Skip to main content
Log in

Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Fraxinus pennsylvanica hypocotyls and plant regeneration

  • Genetic Transformation and Hybridization
  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A genetic transformation protocol for green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) hypocotyl explants was developed. Green ash hypocotyls were transformed using Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 harboring binary vector pq35GR containing the neomycin phosphotransferase (nptII) and β-glucuronidase (GUS) fusion gene, and an enhanced green fluorescent protein gene. Pre-cultured hypocotyl explants were transformed in the presence of 100 μM acetosyringone using 90 s sonication plus 10 min vacuum-infiltration. Kanamycin at 20 mg l−1 was used for selecting transformed cells. Adventitious shoots regenerated on Murashige and Skoog medium supplemented with 13.3 μM 6-benzylaminopurine, 4.5 μM thidiazuron, 50 mg l−1 adenine sulfate, and 10% coconut water. GUS- and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive shoots from the cut ends of hypocotyls were produced via an intermediate callus stage. Presence of the GUS and nptII genes in GUS-positive shoots were confirmed by PCR and copy number of the nptII gene in PCR-positive shoots was determined by Southern blotting. Three transgenic plantlets were acclimatized to the greenhouse. This transformation and regeneration system using hypocotyls provides a foundation for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of green ash. Studies are underway using a construct containing the Cry8Da protein of Bacillus thuringiensis for genetic transformation of green ash.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BA:

6-Benzylaminopurine

EGFP:

Enhanced green fluorescent protein

GUS:

β-Glucuronidase

IAA:

Indole-3-acetic acid

IBA:

Indole-3-butyric acid

MS:

Murashige and Skoog

nptII:

Neomycin phosphotransferase

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

TDZ:

Thidiazuron

References

  • Bates SA (1997) Developing protocols to genetically transform white ash (Fraxinus americana L.). PhD Dissertation. Southern Illinois University at Carbondale

  • Cappaert D, McCullough DG, Poland TM, Siegert NW (2005) Emerald ash borer in North America: a research and regulatory challenge. Am Entomol 51:51–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty R, Viswakarma N, Bhat SR, Kirti PB, Singh BD, Chopra VL (2002) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of cauliflower: optimization of protocol and development of Bt-transgenic cauliflower. J Biosci 27(5):495–502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dobesberger EJ (2002) Emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis: pest risk assessment. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Plant Health Risk Assessment Unit, Nepean

  • Dong JZ, McHughen A (1993) An improved procedure for production of transgenic flax plants using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Sci 88:61–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Du N, Pijut PM (2008) Regeneration of plants from Fraxinus pennsylvanica hypocotyls and cotyledons. Sci Hortic 118(1):74–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res 50:151–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Padilla IM, Webb K, Scorza R (2003) Early antibiotic selection and efficient rooting and acclimatization improve the production of transgenic plum plants (Prunus domestica L.). Plant Cell Rep 22(1):38–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haack RA, Jendek E, Liu H, Marchant KR (2002) The emerald ash borer: a new exotic pest in North America. Newsl Mich Entomol Soc 47(3&4):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW (1987) GUS fusions: β-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J 6:3901–3907

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy HE (1990) Green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marsh.). In: Burns RM, Honkala BH (tech cords) Silvics of North America. Agric. handbook 654. USDA, Forest Service, Washington, pp 348–354

  • Kim KH, Lee YH, Kim D, Park YH, Lee JY, Hwang YS, Kim YH (2004) Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of Perilla frutescens. Plant Cell Rep 23:386–390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koroch A, Kapteyn J, Juliani HR, Simon JE (2002) In vitro regeneration and Agrobacterium transformation of Echinacea purpurea leaf explants. In: Janick J, Whipkey A (eds) Trends in new crops and new uses. ASHS Press, Alexandria, pp 522–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee YH, Lee SB, Suh SC, Byun MO, Kim HO (2000) Herbicide resistant cabbage (Brassica oleracea ssp. capitata) plants by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. J Plant Biotechnol 2:35–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefort F, Douglas GC (1999) An efficient micro-method of DNA isolation from mature leaves of four hardwood tree species Acer, Fraxinus, Prunus and Quercus. Ann Des Sci Forestières 56:259–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li ZJ, Jayasankar S, Gray DJ (2004) Bi-directional duplex promoters with duplicated enhancers significantly increase transgene expression in grape and tobacco. Transgenic Res 13:143–154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu ZC, Park BJ, Kanno A, Kameya T (2005) The novel use of a combination of sonication and vacuum infiltration in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) with lea gene. Mol Breed 16:189–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd G, McCown B (1981) Commercially feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel, Kalmia latifolia, by use of shoot-tip culture. Proc Int Plant Prop Soc 30:421–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murray BE, Handyside RJ, Keller WA (1977) In vitro regeneration of shoots on stem explants of haploid and diploid flax (Linum usitatissimum). Can J Genet Cytol 19:177–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Park BJ, Liu ZC, Kanno A, Kameya T (2005) Genetic improvement of Chinese cabbage for salt and drought tolerance by constitutive expression of a B. napus LEA gene. Plant Sci 169(3):553–558

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pathak MR, Hamzah RY (2008) An effective method of sonication-assisted Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of chickpeas. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 93:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poland TM, McCullough DG (2006) Emerald ash borer: invasion of the urban forest and the threat to North America’s ash resource. J For 104(3):118–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohini VK, Manjunath NH, Rao KS (2005) Studies to develop systems to mobilize foreign genes into parasitic flowering plants. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 11(1):111–120

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roome WJ (1992) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of two forest tree species Prunus serotina and Fraxinus pennsylvanica. MS Thesis, State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry

  • SAS Institute (1999) The SAS system for Windows, ver. 8. SAS Inst., Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin D, Park HS (2006) Enhancement of genetic transformation for seedlings of Brassica juncea L. Czern var. Laciniata Makino by chemical wounding. Korean J Breed 38(5):366–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Stachel SE, Messens E, Van Montagu M, Zambryski P (1985) Identification of signal molecules produced by wounded plant cells that activate T-DNA transfer in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Nature 318:624–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steward FC, Caplin SM, Shantz EM (1955) Investigations on the growth and metabolism of plant cells. Ann Bot 19:29–47

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Supartana P, Shimizu T, Nogawa M, Shioiri H, Nakajima T, Haramoto N, Nozue M, Kojima M (2006) Development of simple and efficient in planta transformation method for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Biosci Bioeng 102(3):162–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trick HN, Finer JJ (1997) Sonication-assisted Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Transgenic Res 6(5):329–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USDA FAS (2004) Foreign agricultural service export commodity aggregations. Department of Commerce, US Census Bureau, Foreign Trade Statistics

  • Wang X, Zhou Z, Li Q, Gu XH, Ma DF (2006) Optimization of genetic transformation using SAAT in sweetpotato. Jiangsu J Agric Sci 22(1):14–18

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wei X, Guo X, Yuan T, Russell SD (2006) A highly efficient in vitro plant regeneration system and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in Plumbago zeylanica. Plant Cell Rep 25(6):513–521

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yookongkaew N, Srivatanakul M, Narangajavana J (2007) Development of genotype-independent regeneration system for transformation of rice (Oryza sativa ssp. indica). J Plant Res 120(2):237–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yu C (1992) Agrilus arcopoli Obenberger. In: Xiao GR (ed) Forest insects of China, 2nd edn. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing, pp 400–401

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported financially by a Fred M. van Eck scholarship for Purdue University to Ningxia Du. The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Dennis J. Gray, University of Florida, for the transformation vector pq35GR, and Drs. Shujun Chang and Zhijan Li for their constructive review and suggestions for the improvement of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paula M. Pijut.

Additional information

Communicated by W. Harwood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Du, N., Pijut, P.M. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Fraxinus pennsylvanica hypocotyls and plant regeneration. Plant Cell Rep 28, 915–923 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-009-0697-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-009-0697-z

Keywords

Navigation