Skip to main content
Log in

Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.)

  • Genetic Transformation and Hybridization
  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transient expression studies using blueberry leaf explants and monitored by β-glucuronidase (GUS) assays indicated Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 was more effective than LBA4404 or GV3101; and the use of acetosyringone (AS) at 100 μM for inoculation and 6 days co-cultivation was optimum compared to 2, 4, 8, 10 or 12 days. Subsequently, explants of the cultivars Aurora, Bluecrop, Brigitta, and Legacy were inoculated with strain EHA105 containing the binary vector pBISN1 with the neomycin phosphotransferase gene (nptII) and an intron-interrupted GUS gene directed by the chimeric super promoter (Aocs)3AmasPmas. Co-cultivation was for 6 days on modified woody plant medium (WPM) plus 100 μM AS. Explants were then placed on modified WPM supplemented with 1.0 mg l−1 thidiazuron, 0.5 mg l−1 α-naphthaleneacetic, 10 mg l−1 kanamycin (Km), and 250 mg l−1 cefotaxime. Selection for Km-resistant shoots was carried out in the dark for 2 weeks followed by culture in the light at 30 μE m−2 s−1 at 25°C. After 12 weeks, selected shoots that were both Km resistant and GUS positive were obtained from 15.3% of the inoculated leaf explants of cultivar Aurora. Sixty-eight independent clones derived from such shoots all tested positive by the polymerase chain reaction using a nptII primer. Eight of eight among these 68 clones tested positive by Southern hybridization using a gusA gene derived probe. The transformation protocol also yielded Km-resistant, GUS-positive shoots that were also PCR positive at frequencies of 5.0% for Bluecrop, 10.0% for Brigitta and 5.6% for Legacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1a–d
Fig. 2
Fig. 3a–d
Fig. 4a–f
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alsheikh MK, Suso H-P, Robson M, Battey NH, Wetten A (2002) Appropriate choice of antibiotic and Agrobacterium strain improves transformation of antibiotic-sensitive Fragaria vesca and F.v. semperflorens. Plant Cell Rep 20:1173–1180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Billings SG, Chin CK, Jelenkovic G (1988) Regeneration of blueberry plantlets from leaf segments. HortScience 23:63–766

    Google Scholar 

  • Boase MR, Butler RC, Borst NK (1998) Chrysanthemum cultivar-Agrobacterium interactions revealed by GUS expression time course experiments. Sci Hortic 77:89–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Callow P, Haghighi K, Giroux M, Hancock J (1989) In vitro shoot regeneration on leaf tissue from micropropagated highbush blueberry. HortScience 24:372–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao X, Hammerschlag FA (2000) Improved shoot organogenesis from leaf explants of highbush blueberry. HortScience 35:945–947

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cao X, Liu Q, Rowland LJ, Hammerschlag FA (1998) GUS expression in blueberry (Vaccinium spp.): factors influencing Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer efficiency. Plant Cell Rep 18:266–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cao X, Hammerschlag FA, Douglass L (2002) A two step pretreatment significantly enhances shoot organogenesis from leaf explants of highbush blueberry cv. ‘Bluecrop’. HortScience 37:819–821

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cao X, Fordham I, Douglass L, Hammerschlag FA (2003) Sucrose level influences micropropagation and gene delivery into leaves from in vitro propagated highbush blueberry shoots. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 75:255–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson PA, Simmonds DH (2000) Susceptibility to Agrobacterium tumefaciens and cotyledonary node transformation in short-season soybean. Plant Cell Rep 19:478–484

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlenfeldt MK, Prior RL (2001) Oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) and phenolic and anthocyanin concentrations in fruit and leaf tissues of highbush blueberry. J Agric Food Chem 49:2222–2227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fari M, Nagy I, Csanyi M, Mityko J, Andrasfalvy A (1995) Agrobacterium mediated genetic transformation and plant regeneration via organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis from cotyledon leaves in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Plant Cell Rep 15:82–86

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fasolo F, Zimmerman RH, Fordham I (1989) Adventitious shoot regeneration from leaves of in vitro grown shoots of apple cvs. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 16:75–87

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graham J, Greig K, McNicol RJ (1996) Transformation of blueberry without antibiotic selection. Ann Appl Biol 128:557–564

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammat N, Grant NJ (1998) Shoot regeneration from leaves of Prunus serotina Ehrh. (black cherry) and P. avium L. (wild cherry). Plant Cell Rep 17:526–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekema A, Hirsch PR, Hooykaas PJJ, Schilperoort RA (1983) A binary plant vector strategy based on separation of Vir- and T-region of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti-plasmid. Nature 303:179–180

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hood EE, Gelvin SB, Melchers LS, Hoekema A (1993) New Agrobacterium helper plasmids for gene transfer to plants. Transgenic Res 2:208–218

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horsch RB, Fry JE, Hoffmann, NL, Eichholtz D, Rogers SG, Fraley RT (1985) A simple and general method for transferring genes into plants. Science 227:1229–1231

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huetteman CA, Peece JE (1993) Thidiazuron: a potent cytokinin for woody plant tissue culture. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 33:105–119

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Humara JM, Lópet M, Ordás RJ (1999) Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Pinus pinea L. cotyledons: an assessment of factors influencing the efficiency of uidA gene transfer. Plant Cell Rep 19:51–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW (1987) GUS fusions: β-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J 6:3901–3907

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khachatourians GG, McHughen A, Scorza R, Nip W, Hui YH (2002) Transgenic plants and crops. Dekker, New York, pp 327–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Koncz C, Schell J (1986) The promoter of Ti-DNA gene controls the tissue-specific expression of chimaeric genes by a novel type of Agrobacterium binary vector. Mol Gen Genet 204:383–396

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Liu C, Ritchie SW, Peng J, Gelvin SB, Hodges TK (1992) Factors influencing Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression of gusA in rice. Plant Mol Biol 20:1037–1048

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd E, McCown B (1980) Commercially feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel, Kalmia latifolia, by use of shoot tip culture. Proc Intl Plant Prop Soc 30:421–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Narasimhulu S, Deng X, Sarria R, Gelvin SB (1996) Early transcription of Agrobacterium T-DNA genes in tobacco and maize. Plant Cell 8:873–886

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ni M, Cui D, Einstein J, Narasimhulu S, Vergara CE, Gelvin SB (1995) Strength and tissue specificity of chimeric promoters derived from the octopine and mannopine synthase genes. Plant J 7:661–676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prior RL, Cao G, Martin A, Sofic E, McEwen J, O’Brien C, Lischner N, Ehlenfeldt M, Kalt W, Krewer G, Mainland M (1998) Antioxidant capacity is influenced by total phenolic and anthocyanin content, maturity, and variety of Vaccinium species. J Agric Food Chem 46:2686–2693

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reed BM, Abdelnour-Esquivel A (1991) The use of zeatin to initiate in vitro cultures of Vaccinium species and cvs. HortScience 26:1320–1322

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland LJ, Ogden EL (1992) Use of a cytokinin conjugate for efficient shoot regeneration from leaf sections of highbush blueberry. HortScience 27:1127–1129

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vervliet G, Holsters M, Teuchy H, Van Montagu M, Schell J (1975) Characterization of different plaque-forming and defective temperate phages in Agrobacterium strains. J Gen Virol 26:33–48

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Viss WJ, Pitrak J, Humann J, Cook M, Driver J, Ream W (2003) Crown-gall-resistant transgenic apple trees that silence Agrobacterium tumefaciens oncogenes. Mol Breed 12:283–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. S. Gelvin, Purdue University, for providing plasmid pBISN1, Drs. Jim Hancock and Peter Callow, Michigan State University for providing the cv. Aurora and technical assistance on micropropagation, respectively, and Dr. A. N. Kravchenko for statistical consultation. This research was supported by MSU Project GREEEN (Generating Research and Extension to Meet Economic and Environmental Needs).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. C. Sink.

Additional information

Communicated by J.M. Widholm

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Song, GQ., Sink, K.C. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.). Plant Cell Rep 23, 475–484 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-004-0842-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-004-0842-7

Keywords

Navigation