This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Change history
19 April 2024
Source Line layout was corrected.
References
Kamphuis MJ, van der Kamp LT, van Eijk RPA et al (2024) Scanxiety and quality of life around follow-up imaging in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a prospective cohort study. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10602-0
Feiler B (2011) Scanxiety. Fear of a postcancer ritual. Time 13:56
Bui KT, Liang R, Kiely BE, Brown C, Dhillon HM, Blinman (2021) Scanxiety: a scoping review about scan-associated anxiety. BMJ Open 11:e043215
Derry-Vick HM, Heathcote LC, Glesby N et al (2023) Scanxiety among adults with cancer: a scoping review to guide research and interventions. Cancers (Basel) 15:1381
Homewood H, Hewis J (2023) ‘Scanxiety’: content analysis of pre-MRI patient experience on Instagram. Radiography (Lond) 29:S68–S73
Bui KT, Li Z, Dhillon HM, Kiely BE, Blinman P (2023) Scanxiety conversations on twitter: observational study. JMIR Cancer 2023:e43609
Bauml JM, Troxel A, Epperson CN et al (2016) Scan-associated distress in lung cancer: quantifying the impact of “scanxiety”. Lung Cancer 100:110–113
Rohman M (2017) RSNA 2017: Is a radiologist the doctor’s doctor, the patient’s physician—or both? HealthImaging Website. https://healthimaging.com/topics/healthcare-management/healthcare-economics/rsna-2017-radiologist-doctors-doctor-patients. Accessed: 31 January 2024
Custers JAE, Davis L, Messiou C, Prins JB, van der Graaf WTA (2021) The patient perspective in the era of personalized medicine: What about scanxiety? Cancer Med 10:2943–2945
Kemp J, McKenzie A, Burns J, Miller K (2020) Immediate interpretation and results communication decreases patient anxiety: experience in a private practice community hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 214:1311–1315
Gutzeit A, Heiland R, Sudarski S et al (2019) Direct communication between radiologists and patients following imaging examinations. Should radiologists rethink their patient care? Eur Radiol 29:224–231
Funding
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Guarantor
The scientific guarantor of this publication is José María García Santos.
Conflict of interest
Juana María Plasencia Martínez is a member of the Scientific Editorial Board, Chest Section, of European Radiology. José María García Santos is Deputy Editor of European Radiology. They have not taken part in the review or selection process of this article. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and biometry
No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was not required.
Ethical approval
Institutional Review Board approval was not required.
Study subjects or cohorts overlap
Not applicable.
Methodology
-
Commentary
Additional information
Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This comment refers to the article available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10602-0.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
García Santos, J.M., Plasencia Martínez, J.M. Scanxiety: potential lessons for personalized radiology. Eur Radiol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10726-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10726-3