869. Biol Bull 148:199–218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Eckelbarger KJ, Tyler PA, Langton RW (1998) Gonadal morphology and gametogenesis in the sea pen Pennatula aculeata (Anthozoa: Pennatulacea) from the Gulf of Maine. Mar Biol 132:677–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eckelbarger KJ, Hand C, Uhlinger KR (2008) Ultrastructural features of the trophonema and oogenesis in the starlet sea anemone, Nematostella vectensis (Edwardsiidae). Invert Biol 127(4):381–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fautin DG, Mariscal RN (1991) Cnidaria: Anthozoa. In: Harrison FW, Westfall JA (eds) Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates. Vol. 2: Placozoa, Porifera, Cnidaria, and Ctenophora. Wiley–Liss, New York. pp. 267–358Google Scholar
  7. Hertwig R (1882) Die Actinien der Challenger expedition. Gustav Fischer, JenaGoogle Scholar
  8. Hertwig O, Hertwig R (1879) Die Actinien: Anatomisch und Histologisch, mit besonderer Berucksichtigung des Nervermuskelsystems Untersucht. Gustav Fischer, JenaGoogle Scholar
  9. Humason G (1967) Animal tissue techniques. Freeman and Company, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  10. Larkman AU, Carter MA (1982) Preliminary ultrastructural and autoradiographic evidence that the trophonema of the sea anemone Actinia fragacea has a nutritive function. Intl J Invert Reprod 4:375–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lauretta D, Penchaszadeh PE (2017) Gigantic oocytes in the deep sea black coral Dendrobathypathes grandis (Antipatharia) from the Mar del Plata submarine canyon area (southwestern Atlantic). Deep Sea Res Part I 128:109–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moseley H (1877) On new forms of Actiniaria dredged in the deep sea; with a description of certain pelagic surface-swimming species. Trans Linn Soc Lond Series 2(1):295–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nyholm KG (1943) Zur Entwicklung und Entwicklungsbiologie der Ceriantharie und Aktinien. Zool Bidr Uppsala 22:87–248Google Scholar
  14. Opresko DM (2002) Revision of the Antipatharia (Cnidaria: Anthozoa). Part II. Schizopathidae. Zool Med Leiden 76(22):411–442Google Scholar
  15. Schmidt H, Schaefer WG (1980) The anthozoan egg: trophic mechanisms and oocyte surface. In: Tardent P, Tardent R (eds) Development and Cellular Biology of Coelenterates. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 41–46Google Scholar
  16. Schmidt H, Zissler D (1979) Die Spermien der Anthozoen und ihre phylogenetische Bedeutung. Zoologica 129:1–98Google Scholar
  17. Shikina S, Chang C-F (2016) Sexual reproduction in stony corals and insight into the evolution of oogenesis in Cnidaria. In: Goffred S, Dubinsky Z (eds) The Cnidaria, Past, Present and Future. Springer, Berlin, pp 249–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Suvarna SK, Layton C, Bancroft JD (2013) Bancroft’s theory and practice of histological techniques. Churchill Livingstore, Elsevier, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Wagner D, Waller RG, Toonen RJ (2011) Sexual reproduction of Hawaiian black corals, with a review of the reproduction of antipatharians (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Hexacorallia). Invert Biol 130(3):211–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wagner D, Luck DG, Toonen RJ (2012) The biology and ecology of black corals (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Hexacorallia: Antipatharia). Adv Mar Biol 63:67–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”-CONICETBuenos AiresArgentina
  2. 2.JHT, Inc., NOAA National Centers for Coastal Ocean ScienceCharlestonUSA

Personalised recommendations