Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of the body mass index, basal metabolic rate, and body fat on the radiofrequency echographic multi-spectrometry (REMS)-based bone mineral density and fracture risk: a cross-sectional study

  • Observational Research
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Radiofrequency echographic multi-spectrometry (REMS) is a method to assess bone mineral density (BMD) of the axial skeleton, fragility score (FS), body mass index (BMI), basal metabolic rate (BMR), and body fat (BF) in %. The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of the BMI, BMR, and BF on the BMD and fracture risk with REMS. We conducted a cross-sectional study among 313 women, aged 20–90 years who underwent a screening for osteoporosis with REMS. Kruskal–Wallis was used to analyze the differences in BMI, BMR, and BF between the groups according to the BMD: normal BMD, osteopenia and osteoporosis and differences in the FS, fracture risk assessment (FRAX) for major osteoporotic fractures and for hip fractures (HF) according to the BMI groups: underweight, normal weight, overweight, obese, and extreme obese. Linear regression was used to assess the correlations BMI–BMD, BMR–BMD, and BF–BMD. BMI, BMR, and BF differed significantly between the groups according to the BMD (p < 0.001, p = 0.028, and p < 0.001, respectively). BMR showed high positive correlation to BMD (R = 0.765) with 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.715, 0.807] and significance of p < 0.001. BMI correlated significantly to BMD (p < 0.001), the correlation was low positive (R = 0.362) with 95% CI [0.262, 0.455]. In the BMI groups, there was significant difference in FRAX for HF and FS with p value 0.014 and < 0.001, respectively. Subjects with low BMI, BMR, and BF are at high risk for osteoporosis. Underweight women show significantly high fracture risk, assessed with FRAX and FS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data available on request due to privacy/ethical restrictions.

References

  1. Salari Sharif P, Abdollahi M, Larijani B (2011) Current, new and future treatments of osteoporosis. Rheumatol Int 31:289–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jordan KM, Cooper C (2002) Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 5(16):795–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sinigaglia L, Varenna M, Girasole G, Bianchi G (2006) Epidemiology of osteoporosis in rheumatic diseases. Rheum Dis Clin 32(4):631–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kanis JA, McCloskey EV (1998) Risk factors in osteoporosis. Maturitas 30(3):229–233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Senosi MR, Fathi HM, Baki NMA, Zaki O, Magdy AM, Gheita TA (2022) Bone mineral density, vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms, fracture risk assessment (FRAX), and trabecular bone score (TBS) in rheumatoid arthritis patients: connecting pieces of the puzzle. Clin Rheumatol 41(5):1333–1342

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Georgescu CE, Ilie I, Brad C, Duncea I (2010) Association between body composition and bone mineral density in healthy, non-obese, young Romanian adults and effects of menopause. Maedica 5(1):24–27

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang MC, Bachrach LK, Van Loan M, Hudes M, Flegal KM, Crawford PB (2005) The relative contributions of lean tissue mass and fat mass to bone density in young women. Bone 37(4):474–481

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. El Badri D, Rostom S, Bouaddi I, Hassani A, Chkirate B, Amine B, Hajjaj-Hassouni N (2014) Effect of body composition on bone mineral density in Moroccan patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pan African Med J 17

  9. Chen Z, Lohman TG, Stini WA, Ritenbaugh C, Aickin M (1997) Fat or lean tissue mass: which one is the major determinant of bone mineral mass in healthy postmenopausal women? J Bone Miner Res 12(1):144–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Reid IR (2002) Relationships among body mass, its components, and bone. Bone 31(5):547–555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gnudi S, Sitta E, Fiumi N (2007) Relationship between body composition and bone mineral density in women with and without osteoporosis: relative contribution of lean and fat mass. J Bone Miner Metab 25:326–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gonnelli S, Caffarelli C, Nuti R (2014) Obesity and fracture risk. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 11(1):9

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Thomas T, Burguera B (2002) Is leptin the link between fat and bone mass? J Bone Miner Res 17(9):1563–1569

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hsu YH, Venners SA, Terwedow HA, Feng Y, Niu T, Li Z, Xu X (2006) Relation of body composition, fat mass, and serum lipids to osteoporotic fractures and bone mineral density in Chinese men and women. The American journal of clinical nutrition 83(1): 146–154

  15. Bergkvist D, Hekmat K, Svensson T, Dahlberg L (2009) Obesity in orthopedic patients. Surg Obe Related Dis 5(6):670–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ensrud KE, MPh, RCL, Orwoll ES, Genant HK, Cummings SR, Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group (1997) Body size and hip fracture risk in older women: a prospective study. Am J Med 103(4): 274-280

  17. Premaor MO, Pilbrow L, Tonkin C, Parker RA, Compston J (2010) Obesity and fractures in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 25(2):292–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Prieto‐Alhambra D, Premaor MO, Fina Avilés F, Hermosilla E, Martinez‐Laguna D, Carbonell‐Abella C, Díez‐Pérez A (2012) The association between fracture and obesity is site‐dependent: a population‐based study in postmenopausal women. J Bone Min Res 27(2): 294–300

  19. Moayyeri A, Luben RN, Wareham NJ, Khaw KT (2012) FM is a predictor of risk of osteoporotic fractures in women but not in men: a prospective population study. J Intern Med 271(5):472–480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Odén A, Johansson H, McCloskey EFRAX (2008) FRAX™ and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19:385–397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Pisani P, Conversano F, Muratore M, Adami G, Brandi ML, Caffarelli C, Casciaro S (2023) Fragility score: a REMS-based indicator for the prediction of incident fragility fractures at 5 years. Aging Clin Exp Res 35(4): 763–773

  22. Adami G, Arioli G, Bianchi G, Brandi ML, Caffarelli C, Cianferotti L, Gatti D, Girasole G, Gonnelli S, Manfredini M, Muratore M, Quarta E, Quarta L (2020) Radiofrequency echographic multi spectrometry for the prediction of incident fragility fractures: a 5-year follow-up study. Bone 134:115297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Compston JE, Watts NB, Chapurlat R, Cooper C, Boonen S, Greenspan S, Glow Investigators (2011) Obesity is not protective against fracture in postmenopausal women: GLOW. Am J Med 124(11): 1043–1050

  24. Di Paola M, Gatti D, Viapiana O, Cianferotti L, Cavalli L, Caffarelli C, Rossini M (2019) Radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry compared with dual X-ray absorptiometry for osteoporosis diagnosis on lumbar spine and femoral neck. Osteoporosis Int 30:391–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Body composition module, EchoLight user manual, rev. 02, 02/04/2020

  26. Pisani P, Conversano F, Muratore M, Adami G, Brandi ML, Caffarelli C, Casciaro E, Di Paola M, Franchini R, Gatti D, Gonnelli S, Guglielmi G, Lombardi FA, Natale A, Testini V, Casciaro S (2023) Fragility score: a REMS-based indicator for the prediction of incident fragility fractures at 5 years. Aging Clin Exp Res 35(4):763–773

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Simpkins RC, Downs TN, Lane MT (2017) FRAX Prediction with and without bone mineral density testing. Fed Pract 34(5):40–43

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Albala C, Yanez M, Devoto E, Sostin C, Zeballos L, Santos JL (1996) Obesity as a protective factor for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Int J Obe Related Metab Dis 20(11):1027–1032

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. De Laet CEDH, Kanis JA, Odén A, Johanson H, Johnell O, Delmas P, Tenenhouse A (2005) Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Osteoporosis Int 16: 1330–1338

  30. Johansson H, Kanis JA, Odén A, McCloskey E, Chapurlat RD, Christiansen C, Zillikens MC (2014) A meta‐analysis of the association of fracture risk and body mass index in women. J Bone Min Res 29(1): 223–233

  31. Khu A, Sumardi M (2020) A REMS scan-based report on relation between body mass index and osteoporosis in urban population of medan at royal prima hospital. Maj Kedokt Bdg 52:22–27

    Google Scholar 

  32. Choi JW, Pai SH (2003) Bone mineral density correlates strongly with basal metabolic rate in postmenopausal women. Clin Chim Acta 333(1):79–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hsu WH, Fan CH, Lin ZR, Hsu RWW (2013) Effect of basal metabolic rate on the bone mineral density in middle to old age women in Taiwan. Maturitas 76(1):70–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, Borgström F, Ström O, McCloskey E (2009) FRAX® and its applications to clinical practice. Bone 44(5):734–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gnudi S, Sitta E, Lisi L (2009) Relationship of body mass index with main limb fragility fractures in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Metab 27:479–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nikola Kirilov.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

All authors of this research paper have directly participated in the planning, execution, analysis of this study and contributed equally to this work. All authors take full responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of all aspects of the work and have approved the final version to be published.

The study was approved by the ethics commission for scientific research of the Medical Faculty, Trakia University, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria. (Protocol number: 26, date 01.06.2023).

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kirilov, N., Vladeva, S., Bischoff, F. et al. Effect of the body mass index, basal metabolic rate, and body fat on the radiofrequency echographic multi-spectrometry (REMS)-based bone mineral density and fracture risk: a cross-sectional study. Rheumatol Int 43, 2271–2279 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-023-05460-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-023-05460-w

Keywords

Navigation