To evaluate the performance of single-echo Dixon water-fat imaging and computed tomography (CT)–like imaging based on a single ultrashort echo time (sUTE) MR sequence for imaging of vertebral fractures as well as degenerative bone changes of the spine in comparison to conventional CT and MR sequences.
Thirty patients with suspected acute vertebral fractures were examined using a 3-T MRI, including an sUTE sequence as well as short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) and T1-weighted sequences. During postprocessing, water-fat separation was performed by solving the smoothness-constrained inverse water-fat problem based on a single-complex UTE image. By removing the unwanted low-frequency phase terms, additional MR-based susceptibility-weighted-like (SW-like) images with CT-like contrast were created. Two radiologists evaluated semi-quantitative and quantitative features of fractures and degenerative changes independently and separately on CT and MR images.
In total, all 58 fractures were accurately detected of whom 24 were correctly classified as acute fractures with an edema detected on the water-fat-separated UTE images, using STIR and T1w sequences as standard of reference. For the morphological assessment of fractures and degenerative changes, the overall agreement between SW-like images and CT was substantial to excellent (e.g., Genant: κ 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.54–1.00); AO/Magerl: κ 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.43–1.00)). Overall inter-reader agreement for water-fat-separated UTE images and SW-like images was substantial to almost perfect.
Detection and assessment of vertebral fractures and degenerative bone changes of the spine were feasible and accurate using water-fat-separated images as well as SW-like images, both derived from the same sUTE-Dixon sequence.
• The detection of acute vertebral fractures was feasible using water-fat-separated images and CT-like images reconstructed from one sUTE sequence.
• Assessment of the vertebral fractures using SW-like images with CT-like contrast was found to be comparable to conventional CT.
• sUTE imaging of the spine can help reduce examination times and radiation exposure.
Spine pathologies and degenerative changes are associated with back pain and disability and are among the greatest risk factors for morbidity and mortality worldwide [1, 2]. For adequate treatment, an accurate morphological assessment is needed to evaluate the stability of the fractured vertebral segments and the surrounding soft tissue as well as the fracture age. In clinical routine, CT provides accurate information on the osseous structures, but lacks accuracy regarding the evaluation of the bone marrow and soft tissue components. Therefore, additional MR imaging is often performed [3,4,5], yet, combined imaging with CT and MRI is associated with overall increased costs and duration of the diagnostic evaluation . Furthermore, CT causes additional radiation exposure to the patient. Acquisition of all diagnostic information on osseous pathologies as well as soft tissue with one examination would therefore be highly beneficial for the patient. Several approaches using high-resolution MR sequences with bone-specific sequences have been previously suggested for imaging of osseous structures: CT-like images, derived from a 3D T1 spoiled gradient-echo sequence (GRE) and derived from UTE images, previously showed high agreement and comparable results to CT when assessing vertebral fractures and degenerative changes of the spine . Furthermore, 3D UTE and zero echo time (ZTE) imaging were used to assess cortical and trabecular bone  and previously susceptibility-weighted MRI also showed to be reliable and accurate regarding the evaluation of vertebral fractures . Most recently, different promising deep learning–based approaches were proposed, including the creation of “synthetic” or “pseudo” CTs from MRI using convolutional neuronal networks (CNN) or generative adversarial networks (GAN) [10, 11].
For the assessment of the fracture age, STIR- and T1-weighted sequences are usually acquired to identify edema-equivalent bone marrow changes, which are considered to be highly specific for bone marrow edema after an acute trauma [12, 13]. Recent studies also suggested the use of a T2-weighted Dixon sequence for the detection of occult fractures and the differentiation of malignant versus benign vertebral fractures in order to shorten the examination duration [14, 15]. Nevertheless, accurate examination of the spine with regular morphological sequences or with a combination of the sequences mentioned previously would take at least 10 to 15 min and require several MR sequences. More recent approaches described methods of fat and water separation or fat suppression for UTE images, which are able to assess the signal of tissues with short T2* relaxation times [16,17,18]. However, at least two echoes need to be acquired to suppress fat in the UTE image, which can prolong the scan time. Similarly, to separate water and fat, conventional Dixon imaging was combined with UTE imaging . However, several echoes need to be acquired and UTE-Dixon has its limitations since it does not take the short T2* decay of water signal into account . Single-echo Dixon (sTE-Dixon) methods have been used to reduce scan time, yet an additional reference scan is needed to remove the unwanted phase terms [16, 20, 21]. Recently a new method was proposed by using ultrashort echo time cones double echo steady state (UTE-Cones-DESS) imaging which showed high morphological contrast for tissue with short T2, again requiring the acquisition of two complex signals to solve the background phase terms in postprocessing which prolonged the scan time .
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of a newly developed method  that simultaneously performs single-TE Dixon and SW-like imaging with CT-like contrast based on a single-echo UTE spoiled gradient echo acquisition for the evaluation of acute vertebral fractures and degenerative changes of the spine.
Materials and methods
The study was approved by our institutional review board (Ethics Commission of the Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich, Germany; Ethics proposal number 537/20 S-KH). Informed consent was obtained from all study participants prior to inclusion. Participants which were admitted to the emergency unit were recruited from November 2018 until September 2019. In total, 30 patients (65.3 ± 17.5 years, 19 women) with suspected acute thoracolumbar vertebral fracture were included into the study. All patients received a CT scan of the spine as part of the routine clinical diagnostic work flow and received a MRI within 3 days.
Each patient received a CT scan of the thoracolumbar spine using either a Philips IQon Spectral CT scanner or a Siemens Somatom Definition AS+ scanner. Clinical scan parameters were set according to the clinical routine: collimation, 0.6 mm; pixel spacing, 0.4/0.3 mm; pitch factor, 0.8/0.9; tube voltage (peak), 120 kV; and modulated tube current, 102–132 mA. Images were acquired in axial orientation and reformatted in sagittal and coronal orientation using a bone-specific convolution kernel (170H/YB, 3-mm slices).
For MR imaging, a standard spine protocol was used including a sagittal T1-weighted sequence with turbo spin echo (T1w TSE) and a sagittal STIR sequence. To measure the signal of tissues with short T2* values, a 3D UTE stack-of-stars sequence was employed [23, 24] with a non-selective rectangular RF pulse. The RF excitation was followed by a variable-duration slice encoding gradient. The following scan parameters were used: echo time 0.14 ms, repetition time 6.3 ms, flip angle 5°, field of view (FOV) 250 × 250 × 279 mm3, voxel size (acquired) 0.45 × 0.45 × 3 mm3, voxel size (reconstructed) 0.28 × 0.28 × 0.75 mm3 and acquisition time 6.3 ± 0.23 min, ramp length 0.08 ms, max. gradient strength 15.04 mT/m, sampling dwell time 3.12 μs with 568 samples, acquisition window 1.77 ms, 945 number of spokes, with radial percentage of 85%, partial Fourier with a factor of 0.6 in slice direction. Image reconstruction was performed offline and gradient imperfections were corrected by means of a gradient impulse response function . During the reconstruction, the images were Fourier interpolated from the acquired resolution to the reconstruction resolution. All participants were examined using a 3-Tesla MR scanner (Ingenia; Philips Healthcare) with dedicated 16-channel anterior and posterior body coils (dStream Torso coil, Philips Healthcare).
For postprocessing of the single-echo UTE images, sUTE-Dixon water-fat separation was performed. The algorithm solves the water and fat inverse problem while simultaneously removing unwanted phase terms in the UTE phase. The unwanted phase terms were mainly composed of phase due to B0 inhomogeneities, eddy currents, signal delays in the receiver chains, and the B1 transmit/receive phase. Due to the smoothly and slowly varying nature of these unwanted phase terms, an iterative and smoothness constrained approach was used as done previously . The newly developed algorithm solves the smoothness-constrained non-linear inverse water-fat problem while at the same time removing the unwanted low-frequency phase terms. All sUTE-Dixon processing computations were performed offline in Python on the graphics card of a workstation with GPU 24GiB RAM, 24-core CPU (Intel Xeon Gold), and 768 GB memory. In average, the water-fat separation of a full UTE spine data set took 160 s .
SW-like images were created by using the corrected UTE phase from the sUTE-Dixon processing. Based on the corrected UTE phase, phase masks were generated and scaled between 0 and 1 to increase bone contrast. The phase masks were then n = 1–5 times multiplied with the magnitude of the original UTE image to achieve an improved contrast S′n. In order to achieve a CT-like contrast with high “bone-like” signal, the SW-like images were inverted.
CT and MR images were read by two radiologists (M.R., board-certified radiologist with over 7 years of experience, and Y.L. with 4 years of experience in musculoskeletal radiology). The images were read individually and independently in a random order and blinded to clinical information and any other imaging data. The different MR sequences and CT images were read with at least 8 weeks in between readings, respectively. For intra-reader reproducibility, 10 patients were assessed once again after 8 weeks by both radiologists. Image analyses were performed on a PACS work station certified for clinical use (IDS7 21.2, Sectra).
The images were assessed for the presence and exact location of vertebral fractures. For the evaluation of the fracture age, STIR and water-separated sUTE images were analyzed for the presence of edema-like bone marrow signal. T1-weighted images and fat-separated sUTE images were evaluated for a corresponding signal drop. Additionally, UTE-based SW-like images and CT were assessed for the visibility of fracture lines and contrast of the vertebrae using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = poor, 2 = below average, 3 = fair, 4 = good, 5 = excellent). Morphological features of the spine were analyzed and graded according to previously described clinical scores . Fractures were classified according to AO/Magerl [25, 26], and the differentiation of acute and chronic vertebral fractures was performed as previously defined . The height of the anterior and posterior vertebral body in the mid-sagittal plane was measured and the height loss was classified according to Genant et al . Degenerative changes were evaluated in two adjacent non-fractured vertebrae, including the intervertebral disc height , presences of Schmorl’s nodes, anteroposterior (AP) diameter of intervertebral foramina , and spondylolisthesis. Furthermore, the sclerosis-like bone signal adjacent to one or both vertebral endplates, osteophyte formation , and facet joint degeneration  were assessed. Overall diagnostic image quality was graded using a 5-point Likert scale.
The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 27.0 (IBM Corp.). All statistical tests were performed two-sided and a level of significance (α) of 0.05 was used. Agreement of ordinal scaled parameters was assessed using weighted Cohen’s κ . The agreement of numerical data was evaluated with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). The inter- and intra-observer reliabilities were also calculated using Cohen’s kappa und ICC, respectively . Descriptive statistics were performed using paired t-tests (for numeric variables) and McNemar’s tests (for binary categorical variables).
Fracture characteristics and image quality
The overall mean image quality for both readers measured with a 5-point Likert scale was 4.1 ± 0.81 for the water-separated sUTE images and 4.3 ± 0.63 for the fat-separated sUTE images. Overall image quality of the SW-like images was rated good (mean 4.38 ± 0.70), with a slight difference depending on the phase masks applied (range 4.10–4.58, n = 1–5; Table 3).
Overall, 58 fractures were detected using CT as standard of reference. The most affected vertebra was L5 with 22 % of the fractures. Twenty-four out of 58 fractures were classified as acute fractures due to an edema-like signal identified in the morphological MR images. The majority (83%) of the fractures were classified as AO3.
Diagnostic agreement of STIR and T1-weighted images and water-/fat-separated sUTE images
Edema-like signal was detected in all 24 acute fractures by both readers using the water-separated sUTE images (readers 1 and 2: κ 1.00 (95% confidence interval 1.00–1.00)) (Figs. 1 and 3), using the morphological sequences as standard of reference. A corresponding signal drop was identified on the fat-separated images. Of the 34 non-acute vertebral fractures, two fractures were falsely classified as acute fractures due to hyperintense signal adjacent to the fracture in the water-separated sUTE images. The overall agreement for fracture classification was substantial to almost perfect (AO Magerl, κ 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.36–1.00); Genant classification, κ 0.89 (95% confidence interval 0.48–1.00)). The overall agreement regarding the evaluation of the fracture age was excellent, κ 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.33–1.00), and for degenerative changes substantial to almost perfect, κ 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.15–1.00, Table 1) (Figs. 2 and 3).
Diagnostic agreement of CT and SW-like images
All vertebral fractures were accurately detected using SW-like images with CT-like contrast by both readers (N = 58, κ 1.00 (95% CI 1.00–1.00) for both readers, Figs. 2 and 4) (Table 2). The mean image quality of the CT-like images increased with the number of phase masks that were applied, with the mean image quality ranging from 4.11 to 4.41 for reader 1 and from 4.46 to 4.58 for reader 2 (Table 3). Similarly, the contrast of the vertebrae to the surrounding soft tissue which increased with the number of phase masks applied ranging from 3.76 to 4.42 for reader 1 and from 3.77 to 4.77 for reader 2. A slight decrease was seen in the visibility of the fracture morphology in reader 1 (range from 2.53 to 2.20 for reader 1 and from 2.54 to 3.54 for reader 2).
AO classification of the fractures was graded identical for SW-like images with 5 phase masks applied by both readers compared to CT (readers 1 and 2: κ 1.00 (95% confidence interval 1.00–1.00, Table 2)). For quantitative parameters describing degenerative changes, the agreement was excellent, ranging between ICC 0.69 (95% CI 0.31–0.89, reader 1) for anterior disc height and 0.95 (95% CI 0.88–0.98, reader 2) for neuroforaminal diameter. The agreement for ordinal-scale parameters ranged from substantial (sclerosis; κ 0.75 (95% CI 0.27–1.00, reader 2)) to almost perfect (facet joint degeneration; κ 0.94 (95% CI 0.80–1.00, reader 1)).
Inter-reader agreement for water- and fat-separated sUTE images and SW-like images
Inter-reader agreement for water- and fat-separated sUTE images was excellent ranging from κ 0.62 (95% CI 0.35–0.84) for the contrast of the vertebrae to perfect (κ 1.00 (95% confidence interval 1.00–1.00)) for classification of the fracture age and edema-like signal detection (Table 4). The inter-reader agreement for the SW-like images ranged from κ 0.82 (95% CI 0.59–1.00) for the fracture age to κ 1.00 (95% CI 1.00–1.00) for the fracture classification (AO/Genant) and detection of osteophytes (Table 4).
Intra-reader agreement for water- and fat-separated sUTE images and SW-like images
For intra-reader reliability, both readers assessed the images of 10 patients after at least 8 weeks separately, independently and blinded to all clinical information. The intra-reader agreement was overall substantial to almost perfect (range κ 0.71 to 1.00) for both readers (Table 5). All acute fractures were once more accurately identified on the water-separated UTE images (N = 24, κ 1.00 (95% CI 1.00–1.00) for both readers).
In this study, we showed that water- and fat-separated Dixon imaging as well as SW-like imaging with CT-like contrast is feasible using only one single UTE scan of the spine. Detection and assessment of an edema-like signal in acute vertebral fractures was feasible and accurate using water-separated sUTE images compared to standard morphological MR sequences. A substantial to almost perfect agreement was found for the assessment of degenerative bone changes using fat- and water-separated images compared to standard MR sequences. The SW-like images with CT-like contrast, which were reconstructed from the same sUTE, showed an excellent agreement for the morphological assessment and accuracy in the detection of vertebral fractures and degenerative changes compared to conventional CT.
In clinical routine, patients usually receive a conventional CT and an additional MRI with multiple sequences to assess the fracture age and degenerative changes of the spine. Acquiring all diagnostic information for the assessment of vertebral fractures in one examination/sequence may therefore reduce the overall examination duration and costs as well as reduce the radiation exposure of the patient caused by the CT scan. Additionally, acquisition time was about 6.3 ± 0.23 min for the presented sequence, which is overall significantly shorter compared to the combined examination duration of CT and MRI with multiple sequences. An overall shorter examination duration may be beneficial for patients that experience severe pain, which may be the case in patients with vertebral fractures, or suffer from claustrophobia. Therefore, single UTE reconstructed water- and fat-separated images and SW-like images may be a useful alternative to the standard MRI and CT when assessing vertebral fractures or degenerative changes of the spine.
To our knowledge, this is the first study using a single TE UTE scan of the spine for the reconstruction of water- and fat-separated images and simultaneously acquired SW-like images with CT-like contrast in a clinical study cohort, by solving the smoothness-constrained non-linear inverse water-fat problem while at the same time removing the unwanted low-frequency phase terms. In a recent study, single-echo Dixon processing in UTE DESS imaging was used for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and was able to show a high contrast for tissue with short T2 and sufficient fat saturation . In contrast to our study, two complex signals were used to directly solve for background contributions. The approach presented in this study used an iterative non-linear optimization approach to remove the unwanted low-frequency phase terms based on a single complex signal.
Furthermore, in our study, data postprocessing of the sUTE images was fully automatic by removing the unwanted low-frequency phase terms, using an iterative non-linear optimization approach which is an advantage compared to filtering methods. The processing was performed offline, however could potentially be performed on the scanner, since no manual fine-tuning is needed.
Dixon imaging has also been used as an alternative to standard MR for the differentiation of malignant and benign vertebral fractures , but the proposed six-echo Dixon method mainly assesses the fat fraction and has its limitation with regard to the differentiation of acute and old vertebral fractures. Another advantage of the methodology proposed in this study is the simultaneous acquisition of SW-like images with CT-like contrast. SW-like images showed a substantial to almost perfect agreement for the classification and detection of vertebral fractures compared to conventional CT. Distance measurements as well as the evaluation of sclerosis were excellent and comparable to CT. A previous study demonstrated the possibility to detect vertebral fractures on susceptibility-weighted MRI . Although the acquired slice thickness was comparable to our study, the previous study was performed using a 1.5-T MR scanner, which consequently reduces the image quality and might reduce the diagnostic information.
For MR imaging of osseous parts of the spine, the use of a T1 GRE sequence was recently suggested, which was able to show a performance similar to the performance of a CT  and therefore showed accurate results for the detection of vertebral fractures.
Yet, compared to UTE imaging, ligaments, calcifications, and other tissues with short T2 appear brighter on the intensity inverted T1 GRE images which could make the identification and differentiation of certain pathologies more challenging, e.g., in cases presenting with ankylosing spondylitis. The current gold standard for the diagnosis of spine fractures and degenerative changes usually includes several morphologic MR sequences (e.g., STIR and T1-weighted sequences) as well as in most cases a CT for the evaluation of the fracture itself. Using the proposed image reconstructions of the UTE sequence, both SW-like images with CT-like contrast and water-fat-separated images can be reconstructed from one single UTE sequence, which consequently may save scan time, since in theory no additional sequences or examinations would be needed. The reconstructions are performed on a separate server.
There are some limitations to this study. Although the radial acquisition of the images made the scan less motion sensitive, the acquisition time of approximately 6.3 min itself creates a certain susceptibility to motion artifacts. Furthermore, the UTE was susceptible to slight fat blurring due to the radial k-space trajectory which depends on the readout bandwidth and the in-plane resolution of the scan protocol. In some cases, a slight hyperintense signal was seen in the water-separated sUTE images adjacent to the fractures which was presumably caused by the vertebral venous plexus and was misinterpreted in two cases as an acute fracture. The signal of the presumed vertebral venous plexus usually appeared to be weak hyperintense with a lower signal than the signal of an acute bone marrow edema caused by a fracture. Yet, when assessed simultaneously with the SW-like images, the vertebral venous plexus can be differentiated in the vast majority of the cases from an acute fracture due to the weaker signal hyperintensity compared to edema and the missing fracture morphology. This needs to be taken into consideration when interpreting the images and for fracture assessment the fat- and water-separated images as well as SW-like images should be evaluated simultaneously to avoid false-positive results.
Another limitation was the use of phase information in the weighting of the SWI magnitude, which causes not only the osseous structures to be weighted but also parts with high fat content. Therefore, SW-like images comprised both susceptibility and chemical shift effects. In this study, an increased contrast of the vertebrae to the surrounding soft tissue was seen with increasing phase masks applied. Inversely a slight but non-significant decrease in the visibility of the thin cortical layer and fracture lines was detected most likely due to the increasing chemical shift effects. This needs to be considered when evaluating the SW-like images. Effects on the contrast of trabecular bone were not assessed as the primary focus was on the fracture detection and differentiation. Patients with metallic implants were not included in the study due to artifacts in 3-T scanners. Nevertheless, due to the half-radial readout of UTE sequences, UTE imaging is known to be less affected by artifacts due to implants and strong B0 inhomogeneities when compared to Cartesian or radial imaging. The use of artifact reduced UTE sequences on 3-T and 1.5-T MR systems needs to be assessed in the future.
In summary, detection and age assessment of vertebral fractures as well as the morphological assessment of fractures and degenerative bone changes of the spine were feasible and accurate using water-fat-separated images as well as SW-like images with CT-like contrast, both derived from the sUTE-Dixon technique. This was possible by developing a new methodology which solved the smoothness-constrained non-linear inverse water-fat problem while at the same time removing the unwanted low-frequency phase terms. Simultaneously extracting water-fat images and CT-like images from one single MR sequence could be highly useful for clinical examinations due to a reduction of overall examination times and radiation exposure.
Dual echo steady state
Field of view
Magnetic resonance imaging
Short-tau inversion recovery sequence
Single ultrashort echo time sequence
- T1w GRE:
T1-weighted gradient-echo sequence
Zero echo time
O'Neill TW et al (2004) Back pain, disability, and radiographic vertebral fracture in European women: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int 15(9):760–765
Nevitt MC et al (1998) The association of radiographically detected vertebral fractures with back pain and function: a prospective study. Ann Intern Med 128(10):793–800
Ettinger B et al (1992) Contribution of vertebral deformities to chronic back pain and disability. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 7(4):449–456
Mandalia V, Henson JH (2008) Traumatic bone bruising--a review article. Eur J Radiol 67(1):54–61
Piazzolla A et al (2015) Vertebral bone marrow edema (VBME) in conservatively treated acute vertebral compression fractures (VCFs): evolution and clinical correlations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40(14):E842–E848
Sistrom CL, McKay NL (2005) Costs, charges, and revenues for hospital diagnostic imaging procedures: differences by modality and hospital characteristics. J Am Coll Radiol 2(6):511–519
Schwaiger BJ et al (2021) CT-like images based on T1 spoiled gradient-echo and ultra-short echo time MRI sequences for the assessment of vertebral fractures and degenerative bone changes of the spine. Eur Radiol 31(7):4680–4689
Lu X et al (2019) Three-dimensional ultrashort echo time imaging with tricomponent analysis for human cortical bone. Magn Reson Med 82(1):348–355
Boker SM et al (2018) Evaluation of vertebral body fractures using susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 28(5):2228–2235
Morbee L et al (2021) MRI-based synthetic CT of the lumbar spine: geometric measurements for surgery planning in comparison with CT. Eur J Radiol 144:109999
Boulanger M et al (2021) Deep learning methods to generate synthetic CT from MRI in radiotherapy: a literature review. Phys Med 89:265–281
Qaiyum M et al (2001) MRI detection of unsuspected vertebral injury in acute spinal trauma: incidence and significance. Skeletal Radiol 30(6):299–304
Schwaiger BJ et al (2018) Three-material decomposition with dual-layer spectral CT compared to MRI for the detection of bone marrow edema in patients with acute vertebral fractures. Skeletal Radiol 47(11):1533–1540
Heynen B et al (2019) MRI detection of radiographically occult fractures of the hip and pelvis in the elderly: comparison of T2-weighted Dixon sequence with T1-weighted and STIR sequences. Diagn Interv Imaging 100(3):169–175
Kim DH et al (2017) Differentiation of acute osteoporotic and malignant vertebral fractures by quantification of fat fraction with a Dixon MRI sequence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 209(6):1331–1339
Jang H et al (2019) Fat suppression for ultrashort echo time imaging using a single-point Dixon method. NMR Biomed 32(5):e4069–e4069
Jang H et al (2021) Ultrashort echo time Cones double echo steady state (UTE-Cones-DESS) for rapid morphological imaging of short T2 tissues. Magn Reson Med 86(2):881–892
Su KH et al (2015) Generation of brain pseudo-CTs using an undersampled, single-acquisition UTE-mDixon pulse sequence and unsupervised clustering. Med Phys 42(8):4974–4986
Su KH et al (2019) UTE-mDixon-based thorax synthetic CT generation. Med Phys 46(8):3520–3531
Ma J (2008) A single-point Dixon technique for fat-suppressed fast 3D gradient-echo imaging with a flexible echo time. J Magn Reson Imaging 27(4):881–890
Yu H et al (2006) Single acquisition water-fat separation: feasibility study for dynamic imaging. Magn Reson Med 55(2):413–422
Kronthaler S et al (2021) Assessment of vertebral fractures and edema of the thoracolumbar spine based on water-fat and susceptibility-weighted images derived from a single ultra-short echo time scan. Magn Reson Med 87(4):1771–1783
Kronthaler S et al (2021) Trajectory correction based on the gradient impulse response function improves high-resolution UTE imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Magn Reson Med 85(4):2001–2015
Qian Y, Boada FE (2008) Acquisition-weighted stack of spirals for fast high-resolution three-dimensional ultra-short echo time MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 60(1):135–145
Magerl F et al (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3(4):184–201
Vaccaro AR et al (2013) AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: fracture description, neurological status, and key modifiers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(23):2028–2037
Hedderich DM et al (2019) Differentiation of acute/subacute versus old vertebral fractures in multislice detector computed tomography: is magnetic resonance imaging always needed? World Neurosurg 122:e676–e683
Genant HK et al (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8(9):1137–1148
Frobin W et al (2001) Height of lumbar discs measured from radiographs compared with degeneration and height classified from MR images. Eur Radiol 11(2):263–269
Mamisch N et al (2012) Radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of spinal stenosis: results of a Delphi survey. Radiology 264(1):174–179
Wilke HJ et al (2006) Validity and interobserver agreement of a new radiographic grading system for intervertebral disc degeneration: part I. Lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 15(6):720–730
Weishaupt D et al (1999) MR imaging and CT in osteoarthritis of the lumbar facet joints. Skeletal Radiol 28(4):215–219
Cohen J (1968) Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 70(4):213–220
Fleiss JL, Cohen J (1973) The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Meas 33(3):613–619
We would like to thank the staff of the Department of Radiology of the University hospital Rechts der Isar, for their invaluable assistance with patient selection and technical support.
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Georg C. Feuerriegel, MD.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Statistics and biometry
No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.
Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Feuerriegel, G.C., Kronthaler, S., Boehm, C. et al. Diagnostic value of water-fat-separated images and CT-like susceptibility-weighted images extracted from a single ultrashort echo time sequence for the evaluation of vertebral fractures and degenerative changes of the spine. Eur Radiol 33, 1445–1455 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09061-2