Physical activity (PA) is a primary non-pharmacological treatment option for those living with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA). The aim of this systematic literature review was to summarize and present an updated synthesis of the factors associated with PA in the RA and SpA populations. A tailored search of PubMed (inc. Medline), Web of Science, Embase, APA PsycNET, and Scopus was conducted for research published between 2004 and June 2019. Methodological quality was assessed using The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Quality Assessment Tools for Observational Cohort and Cross-sectional Studies, Case–Control Studies, and Controlled Intervention Studies. Forty RA and eleven SpA articles met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was generally fair to good, with two RA studies rated as poor. Correlates are discussed in the sociodemographic, physical, psychological, social, and environmental categories. Environmental factors were not measured in any RA study. In individuals living with RA, consistent positive associations were found between PA and high-density lipoprotein, self-efficacy, and motivation. Consistent negative associations were found for functional disability and fatigue. In individuals with SpA, consistent positive associations were found between PA and quality of life, and consistent negative associations with functional disability. Physical and psychological factors are most consistently related with PA parameters in those living with RA and SpA. Many variables were inconsistently studied and showed indeterminant associations. Studies with prospective designs are needed to further understand the factors associated with PA in these populations, especially in those living with SpA.
Spondyloarthritis (SpA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are chronic inflammatory diseases which share the occurrence of fluctuating flares and stable disease activity [1,2,3,4]. Clinically, those with SpA (specifically axial spondyloarthritis) often suffer from inflammatory back pain, sacroiliitis, stiffness, and extreme fatigue , whereas those with RA often suffer from joint swelling, cartilage damage and synovial joint destruction . Both inflammatory conditions cause disability and are associated with work challenges [7, 8] and reduced health-related quality of life . The prevalence of SpA ranges from 0.20% in South-East Asia to 1.61% in Northern Arctic communities, whereas the prevalence of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) ranges from 0.02% in Sub-Saharan Africa to 0.35% in Northern Arctic communities . In terms of RA, results of a meta-analyses of 67 studies showed the global prevalence to be 460 per 100,000 between the years 1980 to 2019 .
Progressive and beneficial pharmacological treatments for SpA and RA include non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs [12, 13]. However, in recent European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations, physical activity (PA) has been proposed as an integral option for the non-pharmacological management of inflammatory arthritides . The latest World Health Organizations (WHO) 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour  are the same for healthy adults and those with chronic conditions. Here, the recommendations are that all adults should undertake at least 150 to 300 min of moderately intense aerobic PA or 75 to 150 min of vigorously intense PA, whilst also conducting muscle-strengthening PA at least 2 days per week on all major muscle groups. For adults aged 65 years and older, multicomponent PA focusing on strength training and functional balance is also recommended. Despite the recommendations, those with SpA and RA have been shown to be more sedentary and less physically active than their healthy counterparts [16, 17].
People living with SpA and RA receive similar benefits to their healthy counterparts from engaging in regular PA, including increased muscle strength and cardiovascular fitness . However, supplementary benefits of PA in the SpA and RA population include a reduction in disease activity and inflammation [19, 20]. While the aforementioned studies demonstrate how PA interventions can improve general and disease-related health of individuals with RA and SpA, challenges arise both before and after the PA intervention itself. Adherence to PA after intervention is an example of one challenge in the SpA and RA populations [21, 22], yet this review will focus on the initial challenge of identifying the factors that associate with PA behaviour. Correlates of PA provide clinically relevant information that needs early consideration in intervention design to maximise the potential benefits of a PA intervention.
Despite a growing body of research on the correlates of PA, little research has collated the data in those with SpA. Wilcox et al.  initially evaluated the correlates of PA in people living with inflammatory arthritis, however, only two studies were identified that included SpA participants. In narrowing the focus to just people living with RA, a more recent review by Larkin and Kennedy  reported positive associations between PA and health perception, self-efficacy, motivation, and levels of previous PA. In addition, coerced regulation style, fatigue, and specific physiological variables were negatively associated with PA. Nevertheless, Larkin and Kennedy  concluded there were no definite correlates of PA, prompting the need for more research to aid clinical practitioners in supporting PA behaviour in those with RA. To address the current lack of synthesis of PA correlates in those with SpA and the advancing research utilizing objective measures of PA in inflammatory rheumatic conditions, an updated comprehensive review is needed to allow a better understanding of the factors related to PA in people living with SpA and RA. Therefore, the aim of the present work is to provide an updated synthesis of the factors most strongly associated with PA among people living with SpA and RA.
The protocol for this review was registered online with a prospective registry of systematic reviews (PROSPERO ID: CRD42019138993). Where possible, the ‘Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses’ (PRISMA) recommendations  were followed.
A systematic search was conducted using a tailored search strategy in the following databases: PubMed (inc. Medline), Web of Science, Embase, APA PsycNET, and Scopus. The search strategy was developed based on a preliminary search in PubMed to identify relevant terminology, search terms employed by similar reviews into correlates of PA in inflammatory arthritis, and discussions with a subject librarian and the research team. The databases were searched from 2004 to June 2019, to develop and further a review previously conducted by Larkin and Kennedy . An example of the search strategy used is shown below. The search was restricted to articles with human participants and published in English. Additional eligible studies the author became aware of were included.
Example search strategy for PubMed (inc. Medline)
(Spondyloarthr* OR spondyloarthritis[mh] OR “ankylosing spondylitis*” OR ankylosing spondylitis[mh] OR “rheumatoid arthritis” OR rheumatoid arthritis[mh]) AND (“physical activity” OR physical activity[mh] OR exercis* OR exercise[mh] OR stretch* OR yoga* OR train*) AND (determinant* OR correl* OR factor* OR predict* OR participat* OR “exercise belief”) All others are [all fields].
*indicates the use of all possible suffixes.
Quantitative observational studies and experimental studies that explored correlates of PA in adults (≥ 18 years) with SpA and/or RA were included. Intervention studies were eligible for inclusion if baseline data were reported. Study participants must have had a diagnosis of RA using the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) /EULAR criteria . Due to the limited number of studies, those with SpA were included if they received a doctor diagnosis, but not if the diagnosis was self-reported. SpA diagnoses that were eligible included: axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA); non-radiographic spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA); ankylosing spondylitis (AS); psoriatic arthritis (PsA); enteropathic arthritis (EnA); reactive arthritis (ReA); and undifferentiated spondyloarthritis (uSpA). Studies utilising self-reported (questionnaires) and objective measures (accelerometers, pedometers, calorimetry, doubly labelled water, and heart rate monitors) of PA were included. For consistency with other reviews , PA was defined in this work as ‘any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that results in energy expenditure’ . Exercise is a subcategory of PA, that is distinct in definition by its ‘planned, structured and repetitive’ nature, with an ‘objective to improve or maintain physical fitness component(s)’ . Cross-sectional studies where PA was not the dependent variable were included.
Articles were excluded if they were not published between 2004 and June 2019 and if the study participants were aged younger than 18 years. Qualitative studies and studies that exclusively explored functional or physiological variables of PA in SpA and RA were excluded. Studies that included multiple forms of arthritis but did not analyse the data separately were excluded. Studies that reported on physical inactivity were included, but those reporting exclusively on sedentary behaviour were excluded as sedentary behaviour is independent from physical (in)activity . Longitudinal studies in which PA was not the dependent variable were excluded, unless baseline data were reported. Abstracts, conference proceedings, and grey literature were excluded.
Screening and data extraction
The first author conducted the database searches and imported them to the reference manager software Endnote, whereby duplicates were removed. The abstracts were then imported into the review management software Covidence  and further duplicates removed. The first author screened all titles and abstracts independently against the selection criteria, with a second author independently screening 40% to determine eligibility. The same method was used for the review and selection of full text articles. During these two stages a consensus approach was used to resolve any disputes. All disputes were resolved without the need for consultation with a third author. Data extraction was conducted by the first author. Data such as participant characteristics, study design, measure of PA, variables analysed, statistical test, and statistical output were extracted.
Selected articles fulfilling the inclusion criteria were assessed for methodological quality using The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Quality Assessment Tools for Observational Cohort and Cross-sectional Studies and Case–Control studies . These assessment tools are recommended and deemed acceptable . The assessment tools appraise studies based on the following concepts: objectives; population and sample size; timeframe; outcome measure; exposure variables and measures; attrition; blinding; and analysis. Each of the questions were scored as yes, no, cannot determine, not applicable, or not reported as appropriate. A final quality rating of good, fair, or poor is afforded to each study by the reviewer. The lead author independently assessed the quality of studies, with a following two authors independently assessing 50% each. Any disputes were resolved via a consensus method between the authors, and further consultation from a third author was not warranted.
Data synthesis and coding
Following discussions with the research team, meta-analysis was not conducted due to the nature of included studies (e.g., type of PA and statistics reported). Rather, the coding framework employed by Sallis et al.  was used to pool and classify the associations between PA parameters and potential correlates into largely positive/negative ( ±), indeterminant / inconsistent (?) or no association (0). Following this framework, univariate tests were reported, even if multivariate tests were presented. The results will be presented using this approach for consistency across studies. Yet, an associations table utilizing the most adjusted or final statistical model for each variable can be seen in Online Resources 1 and 2. Conceptually similar variables were grouped together, for example, “high-density lipoprotein” (HDL) included, HDL, HDL particle, small particle, and large particle concentration. To be consistent with previous reviews , the correlates identified were categorised into the following domains: sociodemographic, physical, psychological, social, and environmental.
For studies utilizing multiple measures of PA (i.e., subjective, objective, or multiple subjective), correlations from all PA measures were included. Both categorical (e.g., active vs. inactive, meeting PA recommendations, health-enhancing PA, exercising ≥ 2/week) and continuous PA parameters (e.g., total PA min, step count, time spent in PA intensities, metabolic equivalent of task, physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE), accelerometer counts) were eligible for inclusion. Continuous parameters of PA are reported above categorical parameters of PA if the same study reports both. However, if a variable was analysed as a potential correlate of a categorical PA parameter, but not of a continuous PA parameter, this was included. Up to two PA parameters were included for each study (indicators of total PA considered first), apart from if multiple measures of PA were used, so that one study population is not overrepresented. If more than two types of PA intensity were reported in a study (i.e., light PA (LPA), moderate-intensity PA (MI-PA), vigorous-intensity PA (VI-PA)), the two most intense categories were included. For accelerometer data, PAEE was considered over total energy expenditure (TEE).
Study selection, characteristics and quality
Fifty-one published articles (RA = 40; SpA = 11) were included with the full screening process provided in Fig. 1. The predominant reasons for exclusion were that the studies did not report correlates of PA (n = 30) and that the study included mixed diagnoses, non-specific arthritides or did not analyse RA and SpA data separately (n = 19). A description of each study and the overall methodological quality can be seen in Tables 1 and 2. The number of RA participants ranged from 20 to 3,152, whereas the number of SpA participants ranged from 24 to 2,167. Three RA studies utilized participants from the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Registers [35,36,37], and a further two used participants from the Swedish RA register [40, 41] . Two RA studies contained the same patients from 3 hospitals in The Netherlands [49, 53]. Two other RA studies used participants and cross-sectional data from the same randomized clinical trial investigating the effectiveness of a PA promotion intervention in the USA [38, 54]. One randomized intervention study  investigated the effects of a 12-week low-impact aerobic exercise programme on disease and psychological variables, and aerobic fitness, in those with RA. The randomized intervention study compared a class exercise treatment group, a home exercise treatment group (via videotape), and a control group . Two SpA studies included patients from the Skåne Healthcare Register [78, 79]. Most RA studies had a larger proportion of female participants than male, and four RA studies included only female participants [39, 64, 65, 67]. Twelve RA studies were conducted in the United States and twenty-five were conducted in Europe. Ten of the eleven SpA studies were conducted in Europe. The pooled associations and correlates of PA in those with RA and SpA are displayed in Tables 3 and 4. The results are coded in terms of the specific variable and not necessarily the statistical direction derived from the measure of the variable. Online resources 3 and 4 show the positive and negative statistics for each variable related to PA in all included studies.
Measurement of PA
Self-reported measures of PA were used in twenty-seven RA studies. Twenty-one RA studies used known self-report questionnaires, whereas six studies applied custom questionnaires or interviews. Objective measures of PA were used in fourteen RA studies. Thirteen RA studies used an accelerometer, and one used a Liferecorder. Nine SpA studies used self-reported measures of PA, whereby, five SpA studies used validated questionnaires, and a further four used customized scales. Objective measures of PA were used in four SpA studies (i.e., accelerometers).
Correlates of PA in rheumatoid arthritis
The most frequently studied sociodemographic variables were age and gender. Across studies, age and gender showed inconsistent associations with PA, yet the direction of associations were largely split between inverse (age, 53%; female gender, 47%) or no relationship. Higher educational level and employment status were indeterminately associated with PA parameters; however, over half of the associations were reported as positive (educational level, 55%; and employment status, 50%). Non-significant associations were found for race/ethnicity, income, marital status, living status, and smoking.
Consistent negative associations with PA were reported for functional disability (60%) and fatigue (61%). However, Løppenthin et al.  utilized the five domains of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20 ), contributing four negative and one non-significant association to the pooling. Removing this study would categorise fatigue as inconsistently related to PA parameters, with only 54% of associations negative. Although disease activity and body mass index (BMI) received inconsistent summary codes, 42% and 38% of associations were negative. Disease activity was measured using the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) in 19 studies, the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) in 2 studies, and the Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index (RADAI) in 2 studies (based on included associations). The pooled associations between sleep and PA were indeterminant, with two associations supporting a positive relationship (40%). Non-significant associations with PA were consistently reported for RA duration, comorbidities, tender and swollen joint count, strength and muscle function, and pain.
Of the biochemical variables, HDL was consistently positively related to PA parameters (67%), whereas low-density lipoprotein (LDL) was unrelated. Additional variables demonstrating consistent and non-significant associations with PA parameters include erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and cardiovascular risk.
In adults with RA, motivation was consistently and positively related to PA in 5 of the 6 comparisons (83%), in addition to, self-efficacy in 7 of 10 comparisons (70%). Motivation was assessed in 5 studies, using a variety of scales (Customized scale based on the Perceived Competence Scale, n = 1; an adapted scale (for endurance and strength training motivation) previously used in those with arthritis, n = 1; the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ), n = 2; and a 6-item scale for assessing motivation for increasing PA (confidence to maintain an active lifestyle) based on the Interaction Model of Client Health Behavior (IMCHB), n = 1). Self-efficacy was assessed in 8 studies, also using a range of assessment tools (Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale (ESES), n = 2; Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES), n = 1; an adapted scale (for endurance and strength training self-efficacy) previously used in those with arthritis, n = 1; Lorig’s Self Efficacy Scale (for managing arthritis), n = 1; goal self-efficacy subscale of the Self-Regulation Skills Battery, n = 1; the mean of two confidence measures, n = 1; and the Self-Efficacy Scale 28 (for fatigue), n = 1). One study investigated subjective vitality, whereby a positive correlation with light PA was found (r = 0.27, p < 0.05) . Positive associations were seen for exercise beliefs and outcome expectations (50%), health perception (43%) and health-related quality of life (40%), yet these resulted in inconsistent summary codes. The psychological variables most consistently reporting non-significant associations with PA were depression/anxiety (75%), coping strategies for fatigue (100%) and the individual components of the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36; 87%). Studies utilizing the individual components of the SF-36 were grouped due to the disparity of studies reporting total quality of life versus the individual components.
The relationship between social support and PA parameters were examined in six studies. Within these six studies, 6 of 9 associations between social support and PA were non-significant (67%).
Environmental variables were not examined in any of the included RA studies.
Three associations from two studies (100%) found that already established PA at baseline was a significant positive predictor of PA. Eurenius et al.  found that high baseline PA predicted high levels of PA after one year (OR 3.85, 95% CI 1.67–9.09). Similarly, Demmelmaier et al.  identified three trajectories of PA over two years, and previously established PA was a significant positive predictor of being in the stable high vs the decreasing or stable low trajectory. Further, negative associations were reported in one study between PA and the number and length of hospital admissions . Medications and biological treatment were not significantly related to PA parameters. Negative associations were found for corticosteroid use  and glucocorticoid therapy .
Pooled associations based on most adjusted or final model statistics
Online Resource 1 shows the pooled associations when considering the final model and adjusted associations for each variable. When pooled in this fashion, the indeterminant relationships of employment status shifted to unrelated. Further, the positive relationships of alcohol use and gait speed changed to unrelated. The negative relationships of functional disability, abdominal obesity, nutritional complications, and hypertension shifted to inconsistent. Fatigue was negatively related to PA parameters, yet when pooling for the most adjusted or final models this relationship changed to unrelated. This association change remained the same when removing the results reported by Løppenthin et al.  which contributed five independent domains of fatigue. The inconsistent pooled results for disease activity, triglycerides, health perception, fear avoidance beliefs, and health-related quality of life all shifted to unrelated.
Pooled associations with only objective measures of PA
The main differences between the pooled associations from all studies and the pooled associations from studies using objective measures of PA are as follows (all studies vs objective PA studies): age (16/30, 53%, ?? vs. 6/10, 60%, − −); gender (9/19, 47%, ?? vs. 4/5, 80%, − −); race/ethnicity (2/6, 33%, 00 vs. 1/2, 50%, ?); educational level (6/11, 55%, ?? vs. 2/3, 67%, +); smoking (2/6, 33%, 00 vs. 1/2, 50%, ?); RA duration (7/25, 28%, 00 vs. 5/11, 45%, ??); comorbidities (3/10, 30%, 00 vs. 2/4, 50%, ?); disease activity (13/31, 42%, ?? vs. 5/18, 28%, 00); strength and muscle function (2/6, 33%, 00 vs. 1/2, 50%, ?); balance (1/4, 25%, 0 vs. 1/2, 50%, ?); fatigue (11/18, 61%, − − vs. 1/2, 50%, ?); sleep (2/5, 40%, ? vs. 1/3, 33%, 0); metabolic syndrome (2/3, 67%, − vs. 0/1, 0%, 0); HDL (6/9, 67%, ++ vs. 1/2, 50%, ?); exercise beliefs and outcome expectations (5/10, 50%, ?? vs. 2/2, 100%, +); depression / anxiety (2/8, 25%, 00 vs. 1/2, 50%, ?); health perception (6/14, 43%, ?? vs. 1/3, 33%, 0); social support (2/9, 22%, 00 vs. 1/1, 100%, +). Some variables were only assessed in studies using self-reported measures of PA and therefore comparisons cannot be made (e.g., income, fear avoidance beliefs).
Correlates of PA in Spondyloarthritis
In adults with SpA, none of the sociodemographic variables showed consistent positive or negative associations with PA. Marital status and smoking were negatively related to PA in 1 of 2 associations (50%), resulting in inconsistent summary scores. Age and gender were consistently not associated with PA; however, in two studies (29%) and one study (17%) respectively, positive associations were found. Some evidence suggested that variables such as employment status, education and raising children under 12 years old, were also unrelated to PA.
The two most frequently studied physical variables were functional disability and disease activity. Functional disability was the only physical variable that was consistently and negatively associated with PA parameters (62% of 13 associations). The summary score between disease activity and PA was deemed indeterminant, however, 42% of 19 associations were negative. Disease activity was assessed using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) in 8 studies and the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS-CRP) in 4 studies (based on included associations). One study utilized the total Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) score as an indicator of spinal immobility and found it unrelated with PA . However, Arends et al.  investigated the separate components of spinal mobility in relation to PA using three different measures of PA (International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), Short QUestionnaire to ASsess Health-enhancing physical activity (SQUASH) and Actigraph, GT1M). The Modified Schober test and cervical rotation were positively related to PA in 2 of 3 (67%) comparisons. One positive association was found between lateral spinal flexion and accelerometer measured PA (33%), whereas one negative association was reported between occiput-to-wall distance and PA measured using the SQUASH (33%). Chest expansion was unrelated to PA parameters. The direction of these associations indicates that PA is positively related to spinal mobility. In one study , negative associations were seen for reduced activity, mental and physical fatigue (30%), however other sub-categories of the MFI-20-G were non-significant (70%).
In one study, SpA subtypes such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-related arthritis and uSpA were not significantly associated with meeting WHO MI-PA or VI-PA recommendations, however, one negative relationship (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56–0.92, p = 0.009) between the diagnosis of PsA and meeting the VI-PA WHO recommendations was found . Extra-musculoskeletal manifestations, BMI, ESR and CRP were also unrelated to PA.
Of the psychological variables, only higher quality of life was consistently and positively related to increased PA parameters (83%) in adults with SpA. Although motivation was only investigated in one study, the indeterminant summary code is not overly representative of the findings from this study. Brophy et al.  investigated motivation using the Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2) and found relationships between motivation, individual motivation regulations and PA. Positive associations between intrinsic (β slope 1320 (960–1680), p < 0.05) and identified motivation (β slope 994 (651.5–1336), p < 0.05) and PA were found. Further, introjected motivation and external motivation were unrelated to PA, while amotivation (β slope − 667 (− 1242 to − 92), p < 0.05) was negatively related. The findings by Brophy et al.  are consistent with the tenets of self-determination theory showing that autonomous motivations towards exercise had the greatest influence on PA levels . Thus, moving forward, motivation will be discussed as being positively related to PA in those with SpA. Health perceptions, depression, and anxiety were unrelated to PA, yet the associations were derived from only three studies.
Social variables were not examined in any of the included SpA studies.
Seasonal variation was the only environmental factor explored. One cross-sectional comparative study  showed a positive relationship (p ≤ 0.02) between total weekly PA energy expenditure and summer months (i.e., as compared to winter).
In one study , results of multiple logistic regression analyses showed that previous levels of PA positively predicted PA after two years (OR 37.03, 95% CI 3.85–370.00, p = 0.002). Physiotherapy and the use of biologics or medication were unrelated to PA. Yet, one multicentre observational study limited to retrospective data, reported that age at onset of anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha (anti-TNFα) therapy was negatively related to PA, whereas anti-TNFα use was associated with increased PA .
Pooled associations based on most adjusted or final model statistics
Considering the results of the pooled associations of PA based on the most adjusted or final models for each variable (see Online Resource 2), the association of employment status and symptom duration shifted (non-significant to indeterminant). Further, the indeterminant association of disease activity changed to unrelated.
Pooled associations with only objective measures of PA
The main differences between the pooled associations from all studies and the pooled associations from studies using objective measures of PA are as follows (all studies vs objective PA studies): disease activity (8/19, 42%, ?? vs. 1/7, 14%, 00); ESR (1/3, 33%, 0 vs. 1/1, 100%, −); CRP (1/4, 25%, 0 vs. 1/1, 100%, −); lateral spinal flexion (1/3, 33%, 0 vs. 1/1, 100%, +); and quality of life (5/6, 83%, + + vs. 1/2, 50%, ?). Several variables were only measured in studies using self-reported measures of PA and therefore comparisons cannot be made (e.g., employment status, comorbidities, motivation, and previous levels of PA).
This systematic review provides a needed update of the multifaceted correlates of PA in RA, in a field advancing in pharmacological treatments and more frequently utilizing objective measures of PA. To the best of our knowledge, this is also the first systematic review to synthesise the correlates of PA among adults living with SpA. A total of 40 RA and 11 SpA studies were reviewed with correlates examined in the following domains: sociodemographic; physical; psychological; social; and environmental.
Main correlates of PA—Rheumatoid Arthritis
The current systematic review extends and updates Larkin and Kennedy’s  review that was limited to ten studies with mainly cross-sectional designs (8/10) and only one study utilizing objective measures of PA. The pooled results of the RA studies in this review support those presented by Larkin and Kennedy . Motivation, self-efficacy, and previous levels of PA were positively associated with PA parameters. Fatigue and plasma glucose were negatively related with PA. HDL was consistently positively related with PA parameters. However, the positive association of health perception with PA was indeterminant in this review. Additional positive associations identified via this latest review include, any use of alcohol, gait speed, lean fat/mass, apolipoprotein A1 and subjective vitality. Additional negative associations include functional inability, stiffness, abdominal obesity, body fat, hypertension, blood pressure, metabolic syndrome, nutritional complications, insulin resistance, RA-related joint surgery, and hospital admissions/length. The most frequently studied variables showing a lack of consistent findings include age, gender, educational level, BMI, disease activity, exercise beliefs, health perception, and health-related quality of life.
This review did not find any of the sociodemographic variables to be consistently related to PA in those with RA. Some evidence that any use of alcohol (100%, n = 1/1) was positively related to PA was reported, however, this was investigated in one study, and was unrelated to PA when the results where pooled based on the most adjusted or final models for each variable. Age and female gender were inconsistently related to PA; however, the associations were predominantly negative (age, 53%, n = 16/30; female gender, 47%, n = 9/19) and non-significant. The trend towards a negative relationship is somewhat consistent with findings in the general population of older adults, whereby higher age and female sex are associated with a decreased likelihood of persistent PA over ten years . The reason for inconsistent or indeterminant pooled associations between sociodemographic variables and PA is likely to be multifaceted. For example, the age ranges between samples varies considerably, with studies utilizing both narrow (i.e., 40–70 years)  and wide (i.e., 19–90 years)  age ranges. Further, a gender imbalance is observed in many studies, with a female dominance of participants. Assessment of PA may also be a factor, as when pooling only associations of objective measures of PA, female gender was consistently and negatively related to PA (80%, n = 4/5). A possible reason for the negative association between female gender and PA could be that females report greater disease activity and physical function, compared to males with RA . Race/ethnicity was consistently unrelated to PA parameters, yet, caution should be taken in the interpretation of this result, as racial or ethnic minorities were not proportionately represented in some studies. For example, one study reported that 71% of participants were Caucasian, whereas 2% were Asian, and 22% African American . In another study of 573 individuals with RA, 94% of the participants were Caucasian .Of the physical variables, functional disability was the most consistent and negative correlate of PA parameters (60%, n = 18/30). Although the findings were more inconsistent when considering the most adjusted or final model statistics, this finding corroborates recent reports linking worse physical functioning to lower levels of PA in those with early RA  and PA maintenance over a 7-year period . Further, fatigue was negatively related to PA (61%, n = 11/18), yet the results may be distorted due to one study  utilizing the five separate domains of the MFI-20. Univariately, Løppenthin et al.  found four of the five domains of fatigue to be inversely associated with regular PA. However, in the multivariate model, only reduced activity due to fatigue and physical fatigue remained significant. Predominantly, our findings support recent longitudinal studies showing a negative relationship between fatigue and PA [89, 90]. Interestingly, disease activity was inconsistently related to PA, however, almost half of the associations were negative (42%, n = 13/31). Disease activity was unrelated to PA when pooling the results based on the most adjusted statistics or when considering studies utilizing objective measures of PA. One possible reason for the inconsistency in results might relate to whether participants were experiencing a flare when PA was measured. Further, the relationship between disease activity and PA might be dependent on the contribution of other variables in explaining PA. For example, recent reports have shown no association between PA and disease activity, when controlling for age and fatigue . BMI and obesity have been shown to negatively associate with PA in the general population  and those with hip osteoarthritis , yet our findings suggest this relationship is more inconsistent in people living with RA (38%, n = 8/21). This inconsistency in findings is not surprising considering the complex nature of energy expenditure, which is largely determined by body composition and body weight . In support of a previous review , RA duration and pain was unrelated to PA parameters. The most consistent physiological variable positively related to PA parameters was HDL (67%, n = 6/9). Other physiological variables, especially those detecting inflammation (i.e., ESR and CRP), were unrelated to PA.
Self-efficacy was one of the most consistent psychological variables positively related with PA (70%, n = 7/10). Greater self-efficacy has been positively associated with PA in healthy populations  and women with other long-term conditions such as fibromyalgia . This review adds to the evidence supporting the association between self-efficacy and PA previously reported by Larkin and Kennedy , with the addition of six more studies (seven associations) in the RA population. Inconsistent findings were reported for exercise beliefs and expectations, health perception (including global health/assessment), and health-related quality of life. Motivation was the most consistent psychological variable positively related to PA (83%, n = 5/6) in this review. This positive relationship is supported by studies highlighting the importance of autonomous motivation in predicting PA participation levels in 207 RA members of the National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society  and in increased engagement in moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) during a randomized controlled trial . Two studies investigating motivation regulation style (on the self-determination theory continuum), showed an autonomous regulatory style to be associated with higher PA, and a more controlling regulatory style to relate to lower PA. The importance of autonomous regulations in fostering PA behaviour is supported by the findings of a systematic review exploring the relationship between self-determination theory constructs (e.g., autonomous vs. controlled motivation) and PA .
Social variables in this review were limited to social support and no significant relationship was found. This non-significant relationship was surprising as research conducted with people living with knee and hip osteoarthritis, has reported that perceptions of autonomy support from their spouse regarding PA to be positively related to PA, while perceived pressure from a female spouse (to a male partner), has been shown to be negatively related to PA . In the current review, positive (n = 2), negative (n = 1), and non-significant relationships (n = 6) were found between social support and PA parameters. The variability in results may be due to the differences in assessment methods (Social Support for Exercise Behaviors Scale, 2 studies; Important Other Climate Questionnaire, 1 study; Health Care Climate Questionnaire, 1 study; Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey, 2 studies), type of PA parameter (e.g., total PA, trajectory of PA, health-enhancing PA or LPA), or the type of individual assessed for social support (e.g., spouse, friend, rheumatologist). Further research is needed to explore this variability and the factors that affect the relationship between social correlates and PA behaviour.
No environmental correlates were investigated in the RA studies. Of the other variables, and in concordance with two other reviews [23, 24], previous levels of PA were shown to be positively associated with PA parameters (100%, n = 3/3).
Main correlates of PA—Spondyloarthritis
In SpA studies, positive associations with PA were found for components of spinal mobility (Modified Schober test and cervical rotation), maximum volume of oxygen (VO2max), quality of life, motivation, previous PA and seasonal variation. However, in a model predicting PA after two years, spinal immobility (total BASMI) was not significant . Negative associations with PA were found for functional disability, having AS, being amotivated, and age at onset of anti-TNFα therapy. Indeterminant associations were found for marital status, smoking, disease activity, and PsA subtype. All other variables were not significantly associated with PA parameters.
None of the sociodemographic variables were positively or negatively related to PA in those with SpA. Gender and age were unrelated to PA in this review. However, total self-reported PA, in 24 AS patients (aged 48 ± 11 ) and meeting the WHO MI-PA recommendations in 2,167 SpA patients (aged 55 ± 14 ) were positively associated with age in two studies (29%, n = 2/7). Marital status and smoking were inconsistently related to PA and employment status, education and children raised under 12 years old were unrelated in a limited number of studies.
Of the physical variables, functional disability was frequently investigated, with studies consistently supporting a negative correlation with PA parameters (62%, 8/13). This is supported by recent findings from a prospective cohort study which found that time spent in MVPA was associated with better function . Surprisingly, spinal immobility, measured via total BASMI score was only reported in one study . Here, a non-significant association with PA was reported. However, Arends et al.  reported on the relationship between PA and the separate domains of spinal mobility, and together, the direction of associations indicates that higher PA is related to better spinal mobility. This association has also been supported in relation to time spent in MVPA , yet the evidence from exercise programmes is more conflicting and lacks clarity . Longitudinal studies are needed to help clarify the relationship between PA and spinal mobility, and the types of PA most related.
Mixed and inconsistent associations were found between PA and disease activity, with studies reporting positive (n = 3), negative (n = 8) and non-significant (n = 8) associations. Such disparity in findings is commensurate with a review investigating the correlates of PA in people with arthritis . The inconsistency in results may partially be due to the intensity of PA measured, for example, one study showed that higher disease activity (measured via the BASDAI) was associated with greater LPA in adults with AS aged ≥ 52 years, but not associated with MVPA in AS patients across all ages . A further explanation for the inconsistency in results may be that some individuals with SpA may participate in PA as a reaction to disease activity, in comparison to those who may start PA engagement earlier as a preventative measure against disease activity. Interestingly, only one study investigated whether SpA subtype was associated with PA . In multivariate analyses, uSpA and IBD-related arthritis were not significantly associated with meeting the MI-PA or VI-PA recommendations, however, PsA was negatively related to meeting VI-PA recommendations. One possible explanation is that individuals with PsA typically experience more inflammation of the peripheral joints than other SpA subtypes  and have separate clinical presentations. Due to the limited number of studies, more research is needed to determine potential differences between SpA subtype and PA parameters.
Of the psychological variables, a self-reported better quality of life was associated with higher PA (83%, n = 5/6) in those with SpA. This association is supported in an online survey of 445 Danish individuals with SpA  and those with hip osteoarthritis . Motivation to exercise was investigated in one study , whereby intrinsic motivation was positively related to PA levels. Using a path analysis, autonomous forms of motivation (i.e., intrinsic motivation and identified regulation) were positively associated to PA, whereas amotivation was negatively associated. Regulation style has also been found to be a significant determinant of PA in those with RA . The importance of motivation is further highlighted in a behaviour change intervention for those with axial spondyloarthritis. Those undertaking the intervention aimed at supporting PA motivation had improved health-enhancing PA and spinal mobility . Despite the apparent importance of motivation on PA behaviour , little research has been conducted in those with SpA. Future research should focus on longitudinal study designs or the utilization of ecological momentary assessment methods  to yield insight into the causal and fluctuating relationships between PA motivation and PA behaviour.
Previous levels of PA were found to positively correlate to PA . Based on retrospective data, one study reported that individuals who started anti-TNFα therapy earlier had greater gains in PA . Seasonal variation (summer) was positively associated with PA energy expenditure in one study .
Recommendations for future research
Many studies adopted a cross-sectional design and therefore causal effects cannot be determined. To establish the causal relationships between variables and PA, prospective and interventional studies are required. In both RA and SpA studies, psychological variables (namely motivation) are underrepresented despite significant associations and the support of intervention studies. In those with SpA, negative and non-significant associations between mental and physical fatigue, and PA were identified, yet fatigue was only evaluated in one study. Research is needed to determine if a stable relationship between fatigue and PA exists in those with SpA. Self-efficacy is positively related to PA in those with RA, yet self-efficacy was not measured in any of the SpA studies. Studies investigating correlates of PA in the axSpA population was generally sparse. Only one eligible study, investigated diagnoses of SpA other than nr-axSpA and AS. The lack of data reported for more peripheral SpA subtypes (e.g., PsA), poses a challenge to clinicians aiming to support PA behaviour. Considering PA is highly recommended in those with SpA, a greater effort is needed to verify the determinants of PA and evaluate potential differences between subtypes. Researchers would do well to employ longitudinal and interventional studies to explore functional ability, in addition to supporting PA self-efficacy and autonomous motivation in these populations. Whilst the reasons for inconsistent results are likely to be multifaceted, the presence of flares have been shown to impact PA behaviour in those with RA and SpA . Although difficult to measure, no eligible studies in this review utilized flares as a variable. Future research should incorporate flares as a variable, with the aim to provide clinically useful information regarding disease activity and its impact on PA.
Strengths and limitations
This systematic review provides an up-to-date and valuable synthesis of the correlates of PA in those with RA and SpA, which can help inform clinical practitioners and intervention design to support the initiation and maintenance of PA. However, several strengths and limitations of this review are apparent. The systematic review included an array of variables, measures of PA (i.e., self-report and objective) and parameters of PA (e.g., total PA, meeting PA recommendations, MVPA). Multiple measures and parameters of PA allow for a more complete account of PA correlates but somewhat hinders the ability to define and conclude the strength of any relationship (i.e., via meta-analysis). A limited number of studies reporting potential correlates of PA in the SpA population met the inclusion criteria. This was somewhat alleviated by permitting studies that included a doctor diagnosis of SpA, instead of the having to meet a classification criterion. While this allows greater opportunity for the exploration of PA correlates in SpA studies, the uniformity between patients is less stringent than if a classification criterion was applied. RA studies were included if the study cohort met the ACR/EULAR criteria , which should be considered when comparing the RA and SpA studies and the potential correlates of PA identified. Further, ten SpA studies (n = 10/11) were conducted in Europe, therefore, it is difficult to extrapolate these results to SpA populations outside of Europe who may have differing living conditions, health systems and treatment options. The findings are more generalizable to female persons with RA and male persons with SpA. Female participants were represented more than males in most RA studies, while four RA studies included female participants only. Participation rate of eligible persons and sample size justification were often not reported. The review was limited to fourteen RA (n = 14/40) and four SpA studies (n = 4/11) that utilized objective measures of PA. The remaining studies employed self-report measures of PA, which increases the risk of bias. Self-reported measures of PA may be subject to recall bias, with over or under-reporting of activity possible [105, 106]. The ability to evaluate causal relationships was limited due to the large number of studies adopting a cross-sectional design. Two RA studies were assessed as having a ‘poor’ quality rating, due to unclear reporting  and a greater than 15% differential drop-out rate between intervention groups .
The aim of this review was to identify potential and consistent correlates of PA in those living with RA and SpA. Few consistent associations with PA were found in the RA and SpA populations. In individuals with RA, consistent positive associations were found between PA and HDL, self-efficacy and motivation, and consistent negative associations with functional disability and fatigue. In individuals with SpA, consistent positive associations were found between PA and quality of life, and consistent negative associations with functional disability. Prospective studies investigating the correlates of PA in these populations are needed, especially in those with SpA. These findings should inform future research and the design of interventions aiming to promote PA in people with RA and SpA.
Cooksey R, Brophy S, Gravenor MB, Brooks CJ, Burrows CL, Siebert S (2010) Frequency and characteristics of disease flares in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 49(5):929–932. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kep435
Wendling D, Prati C (2016) Flare in axial spondyloarthritis. The dark side of the outcome. Ann Rheum Dis 75:950–951. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209218
Bykerk VP, Bingham CO, Choy EH, Lin D, Alten R, Christensen R et al (2016) Identifying flares in rheumatoid arthritis: reliability and construct validation of the OMERACT RA Flare Core Domain Set. RMD Open 26(2):e000225. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000225
Bechman K, Tweehuysen L, Garrood T, Scott DL, Cope AP, Galloway JB, Ma MHY (2018) Flares in rheumatoid arthritis patients with low disease activity: predictability and association with worse clinical outcome. J Rheumatol 45(11):1515–1521. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.171375
Braun J, Sieper J (2007) Ankylosing spondylitis. The Lancet 369(9570):1379–1390. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60635-7
Smolen JS, Aletaha D, McInnes IB (2016) Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 388(10055):2023–2038. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30173-8
Martindale J, Shukla R, Goodacre J (2015) The impact of ankylosing spondylitis/axial spondyloarthritis on work productivity. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 29(3):512–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2015.04.002
Bertin P, Fagnani F, Duburcq A, Woronoff AS, Chauvin P, Cukierman G et al (2016) Impact of rheumatoid arthritis on career progression, productivity, and employability: The PRET Study. Joint Bone Spine 83(1):47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2015.05.001
Salaffi F, Carotti M, Gasparini S, Intorcia M, Grassi W (2009) The health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriatic arthritis: a comparison with a selected sample of healthy people. Health Qual Life Outcomes 7:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-7-25
Stolwijk C, van Onna M, Boonen A, van Tubergen A (2016) Global prevalence of spondyloarthritis: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Arthritis Car Res 68(9):1320–1331. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22831
Almutairi K, Nossent J, Preen D, Keen H, Inderjeeth C (2021) The global prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis based on a systematic review. Rheumatol Int 41(5):863–877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-020-04731-0
Poddubnyy D, Sieper J (2020) Treatment of axial spondyloarthritis: what does the future hold? Current Rheumatol Rep 22(9):47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-020-00924-5
Bullock J, Rizvi SAA, Saleh AM, Ahmed SS, Do DP, Ansari RA, Ahmed J (2018) Rheumatoid arthritis: a brief overview of the treatment. Med Princ Pract 27(6):501–507. https://doi.org/10.1159/000493390
Rausch Osthoff AK, Niedermann K, Braun J, Adams J, Brodin N, Dagfinrud H et al (2018) 2018 EULAR recommendations for physical activity in people with inflammatory arthritis and osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 77(9):1251–1260. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213585
Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G et al (2020) World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med 54(24):1451–1462. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955
O’Dwyer T, O’Shea F, Wilson F (2015) Physical activity in spondyloarthritis: a systematic review. Rheumatol Int 35(3):393–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-014-3141-9
Tierney M, Fraser A, Kennedy N (2012) Physical activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. J Phys Act Health 9(7):1036–1048. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.9.7.1036
Rausch Osthoff AK, Juhl CB, Knittle K, Dagfinrud H, Hurkmans E, Braun J et al (2018) Effects of exercise and physical activity promotion: meta-analysis informing the 2018 EULAR recommendations for physical activity in people with rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis and hip/knee osteoarthritis. RMD Open 4(2):e000713. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000713
Sveaas SH, Bilberg A, Berg IJ, Provan SA, Rollefstad S, Semb AG et al (2020) High intensity exercise for 3 months reduces disease activity in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA): a multicentre randomised trial of 100 patients. Br J Sports Med 54:292–297. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-099943
Verhoeven F, Tordi N, Prat C, Demougeot C, Mougin F, Wendling D (2016) Physical activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Joint Bone Spine 83(3):265–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2015.10.002
McDonald MT, Siebert S, Coulter EH, McDonald DA, Paul L (2019) Level of adherence to prescribed exercise in spondyloarthritis and factors affecting this adherence: a systematic review. Rheumatol Int 39(2):187–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-018-4225-8
Ezzat AM, MacPherson K, Leese J, Li LC (2015) The effects of interventions to increase exercise adherence in people with arthritis: a systematic review. Musculoskeletal Care 13(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1084
Wilcox S, Der Ananian C, Sharpe PA, Robbins J (2005) Correlates of physical activity in persons with arthritis: review and recommendations. J Phys Act Health 2(2):230–252. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2.2.230
Larkin L, Kennedy N (2014) Correlates of physical activity in adults with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. J Phys Act Health 11(6):1248–1261. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2012-0194
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO 3rd et al (2010) 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 62(9):2569–2581. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.27584
Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM (1985) Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep 100(2):126–131
Tremblay MS, Aubert S, Barnes JD, Saunders TJ, Carson V, Latimer-Cheung AE et al (2017) Sedentary behaviour research network (SBRN) – terminology consensus project process and outcome. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 14(1):75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8
Covidence systematic review software, Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia. Available at www.covidence.org
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Study quality assessment tools. Bethesda: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Available at https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools
Ma LL, Wang YY, Yang ZH, Huang D, Weng H, Zeng XT (2020) Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? Military Med Res. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8
Sallis JF, Prochaska JJ, Taylor WC (2000) A review of correlates of physical activity of and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32(5):963–975. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200005000-00014
Bryam KW, Oeser AM, Linton MF, Fazio S, Stein CM, Ormseth MJ (2018) Exercise is associated with increased small HDL particle concentration and decreased vascular stiffness in rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Rheumatol 24(8):417–421. https://doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000000809
Conigliaro P, Triggianese P, Ippolito F, Lucchetti R, Chimenti MS, Perricone R (2014) Insights on the role of physical activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Drug Dev Rev 75(S1):S54-56. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.21196
Demmelmaier I, Dufour AB, Nordgren B, Opava CH (2016) Trajectories of physical activity over two years in persons with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 68(8):1069–1077. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22799
Demmelmaier I, Bergman P, Nordgren B, Jensen I, Opava CH (2013) Current and maintained health-enhancing physical activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study. Arthritis Care Res 65(7):1166–1176
Demmelmaier I, Björk A, Dufour AB, Nordgren B, Opava CH (2018) Trajectories of fear-avoidance beliefs on physical activity over two years in people with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 70(5):695–702. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.23419
Ehrlich-Jones L, Lee J, Semanik P, Cox C, Dunlop D, Chang RW (2011) Relationship between beliefs, motivation, and worries about physical activity and physical activity participation in persons with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 63(12):1700–1705. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20616
Elkan AC, Håkansson N, Frostegård J, Hafström I (2011) Low level of physical activity in women with rheumatoid arthritis is associated with cardiovascular risk factors but not with body fat mass—a cross sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-13
Eurenius E, Stenström CH (2005) Physical activity, physical fitness, and general health perception among individuals with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 53(1):48–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20924
Eurenius E, Brodin N, Lindbald S, Opava CH, PARA Study Group (2007) Predicting physical activity and general health perception among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 34(1):10–15
Fenton SAM, Veldhuijzen van Zanten JJCS, Metsios GS, Rouse PC, Yu C, Kitas GD, Duda JL (2018) Autonomy support, light physical activity and psychological well-being in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study. Ment Health Phys Act 14:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhpa.2017.12.002
Greene BL, Haldeman GF, Kaminski A, Neal K, Lim SS, Conn DL (2006) Factors affecting physical activity behaviour in urban adults with arthritis who are predominantly African-American and female. Phys Ther 86(4):510–519. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/86.4.510
Hashimoto T, Yoshiuchi K, Inada S, Shirakura K, Wada N, Takeuchi K, Matsushita M (2015) Physical activity of elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis and healthy individuals: an actigraph study. Biopsychosoc Med 9:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-015-0046-0
Henchoz Y, Bastardot F, Guessous I, Theler JM, Dudler J, Vollenweider P, So A (2012) Physical activity and energy expenditure in rheumatoid arthritis patients and healthy controls. Rheumatology (Oxford) 51(8):1500–1507. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kes067
Hernández-Hernández V, Ferraz-Amaro I, Díaz-González F (2014) Influence of disease activity on the physical activity of rheumatoid arthritis patients. Rheumatology (Oxford) 53(4):722–731. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ket422
Huffman KM, Pieper CF, Hall KS, St Clair EW, Kraus WE (2015) Self-efficacy for exercise, more than disease-related factors, is associated with objectively assessed exercise time and sedentary behaviour in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 44(2):106–110. https://doi.org/10.3109/03009742.2014.931456
Hugo M, Mesen-Cetre N, Pierreisnard A, Schaeverbeke T, Gin H, Rigalleau V (2016) Energy expenditure and nutritional complications of metabolic syndrome and rheumatoid cachexia in rheumatoid arthritis: an observational study using calorimetry and actimetry. Rheumatology (Oxford) 55(7):1202–1209. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kew038
Hurkmans EJ, Maes S, de Gucht V, Knittle K, Peeters AJ, Ronday HK, Vliet Vlieland TPM (2010) Motivation as a determinant of physical activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 62(3):371–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20106
Iversen MD, Frits M, von Heideken J, Cui J, Weinblatt M, Shadick NA (2017) Physical activity and correlates of physical activity participation over three years in adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 69(10):1535–1545. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.23156
Katz P, Margaretten M, Trupin L, Schmajuk G, Yazdany J, Yelin E (2016) Role of sleep disturbance, depression, obesity, and physical inactivity in fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 68(1):81–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22577
Khoja SS, Almeida GJ, Wasko MC, Terhorst L, Piva SR (2016) Association of light-intensity physical activity with lower cardiovascular disease risk burden in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 68(4):424–431. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22711
Knittle KP, De Gucht V, Hurkmans EJ, Vliet Vlieland TPM, Peeters AJ, Ronday HK, Maes S (2011) Effect of self-efficacy and physical activity goal achievement on arthritis pain and quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 63(11):1613–1619. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20587
Lee J, Dunlop D, Ehrlich-Jones L, Semanik P, Song J, Manheim L, Chang RW (2012) Public health impact of risk factors for physical inactivity in adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 64(4):488–493. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.21582
Løppenthin K, Esbensen BA, Østergaard M, Jennum P, Tolver A, Aadahl M, Thomsen T, Midtgaard J (2015) Physical activity and the association with fatigue and sleep in Danish patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int 35(10):1655–1664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-015-3274-5
Lundgren S, Olausson SA, Bergström G, Stenström CH (2005) Physical activity and pain among patients with rheumatoid arthritis – a cognitive approach. Adv Physiother 7(2):77–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/14038190510010322
Malm K, Bergman S, Andersson M, Bremander A, the BARFOT study group, (2015) Predictors of severe self-reported disability in RA in a long-term follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil 37(8):686–691. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2014.939773
Mancuso CA, Rincon M, Sayles W, Paget SA (2006) Psychosocial variables and fatigue: a longitudinal study comparing individuals with rheumatoid arthritis and healthy controls. J Rheumatol 33(8):1496–1502
McKenna S, Tierney M, O’Neill A, Fraser A, Kennedy N (2018) Sleep and physical activity: a cross-sectional objective profile of people with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int 38(5):845–853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-018-4009-1
Metsios GS, Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou A, Treharne GJ, Nevill AM, Sandoo A, Panoulas VF et al (2011) Disease activity and low physical activity associate with number of hospital admissions and length of hospitalisation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 13(3):R108. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar3390
Mochizuki T, Yano K, Ikari K, Kawakami K, Hiroshima R, Momohara S (2018) Relationship between achievement of physical activity goal and characteristics of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Mod Rheumatol 28(4):606–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/14397595.2017.1371104
Munsterman T, Takken T, Wittink H (2013) Low aerobic capacity in physical activity not associated with fatigue in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study. J Rehabil Med 45(2):164–169. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1073
Neuberger GB, Aaronson LS, Gajewski B, Embretson SE, Cagle PE, Loudon JK, Miller PA (2007) Predictors of exercise and effects of exercise on symptoms, function, aerobic fitness, and disease outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 57(6):943–952. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.22903
Piva SR, Almeida GJM, Wasko MCM (2010) Association of physical function and physical activity in women with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 62(8):1144–1151. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20177
Prioreschi A, Hodkinson B, Avidon I, Tikly M, McVeigh J (2013) The clinical utility of accelerometry in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 52(9):1721–1727. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ket216
Rongen-van Dartel SA, Repping-Wuts H, van Hoogmoed D, Knoop H, Bleijenberg G, van Riel PLCM, Fransen J (2014) Relationship between objectively assessed physical activity and fatigue in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: inverse correlation of activity and fatigue. Arthritis Care Res 66(6):852–860. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22251
Semanik P, Wilbur J, Sinacore J, Chang RW (2004) Physical activity behaviour in older women with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 51(2):246–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20245
Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou A, Metsios GS, Smith JP, Panoulas VF, Douglas KMJ, Jamurtas AZ, Koutedakis Y, Kitas GD (2010) What predicts obesity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis? An investigation of the interaction between lifestyle and inflammation. Int J Obes 34:295–301. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2009.220
Tierney M, Fraser A, Purtill H, Kennedy N (2015) Profile of energy expenditure in people with rheumatoid arthritis. Disabil Health J 8(4):514–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.03.008
Uutela T, Kautiainen H, Järvenpää S, Salomaa S, Hakala M, Häkkinen A (2014) Waist circumference based abdominal obesity may be helpful as a marker for unmet needs in patients with RA. Scand J Rheumatol 43(4):279–285. https://doi.org/10.3109/03009742.2013.858769
Van den Berg MH, de Boer IG, le Cessie S, Breedveld FC, Vliet Vlieland TPM (2007) Most people with rheumatoid arthritis undertake leisure-time physical activity in the Netherlands: an observational study. Aust J Physiother 53(2):113–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(07)70044-2
Van der Goes MC, Hoes JN, Cramer MJ, van der Veen MJ, van der Werf JH, Bijlsma JWJ, Jacobs JWG (2014) Identifying factors hampering physical activity in longstanding rheumatoid arthritis: what is the role of glucocorticoid therapy? Clin Exp Rheumatol 32(2):155–161
Arends S, Hofman M, Kamsma YPT, van der Veer E, Houtman PM, Kallenberg CGM, Spoorenberg A, Brouwer E (2013) Daily physical activity in ankylosing spondylitis: validity and reliability of the IPAQ and SQUASH and the relation with clinical assessments. Arthritis Res Ther 15(4):R99. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar4279
Brodin N, Opava CH (2007) Predicting general health perception and exercise habits in ankylosing spondylitis. Adv Physiother 9(1):23–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14038190601090901
Brophy S, Cooksey R, Davies H, Dennis MS, Zhou SM, Siebert S (2013) The effect of physical activity and motivation on function in ankylosing spondylitis: a cohort study. Semin Arthritis Rheum 42(6):619–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2012.09.007
Fabre S, Molto A, Dadoun S, Rein C, Hudry C, Kreis S et al (2016) Physical activity in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: a cross-sectional study of 203 patients. Rheumatol Int 36(12):1711–1718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-016-3565-5
Fongen C, Halvorsen S, Dagfinrud H (2013) High disease activity is related to low levels of physical activity in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol 32(12):1719–1725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-013-2320-5
Haglund E, Bergman S, Petersson IF, Jacobsson LTH, Strömbeck B, Bremander A (2012) Differences in physical activity patterns in patients with spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Care Res 64(12):1886–1894. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.21780
Meesters JJL, Petersson IF, Bergman S, Haglund E, Jacobsson LTH, Bremander A (2014) Sociodemographic and disease-related factors are associated with patient-reported anxiety and depression in spondyloarthritis patients in the Swedish SpAScania cohort. Clin Rheumatol 33(11):1649–1656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-014-2699-7
O’Dwyer T, O’Shea F, Wilson F (2015) Decreased physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness in adults with ankylosing spondylitis: a cross-sectional controlled study. Rheumatol Int 35(11):1863–1872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-015-3339-5
Prince DS, McGuigan LE, McGirr EE (2014) Working life and physical activity in ankylosing spondylitis pre and post anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy. Int J Rheum Dis 17(2):165–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185x.12018
Van Genderen S, Boonen A, van der Heijde S, Heuft L, Luime J, Spoorenberg A et al (2015) Accelerometer quantification of physical activity and activity patterns in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and population controls. J Rheumatol 42(12):2369–2375. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.150015
Van Genderen S, van den Borne C, Geusens P, van der Linden S, Boonen A, Plasqui G (2014) Physical functioning in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: comparing approaches of experienced ability with self-reported and objectively measured physical activity. J Clin Rheumatol 20(3):133–137. https://doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000000086
Smets EM, Garssen B, Bonke B, De Haes JC (1995) The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. J Psychosom Res 39(3):315–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(94)00125-O
Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Markland D, Silva MN, Ryan RM (2012) Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 9:78. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-78
Smith L, Gardner B, Fisher A, Hamer M (2015) Patterns and correlates of physical activity behaviour over 10 years in older adults: prospective analyses from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. BMJ Open 5(4):e007423. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007423
Ahlmén M, Svensson B, Albertsson K, Forslind K, Hafström I, BARFOT Study Group (2010) Influence of gender on assessments of disease activity and function in early rheumatoid arthritis in relation to radiographic joint damage. Ann Rheum Dis 69(1):230–233. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.102244
Qvarfordt M, Andersson MLE, Larsson I (2019) Factors influencing physical activity in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: a mixed-methods study. SAGE Open Med 7:2050312119874995. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312119874995
Bremander A, Malm K, Andersson ML, BARFOT study group (2020) Physical activity in established rheumatoid arthritis and variables associated with maintenance of physical activity over a seven-year period – a longitudinal observation study. BMC Rheumatol 4:53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41927-020-00151-6
Lange E, Gjertsson I, Mannerkorpi K (2020) Long-time follow up of physical activity level among older adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act 17:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-020-00242-w
Toyoshima Y, Yajima N, Nemoto T, Namiki O, Inagaki K (2021) Relationship between disease activity level and physical activity in rheumatoid arthritis using a triaxial accelerometer and self-reported questionnaire. BMC Res Notes 14(1):242. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05666-w
Stubbs B, Hurley M, Smith T (2015) What are the factors that influence physical activity participation in adults with knee and hip osteoarthritis? A systematic review of physical activity correlates. Clin Rehabil 29(1):80–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215514538069
Westerterp K (2017) Control of energy expenditure in humans. Eur J Clin Nutr 71:340–344. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2016.237
Trost SG, Owen N, Bauman AE, Sallis JF, Brown W (2002) Correlates of adults’ participation in physical activity: review and update. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34(12):1996–2001. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200212000-00020
Oliver K, Cronan TA (2005) Correlates of physical activity among women with fibromyalgia syndrome. Ann Behav Med 29:44–53. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2901_7
Yu CA, Rouse PC, Van Zanten JVJCS, Metsios GS, Ntoumanis N, Kitas GD, Duda JL (2015) Motivation-related predictors of physical activity engagement and vitality in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Health Psychol Open 2(2):2055102915600359. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055102915600359
Fenton SAM, Van Zanten JVJCS, Metsios GS, Rouse PC, Yu CA, Ntoumanis N, Kitas GD, Duda JL (2021) Testing a self-determination theory-based process model of physical activity behaviour change in rheumatoid arthritis: results of a randomized controlled trial. Transl Behav Med 11(2):369–380. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaa022
Coulter EH, McDonald MT, Cameron S, Siebert S, Paul L (2020) Physical activity and sedentary behaviour and their associations with clinical measures in axial spondyloarthritis. Rheumatol Int 40(3):375–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-019-04494-3
Regnaux JP, Davergne T, Roren PC, A, Rannou F, Boutron I, Lefevre-Colau MM, (2019) Exercise programmes for ankylosing spondylitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10(10):CD011321. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011321.pub2
Rossou E, Sultana S (2012) Early spondyloarthritis in multiracial society: differences between gender, race, and disease subgroups with regard to first symptom at presentation, main problem that the disease is causing to patients, and employment status. Rheumatol Int 32(6):1597–1604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-010-1680-2
Rasmussen JO, Primdahl J, Fick W, Bremander A (2020) Physical activity in people with axial spondyloarthritis and the impact of overall attitudes, barriers, and facilitators: a cross-sectional study. Musculoskeletal Care 18(4):510–518. https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1495
O’Dwyer T, Monaghan A, Moran J, O’Shea F, Wilson F (2017) Behaviour change intervention increases physical activity, spinal mobility and quality of life in adults with ankylosing spondylitis: a randomised trial. J Physiother 63(1):30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2016.11.009
Taylor IM, Ntoumanis N, Standage M, Spray CM (2010) Motivational predictors of physical education students’ effort, exercise intentions, and leisure-time physical activity: a multilevel linear growth analysis. J Sport Exerc Psychol 32(1):99–120. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.32.1.99
Jacquemin C, Molto A, Servy H et al (2017) Flares assessed weekly in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or axial spondyloarthritis and relationship with physical activity measured using a connected activity tracker: a 3-month study. RMD Open 3(1):e000434. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000434
Neilson HK, Robson PJ, Friedenreich CM, Csizmadi I (2008) Estimating activity energy expenditure: how valid are physical activity questionnaires. Am J Clin Nutr 87(2):279–291. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/87.2.279
Ferrari P, Friedenreich C, Matthews CE (2007) The role of measurement error in estimating levels of physical activity. Am J Epidemiol 166(7):832–840. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwm148
We thank the Bath Institute for Rheumatic Diseases (BIRD) and the University of Bath for funding Thomas’s PhD studentship. We would also like to thank Peter Bradley (Subject Librarian) at the University of Bath for his help with search terms and databases.
TI received a match-funded PhD studentship from the Bath Institute for Rheumatic Diseases (BIRD) and the University of Bath to conduct the programme of research that this systematic literature review is associated with.
Conflict of interest
Dr. Raj Sengupta has previously held unrelated grants from UCB, Pfizer, Abbvie and Novartis and received honoraria for giving talks from Abbvie, Biogen, Lilly, UCB, Novartis and Pfizer. Rosie Barnett has received unrelated funding from UCB. Thomas Ingram, Prof. Martyn Standage, and Dr. Peter Rouse have no disclosures.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ingram, T., Sengupta, R., Standage, M. et al. Correlates of physical activity in adults with spondyloarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. Rheumatol Int 42, 1693–1713 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-022-05142-z
- Physical activity
- Rheumatoid arthritis