Abstract
Objectives
To define and compare growth rates of the distal aorta in Marfan patients with and without aortic root replacement using serial MR angiography (MRA).
Methods
We retrospectively included 136 Marfan patients with a total of 645 MRAs who underwent a median of five MRAs (range: 2–13) at 1.5 T and 3 T in annual intervals. Of these, 41 patients (34.8 ± 12 years) had undergone aortic root replacement. The remaining 95 patients (29.0 ± 17 years) still had a native aorta and served as the control group. Thoracic aortic diameters were independently measured at eleven predefined levels. Estimated growth rates were calculated using a mixed effects model adjusted for sex, age, BMI, and medication.
Results
Marfan patients with aortic root replacement revealed the highest mean estimated growth rate in the proximal descending aorta (0.77 mm/year, CI: 0.31–1.21). Mean growth rates at all levels of the distal thoracic aorta were significantly higher in patients with aortic root replacement (0.28–0.77 mm/year) when compared to patients without aortic root replacement (0.03–0.07 mm/year) (all p < 0.001). Antihypertensive medication, gender, and BMI had no significant impact on the distal aortic growth rates.
Conclusion
Distal thoracic aortic diameters increase at a significantly higher rate in Marfan patients with aortic root replacement compared to Marfan patients without aortic root replacement. Further studies are warranted to investigate if the increased growth rate of the distal thoracic aorta after aortic root replacement is caused by altered hemodynamics due to the rigid aortic root graft or due to the general genetic disposition of post-operative Marfan patients.
Clinical relevance statement
High growth rates of the distal aorta after aortic root replacement underline the need for careful life-long aortic imaging of Marfan patients after aortic root replacement.
Key Points
• Aortic growth rates in Marfan patients with aortic root replacement are highest in the mid-aortic arch, the proximal- and mid-descending aorta.
• Growth rates of the distal thoracic aorta are significantly higher in Marfan patients with aortic root replacement compared to Marfan patients without aortic root replacement.
• Antihypertensive medication, gender, and BMI have no significant impact on distal aortic growth rates in Marfan patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Marfan syndrome is a genetic disorder of connective tissue caused by mutations in the Fibrilin-1 (FBN1) gene encoding the matrix protein fibrilin-1 [1]. The disease affects different parts of the human body, including the heart and blood vessels [2,3,4]. The most frequent cardiovascular complication in Marfan patients is progressive aortic root dilatation [1, 5]. Aortic root aneurysms increase the risk of lethal aortic dissection [1, 5,6,7]. An absolute aortic diameter of 50 mm, or 45 mm in patients who have additional risk factors, or a rapid increase of aortic root diameters (≥ 5 mm/year) indicates elective prophylactic aortic surgery in Marfan patients to mitigate the risk of aortic dissection [8, 9]. The surgical therapy of proximal aortic root disease is now well established with excellent long-term survival of post-operative Marfan patients [10, 11].
However, despite prolonged survival, aortic root replacement has led to an increased number of Marfan patients who experience aortic complications beyond the replaced aortic root [12, 13]. The progression of distal aortic diameters has been described in Marfan patients after aortic root replacement [14,15,16].
Precise growth rates of the distal aorta have not been defined for Marfan patients after aortic root replacement. MR angiography enables precise monitoring of aortic diameters in Marfan patients since it allows accurate visualization of aortic morphology at all levels of the thoracic aorta [17,18,19,20,21].
Therefore, the aim of this study was to define and compare growth rates of the distal aorta in Marfan patients with and without aortic root replacement using serial MR angiography.
Materials and methods
Study sample
The local institutional review board approved our retrospective single-center study and waived the requirement for written informed consent.
Patients with confirmed Marfan syndrome, who were referred for routine MR angiography between August 2006 and February 2020 were screened retrospectively for inclusion in the study. Marfan diagnosis was established according to the latest Ghent nosology and confirmed by genetic analyses with the sequencing of the FBN1 gene [9].
Elective replacement of the aortic root was performed in Marfan patients with a maximum diameter of ≥ 50 mm, or ≥ 45 mm in patients who have additional risk factors, or rapid increase of aortic root diameters (≥ 5 mm/year), as recommended by the ESC guideline [9]. In our clinic, Marfan patients eligible for prophylactic aortic surgery are discussed in a multidisciplinary board (cardiology, cardiac surgery, radiology) before surgery is proposed. The proposal is then discussed with the patients. As a result, > 90% of Marfan patients eligible for prophylactic aortic root replacement undergo surgery.
Patients were included in the study if they had (i) confirmed diagnosis of Marfan syndrome, ii) at least two MR angiography studies to allow for calculation of growth rates, (iii) and at least one pre-operative MRI study in case of prior aortic surgery.
Patients were excluded from the study if they had persistent residual dissection distal to the aortic graft, which might alter natural aortic growth rates.
All patient records were screened for the date of aortic surgery and/or complications after surgery.
MR angiography
MR angiography (MRA) of the entire aorta was performed with or without [22] contrast enhancement as described previously using either 1.5 [19, 23] or 3-T [24] MR systems equipped with multi-channel receiver coils for cardiovascular imaging (Achieva and Ingenia, Philips Medical Systems).
Image analyses
All MR images were interpreted on state-of-the-art RIS/PACS workstations (Centricity™ RIS-i 7, GE General Electric Company). Two radiologists with 6 and 4 years of experience in cardiovascular imaging performed all diameter measurements individually from the inner-to-inner edge of the aortic wall at the following eleven aortic levels: aortic annulus, sinuses of Valsalva, sinotubular junction, mid-ascending aorta, proximal aortic arch, mid-aortic arch, proximal descending thoracic aorta (2 cm distal to the left subclavian artery), proximal descending thoracic aorta at maximum diameter, mid-descending aorta, diaphragmatic aorta and abdominal aorta (Fig. 1) [21, 25].
Diameter measurements were performed perpendicular to the blood-filled lumen at all levels on identically orientated para-sagittal MRA images [26]. Using identically oriented para-sagittal images avoided possible user influence introduced by individually performed multiplanar reformations [19, 23, 27]. Readers were free to choose appropriate slices displaying the maximal profile of the aorta from the stacks of para-sagittal images.
Statistical analyses
Inter-rater reliability of aortic diameter measurements was evaluated. Further statistical analyses were based on the calculated mean of measurements of both readers. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated based on a two-way mixed effects model (single rater, absolute agreement).
The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to evaluate whether the parameters were normally distributed. Data were compared by a two-sided paired t-test if normally distributed and by the Mann–Whitney test if non-normally distributed.
We have performed a locally weighted polynomial regression (LOESS) to check the linearity of the slope (data not shown). Growth rates at different aortic levels were calculated in all Marfan patients by applying a linear mixed model to describe changes in diameter.
Results were reported as estimated marginal means, which are represented in graphs with their corresponding 95%-confidence intervals (CIs). A multiple linear mixed regression model was used to adjust for age, gender, BMI, and antihypertensive medication between Marfan patients with and without aortic root replacement. p values < 0.05 were considered a statistically significant difference. Statistical analyses were computed by a biomedical statistics expert using R (R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021) [28].
Results
Study population
Within the study period, 362 patients with confirmed Marfan syndrome were treated in our institution.
We included 136 Marfan patients (37.6%, 58 men; 78 women, age range 7–71 years; mean age 30.7 ± 16 years, BMI: 22.1 ± 4.9 kg/m2) with a total of 645 MRAs. The median number of MRA scans was five (range: 2–13). The time interval between individual scans was 18.2 ± 9.6 months. The median monitoring time was 5.8 years (range 0.6–13.2 years) (Table 1).
We excluded 226 patients (62.4%). Of these, 214/226 patients (94.7%) were excluded due to the lack of at least two MR angiography studies precluding the estimation of growth rates. We further excluded 12/226 patients (5.3%) with persistent residual dissection distal to the aortic graft, which might alter natural aortic growth rates.
Forty-one of the included patients (24 men; 17 women; mean age: 34.8 ± 12 years, BMI: 23.2 ± 3.7 kg/m2, antihypertensive medication: 82.9%) underwent elective aortic root replacement during this period due to increased aortic root diameter or rapid growth rate. David’s procedure (valve-sparing aortic root replacement) was performed in 37 patients and the Bentall procedure (aortic root and aortic valve replacement) was performed in four patients. The median number of MRA scans was five (range: 2–13) (Table 1).
The remaining 95 patients had no surgical interventions (34 men; 61 women; mean age: 29.0 ± 17 years, BMI: 21.7 ± 5.2 kg/m2, antihypertensive medication: 60%). The median number of MRA scans was four (range: 2–12) (Table 1).
Inter-rater reliability of aortic diameter measurements
A high degree of reliability was found between both readers for diameter measurements at all aortic levels. The ICC was between 0.79 and 0.87.
Aortic diameters of Marfan patients with and without aortic root replacement
Mean diameters at baseline and last follow-up in Marfan patients with and without aortic root replacement are displayed in Table 2. In Marfan patients with aortic root replacement, a maximal increase of 3 mm was observed for the maximal diameter of the proximal descending aorta with an increase from 2.52 ± 0.37 to 2.81 ± 0.40 cm. In Marfan patients without aortic surgery, the maximal increase of 11 mm was observed at the level of the sinuses of Valsalva with an increase from 3.67 ± 0.58 to 3.78 ± 0.59 cm. The distal aorta diameters showed less increase in absolute aortic diameters.
Aortic growth rates of Marfan patients with and without aortic root replacement
In Marfan patients with aortic root replacement, the highest aortic growth rates of the distal aorta were observed in the mid-aortic arch (0.57 mm/year, CI: 0.38–0.76 mm/year), proximal descending aorta (0.77 mm/year, CI: 0.31–1.22 mm/year), and mid-descending aorta (0.66 mm/year, CI: 0.40–0.91 mm/year) (Fig. 2). The lowest growth rates of the distal aorta were observed at the level of the diaphragmatic aorta (0.28 mm/year, CI: 0.21–0.36 mm/year) and the abdominal aorta (0.46 mm/year, CI: 0.24–0.67 mm/year). As expected, the diameter of the aortic root graft showed little if any growth.
In Marfan patients without aortic root replacement, the highest aortic growth rates were observed for the sinuses of Valsalva (0.24 mm/year, CI: 0.17–0.30 mm/year) and for the sinotubular junction (0.12 mm/year, CI: 0.08–0.15 mm/year). Low growth rates were observed for all levels of the distal aorta.
Comparison of Marfan patients with and without aortic root replacement revealed significantly higher growth rates of aortic diameters at all levels from the proximal aortic arch to the abdominal aorta for Marfan patients with aortic root replacement (all p < 0.001).
At the mid-ascending aorta, no significant difference in growth rates was observed between Marfan patients with (0.08 mm/year, CI: 0.03–0.13 mm/year) and without (0.09 mm/year, CI: 0.05–0.13 mm/year) aortic root replacement (p = 0.735).
Growth rates for the ascending aorta at the levels of the aortic anulus, sinuses of Valsalva, and sinotubular junction were significantly higher in Marfan patients without aortic root surgery when compared to Marfan patients with aortic root surgery, where measurements were made at corresponding levels of the graft.
Linear mixed regression analysis
Multiple linear mixed regression adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and antihypertensive medication—performed for all 11 aortic levels—confirmed that aortic root replacement is an independent predictor for increased aortic growth rates distal to the aortic root graft in Marfan patients (all p < 0.001). The highest growth rate differences between Marfan patients with and without aortic root replacement were observed for the proximal descending aorta two cm distal to the left subclavian artery (0.30 mm/year, CI: 0.24–0.36 mm/year; p < 0.001), the proximal descending aorta at the maximum diameter (0.33 mm/year, CI: 0.27–0.39 mm/year; p < 0.001) and the mid-descending aorta (0.36 mm/year, CI: 0.30–0.41 mm/year; p < 0.001) (Fig. 3, Appendix).
Discussion
Our MRA study reveals that distal thoracic aortic diameters increase at a significantly higher rate in Marfan patients with aortic root replacement when compared to Marfan patients without aortic root replacement.
The differences in aortic growth rates were dependent on the different aortic levels. Growth rates for the ascending aorta at the levels of the aortic anulus, sinuses of Valsalva, and sinotubular junction were significantly higher in Marfan patients without aortic root surgery when compared to Marfan patients with aortic root surgery. This is an expected result since no growth is present along the rigid aortic graft in post-operative Marfan patients. However, continued growth takes place in the native ascending aorta of pre-operative Marfan patients [5, 29, 30].
At the mid-ascending aorta, no significant difference in growth rates was observed between Marfan patients with and without aortic root replacement. This aortic level shows less growth when compared to proximal aortic levels of pre-operative patients. This part of the aorta is therefore not always replaced by the graft, which is fitted individually, explaining the comparable growth rates of pre- and post-operative Marfan patients at this level.
Growth rates of aortic diameters for all levels from the proximal aortic arch to the abdominal aorta were significantly higher for Marfan patients with aortic root replacement when compared to Marfan patients without aortic surgery. There are two possible explanations for this observation.
The first possible explanation may be that the replacement of the aortic root by a rigid graft leads to increased velocities and wall shear stress in the aortic arch and the descending aorta resulting in progressive dilatation. Further studies using modern imaging techniques such as 4D flow MRI are warranted [21, 31]. Comparative analyses of Marfan patients with and without aortic root replacement using 4D flow MRI will allow a comparison of three-dimensional blood flow profiles and quantification of flow velocity, flow eccentricity, and wall shear stress in the distal aorta.
The second possible explanation of the increased growth rate of the distal aorta after aortic root replacement might be the general genetic disposition of the cohort of post-operative Marfan patients, which might be different in the pre-operative cohort. Not all Marfan patients develop aortic root aneurysms or only later in life [32]. Therefore, the pre-operative cohort of Marfan patients in our study is likely to be a mix of patients with low and high growth rates, which is indicated by the relatively high 95% confidence intervals at the level of the sinuses of Valsalva. On the contrary, the post-operative cohort is likely to consist of Marfan patients with high growth rates, which is underlined by the fact that these patients had to undergo preventive surgery on their dilatated aorta.
This notion is supported by the fact that maximal growth rates of the distal aorta (0.77 mm/year, CI: 0.31–1.22 mm/year) in Marfan patients after aortic root surgery were higher than maximal growth rates of the mid-ascending aorta (0.24 mm/year, CI: 0.17–0.30 mm/year) in Marfan patients before aortic root surgery.
The defined high growth rates of the distal aorta using MRA is an important observation with clinical implications. Our results underline the need for careful life-long aortic imaging of Marfan patients after aortic root replacement, as recommended by current guidelines: Marfan patients who have undergone aortic root replacement should undergo annual surveillance by MRI (or CT) to evaluate changes in the distal aorta. If normal in diameter and unchanged after two years, surveillance imaging may be performed every other year [33].
Previous studies have shown that the prolonged survival of Marfan patients after aortic surgery has led to an increase in aortic complications beyond the root [13,14,15]. We therefore recommend non-contrast MRA techniques [23] providing high image quality, precise and reproducible aortic diameter measurements with high diagnostic performance in the detection of relevant aortic pathologies in Marfan patients after aortic root replacement [13,14,15]. CT angiography may be used as an alternative imaging technique when MRA is contraindicated [34].
The major limitation of our study is its retrospective nature precluding to elucidate the exact underlying cause for the increased growth rates of the distal aorta in post-operative Marfan patients. Further prospective and longitudinal follow-up studies using modern MR imaging techniques such as 4D flow MRI are needed to determine the cause of the increased growth rates of the distal aorta in post-operative Marfan patients.
Conclusion
Distal thoracic aortic diameters increase at a significantly higher rate in Marfan patients with aortic root replacement compared to Marfan patients without aortic root replacement. Further studies are warranted to investigate if the increased growth rate of the distal aorta after aortic root replacement is caused by altered hemodynamics due to the rigid aortic root graft or due to the general genetic disposition of post-operative Marfan patients.
Abbreviations
- FBN1:
-
Fibrillin-1
- ICC:
-
Intraclass correlation coefficients
- MRA:
-
Magnetic resonance angiography
References
Judge DP, Dietz HC (2005) Marfan’s syndrome. Lancet 366:1965–1976
von Kodolitsch Y, De Backer J, Schüler H et al (2015) Perspectives on the revised Ghent criteria for the diagnosis of Marfan syndrome. Appl Clin Genet. https://doi.org/10.2147/TACG.S60472:137-119
Lam HV, Groth M, Mir T et al (2021) Impact of chest wall deformity on cardiac function by CMR and feature-tracking strain analysis in paediatric patients with Marfan syndrome. Eur Radiol 31:3973–3982
Sheikhzadeh S, De Backer J, Gorgan NR et al (2014) The main pulmonary artery in adults: a controlled multicenter study with assessment of echocardiographic reference values, and the frequency of dilatation and aneurysm in Marfan syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 9:203
Murdoch JL, Walker BA, Halpern BL, Kuzma JW, McKusick VA (1972) Life expectancy and causes of death in the Marfan syndrome. N Engl J Med 286:804–808
den Hartog AW, Franken R, de Witte P et al (2013) Aortic disease in patients with Marfan syndrome: aortic volume assessment for surveillance. Radiology 269:370–377
Holloway BJ, Rosewarne D, Jones RG (2011) Imaging of thoracic aortic disease. Br J Radiol 84 Spec No 3:S338–354
Jondeau G, Detaint D, Tubach F et al (2012) Aortic event rate in the Marfan population: a cohort study. Circulation 125:226–232
Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C et al (2014) 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 35:2873–2926
Milewicz DM, Dietz HC, Miller DC (2005) Treatment of aortic disease in patients with Marfan syndrome. Circulation 111:e150-157
von Kodolitsch Y, Rybczynski M, Vogler M et al (2016) The role of the multidisciplinary health care team in the management of patients with Marfan syndrome. J Multidiscip Healthc 9:587–614
Kari FA, Russe MF, Peter P et al (2013) Late complications and distal growth rates of Marfan aortas after proximal aortic repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 44:163–171
Mimoun L, Detaint D, Hamroun D et al (2011) Dissection in Marfan syndrome: the importance of the descending aorta. Eur Heart J 32:443–449
Girdauskas E, Kuntze T, Borger MA, Falk V, Mohr FW (2008) Distal aortic reinterventions after root surgery in Marfan patients. Ann Thorac Surg 86:1815–1819
Engelfriet PM, Boersma E, Tijssen JG, Bouma BJ, Mulder BJ (2006) Beyond the root: dilatation of the distal aorta in Marfan’s syndrome. Heart 92:1238–1243
den Hartog AW, Franken R, Zwinderman AH et al (2015) The risk for type B aortic dissection in Marfan syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 65:246–254
Bannas P, Groth M, Rybczynski M et al (2013) Assessment of aortic root dimensions in patients with suspected Marfan syndrome: intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced and non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography with echocardiography. Int J Cardiol 167:190–196
Bannas P, Rybczynski M, Sheikhzadeh S et al (2015) Comparison of cine-MRI and transthoracic echocardiography for the assessment of aortic root diameters in patients with suspected Marfan syndrome. Rofo 187:1022–1028
Veldhoen S, Behzadi C, Derlin T et al (2014) Exact monitoring of aortic diameters in Marfan patients without gadolinium contrast: intraindividual comparison of 2D SSFP imaging with 3D CE-MRA and echocardiography. Eur Radiol 25:872–882
Groner LK, Lau C, Devereux RB, Green DB (2018) Imaging of the postsurgical aorta in Marfan syndrome. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 20:423–425
Weinrich JM, Lenz A, Girdauskas E, Adam G, von Kodolitsch Y, Bannas P (2020) Current and Emerging Imaging Techniques in Patients with Genetic Aortic Syndromes. Rofo 192:50–58
Groth M, Henes FO, Mullerleile K, Bannas P, Adam G, Regier M (2012) Accuracy of thoracic aortic measurements assessed by contrast enhanced and unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 81:762–766
Veldhoen S, Behzadi C, Lenz A et al (2017) Non-contrast MR angiography at 1.5 Tesla for aortic monitoring in Marfan patients after aortic root surgery. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 19:82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0394-y
Avanesov M, Weinrich JM, Sinn M et al (2021) Intraindividual comparison of 1.5 T and 3 T non-contrast MR angiography for monitoring of aortic root diameters in Marfan patients. Int J Cardiol 337:119–126
Mendoza DD, Kochar M, Devereux RB et al (2011) Impact of image analysis methodology on diagnostic and surgical classification of patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms. Ann Thorac Surg 92:904–912
Weinrich JM, Avanesov M, Lenz A et al (2020) Reliability of non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography-derived aortic diameters in Marfan patients: comparison of inner vs. outer vessel wall measurements. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 36:1533–1542
Bannas P, Finck-Wedel AK, Buhk JH et al (2011) Comparison of whole body MR angiography at 1.5 and 3 Tesla in patients with hereditary hyperlipidemia. Acta Radiol 52:547–553
Soon PS, Lynch W, Schwartz P (2004) Breast cancer presenting initially with urinary incontinence: a case of bladder metastasis from breast cancer. Breast 13:69–71
Roman MJ, Rosen SE, Kramer-Fox R, Devereux RB (1993) Prognostic significance of the pattern of aortic root dilation in the Marfan syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 22:1470–1476
Groenink M, Lohuis TA, Tijssen JG et al (1999) Survival and complication free survival in Marfan’s syndrome: implications of current guidelines. Heart 82:499–504
Lenz A, Petersen J, Riedel C et al (2020) 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance for monitoring of aortic valve repair in bicuspid aortic valve disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 22:29
Weinrich JM, Lenz A, Schon G et al (2022) Magnetic resonance angiography derived predictors of progressive dilatation and surgery of the aortic root in Marfan syndrome. PLoS One 17:e0262826
Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black Iii J et al (2022) 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: a Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 80:e223–e393
Westerland O, Frigiola A, Robert L et al (2015) Vascular manifestations of syndromic aortopathies: role of current and emerging imaging techniques. Clin Radiol 70:1344–1354
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Guarantor
The scientific guarantor of this publication is A. Lenz.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare relationships with the following companies:
B. Schoennagel: Co-founder and stakeholder of north medical GmbH.
The remaining authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and biometry
One of the authors, G. Schoen, is an expert in Medical Biometry and has significant statistical expertise.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained for the routine clinical MR examination from every patient but was not required for this observational study because of the retrospective analysis of anonymized patient data.
Ethical approval
Institutional Review Board approval was not required because of the retrospective analysis of anonymized patient data.
Study subjects or cohorts overlap
No study subjects or cohorts have been previously reported.
Methodology
• retrospective
• observational
• performed at one institution
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lenz, A., Warncke, M., Wright, F. et al. Longitudinal follow-up by MR angiography reveals progressive dilatation of the distal aorta after aortic root replacement in Marfan syndrome. Eur Radiol 33, 6984–6992 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09684-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09684-z