Abstract
Objectives
To implement, examine, and compare three multichannel transmit/receive coil configurations for cardiovascular MR (CMR) at 7T.
Methods
Three radiofrequency transmit-receive (TX/RX) coils with 4-, 8-, and 16-coil elements were used. Ten healthy volunteers (seven males, age 28 ± 4 years) underwent CMR at 7T. For all three RX/TX coils, 2D CINE FLASH images of the heart were acquired. Cardiac chamber quantification, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) analysis, parallel imaging performance assessment, and image quality scoring were performed.
Results
Mean total examination time was 29 ± 5 min. All images obtained with the 8- and 16-channel coils were diagnostic. No significant difference in ejection fraction (EF) (P > 0.09) or left ventricular mass (LVM) (P > 0.31) was observed between the coils. The 8- and 16-channel arrays yielded a higher mean SNR in the septum versus the 4-channel coil. The lowest geometry factors were found for the 16-channel coil (mean ± SD 2.3 ± 0.5 for R = 4). Image quality was rated significantly higher (P < 0.04) for the 16-channel coil versus the 8- and 4-channel coils.
Conclusions
All three coil configurations are suitable for CMR at 7.0T under routine circumstances. A larger number of coil elements enhances image quality and parallel imaging performance but does not impact the accuracy of cardiac chamber quantification.
Key Points
• Cardiac chamber quantification using 7.0T magnetic resonance imaging is feasible.
• Examination times for cardiac chamber quantification at 7.0T match current clinical practice.
• Multichannel transceiver RF technology facilitates improved image quality and parallel imaging performance.
• Increasing the number of RF channels does not influence cardiac chamber quantification.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Vaughan JT, Snyder CJ, DelaBarre LJ et al (2009) Whole-body imaging at 7T: preliminary results. Magn Reson Med 61:244–248
Snyder CJ, DelaBarre L, Metzger GJ et al (2009) Initial results of cardiac imaging at 7 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 61:517–524
Frauenrath T, Hezel F, Heinrichs U et al (2009) Feasibility of cardiac gating free of interference with electro-magnetic fields at 1.5 Tesla, 3.0 Tesla and 7.0 Tesla using an MR-stethoscope. Invest Radiol 44:539–547
van Elderen SG, Versluis MJ, Webb AG et al (2009) Initial results on in vivo human coronary MR angiography at 7T. Magn Reson Med 62:1379–1384
Versluis MJ, Tsekos N, Smith NB, Webb AG (2009) Simple RF design for human functional and morphological cardiac imaging at 7tesla. J Magn Reson 200:161–166
van Elderen SG, Versluis MJ, Westenberg JJ et al (2010) Right coronary MR angiography at 7T: a direct quantitative and qualitative comparison with 3T in young healthy volunteers. Radiol 257:254–259
von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Frauenrath T, Prothmann M et al (2010) Cardiac chamber quantification using magnetic resonance imaging at 7 Tesla–a pilot study. Eur Radiol 20:2844–2852
Brandts A, Westenberg JJ, Versluis MJ et al (2010) Quantitative assessment of left ventricular function in humans at 7T. Magn Reson Med 64:1471–1477
Frauenrath T, Hezel F, Renz W et al (2010) Acoustic cardiac triggering: a practical solution for synchronization and gating of cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 7 Tesla. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 12:67
Niendorf T, Sodickson DK, Krombach GA, Schulz-Menger J (2010) Toward cardiovascular MRI at 7T: clinical needs, technical solutions and research promises. Eur Radiol 20:2806–2816
Suttie JJ, Delabarre L, Pitcher A et al (2012) 7 Tesla (T) human cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using FLASH and SSFP to assess cardiac function: validation against 1.5T and 3T. NMR Biomed 25:27–34
Maderwald S, Nassenstein K, Orzada S, et al (2010) MR imaging of cardiac wall-motion at 1.5T and 7T: SNR and CNR comparison. Proc Intl Soc Magn Reson Med 18:1299
Dieringer MA, Renz W, Lindel T et al (2011) Design and application of a four-channel transmit/receive surface coil for functional cardiac imaging at 7T. J Magn Reson 33:736–741
Gräßl A, Winter L, Thalhammer C, et al (2011) Design, evaluation and application of an eight channel transmit/receive coil array for cardiac MRI at 7.0T. Eur J Radiol. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.08.002
Christ A, Kainz W, Hahn EG et al (2010) The Virtual Family—development of surface-based anatomical models of two adults and two children for dosimetric simulations. Phys Med Biol 55:N23
IEC (2010) 60601-2-33 Medical electrical equipment—part 2–33: particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of magnetic resonance equipment for medical diagnosis, ed 3.0. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva
Frauenrath T, Niendorf T, Kob M (2008) Acoustic method for synchronization of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Acta Acust United Ac 94:148–155
Becker M, Frauenrath T, Hezel F et al (2010) Comparison of left ventricular function assessment using phonocardiogram- and electrocardiogram-triggered 2D SSFP CINE MR imaging at 1.5T and 3.0T. Eur Radiol 20:1344–1355
Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Chen Q et al (1999) Resolution enhancement in single-shot imaging using simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH). Magn Reson Med 41:1236–1245
Kellman P, McVeigh ER (2005) Image reconstruction in SNR units: a general method for SNR measurement. Magn Reson Med 54:1439–1447
Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V et al (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105:539–542
Sodickson DK, Hardy CJ, Zhu Y et al (2005) Rapid volumetric MRI using parallel imaging with order-of-magnitude accelerations and a 32-element RF coil array: feasibility and implications. Acad Radiol 12:626–635
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Winter, L., Kellman, P., Renz, W. et al. Comparison of three multichannel transmit/receive radiofrequency coil configurations for anatomic and functional cardiac MRI at 7.0T: implications for clinical imaging. Eur Radiol 22, 2211–2220 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2487-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2487-1