Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of mortality worldwide [1], emphasizing the crucial role of cardiovascular imaging modalities such as cardiac computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging [2, 3]. Radiologists play a pivotal role in the accurate interpretation of these imaging studies, thereby influencing patient management and outcomes [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. A large-scale analysis from the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR) registry addressed the status of radiologist competence in cardiac imaging across Europe and emphasized the need for standardization and collaboration to ensure optimal patient care [14].
Main findings of the analysis of the ESCR registry analysis
Significant increase in cardiac CT and MR examinations
Between 2011 and 2022, there was a notable surge in both cardiac CT and MR examinations across Europe, with a 4.5-fold increase in CT examinations and a 3.8-fold increase in MR examinations. This substantial rise underscores the growing importance of these imaging modalities in cardiovascular disease management and highlights the increasing demand for their utilization in clinical practice.
Evolution of clinical indications
The data reveal the following main clinical indications for cardiac CT and MR imaging. Suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) emerged as the predominant indication (59%) for cardiac CT, followed by transcatheter aortic valve replacement planning (21%). Interestingly, there was a notable increase in the number of patients with intermediate pretest probability undergoing CT for suspected CAD from 61% in 2012 to 82% in 2022, indicating a further increase in appropriate clinical decision-making. For cardiac MR, suspected myocarditis (26%), CAD (21%), and suspected cardiomyopathy (19%) were the main indications, reflecting the diverse diagnostic capabilities of this imaging modality in assessing myocardial inflammation, ischemia, and structural abnormalities.
Role of radiologists in reporting
The majority of CT and MR examinations were reported by radiologists (76% and 71%, respectively), underscoring their central role in the interpretation and diagnosis of cardiac imaging studies. However, a notable proportion of examinations were also reported in consensus with non-radiologists (19% and 27%, respectively), highlighting the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in cardiac imaging. A small minority of CT and MR examinations (5% and 2%, respectively) were reported by non-radiological specialties or through separate readings of radiologists and non-radiologists.
How do these findings fit into the current landscape?
The field of cardiac imaging has witnessed rapid advancements in technology and techniques [15,16,17], enabling more accurate diagnosis and characterization of cardiovascular diseases. Cardiac CT and MR imaging have become indispensable tools in the evaluation of various cardiovascular and cardiothoracic conditions, including CAD, inflammation, myocardial ischemia, and cardiomyopathies. However, the interpretation of these imaging studies requires specialized knowledge and expertize, particularly in recognizing subtle anatomical and pathological findings and optimal use of novel technologies.
What are the remaining key opportunities?
An immense work has been done primarily by the European Society of Radiology (ESR) and the ESCR (in collaboration with national societies) with regard to further increasing the competence of radiologists in cardiac and cardiothoracic CT and MR imaging. Apart from the major congresses of the ESR and ESCR, these include initiatives to start education at the undergraduate level with the ESR ebook for undergraduate education with a dedicated chapter on Cardiac imaging [18], harmonizing radiology training through the European Training Curricula for general Radiology and subspecialisation training [19], the plethora of resources offered through the ESR Premium Education Package [20], the subspecialty diploma of the European Board of Cardiovascular Radiology (EBCR) [21], and availability of dedicated cardiovascular imaging fellowships through the European School of Radiology (ESOR) [22]. Great additional effort should be undertaken to further standardize protocols, implement artificial intelligence solutions, and promote consistent reporting [23, 24] through hands-on cardiac imaging courses.
Addressing these opportunities fully will benefit from multifaceted approaches involving the interdisciplinary collaboration of ESR and ESCR and other stakeholders, among them healthcare institutions, other professional societies, and regulatory bodies on the European and national levels. In addition, efforts should be made to establish additional clinical practice guidelines about cardiac MR [8] and CT [25] for image acquisition, interpretation, and reporting, thereby promoting high-quality consistency in clinical practice.
Furthermore, fostering collaboration among radiologists, general practitioners, cardiologists, and cardiac surgeons [10] is essential for enhancing interdisciplinary communication and facilitating optimal patient care. By continuing to establish multidisciplinary quantitative cardiovascular imaging meetings, further clinical and technical consensus publications will result [18, 19, 26] that will ultimately improve diagnostic performance, resource utilization, and patient outcomes.
What about sharing data from this analysis?
Importantly, the ESCR registry raw data underlying the original published article [14] is available upon request using office@escr.org for data sharing and exchange. It would be pivotal if the original source data underlying analyses such as the exciting previous analysis were more often shared with other researchers using data-sharing platforms such EUCAIM (www.eucaim.org) funded by the European Commission and/or the GUIDE-IT platform funded by German Research Foundation (DFG) (www.guide-it.org). This will ensure sustainable access to pivotal underlying information for the entire radiology community.
What are the conclusions that can be drawn from this analysis?
The competence and involvement of radiologists in cardiac CT and MR imaging play a critical role in the accurate diagnosis and management of cardiovascular diseases. Radiologists are central in the provision of cardiovascular imaging services and high-quality medical care in cardiovascular medicine. Suspected CAD and suspected myocarditis are the most common indications for cardiac CT and MR, respectively. The data from the ESCR registry also show a relevant increase by approximately a factor of four in cardiac CT and MR examinations in the last decade. Radiologists actively engaged in cardiovascular imaging play a central role in providing quantitative imaging findings as the basis for evidence-based recommendations for personalized optimal medical therapy and/or invasive treatment.
I would like to wholeheartedly congratulate the authors from the pivotal ESCR registry on providing important evidence using real-life data from Europe about the best use of cardiovascular imaging. We look very much forward to future analyses providing additional insights into the potential to further improve cardiovascular imaging and care.
References
World Health Organization (WHO) (2019) Available via https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality-and-global-health-estimates. Accessed 19 March 2024
Dewey M (2014) Cardiac CT. Springer, Heidelberg
Higgins CB, de Roos A (2013) MRI and CT of the Cardiovascular System, 3rd edn. Wolters Kluwer
investigators S-H (2015) CT coronary angiography in patients with suspected angina due to coronary heart disease (SCOT-HEART): an open-label, parallel-group, multicentre trial. Lancet 385:2383–2391
investigators S-H, Newby DE, Adamson PD et al (2018) Coronary CT angiography and 5-year risk of myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 379:924–933
DISCHARGE Trial Group, Kofoed K, Bosserdt M et al (2022) Comparative effectiveness of initial computed tomography and invasive coronary angiography in women and men with stable chest pain and suspected coronary artery disease: multicentre randomised trial. BMJ 379:e071133
DISCHARGE Trial Group, Maurovich-Horvat P, Bosserdt M et al (2022) CT or invasive coronary angiography for stable chest pain. N Engl J Med 386:1591–1602
Emrich T, Wintersperger BJ, Greco FD et al (2024) ESR essentials: ten steps to cardiac MR-practice recommendations by ESCR. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10605-x
Foldyna B, Uhlig J, Gohmann R et al (2022) Quality and safety of coronary computed tomography angiography at academic and non-academic sites: insights from a large European registry (ESCR MR/CT Registry). Eur Radiol 32:5246–5255
Dewey M, Henriques JPS, Kirov H, Vliegenthart R (2024) ESR bridges: CT builds bridges in coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol 34:732–735
Gatti M, Liguori C, Muscogiuri G et al (2021) Challenges and opportunities to delivering cardiac imaging training: a national survey by the Italian college of cardiac radiology. Insights Imaging 12:136
Langenbach MC, Sandstede J, Sieren MM et al (2023) German Radiological Society and the Professional Association of German radiologists position paper on coronary computed tomography: clinical evidence and quality of patient care in chronic coronary syndrome. Rofo 195:115–134
Sieren MM, Maintz D, Gutberlet M et al (2022) Current status of cardiovascular imaging in Germany: structured data from the national certification program, ESCR registry, and survey among radiologists. Rofo 194:181–191
Catapano F, Moser LJ, Francone M et al (2024) Competence of radiologists in cardiac CT and MR imaging in Europe: insights from the ESCR Registry. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10644-4
Wolf EV, Muller L, Schoepf UJ et al (2023) Photon-counting detector CT-based virtual monoenergetic reconstructions: repeatability and reproducibility of radiomics features of an organic phantom and human myocardium. Eur Radiol Exp 7:59
Klarenberg H, Gosselink M, Coolen BF et al (2022) A 72-channel receive array coil allows whole-heart cine MRI in two breath holds. Eur Radiol Exp 6:54
Cundari G, Galea N, Mergen V, Alkadhi H, Eberhard M (2023) Myocardial extracellular volume quantification with computed tomography-current status and future outlook. Insights Imaging 14:156
European Society of Radiology, Catalano C, Galea N, Marchitelli L (2022) eBook for Undergraduate Education in Radiology: Cardiac Imaging. https://doi.org/10.26044/esr-undergraduate-ebook-06
European Training Curricullum for Radiology (2024) Available via https://www.myesr.org/education/training-curricula/
European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2024) Available via https://www.myesr.org/education/premium-education-package/ Accessed 19 March 2024
European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR) (2024) Available via https://www.escr.org/diploma/ Accessed 19 March 2024
European School of Radiology (ESOR) (2024) Available via https://www.esor.org/training-exchange-programmes/recently-certified/visiting-scholarship-programme-europe/escr/ Accessed 19 March 2024
QCI Study Group, Follmer B, Williams MC et al (2024) Roadmap on the use of artificial intelligence for imaging of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque in coronary arteries. Nat Rev Cardiol 21:51–64
QCI Study Group, Mezquita AJV, Biavati F et al (2023) Clinical quantitative coronary artery stenosis and coronary atherosclerosis imaging: a consensus statement from the quantitative cardiovascular imaging study group. Nat Rev Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-023-00880-4
Dewey M (2024) The ESR essentials for the medical imaging community. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10588-9
Dewey M, Siebes M, Kachelriess M et al (2020) Clinical quantitative cardiac imaging for the assessment of myocardial ischaemia. Nat Rev Cardiol 17:427–450
Acknowledgements
This editorial was in part written based on prompts to Chat GPT, adhering to the editorial policy.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Guarantor
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Marc Dewey.
Conflict of interest
The author of this manuscript declares no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. Marc Dewey is Guest Editor of the ESR Essentials series and chairperson of the ESR Publications Committee.
Statistics and biometry
No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was not required.
Ethical approval
Institutional Review Board approval was not required.
Study subjects or cohorts overlap
Not applicable.
Methodology
-
Commentary
Additional information
Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This comment refers to the article available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10644-4.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Dewey, M. Competence and contributions of radiologists to cardiac CT and MR imaging across Europe. Eur Radiol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10741-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10741-4