Skip to main content
Log in

Perfusion computed tomography evaluation of angiogenesis in liver cancer

  • Hepatobiliary-Pancreas
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the value of computed tomography (CT) perfusion imaging for assessment of angiogenesis in liver cancer.

Methods

Twenty-one patients with histologically proven liver cancer underwent CT perfusion examination. We compared the following perfusion parameters in the tumour area versus the non-tumour area: total blood flow (TBF), hepatic arterial perfusion (HAP), hepatic portal perfusion (HPP) and hepatic arterial perfusion index (HAPI). Slices of postoperative specimen were stained with haematoxylin–eosin and anti-CD34 immunohistochemistry. The slices were evaluated with emphasis on the CD34-positive neovasculature in the tumour parenchyma. Tumour microvascular density (MVD) was calculated according to the Weidner method. Pearson correlation was used to detect correlations between tumour MVD and tumour perfusion parameters.

Result

TBF and HPP in the tumour area were lower than in the non-tumour area (P < 0.05). HAP and HAPI in the tumour area were higher than those of the non-tumour area (P < 0.05). TBF and HAP in the tumour area correlated with MVD in the tumour (P < 0.05), with correlation coefficients of 0.849 and 0.829, respectively.

Conclusion

CT perfusion imaging can quantitatively assess the blood supply and its distribution in liver cancer. TBF or HAP may be a useful parameter in assessing angiogenesis of liver cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Palma LD (1998) Diagnostic imaging and interventional therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Radiol 71:808–818

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fontanini G, Lucchi M, Vignati S, Mussi A, Ciardiello F, De Laurentiis M, De Placido S, Basolo F, Angeletti CA, Bevilacqua G (1997) Angiogenesis as a prognostic indicator of survival in non-small-cell lung carcinoma: a prospective study. J Natl Cancer Inst 89:881–886

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Padhani AR (1999) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI studies in human tumors. Br J Radiol 72:427–431

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Miles KA, Leggett DA, Kelley BB, Hayball MP, Sinnatamby R, Bunce I (1998) In vivo assessment of neovascularization of liver metastases using perfusion CT. Br J Radiol 71:276–281

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Folkman J (1990) What is the evidence that tumors are angiogenesis dependent? J Natl Cancer Inst 82:4–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fidler IJ, Ellis LM (1994) The implications of angiogenesis for the biology and therapy of cancer metastasis. Cell 79:185–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee TY, Purdie TG, Stewart E (2003) CT imaging of angiogenesis. Q J Nucl Med 47:171–187

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miles KA (2002) Functional computed tomography in oncology. Eur J Cancer 38:2079–2084

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Miles KA, Griffiths MR (2003) Perfusion CT: a worthwhile enhancement? Br J Radiol 76:220–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Miles KA, Hayball MP, Dixon AK (1993) Functional images of hepatic perfusion obtained with dynamic CT. Radiology 188:405–411

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsushima Y, Blomley JK, Kusano S, Endo K (1999) The portal component of hepatic perfusion measured by dynamic CT: an indicator of hepatic parenchymal damage. Dig Dis Sci 44:1632–1638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weidekamm C, Cejna M, Kramer L, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Bader TR (2005) Effects of TIPS on liver perfusion measured by dynamic CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:505–510

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fuentes MA, Keith CJ, Griffiths M, Durbridge G, Miles KA (2002) Hepatic haemodynamics: interrelationships between contrast enhancement and perfusion on CT and Doppler perfusion indices. Br J Radiol 75:17–23

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Weidner N (1995) Current pathologic methods for measuring intratumoral microvessel density within breast carcinoma and other solid tumors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 36:169–180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pluda JM (1997) Tumor-associated angiogenesis: mechanisms, clinical implications, and therapeutic strategies. Semin Oncol 24:203–218

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Miles KA (2003) Perfusion CT for the assessment of tumour vascularity: which protocol? Br J Radiol 76(Spec No 1):S36–S42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cenic A, Nabavi DG, Craen RA, Gelb AW, Lee TY (1999) Dynamic CT measurement of cerebral blood flow: a validation study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20:63–73

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gillard JH, Antoun NM, Burnet NG, Pickard JD (2001) Reproducibility of quantitative CT perfusion imaging. Br J Radiol 74:552–555

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pandharipande PV, Krinsky GA, Rusinek H, lee VS (2005) Perfusion imaging of the liver: current challenges and future goals. Radiology 234:661–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Craft PS, Harris AL (1994) Clinical prognostic significance of tumour angiogenesis. Ann Oncol 5:305–311

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stavropoulos NE, Bouropoulos C, Ioachim IE, Michael M, Hastazeris K, Tsimaris I, Kalogeras D, Liamis Z, Stefanaki S, Agnantis NI (2004) Prognostic significance of angiogenesis in superficial bladder cancer. Int Urol Nephrol 36:163–167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Canoğlu A, Göğüş C, Bedük Y, Orhan D, Tulunay O, Baltaci S (2004) Microvessel density as a prognostic marker in bladder carcinoma: correlation with tumor grade, stage and prognosis. Int Urol Nephrol 36:401–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sahani DV, Holalkere NS, Mueller PR, Zhu AX (2007) Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: CT perfusion of liver and tumor tissue-initial experience. Radiology 243:736–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Leggett DA, Kelley BB, Bunce IH, Miles KA (1997) Colorectal cancer: diagnostic potential of CT measurements of hepatic perfusion and implications for contrast enhancement protocols. Radiology 205:716–720

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (project number C30500138)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jia Xiang Ni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, H.F., Du, Y., Ni, J.X. et al. Perfusion computed tomography evaluation of angiogenesis in liver cancer. Eur Radiol 20, 1424–1430 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1693-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1693-y

Keywords

Navigation