Abstract
The South Georgia Shag Leucocarbo [atriceps] georgianus has breeding populations on the islands of South Georgia, the South Sandwich and South Orkney Islands. The South Orkney Islands are estimated to support ~ 18%–37% of the global population and South Georgia a further 37%–69%. Here, we examine changes in South Georgia Shag population size and productivity from Signy Island, South Orkney Islands, over a 43 year period (1978/1979 to 2020/2021) and from Bird Island, South Georgia, over a 32 year period (1989/1990 to 2020/2021). Analysis of total nesting pairs at Signy Island revealed an overall decline of 40.9% (− 1.3% per annum), with an increase during the 1980s, followed by a fluctuating decline from the 1990s to 2020/2021. Although the two Signy Island colonies showed correlated fluctuations in numbers of nesting pairs, over the whole time period these colonies showed markedly different population trajectories, indicating the limitations of using part-island counts to infer whole island trends, particularly given the low breeding-site fidelity in this species. Nest occupation in the larger colony (596 nests in 1978/1979) declined by 77.2% (− 3.5% per annum) whilst the smaller colony (50 nests in 1978/1979) exhibited an increase of 492% (+ 3.8% per annum). A decline in occupied nests of 58.3%, (− 2.8% per annum), has occurred in the Bird Island population since 1989/1990. Continuation of the significant decline in breeding numbers revealed in this study may be of important conservation concern, particularly as this trend has been mirrored at another site within the South Orkneys.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Beltran M, Tavella G, Casaux R (2017) The diet of post-breeding Antarctic shags Phalacrocorax bransfieldensis at Cockburn Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Mar Ornithol 45:17–19
Bertolin ML, Casaux R (2019) Diet overlap among top predators at the South Orkney Islands, Antarctica. Polar Biol 42:371–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-018-2428-9
Braun C, Esefeld J, Savelieva L, Peter HU (2021) Population decline of the cape petrel (Daption capense) on King George Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Polar Biol 44:1795–1801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-021-02914-4
Carlini AR, Coria NR, Santos MM, Libertelli MM, Donini G (2007) Breeding success and population trends in Adelie penguins in areas with low and high levels of human disturbance. Polar Biol 30:917–924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-006-0251-1
Casanovas P, Naveen R, Forrest S, Poncet J, Lynch HJ (2015) A comprehensive coastal seabird survey maps out the front lines of ecological change on the western Antarctic Peninsula. Polar Biol 38:927–940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-015-1651-x
Casaux R, Barrera-Oro E (2016) Linking population trneds of Antarctic shag (Phalacrocorax barnsfieldensis) and fish at Nelson Island, South Shetland Islands (Antarctica). Polar Biol 39:1491–1497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-015-1850-5
Casaux R, Barrero-Oro E (2006) Shags in Antarctica: their feeding behaviour and ecological role in the marine food web. Antarct Sci 18:3–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102006000010
Casaux R, Coria N, Barrero-Oro E (1997) Fish in the diet of the Antarctic shag Phalacrocorax bransfieldensis at Laurie Island, South Orkney Islands. Polar Biol 18:219–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003000050179
Casaux R, Ramon A (2002) The diet of the South Georgia shag Phalacrocorax georgianus at South Orkney Islands in five consecutive years. Polar Biol 25:557–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-002-0389-4
Cobley N (1986) Influence of age on the biology of the blue-eyed shag Phalacrocorax atriceps bransfieldensis (Murphy). British Antarctic Survey. Report available on request from the British Antarctic Survey Archives. H/1986/N10.
Cobley N (1992) Aspects of the population dynamics of Antarctic blue-eyed shags Phalacrocorax atriceps king. PhD, Durham University. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/6267/.
Coetzee BWT, Chown SL (2016) A meta-analysis of human disturbance impacts on Antarctic wildlife. Biol Rev 91:578–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12184
Coggan R (1997) Seasonal and annual growth rates in the Antarctic fish Notothenia coriiceps Richardson. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 213:215–229
Convey P, Morton A, Poncet J (1999) Survey of marine birds and mammals of the South Sandwich Islands. Polar Rec 35:107–124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247400026450
Coria NR, Montalti D, Rombola EF, Santos MM, Garcia Betono MI, Juares MA (2011) Birds at Laurie Island, South Orkney islands, Antarctica: breeding species and their distribution. Mar Ornithol 39:207–213
Crawford RJM et al (2003) Population, Breeding, Diet and Conservation of the Crozet Shag Phalacrocorax [atriceps] melanogenis at Marion Island, 1994/95-2002/03. Afr J Mar Sci 25:537–547. https://doi.org/10.2989/18142320309504043
Crawford RJM, Dyer BM, Upfold L, Makhado AB (2014) Congruent, decreasing trends of gentoo penguins and Crozet shags at sub-Antarctic Marion Island suggest food limitation through common environmental forcing. Afr J Mar Sci 36:225–231. https://doi.org/10.2989/1814232X.2014.926293
Creuwels JCS, Stark JS, Woehler EJ, van Franeker JA, Ribic CA (2005) Monitoring of a southern giant petrel Macronectes giganteus population on the Frazier Islands, Wilkes Land, Antarctica. Polar Biol 28:483–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-004-0663-8
Croxall JP, Prince PA (1980) Food, feeding ecology and ecological segregation of seabirds at South Georgia. Biol J Linn Soc 14:103–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1980.tb00101.x
Croxall JP, Prince PA, Hunter I, McInnes SJ, Copestake PG (1984) The seabirds of the Antarctic Peninsula, islands of the Scotia Sea, and Antarctic continent between 80W and 20W: their status and conservation. International Council for Bird Preservation Technical Publication No.2:637–666
Dunn M (2020) Counts of South Georgia shag Leucocarbo [atriceps] georgianus nests at Signy Island, South Georgia, from 1947–2020. UK Polar Data Centre BAS, Natural Environment Research Council, UK Research & Innovation. Cambridge. Version:1.0. https://doi.org/10.5285/CA60BFEC-9070-4967-920E-0C42554AD649
Dunn MJ, Adlard S, Taylor AP, Wood AG, Trathan PN, Ratcliffe N (2021) Un-crewed aerial vehicle population survey of three sympatrically breeding seabird species at Signy Island South Orkney Islands. J Polar Biol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-021-02831-6
Dunn MJ, Forcada J, Jackson JA, Waluda CM, Nichol N, Trathan PN (2019) A long-term study of gentoo penguin (Pygoscelis papua) population trends at a major Antarctic tourist site, Goudier Island, Port Lockroy. Biodivers Conserv 28:37–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1635-6
Dunn MJ, Jackson JA, Adlard S, Lynnes AS, Briggs DR, Fox D, Waluda CM (2016) Population size and decadal trends of three penguin species nesting at Signy Island South Orkney Islands. PLoS ONE 11:e0164025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164025
Dunn MJ, Jackson JA, Adlard S, Phillips RA (2015) Population size and trends of southern giant petrels (Macronectes giganteus) nesting at Signy Island, South Orkney Islands. Polar Biol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-015-1855-0
Forcada J, Trathan PN (2009) Penguin responses to climate change in the Southern Ocean. Global Change Biol 15:1618–1630
Forcada J, Trathan PN, Reid K, Murphy EJ, Croxall JP (2006) Contrasting population changes in sympatric penguin species in association with climate warming. Global Change Biol 12:411–423
Green K, Woehler EJ, Copley PB, Jones RT (1998) A review of the population status of the Heard Island cormorant Phalacrocorax nivalis. Mar Ornithol 26:69–74
Harris CM et al. (2015) Important bird areas in Antarctica 2015. BirdLife International and Environmental Research & Assessment Ltd. Cambridge. pp 313. http://www.era.gs/resources/iba/Important_Bird_Areas_in_Antarctica_2015_v5.pdf
Hinke JT, Salwicka K, Trivelpiece SG, Watters GM, Trivelpiece WZ (2007) Divergent responses of Pygoscelis penguins reveal a common environmental driver. Oecologia 153:845–855
IUCN (2021) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2020–2023 https://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 12 March 2021
Jenouvrier S, Barbraud C, Weimerskirch H (2003) Effects of climate variability on the temporal population dynamics of southern fulmars. Ecology 72:576–587. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2003.00727.x
Kennedy M, Spencer HG (2014) Classification of the cormorants of the world. Mol Phylogenet Evol 79:249–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.06.020
Lynch HJ, LaRue MA (2014) First global census of the Adélie penguin. Auk 131:457–466
Lynch HJ, Naveen R, Fagan WF (2008) Censuses of penguin, blue eyed shag Phalacrocorax atriceps and southern giant petrel Macronectes giganteus populations on the Antarctic Peninsula, 2001–2007. Mar Ornithol 36:83–97
Lynch HJ, Naveen R, Trathan PN, Fagan WF (2012) Spatially integrated assessment reveals widespread changes in penguin populations on the Antarctic Peninsula. Ecology 93:1367–1377
Lynch HJ, White R, Naveen R, Black A, Meixler MS, Fagan WF (2016) In stark constrast to widespread declines along the Scotia Arc, a survey of the South Sandwich Islands finds a robust seabird community. Polar Biol 39:1615–1625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-015-1886-6
Marchant S, Higgins PJ (1990) Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic birds. Vol 1. Ratites to ducks, vol 1. Oxford University Press, Melbourne
Massom RA et al (2006) Extreme anomolous atmospheric circulation in the west Antarctic peninsula region in austral spring and summer 2001/2002, AND Its profound impact on sea ice and biota. J Climate 19:3544–3571. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3805.1
Micol T, Jouventin P (2001) Long-term population trends in seven Antarctic seabirds at Pointe Geologie (Terre Adelie): human impact compared with environmental change. Polar Biol 24:175–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003000000193
Muggeo VMR (2003) Estimating regression models with unknown break-points. Stat Med 22:3055–3071. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1545
Muggeo VMR (2016) Testing with a nuisance parameter present only under the alternative: a score-based approach with application to segmented modelling. J Stat Comput Sim 86:3059–3067. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2016.1149855
Orta J (1992) Family Phalacrocoracidae (Cormorants). In: del Hoyo J, Elliot A, Sargatal J (eds) Handbook of the birds of the world, vol 1. Lynx Editions, Barcelona, pp 326–353
Pfeifer C, Rummler MC, Mustafa O (2021) Assessing colonies of Antarctic shags by unamnned aerial vehicle (UAV) at South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. Antarct Sci. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102020000644
Phillips RA, Silk JRD, Massey A, Hughes KA (2019) Surveys reveal increasing and globally important populations of south polar skuas and Antarctic shags in Ryder Bay (Antarctic Peninsula). Polar Biol 42:423–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-018-2432-0
Prince PA, Croxall JP (1983) Birds of South Georgia: new records and re-evaluations of status. Br Antarctic Surv Bull 59:15–27
Rootes DM (1988) The status of birds at Signy Island, South Orkney Islands. Br Antarctic Surv Bull 80:87–119
Ryan PG, Cooper J, Dyer BM, Underhill LG, Crawford RJM, Bester MN (2003) Counts of surface-nesting seabirds breeding at Prince Edward Island, summer 2001/02. Afr J Mar Sci 25:441–451. https://doi.org/10.2989/18142320309504033
Schrimpf M, Naveen R, Lynch HJ (2018) Population status of the Antarctic shag Phalacrocorax (atriceps) bransfieldensis. Antarct Sci 30:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954102017000530
Shaw P (1984) Factors affecting the breeding performance of the Antarctic blue-eyed shag (Phalacrocorax atriceps bransfieldensis). PhD, Durham University. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/7469/.
Shaw P (1986) Factors affecting breeding performance of Antarctic blue-eyed shags Phalacrocorax atriceps. Ornis Scand 17:141–150. https://doi.org/10.2307/3676863
Southwell C, McKinlay J, Emmerson L, Trebilco R, Newbery K (2010) Improving estimates of Adelie penguin breeding population size: developing factors to adjust one-off population counts for availability bias. CCAMLR Sci 17:229–241
Trathan PN et al (2015) Pollution, habitat loss, fishing, and climate change as critical threats to penguins. Conserv Biol 29:31–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12349
Trathan PN, Ratcliffe N, Masden EA (2012) Ecological drivers of change at South Georgia: the krill surplus, or climate variability. Ecography 35:983–993. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07330.x
Trivelpiece ZW, Hinke JT, Miller AK, Reiss CS, Trivelpiece SG (2011) Variability in krill biomass links harvesting and climate warming to penguin population changes in Antarctica. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:7625–7628
Van Franeker JA, Creuwels JCS, Van der Veer W, Cleland S, Robertson G (2001) Unexpected effects of climate change on the predation of Antarctic petrels. Antarct Sci 13:430–439
Wanless S, Harris MP, Morris JA (1992) Diving behaviour and diet of the blue-eyed shag at South Georgia. Polar Biol 12:713–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00238872
Wanless S, Harris MP, Morris JA (1995) Factors affecting daily activity budgets of South Georgian shags during chick rearing at Bird Island, South Georgia. Condor 97:550–558
Woehler EJ, Blight L, Bullock I (2010) Ornithological observations at Eckener Point, Antarctic Peninsula. Polar Rec 46:279–281. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003224740999012X
Woehler EJ et al. (2001) A statistical assessment of the status and trends of Antarctic and Sub-Antarctic seabirds. Report on SCAR BBS Workshop on Southern Ocean seabird populations. SCAR. Cambridge. pp 43. https://www.scar.org/library/scar-publications/occasional-publications/3514-a-statistical-assessment-of-the-status-and-trends-of-antarctic-and-sub-antarctic-seabirds/file/
Woehler EJ, Croxall JP (1997) The status and trends of Antarctic and Sub-Antarctic seabirds. Mar Ornithol 25:43–66
Wood A (2020) Whole island counts of South Georgia Shag nests at Bird Island, South Georgia, from 1989–2020. UK Polar Data Centre NERC, UK Research & Innovation. Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.5285/FC18715A-07D6-4D03-B27C-124637338201
Acknowledgements
We thank all the staff of the British Antarctic Survey (BAS) Signy Island and Bird Island Research Stations who have contributed to and supported the South Georgia Shag monitoring programme. We are very grateful to Sarah Wanless and Mike Harris for kindly allowing us to publish their Bird Island data and Laura Gerrish for her mapping assistance. We also thank Richard Phillips and Norman Ratcliffe for their discussions, and the helpful advice and comments of Michael Schrimpf and two other anonymous reviewers.
Funding
This study is part of the Ecosystems component of the British Antarctic Survey Polar Science for Planet Earth Programme, funded by The Natural Environment Research Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MJD conceived and designed the research. MJD, SA, ASL, DF and TIM contributed to the fieldwork. JAJ and MJD contributed to the data analyses. All authors contributed to and approved the written manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None of the authors have conflicts of interest/competing interests.
Ethical approval
Our research was approved by the British Antarctic Survey Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Board, and permission was granted by the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office on behalf of HM Secretary of State, under Sections 12 and 13 of the Antarctic Act, 1994, 2013.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
All authors and the British Antarctic Survey Polar Science for Planet Earth Programme consent to publication.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dunn, M.J., Adlard, S., Lynnes, A.S. et al. Long-term population size and trends of South Georgia Shags (Leucocarbo [atriceps] georgianus) at Signy Island, South Orkney Islands and Bird Island, South Georgia. Polar Biol 45, 177–189 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-021-02978-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-021-02978-2