Correction to: Plant Cell Reports (2019) 38:1263–1271 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-019-02442-w

The authors signal an error in Fig. 1b which does not show the correct set of plants and should be replaced with the included new Fig. 1. Since the phenotypes are very similar between the two figures, this correction does not alter any of the findings or conclusions of the study.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Nup98 was an inhibitor of flowering. a Single mutants of nup98a1, nup98a2 and nup98b1 had similar flowering phenotypes to wild-type plants in Arabidopsis in long-day conditions. b Overexpression of Nup98 genes did not affect development of wild-type plants in long-day conditions. GFP or RFP genes were fused into Nup98a or Nup98b at N-terminus, and Nup98a was driven by 35S promoter and Nup98b was driven by either 35S promoter or its native promoter. cnup98a nup98b double mutants exhibited early flowering phenotypes, and overexpression of Nup98b can rescue the early flowering phenotype in long-day conditions. Red arrows indicate senescence leaves. d Flowering phenotypes of plants overexpressing different versions of Nup98 genes in different backgrounds. Red arrows indicate senescence leaves. e Statistical analysis of the number of rosette leaves of all plants in a–d. The different lowercase letters denote significant differences (one-way ANOVA with Tukey test, P < 0.05) among means (n > 30)

Full size image