Skip to main content
Log in

Thyroid doses and risk to paediatric patients undergoing neck CT examinations

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To estimate thyroid doses and cancer risk for paediatric patients undergoing neck computed tomography (CT).

Methods

We used average CTDIvol (mGy) values from 75 paediatric neck CT examinations to estimate thyroid dose in a mathematical anthropomorphic phantom (ImPACT Patient CT Dosimetry Calculator). Patient dose was estimated by modelling the neck as mass equivalent water cylinder. A patient size correction factor was obtained using published relative dose data as a function of water cylinder size. Additional correction factors included scan length and radiation intensity variation secondary to tube-current modulation.

Results

The mean water cylinder diameter that modelled the neck was 14 ± 3.5 cm. The mathematical anthropomorphic phantom has a 16.5-cm neck, and for a constant CT exposure, would have thyroid doses that are 13–17 % lower than the average paediatric patient. CTDIvol was independent of age and sex. The average thyroid doses were 31 ± 18 mGy (males) and 34 ± 15 mGy (females). Thyroid cancer incidence risk was highest for infant females (0.2 %), lowest for teenage males (0.01 %).

Conclusions

Estimated absorbed thyroid doses in paediatric neck CT did not significantly vary with age and gender. However, the corresponding thyroid cancer risk is determined by gender and age.

Key Points

Thyroid doses can be estimated from the CTDI vol in paediatric neck CT .

Scan length, neck size, and radiation intensity variation should be accounted for.

Estimated absorbed thyroid doses did not significantly vary with age and gender.

Thyroid cancer incidence risk is primarily determined by gender and age.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CTDIvol :

Volume CT dose index

DLP:

Dose length product

AEC:

Automatic exposure control

References

  1. Broder J, Fordham LA, Warshauer DM (2007) Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the pediatric emergency department, 2000-2006. Emerg Radiol 14:227–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Markel TA, Kumar R, Koontz NA, Scherer LR, Applegate KE (2009) The utility of computed tomography as a screening tool for the evaluation of pediatric blunt chest trauma. J Trauma 67:23–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blackwell CD, Gorelick M, Holmes JF, Bandyopadhyay S, Kuppermann N (2007) Pediatric head trauma: changes in use of computed tomography in emergency departments in the United States over time. Ann Emerg Med 49:320–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography–an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Almohiy H (2014) Paediatric computed tomography radiation dose: a review of the global dilemma. World J Radiol 6:1–6

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z et al (2013) Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 346:f2360

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mettler FA Jr, Wiest PW, Locken JA, Kelsey CA (2000) CT scanning: patterns of use and dose. J Radiol Prot 20:353–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yamauchi-Kawaura C, Fujii K, Aoyama T, Koyama S, Yamauchi M (2010) Radiation dose evaluation in head and neck MDCT examinations with a 6-year-old child anthropomorphic phantom. Pediatr Radiol 40:1206–1214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Huda W, Ogden KM (2008) Comparison of head and body organ doses in CT. Phys Med Biol 53:N9–N14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Preston DL, Ron E, Tokuoka S et al (2007) Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998. Radiat Res 168:1–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Huda W, Spampinato MV, Tipnis SV, Magill D (2013) Computation of thyroid doses and carcinogenic radiation risks to patients undergoing neck CT examinations. Radiat Prot Dosim 156:436–444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Huda W, Magill D, Spampinato MV (2011) Technical note: estimating absorbed doses to the thyroid in CT. Med Phys 38:3108–3113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. BEIR VII Committee (2005) National Academy of Sciences Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR) Report VII. Health Effects of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiations, Washington DC

  16. Ron E, Lubin JH, Shore RE et al (1995) Thyroid cancer after exposure to external radiation: a pooled analysis of seven studies. Radiat Res 141:259–277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schonfeld SJ, Lee C, Berrington de Gonzalez A (2011) Medical exposure to radiation and thyroid cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 23:244–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2011) Size Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. In: Report of the AAPM task group 204, College Park, MD.

  19. Christner JA, Braun NN, Jacobsen MC, Carter RE, Kofler JM, McCollough CH (2012) Size-specific dose estimates for adult patients at CT of the torso. Radiology 265:841–847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Israel GM, Cicchiello L, Brink J, Huda W (2010) Patient size and radiation exposure in thoracic, pelvic, and abdominal CT examinations performed with automatic exposure control. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:1342–1346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. American College of Radiology (2012) American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria®. American College of Radiology. Available via http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/AppCriteria/Diagnostic/NeckMassAdenopathy.pdf2013

  22. Wippold F, Cornelius R, Berger K et al (2010) ACR appropriateness criteria. Neck Mass / Adenopathy. American College of Radiology

  23. Al-Senan R, Mueller DL, Hatab MR (2012) Estimating thyroid dose in pediatric CT exams from surface dose measurement. Phys Med Biol 57:4211–4221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mazonakis M, Tzedakis A, Damilakis J, Gourtsoyiannis N (2007) Thyroid dose from common head and neck CT examinations in children: is there an excess risk for thyroid cancer induction? Eur Radiol 17:1352–1357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Maria Vittoria Spampinato. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. The authors state that this work has not received any funding. No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board. Methodology: retrospective, cross sectional study, performed at one institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Vittoria Spampinato.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spampinato, M.V., Tipnis, S., Tavernier, J. et al. Thyroid doses and risk to paediatric patients undergoing neck CT examinations. Eur Radiol 25, 1883–1890 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3590-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3590-x

Keywords

Navigation