Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The role of MR imaging in the diagnostic characterisation of appendicular bone tumours and tumour-like conditions

  • Musculoskeletal
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

MRI has an established role in the local staging of primary bone tumours. However, as the majority of tumours have non-specific appearances on MRI, the diagnosis is usually established on the basis of clinical history, plain film findings and biopsy. This article reviews the value of MRI in the further characterisation of appendicular bone tumours and tumour-like lesions, with particular reference to peri-lesional oedema, fluid-fluid levels, flow voids, fat signal, cartilage signal and dedifferentiation. These features are a useful adjunct for distinguishing between benign and malignant disease, pointing towards a more specific diagnosis, and guiding biopsy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1a, b
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4a–c
Fig. 5
Fig. 6a, b
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9a–c
Fig. 10a, b
Fig. 11
Fig. 12a–c
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17a, b

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Priolo F, Cerase A (1998) The current role of radiography in the assessment of skeletal tumors and tumor-like lesions. Eur J Radiol 27:S77–S85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rechl H, Hof N, Gerdesmeier L (2001) Differential diagnosis of bone and soft tissue tumors by MRI. Orthopade 30:528–539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Leung JC, Dalinka MK (2000) Magnetic resonance imaging in primary bone tumors. Semin Roentgenol 35:297–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kroon HM, Bloem JL, Holscher HC, van der Woude HJ, Reijnierse M, Taminiau AH (1994) MR imaging of edema accompanying benign and malignant bone tumors. Skeletal Radiol 23:261–269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Holscher HC, Bloem JL, Vanel D et al (1992) Osteosarcoma: chemotherapy-induced changes at MR imaging. Radiology 182:839–844

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lang P, Honda G, Roberts T et al (1995) Musculoskeletal neoplasm-perineoplastic edema versus tumour on dynamic postcontrast MR-images with spatial-mapping of instantaneous enhancement rates. Radiology 197:831–839

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Erdman WA, Tamburro F, Jayson HT, Weatherall PT, Ferry KB, Peshock RM (1991) Osteomyelitis: characteristics and pitfalls of diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 180:533–539

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hanna SL, Fletcher FL, Parham PD, Bugg MF (1991) Muscle oedema in musculoskeletal tumours: MR imaging characteristics and clinical significance. J Magn Reson Imaging 1:441–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Oxtoby JW, Davies AM (1996) MRI characteristics of chondroblastoma. Clin Radiol 5:22–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Assoun J, Richardi G, Railhac JJ (1994) Osteoid osteoma: MR imaging versus CT. Radiology 191:217–223

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. James SLJ, Hughes R, Ali K (2006) Saifuddin A MR imaging of bone marrow oedema associated with focal bone lesions. Clin Radiol 61:1003–1009

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ehara S, Rosenthal DI, Aoki J et al (1999) Peritumoral edema in osteoid osteoma on magnetic resonance imaging. Skeletal Radiol 28:265–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Spouge AR, Thain LM (2000) Osteoid osteoma: MR imaging revisited. Clin Imaging 24:19–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ebrahim FS, Jacobson JA, Lin J, Housner JA, Hayes CW, Resnick D (2001) Intraarticular osteoid osteoma: sonographic findings in three patients with radiographic, CT, and MR imaging correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:1391–1395

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hudson TM, Hamlin DJ, Fitzsimmons JR (1985) Magnetic resonance imaging of fluid levels in an aneurysmal bone cyst and in anticoagulated human blood. Skeletal Radiol 3:267–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mahnken AH, Nolte-Ernsting CC, Wildberger JE et al (2003) Aneurysmal bone cyst: value of MR imaging and conventional radiography. Eur Radiol 13:1118–1124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsai JC, Dalinka MK, Fallon MD, Zlatkin MB, Kressel HY (1990) Fluid-fluid level: a non-specific finding in tumors of bone and soft tissue. Radiology 175:779–782

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Dyck P, Vanhoenacker FM, Vogel J et al (2006) Prevalence, extension and characteristics of fluid-fluid levels in bone and soft tissue tumors. Eur Radiol 16:2644–2651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bonakdarpour A, Levy WM, Aegerter E (1978) Primary and secondary aneurysmal bone cyst: a radiological study of 75 cases. Radiology 126:75–83

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kransdorf MJ, Sweet DE (1995) Aneurysmal bone cyst: concept, controversies, patient presentation, and imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164:573–580

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Szendroi M, Cser I, Konya A, Renyi-Vamos A (1992) Aneurysmal bone cyst. A review of 52 primary and 16 secondary cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 111:318–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jaffe HL (1950) Aneurysmal bone cyst. Bull Hosp Joint Dis 11:3–13

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mirra JM (1989) Chondroblastoma. In: Mirra JM, Picci P, Gold RH (eds) Bone tumors. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 589–623

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kroon HM, Schurmans J (1990) Osteoblastoma: clinical and radiologic findings in 98 new cases. Radiology 175:783–790

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. O’Donnell P, Saifuddin A (2004) The prevalence and diagnostic significance of fluid-fluid levels in focal lesions of bone. Skeletal Radiol 33:330–336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bradley WG Jr (1988) Carmen lecture. Flow phenomena in MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 150:983–994

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Choi JA, Lee KH, Jun WS, Yi MG, Lee S, Kang HS (2003) Osseous metastasis from renal cell carcinoma: “flow-void” sign at MR imaging. Radiology 228:629–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Murakami R, Korogi Y, Sakamoto Y et al (1995) Skull metastasis from hepatocellular carcinoma. CT, MR and angiographic findings. Acta Radiol 36:597–602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bjersand AJ (1982) Bone involvement pattern in hypervascular lesions. Skeletal Radiol 9:103–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lorigan JG, O’Keeffe FN, Evans HL, Wallace S (1989) The radiologic manifestations of alveolar soft-part sarcoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 153:335–339

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Murphey MD, Fairbairn KJ, Parman LM, Baxter KG, Parsa MB, Smith WS (1995) Musculoskeletal angiomatous lesions: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 15:893–917

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mahnken AH, Tacke J, Wolter P, Buttner R, Haller JS, Gunther RW (2002) Cross-sectional imaging of primary osseous hemangiopericytoma. Eur Radiol 12:85–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Torigoe T, Matsumoto T, Terakado A, Takase M, Yamasaki S, Kurosawa H (2005) Primary pleomorphic liposarcoma of bone: MRI findings and review of the literature. Skeletal Radiol 21:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  34. Murphey MD, Arcara LK, Fanburg-Smith J (2005) From the archives of the AFIP: imaging of musculoskeletal liposarcoma with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 25:1371–1395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Marx HF, Colletti PM, Raval JK, Boswell WD Jr, Zee CS (1990) Magnetic resonance imaging features in melanoma. Magn Reson Imaging 8:223–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Campbell RS, Grainger AJ, Mangham DC, Beggs I, Teh J, Davies AM (2003) Intraosseous lipomas: report of 35 cases and a review of the literature. Skeletal Radiol 32:209–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Propeck T, Bullard MA, Lin J, Doi K, Martel W (2000) Radiologic-pathologic correlation of intraosseous lipomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:673–678

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Murphey MD, Carroll JF, Flemming DJ, Pope TL, Gannon FH, Kransdorf MJ (2004) From the archives of the AFIP: benign musculoskeletal lipomatous lesions. Radiographics 24:1433–1466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wenger DE, Wold LE (2000) Benign vascular lesions of bone: radiologic and pathologic features. Skeletal Radiol 29:63–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Beltran J, Herman LJ, Burk JM et al (1988) Femoral head avascular necrosis: MR imaging with clinical-pathologic and radionuclide correlation. Radiology 166:215–220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Sundaram M, Khanna G, El-Khoury GY (2001) T1-weighted MR imaging for distinguishing large osteolysis of Paget’s disease from sarcomatous degeneration. Skeletal Radiol 30:378–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Schweitzer ME, Levine C, Mitchell DG, Gannon FH, Gomella LG (1993) Bull’s-eyes and halos: useful MR discriminators of osseous metastases. Radiology 188:249–252

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Wada R, Lambert RG (2005) Deposition of intraosseous fat in a degenerating simple bone cyst. Skeletal Radiol 34:415–418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Vanel D, Bittoun J, Tardivon A (1998) MRI of bone metastases. Eur Radiol 8:1345–1351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Vanel D, Dromain C, Tardivon A (2000) MRI of bone marrow disorders. Eur Radiol 10:224–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Murphey MD, Walker EA, Wilson AJ, Kransdorf MJ, Temple HT, Gannon FH (2003) From the archives of the AFIP: imaging of primary chondrosarcoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 23:1245–1278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Cohen EK, Kressel HY, Frank TS et al (1988) Hyaline cartilage-origin bone and soft-tissue neoplasms: MR appearance and histologic correlation. Radiology 167:477–481

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Murphey MD, Flemming DJ, Boyea SR, Bojescul JA, Sweet DE, Temple HT (1998) Enchondroma versus chondrosarcoma in the appendicular skeleton: differentiating features. Radiographics 18:1213–1237

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Giudici MA, Moser RP, Kransdorf MJ (1993) Cartilaginous tumours of bone. Radiol Clin North Am 31:237–259

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Aoki J, Sone S, Fujioka F et al (1991) MR of enchondroma and chondrosarcoma: rings and arcs of Gd-DTPA enhancement. J Comput Assist Tomogr 15:1011–1016

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. De Beuckeleer LH, De Schepper AM, Ramon F, Somville J (1995) Magnetic resonance imaging of cartilaginous tumors: a retrospective study of 79 patients. Eur J Radiol 21:34–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Mirra JM, Gold R, Downs J, Eckardt JJ (1985) A new histologic approach to the differentiation of enchondroma and chondrosarcoma. Clin Orthop 201:214–237

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Geirnaerdt MJ, Hogendoorn PC, Bloem JL, Taminiau AH, van der Woude HJ (2000) Cartilaginous tumors: fast contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 214:539–546

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Malgheni J, Berg BV, Noel H, Maldague B (1992) Benign osteochondromas and exostotic chondrosarcomas: evaluation of cartilage cap thickness by ultrasound. Skeletal Radiol 21:33–37

    Google Scholar 

  55. Murphey MD, Choi JJ, Kransdorf MJ, Flemming DJ, Gannon FH (2000) Imaging of osteochondroma: variants and complications with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 20:1407–1434

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Woertler K, Lindner N, Gosheger G, Brinkschmidt C, Heindel W (2000) Osteochondroma: MR imaging of tumor-related complications. Eur Radiol 10:832–840

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Karasick D, Schweitzer ME, Eschelman DJ (1997) Symptomatic osteochondromas: imaging features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:1507–1512

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Norman A, Sissons HA (1984) Radiographic hallmarks of peripheral chondrosarcoma. Radiology 151:589–596

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Jee WH, Choe BY, Kang HS et al (1998) Nonossifying fibroma: characteristics at MR imaging with pathologic correlation. Radiology 209:197–202

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Frick MA, Sundaram M, Unni KK et al (2005) Imaging findings in desmoplastic fibroma of bone: distinctive T2 Characteristics. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1762–1767

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Vanhoenacker FM, Hauben E, De Beuckeleer LH, Willemen D, Van Marck E, De Schepper AM (2000) Desmoplastic fibroma of bone: MRI features. Skeletal Radiol 29:171–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Aoki J, Tanikawa H, Ishii K et al (1996) MR findings indicative of hemosiderin in giant-cell tumour of bone: frequency, cause, and diagnostic significance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:145–148

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Picci P, Baldini N, Sudanese A, Boniani S, Campanacci M (1986) Giant cell reparative granuloma and other giant cell lesions of the bones of the hands and feet. Skeletal Radiol 15:415–421

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Ilaslan H, Sundaram M, Unni KK (2003) Solid variant of aneurysmal bone cysts in long tubular bones: giant cell reparative granuloma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:1681–1687

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Dahlin DC, Beabout JW (1971) Dedifferentiation of low-grade chondrosarcomas. Cancer 28:461–466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Mercuri M, Picci P, Campanacci L, Rulli E (1995) Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma. Skeletal Radiol 24:409–416

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. MacSweeney F, Darby A, Saifuddin A (2003) Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma of the appendicular skeleton: MRI-pathological correlation. Skeletal Radiol 32:671–678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Saifuddin A, Mann BS, Mahroof S, Pringle JA, Briggs TW, Cannon SR (2004) Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma: use of MRI to guide needle biopsy. Clin Radiol 59:268–272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Futani H, Okayama A, Maruo S, Kinoshita G, Ishikura R (2001) The role of imaging modalities in the diagnosis of primary dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma. J Orthop Sci 6:290–294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Shuhaibar H, Friedman L (1998) Dedifferentiated parosteal osteosarcoma with high-grade osteoclast-rich osteogenic sarcoma at presentation. Skeletal Radiol 27:574–577

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Jelinek JS, Murphey MD, Kransdorf MJ, Shmookler BM, Malawer MM, Hur RC (1996) Parosteal osteosarcoma: value of MR imaging and CT in the prediction of histologic grade. Radiology 201:837–842

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, The Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Brockley Hill, Stanmore, HA7 4LP, Middlesex, UK

    F. Alyas, S. L. James & A. Saifuddin

  2. Department of Radiology, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Bristol Road, Northfield, Birmingham, B31 2AP, UK

    S. L. James & A. M. Davies

Authors
  1. F. Alyas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. L. James
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. M. Davies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Saifuddin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Saifuddin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alyas, F., James, S.L., Davies, A.M. et al. The role of MR imaging in the diagnostic characterisation of appendicular bone tumours and tumour-like conditions. Eur Radiol 17, 2675–2686 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0597-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0597-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation