Abstract
Objectives
To investigate the optimal timing for post-chemoradiotherapy (CRT) reference magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in head and neck cancer, so as to demonstrate a maximal treatment response. To assess whether this differs in human papillomavirus–related oropharyngeal cancer (HPV-OPC) and whether the MRI timing impacts on the ability to predict treatment success.
Methods
Following ethical approval and informed consent, 45 patients (40 male, mean age 59.7 ± 7.9 years, 33 HPV-OPC) with stage 3 and 4 HNSCC underwent pre-treatment, 6- and 12-week post-CRT MRIs in this prospective cohort study. Primary tumour (n = 39) size, T2w morphology and diffusion weight imaging (DWI) scores, together with nodal (n = 42) size and necrotic/cystic change, were recorded. Interval imaging changes were analysed for all patients and according to HPV-OPC status. MRI descriptors and their interval changes were also compared with 2-year progression-free survival (PFS).
Results
All MRI descriptors significantly changed between pre-treatment and 6-week post-treatment MRI studies (p < .001). Primary tumour and nodal volume decreased between 6- and 12-week studies; however, interval changes in linear dimensions were only evident for HPV-OPC lymph nodes. Nodal necrosis scores also evolved after 6 weeks but other descriptors were stable. The 6-week nodal necrosis score and the 6- and 12-week nodal volume were predictive of 2-year PFS.
Conclusion
Apart from HPV-OPC patients with nodal disease, the 6-week post-CRT MRI demonstrates maximal reduction in the linear dimensions of head and neck cancer; however, a later reference study should be considered if volumetric analysis is applied.
Key Points
• This study provides guidance on when early post-treatment imaging should be performed in head and neck cancer following chemoradiotherapy, in order to aid subsequent detection of recurrent tumour.
• Lymph nodes in HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer patients clearly reduced in size from 6 to 12 weeks post-treatment. However, other lymph node disease and all primary tumours showed only a minor reduction in size beyond 6 weeks, and this required a detailed volumetric analysis for demonstration.
• Timing of the reference MRI following chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer depends on whether the patient has HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer and whether there is nodal disease. MRI as early as 6 weeks post-treatment may be performed unless volumetric analysis is routinely performed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the principal treatment option for stage 3 and 4 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Despite curative intent, post-treatment loco-regional failure has been shown to occur in more than 25% of such patients [1, 2]. Recurrent disease may be managed with salvage surgery; however, this is ideally performed at an early stage before the onset of fibrosis and before it becomes irresectable.
The detection of residual or recurrent HNSCC by clinical examination maybe challenging due to post-treatment changes, whilst biopsies may be unreliable and add to morbidity [3,4,5,6]. 18F-Fluorodeoxygluocose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) [7], quantitative diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI [8,9,10,11,12] and qualitative MRI descriptors have all been used to aid tumour detection in the post-treatment setting. MRI descriptors such as T2w and DWI signal, morphology and dimensions have been demonstrated to contribute to both the early post-treatment and later symptomatic assessment of recurrent disease [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23].
MRI may be used as reference imaging to help evaluate for future recurrence, whilst it can also provide important predictive information regarding the eventual treatment outcome at primary and nodal sites [16,17,18,19,20]. There is currently no data available on the evolution of the MRI findings or the optimal timing of MRI in the early post-treatment period. It would be useful to ascertain the earliest point at which the successfully treated tumour demonstrates the greatest response on imaging. This would allow for earlier post-treatment reference imaging and potentially earlier detection of recurrent tumour during imaging surveillance. In addition, the impact of human papillomavirus oropharyngeal cancer (HPV-OPC) status on the timing of post-treatment change should be explored since it is a potential confounding factor, with its differing morphological features and improved clinical outcomes [24, 25].
It was hypothesised that a 6-week post-CRT MRI in stage 3 and 4 HNSCC patients would be an appropriate reference MRI, since the maximal post-treatment response and prognostic imaging indicators will be observed. Thus, our primary objective was to determine whether there was an evolution in specific dimensions, morphology and signal of the primary tumour and largest lymph node between 6- and 12-week post-CRT MRI studies, and whether this was influenced by the HPV-OPC status. Secondary objectives were to investigate whether MRI features or their interval changes at these post-treatment time points were predictive of 2-year progression-free survival (PFS).
Methods
Participants
Participants were recruited for a prospective single-centre cohort observational study (http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN58327080) following Research Ethics Committee approval (REC reference 13/LO/1876) and informed consent.
Patients were eligible for the study if there was histologically confirmed stage 3 or 4 primary HNSCC without distant metastatic disease and a 1-cm2 area of measurable primary tumour and/or nodal tumour on the basis of standard clinico-radiological staging, and curative primary (chemo)radiotherapy was planned. Exclusion criteria were prior chemoradiotherapy, an ECOG performance status > 2, known allergy to gadolinium-based contrast medium or eGFR < 30 mL/min.
HPV status
Biopsies were obtained from the primary or nodal site. HPV status was analysed for all oropharyngeal cancers and some other cancer sites. HPV testing comprised p16 using an immune-stain or for high-risk HPV DNA using in situ hybridisation.
Treatment
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was delivered as per the standard of care which was 70 Gy in 35 fractions, 2 Gy per fraction delivered once daily, 5 days a week. Concomitant intravenous cisplatin at a dose of 35 mg/m2 every 7 days, starting on day 1 of radiotherapy, was used for all patients with adequate GFR and no other contraindications, with carboplatin being used if measured GFR < 50 or patient had a history of hearing impairment.
Imaging
Patients underwent MRI pre-treatment and at 6 and 12 weeks after the completion of CRT. MRI was performed with a 1.5-T system (Magnetom Aera, Siemen Healthcare GmbH) using a surface phased array neck coil. The MRI protocol and sequence parameters are listed in Table 1.
Image analysis
The location of any measurable tumour (> 1 cm2) and largest measurable lymph node (> 1 cm2) was recorded at the time of entry into the study by a radiologist (24 years of experience). Two readers (4 and 5 years of experience) independently assessed the measurable pre-treatment followed by the 6- and 12-week post-treatment MRIs. Five test cases were evaluated prior to the study group to attain consistency on the scoring system. The observers were blinded to clinical information.
The post-gadolinium fat-saturated T1 axial sequence was primarily used for the delineation of primary tumour and the largest lymph node, but with access to the other sequences. Areas of peri-tumoural inflammation characterised by high T2w signal, free diffusion and avid gadolinium enhancement were not included. Standardised window widths were applied.
The primary tumour long axial dimension and volume were measured (Fig. 1). The primary tumour T2w morphological score was adapted from a previously described scale [16]: 0, no visible mass lesion; 1, uniformly low T2w signal lesion with flat, retracted margins; 2, mass with characteristics not defined by grade 1 or 3; 3, intermediate T2w signal mass ≥ 10 mm with expansile margins (Figs. 2 and 3). The primary tumour maximal DWI signal (b = 800) was categorised as follows: 0, no visible mass on DWI; 1, hypointense to cord; 2, isointense to cord; 3, moderately hyperintense to cord; and 4, significantly hyperintense to cord (Figs. 1, 2 and 3).
The largest measurable lymph node short- and long-axis dimensions and volume were measured (Fig. 1). The largest lymph node was also assessed for the presence of central areas of non-enhancement on the post-gadolinium fat-saturated T1 axial sequence consistent with cystic/necrotic features. This was scored as 0, no necrosis; 1, < 50% necrosis/cystic change and 2, > 50% necrosis/cystic change.
If the observers’ measurements or scores differed, then consensus was achieved with input from a third radiologist (24 years’ experience). The third radiologist also measured the volume (including solid enhancing and necrotic components) of the primary tumour and the largest lymph node on the pre-treatment and 6- and 12-week post-treatment MRI studies. This was evaluated with a summation of areas technique.
Clinical follow-up
Clinical assessment was performed at 1 year and 2 years following completion of chemoradiotherapy. The outcome of a 12-week 18F-FDG PET/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) study was initially used to guide management as was the standard of care. Recurrent loco-regional and systemic disease was determined by cytological or histological confirmation or by serial progression on imaging follow-up. Two-year PFS was recorded according to whether there was any sign of cancer by 2 years following completion of CRT.
Statistical analysis
Inter-observer agreement was calculated with interclass correlation (ICC) for primary tumour and nodal linear dimensions and Cohen’s kappa for categorical scores.
Consensus score values and the mean of the two recorded tumour linear dimension measures were used for further analysis.
Changes in the primary tumour and nodal MRI features between pre-treatment to 6 weeks post-treatment, and 6 to 12 weeks post-treatment MRI studies were analysed. These comparisons were performed for all cases and then separately for both HPV-OPC and other HNSCC.
The primary tumour and nodal MRI features at 6 and 12 weeks, as well as the changes between pre-treatment to 6 weeks and pre-treatment to 12 weeks, were compared with 2-year PFS.
Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel. All tests were two tailed and a p value of < 0.05 was considered significant for the comparison of interval changes between primary tumour and nodal MRI features and for the comparison of MRI features and their interval changes with 2-year outcomes.
For continuous data, paired t tests were applied when normally distributed according to the Kolmorogov-Smirnov test, whereas the Mann-Whitney U test was applied when it was not normally distributed. Chi-squared test was used to analyse categorical scores.
Results
Descriptive statistics
The participant flowchart is summarised in Fig. 4. There were 70 patients initially enrolled in the study. Patients were subsequently withdrawn from the study (n = 5) or did not attend for either the 6- or 12-week post-treatment MRIs (n = 20).
There were 45 patients analysed (40 male, 5 female, mean age 59.7 ± 7.9 years). The tumour site, subsite and HPV-OPC status are documented in Table 2. There were 33 patients with HPV-OPC and 12 with other HNSCC. Measurable tumour was delineated at the primary site alone (n = 3), the largest lymph node site (n = 6) or both sites (n = 36), so there were 39 patients with measurable primary tumour and 42 patients with measurable nodal disease. There were 37 patients with stage 4 (82%) and 8 patients with stage 3 (18%) disease. The primary site, nodal staging and HPV status are demonstrated in Table 1. Cisplatin was administered in 38 patients and carboplatin in 7 patients. At 2-year follow-up, there were 5/45 patients with disease progression by 2 years (Fig. 4). Nodal recurrence always occurred at the site of the largest lymph node analysed.
The ICCs for primary tumour and nodal linear dimensions were 0.9–0.95, 0.79–0.88 and 0.82–0.86 for pre-treatment, and 6- and 12-week post-treatment MRIs. The Cohen’s kappa statistics for the qualitative scores were 0.8–1, 0.85–1 and 0.87–1 on the pre-treatment, and 6- and 12-week post-treatment MRIs.
Evolution of 6- and 12-week post-treatment MRI descriptors
The primary tumour (long axial and volume) dimension, DWI signal and T2w morphological scores as well as nodal (long/short axial linear and volume) dimensions and presence of necrotic/cystic signal at each timepoint are demonstrated in Table 3. The interval changes between pre-treatment, 6- and 12-week MRIs and p values for the statistical differences are also recorded in Table 3. The separate analyses for HPV-OPC and other HNSCC patients are shown in Table 4.
There was a significant change in the primary tumour (linear and volume) dimensions, DWI signal and T2w morphological scores between pre-treatment and 6 weeks (p < 0.001). Only the primary tumour volume dimensions (− 6.9%) showed a significant change between 6 and 12 weeks, with stable interval DWI signal and T2w morphological scores and no significant reduction in the linear long axial dimension.
There was a significant reduction in nodal volume between both pre-treatment to 6-week and 6- to 12-week studies for all patients (p < 0.001) and regardless of HPV-OPC status. The nodal long/short axial dimensions only decreased further between the 6- and 12-week MRIs in the HPV-OPC lymph nodes (p < 0.001) with a non-significant reduction for other HNSCC. There were interval changes in nodal necrosis scores between pre-treatment to 6-week and 6- to 12-week studies irrespective of HPV-OPC status.
Comparison of 6- and 12-week post-treatment MRI descriptors with 2-year outcomes
The primary tumour and nodal MRI descriptors on pre-treatment and 6- and 12-week MRI studies and their interval changes are compared between patients with and without disease progression at 2 years (Fig. 5) in Table 5. The 6-week nodal necrosis score and both the 6-week and 12-week nodal volume predicted 2-year PFS (p < 0.05). There was also a trend to a significant association between absolute primary tumour volume reduction at 6 weeks (p = 0.06) and 12 weeks (p = 0.06) with the 2-year PFS. There was no other correlation between any of the MRI descriptors on either 6- or 12-week post-treatment imaging or their interval changes, with the 2-year PFS (p = 0.22-1).
Some caution should be exercised when interpreting the comparison with 2-year outcome due to the small number of participants (5/45) with tumour recurrence at 2 years.
Discussion
All the proposed MRI descriptors changed significantly from pre-treatment to 6-week post-treatment studies. Whilst primary tumour and nodal volume dimensions continued to decrease between 6- and 12-week post-treatment MRIs, a significant change in linear dimensions was only demonstrated in HPV-OPC lymph nodes. Nodal necrosis reduced after 6 weeks; however, the other morphological and signal scores remained stable. The nodal necrosis score, absolute primary tumour volume reduction and nodal tumour volume showed prognostic potential at 6 weeks; however, there was only a small sample with recurrent disease so these results should be interpreted with caution.
A comparison with a post-treatment reference MRI aids the accurate interpretation of future follow-up imaging and the detection of recurrent disease. In order to optimise the identification of primary tumour or nodal progression, the imaging appearances should be compared with those at the time of greatest response. The demonstration of clear continued reduction in lymph node linear dimensions from 6 to 12 weeks post-treatment in HPV-OPC patients indicates that a later reference MRI would certainly be required in such cases. HPV-OPC status is of importance since it has unique histopathological characteristics, distinct epidemiology and improved response to CRT. Differing patterns of lymph node response have been noted in the HPV-OPC population, with a greater initial involution but then a more prolonged and inconsistent reduction in size, particularly in the presence of low-density lymph nodes on CT [24,25,26].
Whilst there have been a number of studies addressing the value of quantitative DW-MRI in the early post-CRT period for the prediction of residual disease, there is limited data on the value of primary tumour and nodal qualitative MRI descriptors and dimensions in predicting loco-regional or distant treatment failure [16, 27, 28]. Our choice of the qualitative MRI descriptors to evaluate was informed by previous studies exploring the prognostic significance of post-treatment MRI signal, morphological characteristics and size of residual masses, either alone or in combination. Our T2w signal and morphological criteria for the primary tumour evaluation were adapted from a study by King et al, which showed that a mass of low T2w signal and a flat-edged/retracted margin predicted treatment success, whereas a mass of intermediate T2w signal and > 1 cm with expansile margins was associated with treatment failure [16]. Other authors have included a combination of signal and enhancement characteristics in their evaluation of residual primary tumour for the purposes of predicting outcome [27, 28]. There have been mixed outcomes in studies investigating the prognostic value of nodal signal and morphology in the early post-treatment period [11, 16, 20]. Nodal ill definition, low T2w signal and necrosis were shown to be poorly predictive of treatment failure [18, 20], whilst one study showed increased DWI signal to be more specific for residual tumour than 18F-FDG PET/CT [11]. Our finding of 6-week necrosis score being predictive of 2-year PFS is of uncertain significance, due to the small sample of survivors and the likely influence of the prognostically favourable HPV-OPC cystic lymph nodes.
Tumour dimensions and their interval changes are key to the evaluation of post-treatment reference imaging, and have previously provided prognostic stratification both at primary tumour [29,30,31] and nodal [18, 33, 34] locations. Comparison of interval changes in absolute primary tumour volume at 6 and 12 weeks with 2-year PFS revealed a trend to statistical significance (p = 0.06) in this study. Bhatia et al have demonstrated that a 6-week post-treatment primary tumour absolute volume (> 5.7 cm3) and volume reduction (< 35%) threshold could provide > 90% specificity for treatment failure, although with low sensitivity (58% and 26% respectively). Our data also showed that 6-week and 12-week nodal volume was able to predict 2-year PFS. Whilst interval change in nodal volume was not prognostic in this study, previous CT- [32,33,34] and MRI-based studies have demonstrated a post-treatment percentage reduction in lymph node size to be highly accurate for the identification of residual malignant nodes [18].
Reliable measurements of tumour size are important in order to assess for tumour size and interval change. Although good to excellent reliability of the linear dimensions was achieved in this study (ICC 0.79–0.95), it is known that linear dimensions are prone to measurement error and that the reliability and agreement can be improved by volumetric analysis. Volume measures also have the optimum ability to define change between serial scans when accounting for measurement error. This is corroborated by our finding of 6- and 12-week post-treatment interval changes only being statistically significant on volumetric analysis. However, although algorithms are rapidly evolving, there are currently challenges to the routine use of volume analysis in clinical practice and linear dimensions remain widely practised.
Some limitations of this study are recognised. Firstly, nodal analysis was limited to the single largest node; however, it is possible that this was not representative, and although lymph node cystic and necrotic change analyses were combined, they are known to have differing aetiology and prognostic implications. In addition, the nodal signal evaluation was limited and additional criteria such as nodal DWI signal and T2w signal may be evaluated in future studies [20]. Secondly, the unexpected high proportion of HPV-OPC patients recruited in the prospective study restricted the subgroup analysis, with a limited sample of other HNSCC, and with the low number of treatment failures limiting the interpretation of the comparison with 2-year outcomes.
Conclusion
Our results would support the premise that 6 weeks post-CRT would be an appropriate interval for a reference MRI following CRT for stage 3 and 4 HNSCC primary tumours. The exceptions are when there is HPV-OPC with nodal disease, or when volumetric analysis is routinely performed, in which case a 12-week post-CRT reference study may be more appropriate.
Abbreviations
- CRT:
-
Chemoradiotherapy
- DWI:
-
Diffusion-weighted imaging
- HNSCC:
-
Head and neck squamous cell cancer
- HPV:
-
Human papillomavirus
- IMRT:
-
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy
- OPC:
-
Oropharyngeal cancer
- PET/CT:
-
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography
- PFS:
-
Progression-free survival
References
Beswick DM, Gooding WE, Johnson JT, Branstetter BF 4th (2012) Temporal patterns of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma recurrence with positron-emission tomography/computed tomography monitoring. Laryngoscope 122:1512–1517. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.23341
Million RR, Cassis NJ (1994) Oral cavity. In: Million RR, Cassisi NJ (eds) Management of head and neck cancer: a multidisciplinary approach, 2nd edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 239–298
Alkureishi LWT, de Bree R, Ross GL (2006) RADPLAT: an alternative to surgery? Oncologist 11:469–480. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.11-5-469
de Bree, van der Putten L, Brouwer J, Castelijns JA, Hoekstra OS, Leemans CR (2009) Detection of locoregional recurrent head and neck cancer after (chemo)radiotherapy using modern imaging. Oral Oncol 45:386–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-3016(01)02671-2
Ojiri H, Mendenhall WM, Mancuso AA (2002) CT findings at the primary site of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma within 6-8 weeks after definitive radiotherapy as predictors of primary site control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 52:748–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-3016(01)02671-2
van den Broek GB, Rasch CR, Pameijer FA, Peter E, van den Brekel MW, Balm AJ (2006) Response measurement after intraarterial chemoradiation in advanced head and neck carcinoma: magnetic resonance imaging and evaluation under general anesthesia? Cancer 106:1722–1729. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21786
Sheikhbahaei S, Taghipour M, Ahmad R et al (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of follow-up FDG PET or PET/CT in patients with head and neck cancer after definitive treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:629–639. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.14166
Kim S, Loevner L, Quon H et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for predicting and detecting early response to chemoradiation therapy of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Clin Cancer Res 15:986–994. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1287
King AD, Mo FK, Yu KH et al (2010) Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: diffusion-weighted MR imaging for prediction and monitoring of treatment response. Eur Radiol 20:2213–2220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1769-8
Matoba M, Tuji H, Shimode Y et al (2014) Fractional change in apparent diffusion coefficient as an imaging biomarker for predicting treatment response in head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35:379–385. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3706
Schouten CS, de Bree R, van der Putten L et al (2014) Diffusion-weighted EPI- and HASTE-MRI and 18F-FDG-PET-CT early during chemoradiotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer. Quant Imaging Med Surg 4:239–250. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2014.07.15
Vandecaveye V, Dirix P, De Keyzer F et al (2012) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging early after chemoradiotherapy to monitor treatment response in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:1098–1107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.02.044
Ailianou A, Mundada P, De Perrot T, Pusztaszieri M, Poletti P-A, Becker M (2018) MRI with DWI for the detection of posttreatment head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: why morphologic MRI criteria matter. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39:748–755. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5548
Becker M, Varoquaux AD, Combescure C et al (2018) Local recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck after radio(chemo)therapy: diagnostic performance of FDG-PET/MRI with diffusion-weighted sequences. Eur Radiol 28:651–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4999-1
Bhatia KSS, King AD, Yu K-H et al (2010) Does primary tumour volumetry performed early in the course of definitive concomitant chemoradiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma improve prediction of primary site outcome? Br J Radiol 83:964–970. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/27631720
King AD, Keung CK, Yu KH et al (2013) T2-weighted MR Imaging early after chemoradiotherapy to evaluate treatment response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:1237–1241. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3378
Martins BL, Chojniak R, Kowalski LP, Nicolau UR, Lima ENP, Bitencourt AGV (2013) Diffusion-weighted MRI in the assessment of early treatment response in patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck: comparison with morphological and PET/CT findings. PLoS One 10:e0140009. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140009
King AD, Yu K-H, Mo FKF et al (2016) Cervical nodal metastases from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: MRI criteria for treatment assessment. Head Neck 38:E1598–E1604. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24285
Mundada P, Varoquaux AD, Lenoir V et al (2018) Utility of MRI with morphologic and diffusion weighted imaging in the detection of post-treatment nodal disease in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Radiol 101:162–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.02.026
Piludu F, Gangemi E, Marucci L et al (2018) MRI evaluation using DWI and T2WI of residual lymph nodes in patients affected by head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemo-radiotherapy. Curr Med Imaging 14:599. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573405613666170511144943
Ravanelli M, Farina D, Rizzardi P et al (2013) MR with surface coils in the follow up after endoscopic laser resection for glottic squamous cell carcinoma. Neuroradiology 55:225–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-012-1128-3
Vaid S, Chandorkar A, Are A, Shah D, Vaid N (2016) Differentiating recurrent tumours from post treatment changes in head and neck cancers: does diffusion-weighted MRI solve the eternal dilemma? Clin Radiol 72:74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2016.09.019
Vogel DWT, Zbaeren P, Geretschlaeger A, Vermathen P, De Keyzer F, Thoeny HC (2013) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging including bi-exponential fitting for the detection of recurrent or residual tumour after chemo-radiotherapy for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers. Eur Radiol 23:562–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2596-x
Huang SH, O’Sullivan B, Xu W et al (2013) Temporal nodal regression and regional control after primary radiation therapy for N2-N3 head-and-neck cancer stratified by HPV status. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 87:1078–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.08.049
Sanguineti G, Ricchetti F, Wu B et al (2012) Volumetric change of human papillomavirus-related neck lymph nodes before, during, and shortly after intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Head Neck 34:1640–1647. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.21981
Tang C, Fuller CD, Garden AS (2015) Characteristics and kinetics of cervical lymph node regression after radiation therapy for human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma: quantitative image analysis of post-radiotherapy response. Oral Oncol 51:195–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.11.001
Chen YH, Jian JJ, Chan KY et al (2008) Definitive chemoradiation for resectable head and neck cancer: treatment outcome and prognostic significance of MRI findings. Br J Radiol 81:490–498. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/23571630
Lell M, Baum U, Greess H et al (2000) Head and neck tumors: imaging recurrent tumor and post-therapeutic changes with CT and MRI. Eur J Radiol 33:239–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0720-048x(99)00120-5
Hermans R, Pameijer FA, Mancuso AA, Parsons JT, Mendenhall WM (2000) Laryngeal or hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: can follow-up CT after definitive radiation therapy be used to detect local failure earlier than clinical examination alone? Radiology 214:683–687. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.214.3.r00fe13683
Pameijer FA, Hermans R, Mancuso AA et al (1999) Pre- and post-radiotherapy computed tomography in laryngeal cancer: imaging-based prediction of local failure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45:359–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00149-2
Ljumanovic R, Langendijk JA, Hoekstra OS, Knol DL, Leemans CR, Castelijns JA (2008) Pre- and post-radiotherapy MRI results as a predictive model for response in laryngeal carcinoma. Eur Radiol 18:2231–2240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-0986-x
Clavel S, Charron MP, Belair M et al (2012) The role of computed tomography in the management of the neck after chemoradiotherapy in patients with head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:567–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.066
Labadie RF, Yarbrough WG, Weissler MC, Pillsbury HC, Mukherji SK (2000) Nodal volume reduction after concurrent chemo- and radiotherapy: correlation between initial CT and histopathologic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:310–314
Nishimura G, Matsuda H, Taguchi T et al (2012) Treatment evaluation of metastatic lymph nodes after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res 32:595–600
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital Charity (ref EFT130501) and the Royal College of Radiologists (Kodak Radiology Fund Research Bursary) for the funding of this study.
Funding
Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital Charity (ref EFT130501), Royal College of Radiologists: Kodak Radiology Fund Research Bursary
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Guarantor
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Dr. S.E.J. Connor.`
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and biometry
One of the authors has significant statistical expertise.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.
Ethical approval
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
Study subjects or cohorts overlap
No study subjects or cohorts have been previously reported at present although overlapping cohorts have been analysed using different imaging data and two studies are under review by the overlapping cohorts with differing imaging data and analysis are currently in press (Cancer Reports and DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology).
Methodology
• prospective
• cross-sectional study
• performed at one institution
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Connor, S.E.J., Burd, C., Sivarasan, N. et al. MRI in head and neck cancer following chemoradiotherapy: what is the optimal delay to demonstrate maximal response?. Eur Radiol 31, 9273–9286 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07913-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-07913-x