Skip to main content
Log in

Transformation of a recalcitrant grain legume, Vigna mungo L. Hepper, using Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated gene transfer to shoot apical meristem cultures

  • Genetic Transformation and Hybridization
  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The efficiency of Vigna mungo L. Hepper transformation was significantly increased from an average of 1% to 6.5% by using shoot apices excised from embryonic axes precultured on 10 μM benzyl-6-aminopurine (BAP) for 3 days and wounded prior to inoculation in Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 carrying the binary vector pCAMBIA2301, which contains a neomycin phosphotransferase gene (nptII) and a β-glucuronidase (GUS) gene (gusA) interrupted by an intron. The transformed green shoots that were selected and rooted on medium containing kanamycin, and which tested positive for nptII gene by polymerase chain reaction, were established in soil to collect seeds. GUS activity was detected in whole T0 shoots and T1 seedlings. All T0 plants were morphologically normal, fertile and the majority of them transmitted transgenes in a 3:1 ratio to their progenies. Southern analysis of T1 plants showed integration of nptII into the plant genome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1a–p
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BAP:

6-Benzylaminopurine

IBA:

Indole-3-butyric acid

2-ip:

6-(γ-γ-Dimethylallylamino) purine

AdS:

Adenine sulfate

MSB:

MS salts with B5 vitamins

References

  • Aragao FJL, Ribeiro SG, Barros LMG, Brasileiro ACM, Maxwell DP, Rech EL, Faria JC (1998) Transgenic beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) engineered to express viral antisense RNAs show delayed and attenuated symptoms of bean golden mosaic geminivirus. Mol Breed 4:491–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Aragao FJL, Sarokin L, Vianna GR, Rech EL (2000) Selection of transgenic meristematic cells utilizing a herbicidal molecule results in the recovery of fertile transgenic soybean (Glycine max L. Merril) plants at high frequency. Theor Appl Genet 101:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brar GS, Cohen BA, Vick CL, Johnson GW (1994) Recovery of transgenic peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) plants from elite cultivars utilizing ACCELL technology. Plant J 5:745–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Brar MS, Anderson EJ (1997) In vitro shoot tip multiplication of cowpea. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 33:114–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunning JL, Kintz BL (1977) Computational handbook of statistics, 2nd edn. Scott Foresman, Glenview, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christou P, Swain WF, Yang N-S, Mc Cabe DE (1989) Inheritance and expression of foreign genes in transgenic soybean plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:7500–7504

    Google Scholar 

  • Das DK, Shiva Prakash N, Bhalla Sarin N (1998) An efficient regeneration system of black gram (Vigna mungo L.) through organogenesis. Plant Sci 134:199–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Escudero J, Neuhaus G, Schlappi M, Hohn B (1996) T-DNA transfer in meristematic cells of maize provided with intracellular Agrobacterium. Plant J 10:355–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin G, Ignacimuthu S (2000) Differential morphogenetic response of cotyledonary explants of Vigna mungo. Biol Plant 43:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Nutrient requirement of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res 50:151–158

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gill R, Eapen S, Rao PS (1987) Morphogenic studies of cultured cotyledons of urd bean (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). J Plant Physiol 130:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati A, Jaiwal PK (1994) Plant regeneration from cotyledonary node explants of mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). Plant Cell Rep 13:523–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignacimuthu S, Franklin G (1999) Regeneration of plantlets from cotyledon and embryogenic axis explants of Vigna mungo L. Hepper. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 55:75–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaiwal PK, Singh RP (eds) (2003) Focus on biotechnology, vol 10A. Improvement strategies for leguminosae biotechnology. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW (1987) GUS fusions: β-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J 6:3901–3907

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira A (2000) A transgenic perspective on plant functional genomics. Transgenic Res 9: 245–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers SO, Bendich AJ (1988) Extraction of DNA from plant tissues. In: Gelvin SB, Schilperoot RA (eds) Plant molecular biology manual. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Russel DR, Wallace KM, Bathe JH, Martinell BJ, Mc Cabe DE (1993) Stable transformation of Phaseolus vulgaris via electric-discharge mediated particle acceleration. Plant Cell Rep 12:165–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo L, Sugla T, Jaiwal PK (2003) In vitro regeneration and genetic transformation of Vigna species. In: Jaiwal PK, Singh RP (eds) Focus on biotechnology, vol 10B. Applied genetics of leguminosae biotechnology. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 89–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Saini R, Jaiwal PK (2002) Age, position in mother seedling, orientation, and polarity of the epicotyl segments of blackgram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) determines its morphogenic response. Plant Sci 163:101–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Saini R, Jaiwal S, Jaiwal PK (2003) Stable genetic transformation of Vigna mungo L. Hepper via Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Cell Rep 21:851–859

    Google Scholar 

  • Santalla M, Power JB, Davey MR (1998) Efficient in vitro shoot regeneration responses of Phaseolus vulgaris and P. coccineus. Euphytica 102:195–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen J, Guha-Mukherjee S (1998) In vitro induction of multiple shoots and plant regeneration in Vigna. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 34:276–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiv Prakash N, Pental D, Bhalla-Sarin N (1994) Regeneration of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) from cotyledonary node via multiple shoot formation. Plant Cell Rep 13:623–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Somers DA, Samac DA, Olhoft PM (2003) Recent advances in legume transformation. Plant Physiol 131:892–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stachel SE, Messens E, Van Montagu M, Zambryski P (1985) Identification of signal molecules produced by wounded plant cells that activate T-DNA transfer in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Nature 318:624–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne GCH, Santarem ER, Ferreira AG (1995) Adventitious bud induction and plant regeneration from soybean cotyledonary nodes. Int J Expt Bot 57:127–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Villemont E, Dubois F, Sangwan RS, Vasseur G, Bourgeois Y, Sangwan-Norreel BS (1997) Role of the host cell cycle in the Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of Petunia: evidence of an S-phase control mechanism for T-DNA transfer. Planta 201:160–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright MS, Koehler SM, Hinchee MA, Carnes MG (1986) Plant regeneration by organogenesis in Glycine max. Plant Cell Rep 5:150–154

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

P.K. Jaiwal is grateful to the Department of Biotechnology(DBT), New Delhi, for funding the research programme, to The Centre for Application of Molecular Biology to International Agriculture (CAMBIA), Australia for plasmid CAMBIA2301, and to Dr. M.V. Rajam, UDSC, New Delhi, for help in southern hybridisation. Raman Saini is grateful to DBT for a Senior Research Fellowship

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pawan K. Jaiwal.

Additional information

Communicated by W.A. Parrot

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saini, R., Jaiwal, P.K. Transformation of a recalcitrant grain legume, Vigna mungo L. Hepper, using Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated gene transfer to shoot apical meristem cultures. Plant Cell Rep 24, 164–171 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-005-0934-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-005-0934-z

Keywords

Navigation