Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical indications for image-guided interventional procedures in the musculoskeletal system: a Delphi-based consensus paper from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)—Part II, elbow and wrist

  • Musculoskeletal
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although image-guided interventional procedures of the elbow and wrist are routinely performed, there is poor evidence in the literature concerning such treatments. Our aim was to perform a Delphi-based consensus on published evidence on image-guided interventional procedures around the elbow and wrist and provide clinical indications on this topic.

Methods

A board of 45 experts in image-guided interventional musculoskeletal procedures from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology were involved in this Delphi-based consensus study. All panelists reviewed and scored published papers on image-guided interventional procedures around the elbow and wrist updated to September 2018 according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine levels of evidence. Consensus on statements drafted by the panelists about clinical indications was considered as “strong” when more than 95% of panelists agreed and as “broad” if more than 80% agreed.

Results

Eighteen statements were drafted, 12 about tendon procedures and 6 about intra-articular procedures. Only statement #15 reached the highest level of evidence (ultrasound-guided steroid wrist injections result in greater pain reduction and greater likelihood of attaining clinically important improvement). Seventeen statements received strong consensus (94%), while one received broad consensus (6%).

Conclusions

There is still poor evidence in published papers on image-guided interventional procedures around the elbow and wrist. A strong consensus has been achieved in 17/18 (94%) statements provided by the panel on clinical indications. Large prospective randomized trials are needed to better define the role of these procedures in clinical practice.

Key Points

The panel provided 18 evidence-based statements on clinical indications of image-guided interventional procedures around the elbow and wrist.

Only statement #15 reached the highest level of evidence: ultrasound-guided steroid wrist injections result in greater pain reduction and greater likelihood of attaining clinically important improvement.

Seventeen statements received strong consensus (94%), while broad consensus was obtained by 1 statement (6%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abbreviations

CT:

Computed tomography

ESSR:

European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

PRP:

Platelet-rich plasma

References

  1. Walsh JP, Farrell TP, Hynes J, Hughes N, O'Byrne C, Eustace SJ Therapeutic intervention in musculoskeletal radiology: current practice and future directions. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 22:546–563. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1672193

  2. Chianca V, Orlandi D, Messina C et al (2019) Interventional therapeutic procedures to treat degenerative and inflammatory musculoskeletal conditions: state of the art. Radiol Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-019-01018-8

  3. Silvestri E, Barile A, Albano D et al (2017) Interventional therapeutic procedures in the musculoskeletal system: an Italian Survey by the Italian College of Musculoskeletal Radiology. Radiol Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-017-0842-7

  4. Davidson J, Jayaraman S (2011) Guided interventions in musculoskeletal ultrasound: what’s the evidence? Clin Radiol 66:140–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2010.09.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Albano D, Chianca V, Tormenta S, Migliore A, Sconfienza LM Old and new evidence concerning the crucial role of ultrasound in guiding intra-articular injections. Skeletal Radiol 46:963–964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-017-2644-3

  6. Martins PH, Costa FM, Lopes FPPL, Canella C (2018) Advanced MR imaging and ultrasound fusion in musculoskeletal procedures. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 26:571–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2018.06.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Messina C, Banfi G, Aliprandi A et al (2016) Ultrasound guidance to perform intra-articular injection of gadolinium-based contrast material for magnetic resonance arthrography as an alternative to fluoroscopy: the time is now. Eur Radiol 26:1221–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3945-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Moraes VY, Lenza M, Tamaoki MJ, Faloppa F, Belloti JC (2014) Platelet-rich therapies for musculoskeletal soft tissue injuries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010071.pub3

  9. Colio SW, Smith J, Pourcho AM (2016) Ultrasound-guided interventional procedures of the wrist and hand: anatomy, indications, and techniques. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 27:589–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2016.04.003

  10. Orlandi D, Corazza A, Silvestri E et al (2014) Ultrasound-guided procedures around the wrist and hand: how to do. Eur J Radiol 83:1231–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJRAD.2014.03.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sconfienza LM, Albano D, Allen G et al (2018) Clinical indications for musculoskeletal ultrasound updated in 2017 by European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) consensus. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5474-3

  12. Klauser AS, Tagliafico A, Allen GM et al (2012) Clinical indications for musculoskeletal ultrasound: a Delphi-based consensus paper of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology. Eur Radiol 22:1140–1148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2356-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sconfienza LM, Adriaensen M, Albano D et al (2019) Clinical indications for image-guided interventional procedures in the musculoskeletal system: a Delphi-based consensus paper from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)—part I, shoulder. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06419-x

  14. Sconfienza LM, Adriaensen M, Albano D et al (2019) Clinical indications for image-guided interventional procedures in the musculoskeletal system: a Delphi-based consensus paper from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)-part III, nerves of the upper limb. nerves of the upper limb. Eur Radiol https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06479-z

  15. Steurer J (2011) The Delphi method: an efficient procedure to generate knowledge. Skeletal Radiol 40:959–961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1145-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Messina C, Bignotti B, Tagliafico A et al (2017) A critical appraisal of the quality of adult musculoskeletal ultrasound guidelines using the AGREE II tool: an EuroAIM initiative. Insights Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-017-0563-4

  17. Messina C, Bignotti B, Bazzocchi A et al (2017) A critical appraisal of the quality of adult dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry guidelines in osteoporosis using the AGREE II tool: an EuroAIM initiative. Insights Imaging 8:311–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-017-0553-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group (2011) Levels of evidence. Oxford. Available via: https://www.cebm.net/category/ebm-resources/loe/

  19. Krogh TP, Fredberg U, Stengaard-Pedersen K, Christensen R, Jensen P, Ellingsen T (2013) Treatment of lateral epicondylitis with platelet-rich plasma, glucocorticoid, or saline: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 41:625–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512472975

  20. Krogh TP, Bartels EM, Ellingsen T et al (2013) Comparative effectiveness of injection therapies in lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Sports Med. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512458237

  21. Branson R, Naidu K, du Toit C et al (2017) Comparison of corticosteroid, autologous blood or sclerosant injections for chronic tennis elbow. J Sci Med Sport. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2016.10.010

  22. Coombes BK, Bisset L, Brooks P, Khan A, Vicenzino B (2013) Effect of corticosteroid injection, physiotherapy, or both on clinical outcomes in patients with unilateral lateral epicondylalgia: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 09:461–469

  23. Sorani A, Campbell R (2016) Image-guided elbow interventions: a literature review of interventional treatment options. Br J Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150368

  24. Karaduman M, Okkaoglu MC, Sesen H, Taskesen A, Ozdemir M, Altay M (2016) Platelet-rich plasma versus open surgical release in chronic tennis elbow: a retrospective comparative study. J Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2015.12.005

  25. Creaney L, Wallace A, Curtis M, Connell D (2011) Growth factor-based therapies provide additional benefit beyond physical therapy in resistant elbow tendinopathy: a prospective, single-blind, randomised trial of autologous blood injections versus platelet-rich plasma injections. Br J Sports Med. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2010.082503

  26. Merolla G, Dellabiancia F, Ricci A et al (2017) Arthroscopic debridement versus platelet-rich plasma injection: a prospective, randomized, comparative study of chronic lateral epicondylitis with a nearly 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.02.009

  27. Thanasas C, Papadimitriou G, Charalambidis C, Paraskevopoulos I, Papanikolaou A (2011) Platelet-rich plasma versus autologous whole blood for the treatment of chronic lateral elbow epicondylitis. Am J Sports Med 39:2130–2134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511417113

  28. Montalvan B, Le Goux P, Klouche S, Borgel D, Hardy P, Breban M (2016) Inefficacy of ultrasound-guided local injections of autologous conditioned plasma for recent epicondylitis: results of a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial with one-year follow-up. Rheumatology (Oxford) 55:279–285. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kev326

  29. Martin JI, Atilano L, Merino J et al (2019) Platelet-rich plasma versus lidocaine as tenotomy adjuvants in people with elbow epicondylopathy: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Surg Res 14:109. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1153-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Alessio-Mazzola M, Repetto I, Biti B, Trentini R, Formica M, Felli L (2018) Autologous US-guided PRP injection versus US-guided focal extracorporeal shock wave therapy for chronic lateral epicondylitis: a minimum of 2-year follow-up retrospective comparative study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 26:2309499017749986. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017749986

  31. Chiavaras MM, Jacobson JA (2013) Ultrasound-guided tendon fenestration. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 17:85–90. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1333942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Suresh SPS, Ali KE, Jones H,Connell DA (2006) Medial epicondylitis: is ultrasound guided autologous blood injection an effective treatment? Br J Sports Med 40:935–939. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2006.029983

  33. Sanli I, Morgan B, van Tilborg F, Funk L, Gosens T (2016) Single injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the treatment of refractory distal biceps tendonitis: long-term results of a prospective multicenter cohort study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:2308–2312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3465-8

  34. Barker SL, Bell SN, Connell D, Coghlan JA (2015) Ultrasound-guided platelet-rich plasma injection for distal biceps tendinopathy. Shoulder Elbow 7:110–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573214567558

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. De Zordo T, Ahmad N, Ødegaard F et al (2011) US-guided therapy of calcific tendinopathy: clinical and radiological outcome assessment in shoulder and non-shoulder tendons. Ultraschall Med 32(Suppl 1):S117–S123. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1245333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. McShane JM, Shah VN, Nazarian LN (2008) Sonographically guided percutaneous needle tenotomy for treatment of common extensor tendinosis in the elbow: is a corticosteroid necessary? J Ultrasound Med 27:1137–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Casu E, Obradov-Rajic M (2018) Ultrasound guided standalone percutaneous needle tenotomy for chronic lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review. Adv Tech Musculoskelet Surg 2018:18–28

  38. Stenhouse G, Sookur P, Watson M (2013) Do blood growth factors offer additional benefit in refractory lateral epicondylitis? A prospective, randomized pilot trial of dry needling as a stand-alone procedure versus dry needling and autologous conditioned plasma. Skeletal Radiol 42:1515–1520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1691-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Housner JA, Jacobson JA, Misko R (2009) Sonographically guided percutaneous needle tenotomy for the treatment of chronic tendinosis. J Ultrasound Med 28:1187–1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sellon JL, Wempe MK, Smith J (2014) Sonographically guided distal biceps tendon injections: techniques and validation. J Ultrasound Med 33:1461–1474. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.33.8.1461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mautner K, Stafford CD 2nd, Nguyen P (2015) Ultrasound-guided distal bicep tendon injection using a posterior approach. PM R 7:1007–1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.03.023

  42. Jeyapalan K, Choudhary S (2009) Ultrasound-guided injection of triamcinolone and bupivacaine in the management of De Quervain’s disease. Skeletal Radiol 38:1099–1103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-009-0721-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. McDermott JD, Ilyas AM, Nazarian LN, Leinberry CF (2012) Ultrasound-guided injections for de Quervain’s tenosynovitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:1925–1931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2369-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Danda RS, Kamath J, Jayasheelan N, Kumar P (2016) Role of guided ultrasound in the treatment of De Quervain tenosynovitis by local steroid infiltration. J Hand Microsurg 8:34–37. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1581123

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Hajder E, de Jonge MC, van der Horst CM, Obdeijn MC (2013) The role of ultrasound-guided triamcinolone injection in the treatment of de Quervain’s disease: treatment and a diagnostic tool? Chir Main 32:403–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.main.2013.09.002

  46. De Keating-Hart E, Touchais S, Kerjean Y, Ardouin L, Le Goff B (2016) Presence of an intracompartmental septum detected by ultrasound is associated with the failure of ultrasound-guided steroid injection in de Quervain’s syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 41:212–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193415611414

  47. Kume K, Amano K, Yamada S, Amano K, Kuwaba N, Ohta H (2012) In de Quervain’s with a separate EPB compartment, ultrasound-guided steroid injection is more effective than a clinical injection technique: a prospective open-label study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 37:523–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193411427829

  48. Orlandi D, Corazza A, Fabbro E et al (2015) Ultrasound-guided percutaneous injection to treat de Quervain’s disease using three different techniques: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Radiol 25:1512–1519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3515-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lapègue F, André A, Pasquier Bernachot E et al (2018) US-guided percutaneous release of the first extensor tendon compartment using a 21-gauge needle in de Quervain’s disease: a prospective study of 35 cases. Eur Radiol 28:3977–3985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5387-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Peters SE, Laxer RM, Connolly BL, Parra DA (2017) Ultrasound-guided steroid tendon sheath injections in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a 10-year single-center retrospective study. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 15:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-017-0155-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Rajeswaran G, Lee JC, Eckersley R et al (2009) Ultrasound-guided percutaneous release of the annular pulley in trigger digit. Eur Radiol 19:2232–2237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1397-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Rajeswaran G, Healy J, Lee J (2016) Percutaneous release procedures: trigger finger and carpal tunnel. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 20:432–440. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1594283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lapègue F, André A, Meyrignac O et al (2016) US-guided percutaneous release of the trigger finger by using a 21-gauge needle: a prospective study of 60 cases. Radiology 280:493–499. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2016151886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Guo D, McCool L, Senk A et al (2018) Minimally invasive thread trigger digit release: a preliminary report on 34 digits of the adult hands. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 43:942–947. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193418774497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rojo-Manaute JM, Rodríguez-Maruri G, Capa-Grasa A, Chana-Rodríguez F, Soto Mdel V, Martín JV (2012) Sonographically guided intrasheath percutaneous release of the first annular pulley for trigger digits, part 1: clinical efficacy and safety. J Ultrasound Med 31:417–424

  56. Rojo-Manaute JM, Capa-Grasa A, Del Cerro-Gutiérrez M, Martínez MV, Chana-Rodríguez F, Martín JV (2012) Sonographically guided intrasheath percutaneous release of the first annular pulley for trigger digits, part 2: randomized comparative study of the economic impact of 3 surgical models. J Ultrasound Med 31:427–438

  57. Jou IM, Chern TC (2006) Sonographically assisted percutaneous release of the a1 pulley: a new surgical technique for treating trigger digit. J Hand Surg Br 31:191–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsb.2005.11.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Zhao J-G, Kan S-L, Zhao L et al (2014) Percutaneous first annular pulley release for trigger digits: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence. J Hand Surg Am 39:2192–2202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.07.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Lee SH, Choi YC, Kang HJ (2018) Comparative study of ultrasonography-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release versus blinded percutaneous A1 pulley release. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 26:2309499018772368. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499018772368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Nikolaou VS, Malahias MA, Kaseta MK, Sourlas I, Babis GC et al (2017) Comparative clinical study of ultrasound-guided A1 pulley release vs open surgical intervention in the treatment of trigger finger. World J Orthop 8:163–169. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i2.163

  61. Godey SK, Bhatti WA, Watson JS, Bayat A (2006) A technique for accurate and safe injection of steroid in trigger digits using ultrasound guidance. Acta Orthop Belg 72:633–634

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Bodor M, Flossman T (2009) Ultrasound-guided first annular pulley injection for trigger finger. J Ultrasound Med 28:737–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Mardani Kivi M, Lahiji FA, Jandaghi AB, Saheb Ekhtiari K, Hashemi Motlagh K (2012) Efficacy of sonographically guided intra-flexoral sheath corticosteroid injection. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 46:346–352. https://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2012.2787

  64. Salim N, Abdullah S, Sapuan J, Haflah NHM (2012) Outcome of corticosteroid injection versus physiotherapy in the treatment of mild trigger fingers. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 37:27–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193411415343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Mifune Y, Inui A, Sakata R et al (2016) High-resolution ultrasound in the diagnosis of trigger finger and evaluation of response to steroid injection. Skeletal Radiol 45:1661–1667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-016-2485-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Hansen RL, Søndergaard M, Lange J (2017) Open surgery versus ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection for trigger finger: a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. J Hand Surg Am 42:359–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.02.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Liu D-H, Tsai M-W, Lin S-H et al (2015) Ultrasound-guided hyaluronic acid injections for trigger finger: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 96:2120–2127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.08.421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Callegari L, Spanò E, Bini A, Valli F, Genovese E, Fugazzola C (2011) Ultrasound-guided injection of a corticosteroid and hyaluronic acid. Drugs R D 11:137–145. https://doi.org/10.2165/11591220-000000000-00000

  69. Cunnington J, Marshall N, Hide G et al (2010) A randomised, controlled, double blinded study of ultrasound guided corticosteroid joint injection in patients with inflammatory arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 62. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.27448

  70. Kim TK, Lee JH, Park KD, Lee SC, Ahn J, Park Y (2013) Ultrasound versus palpation guidance for intra-articular injections in patients with degenerative osteoarthritis of the elbow. J Clin Ultrasound 41:479–485. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.22071

  71. Miller JH, Beggs I (2001) Detection of intraarticular bodies of the elbow with saline arthrosonography. Clin Radiol 56:231–234. https://doi.org/10.1053/crad.2000.0630

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Sibbitt WL Jr, Band PA, Chavez-Chiang NR, Delea SL, Norton HE, Bankhurst AD (2011) A randomized controlled trial of the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound-guided intraarticular injection of inflammatory arthritis. J Rheumatol 38:252–263. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.100866

  73. Sibbitt WL Jr, Peisajovich A, Michael AA et al (2009) Does sonographic needle guidance affect the clinical outcome of intraarticular injections? J Rheumatol 36:1892–1902. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.090013

  74. Smith J, Brault JS, Rizzo M, Sayeed YA, Finnoff JT (2011) Accuracy of sonographically guided and palpation guided scaphotrapeziotrapezoid joint injections. J Ultrasound Med 30:1509–1515

  75. Gilliland CA, Salazar LD, Borchers JR (2011) Ultrasound versus anatomic guidance for intra-articular and periarticular injection: a systematic review. Phys Sportsmed 39:121–131. https://doi.org/10.3810/psm.2011.09.1928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Koski JM, Hermunen H (2001) Intra-articular glucocorticoid treatment of the rheumatoid wrist. An ultrasonographic study. Scand J Rheumatol 30:268–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Luz KR, Furtado RN, Nunes CC, Rosenfeld A, Fernandes AR, Natour J (2008) Ultrasound-guided intra-articular injections in the wrist in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a double-blind, randomised controlled study. Ann Rheum Dis 67:1198–1200. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.084616

  78. Salini V, De Amicis D, Abate M, Natale MA, Di Iorio A (2009) Ultrasound-guided hyaluronic acid injection in carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: short-term results. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 22:455–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/039463200902200222

  79. Di Sante L, Cacchio A, Scettri P, Paoloni M, Ioppolo F, Santilli V (2011) Ultrasound-guided procedure for the treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol 30:1195–1200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-011-1730-5

  80. Dubreuil M, Greger S, LaValley M, Cunnington J, Sibbitt WL Jr, Kissin EY (2013) Improvement in wrist pain with ultrasound-guided glucocorticoid injections: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Semin Arthritis Rheum 42:492–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2012.09.006

  81. Zeidenberg J, Aronowitz JG, Landy DC, Owens PW, Jose J (2016) Ultrasound-guided aspiration of wrist ganglions: a follow-up survey of patient satisfaction and outcomes. Acta Radiol 57:481–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185115597719

  82. Wang G, Jacobson JA, Feng FY, Girish G, Caoili EM, Brandon C (2007) Sonography of wrist ganglion cysts: variable and noncystic appearances. J Ultrasound Med 26:1323–1328 quiz 1330–1

  83. Latif A, Ansar A, Butt MQ (2014) Treatment of ganglions; a five year experience. J Pak Med Assoc 64:1278–1281

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Head L, Allen M, Boyd KU (2015) Long-term outcomes and patient satisfaction following wrist ganglion aspiration. Plast Surg (Oakv) 23:51–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Yamamoto M, Kurimoto S, Okui N, Tatebe M, Shinohara T, Hirata H (2012) Sonography-guided arthroscopy for wrist ganglion. J Hand Surg Am 37:1411–1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.04.012

  86. Ho PC, Griffiths J, Lo WN, Yen CH, Hung LK (2001) Current treatment of ganglion of the wrist. Hand Surg 6:49–58

  87. Dias JJ, Dhukaram V, Kumar P (2007) The natural history of untreated dorsal wrist ganglia and patient reported outcome 6 years after intervention. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 32:502–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHSE.2007.05.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Colberg RE, Sánchez CF, Lugo-Vicente H (2008) Aspiration and triamcinolone acetonide injection of wrist synovial cysts in children. J Pediatr Surg 43:2087–2090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.04.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Varley GW, Needoff M, Davis TR, Clay NR (1997) Conservative management of wrist ganglia. Aspiration versus steroid infiltration. J Hand Surg Br 22:636–637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Sinha MK, Mishra P, Mishra TS, Barman A (2019) Aspiration and steroid injection in ganglion cysts: an ultrasound guided evaluation of the response. J Clin Orthop Trauma. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCOT.2019.03.004

  91. Gitto S, Lee SC, Miller TT (2019) Ultrasound-guided percutaneous treatment of volar radiocarpal ganglion cysts: safety and efficacy. J Clin Ultrasound 47:339–344. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.22724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Raza K, Lee CY, Pilling D et al (2003) Ultrasound guidance allows accurate needle placement and aspiration from small joints in patients with early inflammatory arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 42:976–979. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keg269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Tagliafico AS, Wilson D, Sconfienza LM, European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) Research Committee (2019) Encouraging MSK imaging research towards clinical impact is a necessity: opinion paper of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR). Eur Radiol 29:3410–3413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06218-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

All authors are members of the Ultrasound and/or Interventional Subcommittees of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Maria Sconfienza.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Luca Maria Sconfienza, MD PhD.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was not required for this study because it does not involve patients.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was not required because this study does not involve patients.

Methodology

• Literature-based Delphi process

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sconfienza, L.M., Adriaensen, M., Albano, D. et al. Clinical indications for image-guided interventional procedures in the musculoskeletal system: a Delphi-based consensus paper from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)—Part II, elbow and wrist. Eur Radiol 30, 2220–2230 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06545-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06545-6

Keywords

Navigation