Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of intestinal bleeding with multi-detector row CT in an experimental setup. How many acquisitions are necessary?

  • Computed Tomography
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) acquired in different acquisitions (unenhanced, and arterial and portal venous phase following intravenous contrast medium) for detection of intestinal bleeding using an experimental bowel model. The model consisted of an injector tube with a perforation placed in a 7-m-long small bowel of a pig. The bowel was filled with water/contrast medium solution of 30–40 HU and was incorporated in a phantom model. Intestinal bleeding in different locations and bleeding velocities varying from zero to 0.75 ml/min (0.05 ml/min increments) were simulated. Twenty-six datasets in simulated unenhanced, arterial and portal venous contrast phase using increasing bleeding velocities and ten negative controls were measured using 64-row MDCT. Two radiologists blinded to the experimental settings evaluated the datasets in a random order. The likelihood of intestinal bleeding was assessed using a 5-point scale with subsequent ROC analysis. The overall sensitivity for detecting bleeding was 0.44 for an arterial acquisition alone, 0.68 for a portal venous acquisition, 0.68 for the combination unenhanced/arterial, 0.72 for unenhanced/portal venous and 0.80 for arterial/portal. Bleeding velocities of above 0.25 ml/min were detected with a sensitivity of 0.59 for arterial, 0.88 for portal venous, 0.85 for unenhanced/arterial, 0.94 for unenhanced/portal venous and 0.97 for arterial/portal venous contrast phase protocols, respectively. The specificity was 1.00. MDCT provides the highest sensitivity and specificity in the detection of intestinal bleeding using arterial and portal venous acquisition in comparison to mono-phase protocols.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jaeckle T, Stuber G, Hoffmann MH, Jeltsch M, Schmitz BL, Aschoff AJ (2008) Detection and localization of acute upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding with arterial phase multi-detector row helical CT. Eur Radiol 18:1406–1413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Amarteifio E, Sohns C, Heuser M, Pusken M, Lange B, Obenauer S (2008) Detection of gastrointestinal bleeding by using multislice computed tomography-acute and chronic hemorrhages. Clin Imaging 32:1–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Duchesne J, Jacome T, Serou M et al (2005) CT-angiography for the detection of a lower gastrointestinal bleeding source. Am Surg 71:392–397

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ko HS, Tesdal K, Dominguez E et al (2005) Localization of bleeding using 4-row detector-CT in patients with clinical signs of acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Rofo 177:1649–1654

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rajan R, Dhar P, Praseedom RK, Sudhindran S, Moorthy S (2004) Role of contrast CT in acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Dig Surg 21:293–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sabharwal R, Vladica P, Chou R, Law WP (2006) Helical CT in the diagnosis of acute lower gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Eur J Radiol 58:273–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yoon W, Jeong YY, Shin SS et al (2006) Acute massive gastrointestinal bleeding: detection and localization with arterial phase multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology 239:160–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ernst O, Bulois P, Saint-Drenant S, Leroy C, Paris JC, Sergent G (2003) Helical CT in acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Eur Radiol 13:114–117

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ettorre GC, Francioso G, Garribba AP, Fracella MR, Greco A, Farchi G (1997) Helical CT angiography in gastrointestinal bleeding of obscure origin. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:727–731

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tew K, Davies RP, Jadun CK, Kew J (2004) MDCT of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:427–430

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Roy-Choudhury SH, Gallacher DJ, Pilmer J et al (2007) Relative threshold of detection of active arterial bleeding: in vitro comparison of MDCT and digital subtraction angiography. Am J Roentgenol 189:W238–W246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ketai L (1998) Interventional gastrointestinal radiology. In: Juhl JH, Crummy AB, Kuhlman JE (eds) Paul and Juhl’s essentials of radiologic imaging. 7th edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 545–550

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nusbaum M, Baum S (1963) Radiographic demonstration of unknown sites of gastrointestinal bleeding. Surg Forum 13:374–375

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kuhle WG, Sheiman RG (2003) Detection of active colonic hemorrhage with use of helical CT: findings in a swine model. Radiology 228:743–752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoedema RE, Luchtefeld MA (2005) The management of lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2010–2024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dobritz M, Engels HP, Schneider A et al (2009) Evaluation of dual-phase multi-detector-row CT for detection of intestinal bleeding using an experimental bowel model. Eur Radiol 19(4):875–881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Dobritz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dobritz, M., Engels, HP., Schneider, A. et al. Detection of intestinal bleeding with multi-detector row CT in an experimental setup. How many acquisitions are necessary?. Eur Radiol 19, 2862–2869 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1510-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1510-7

Keywords

Navigation