Erratum to: Polar Biol DOI 10.1007/s00300-016-1901-6

In the original publication, five sites (12, 13, 14, 19, and 20) are mislabeled on Fig. 2 x-axis due to an error replacing site names with site codes as part of the revision. Specifically, the data presented for site 14 actually belongs to site 12 (Pony Lake), site 12 data belong to site 13 (MCM lower), and site 13 data belong to site 14 (MCM upper). Furthermore, data for 19 (Parera Pond) and 20 (Picture Pond) should be switched. This error is confined to the x-axis labels of Fig. 2 and does not affect other figures nor the conclusions made by the paper. The corrected Fig. 2 is presented below.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Dot plot representation of relative abundance counts averaged by water body. Site numbers are on the x-axis, and species names are on the y-axis. The size of a dot is proportional to the average relative abundance of a particular species as indicated in the legend. Note that sites 22–24 correspond to samples from Labyrinth Ponds 1–3 that contained no diatoms and have been omitted. See Table 1 for site numbers and Table 2 for species abbreviations