Skip to main content
Download PDF

The association between alcohol consumption and osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of observational studies

Rheumatology International volume 41, pages 1577–1591 (2021)Cite this article

Abstract

There is conflicting evidence for the association between alcohol consumption and common joint conditions such as Osteoarthritis (OA), which affects millions of people. We sought to determine the true association between alcohol intake and OA. We conducted a PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies that reported associations between alcohol consumption and OA. Pooled estimates of association were represented through odds ratios (ORs). Publication bias was assessed with Funnel and Galbraith plots, and risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. We included 29 studies and 25,192 subjects with OA and reported an OR between any alcohol consumption and OA of 0.79 (0.68–0.93), suggesting a protective effect. OR of weekly or more frequent use was 0.79 (0.65–0.97). When grouped by covariates, alcohol consumption was negatively associated with radiographic (0.83, 0.70–0.98), hand (0.80, 0.66–0.95) and knee OA (0.85, 0.72–0.99), North American ethnicity and female gender. Subgroup analysis of unadjusted data resulted in an OR of 0.70 (0.55–0.89) but this disappeared upon analysis of studies with data adjusted for any covariate (0.93, 0.78–1.10). Whilst our pooled analysis suggest that weekly or more frequent alcohol consumption was negatively associated with OA, this was not observed when adjusted for confounding factors. Reasons for this include selection bias and lack of longitudinal exposure and adjustment for confounding variables. Therefore, this meta-analysis provides evidence to dispel notions that alcohol use may be protective against OA.

Introduction

Alcohol consumption is a well-known risk factor for various major health conditions such as cerebrovascular disease, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Reportedly, nearly 3 million deaths worldwide can be attributed to alcohol consumption each year [1]. Yet, there is conflicting evidence in the literature for the association of alcohol consumption with health. Several studies suggest that light to moderate alcohol consumption may have a negative association with specific outcomes of cardiovascular [2] and cerebrovascular disease [3]. The evidence for the beneficial effects of alcohol remains controversial. More recent large-scale international studies report that risk of all-cause mortality rises with alcohol consumption [4], and also that there were no risk thresholds beyond which a reduction in consumption would cease to confer risk reduction [5].

This debate extends into musculoskeletal disorders. The evidence that links alcohol use and musculoskeletal pain is tenuous. While it seems that situational pain due to musculoskeletal disease can increase risk of alcohol abuse as a means of self-medication [6, 7], others cite disease symptoms as reasons for alcohol cessation [8]. While alcohol use may be associated with increased levels of disease-relevant inflammatory markers in rheumatoid arthritis [9], other studies have shown that intake is inversely associated with disease [10, 11] in a dose-dependent manner [12], and is associated with improved function [13].

There are studies that suggest alcohol consumption may be a protective factor in Osteoarthritis (OA) [14]. This, however, is not consistently reported among observational studies. Possible mechanisms for this putative relationship include the association of alcohol use with reduced weight gain over time [15], but even this is an inconsistent finding, with some studies suggesting the opposite is true [16]. Alcohol may also have a positive association with physical activity [17], which may promote joint overuse, and therefore, increase risk of OA [18]. While there may be an underlying biological effect, with some studies in mouse reporting that alcohol consumption can lead to OA changes [19], the true effect of alcohol in human OA remains speculative.

The purpose of this meta-analysis of observational studies is to delineate the combined result between studies of the association between alcohol consumption and OA, and to determine whether subgroup analysis by subject demographics and diagnostic criteria can offer explanation to previously reported results. To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis to provide a pooled estimate of the association between alcohol consumption and risk of OA. Given the increasing global burden of OA and alcohol use [20, 21], understanding their association will inform public health policy and clinical risk prediction models.

Materials and methods

Literature search and study criteria

This meta-analysis was conducted in line with a protocol that adhered to Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) recommendations [22]. A literature search was conducted by three reviewers independently using EMBASE, PubMed via MEDLINE and Scopus databases. The captured publication dates spanned from inception to May 2020. The following search terms: ((((((((alcohol) OR alcoholic beverages) OR ethanol) OR beer) OR wine) OR liquor) OR drinking)) AND Osteoarthritis; were entered for PubMed. The Boolean operators were then adapted for other databases as appropriate.

Inclusion criteria were applied to all studies by each reviewer and disagreements were resolved through discussion. Titles and abstracts were screened for potential eligibility by three reviewers, and those satisfying inclusion criteria or where further information was required to determine eligibility, progressed to full-text review. Any disagreements were resolved through discussion and consensus. Eligibility criteria applied to titles and abstract included: full-text availability in the English language; the investigation of alcohol consumption as a potential risk factor for OA (diagnosed through self-report, clinical or radiological criteria); and a cohort, case–control, cross-sectional or randomised control trial (RCT) design. Subjects of all ethnicity or geographical habitation were included.

The eligibility criteria applied at full-text screen for inclusion in our meta-analysis were as follows:

  1. 1.

    Raw data allowing calculation of the quantitative association (in terms of odds ratio) between alcohol consumption (exposure) and diagnosis of OA.

    or

    Reporting of either Relative Risk (RR), Odds Ratios (OR) or Hazard Ratio (HR) with confidence intervals.

  2. 2.

    The inclusion of a comparison/control group of participants who abstain from alcoholic beverages.

  3. 3.

    Reporting of participant gender and age.

  4. 4.

    Methodology detailing study design including subject recruitment.

  5. 5.

    Information detailing methodology of establishing diagnosis of OA.

Studies that defined OA through clinical endpoints such as having had joint replacement surgery were excluded. Systematic and literature reviews were excluded but to maximise capture, the bibliographies of these articles were scanned. The study selection process is illustrated in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram of literature search and study selection

Full size image

Data extraction and risk of bias assessment

The population demographics of each study were extracted for analysis. Variables of interest included the quantity of alcohol consumed over a given time, and other cohort information as shown in Table 1. Cohort size, ethnicity, BMI, and gender distribution were extracted to facilitate sensitivity analysis based on subgroups. Funnel and Galbraith plots were generated to assess for publication bias. Asymmetry in the funnel plot and the gradient of the Galbraith plot were interpreted to determine the likely direction of bias in the association between alcohol consumption and OA. The risk of bias of each study was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) [23].

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of included studies
Full size table

Data analysis

ORs and confidence intervals (CI) were extracted for meta-analysis. RRs and HRs with CI or standard errors (SE) were converted to ORs through calculation using the metafor package on R software. Both confounder-adjusted and unadjusted OR were included for pooled meta-analysis. All data analyses were conducted using R version 4.0.0 software. A meta-analysis of all studies was performed to generate a summary forest plot (Fig. 2), stratifying studies by design. A funnel plot under a fixed-effects model was created to demonstrate the effect of SE and variance of individual studies (Fig. 3). This was visually inspected for asymmetry and evidence of publication bias.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Summary forest plot of the association of alcohol consumption (any frequency) with osteoarthritis

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Funnel plot of data in summary analysis (CI: 95%). X-axis indicates effect size

Full size image

Heterogeneity was assessed by the Q test and I2 statistic performed on R 4.0.0 using the metafor package and RevMan 5.3 software, respectively. To further determine evidence for publication bias, a Galbraith plot for Egger’s test was generated (Fig. 4) and the y-intercept was reported.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Galbraith plot for Egger’s test: p = 0.0003, R2 = 0.3889, Bias from Egger’s test: α = 2.7496, 95% CI − 0.3321 to 5.831

Full size image

Subgroup meta-analyses and data interpretation were performed according to the categories of study design, cohort size and various subject characteristics as grouped in Table 1. The categories of exposure in terms of level of alcohol consumption and outcomes measured in terms of diagnostic criteria used, and site of OA reported were grouped for analysis. Nearly all analyses reported a significant degree of heterogeneity (I2 > 50%) and a random effects model was applied for these to account for variability in variance. A fixed-effects model was applied for subgroup analysis of covariates that reported a low degree of heterogeneity (I2 < 25%). Likewise, all meta-regression analyses were performed under a restricted maximum likelihood (REML) approach. Meta-regression plots with ORs as the dependent variable were generated to illustrate the results of the analysed covariates graphically (Fig. 5). Only six covariates were analysed to avoid multiplicity. R2 statistic was used to determine the degree of fit, and the Tau statistic was used to measure heterogeneity.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Bubble plots of subgroup analyses. a Patient sample size, b mean age, c mean BMI, d % female, e % smoking, and f year of publication N.B. circles representing patient sample size have been magnified by ×100 for visualisation purposes

Full size image

Results

Study inclusion and characteristics

Our literature search captured a total of 1877 articles. After duplicates were removed, 1422 studies remained (Fig. 1). Following an initial title screen, 139 studies were assessed in full-text, and 9 articles were inaccessible. A total of 29 studies including 25,192 subjects with OA were deemed suitable for quantitative meta-analysis. All the included studies (Table 1) were observational in design; 16 were cross-sectional [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39], 10 were cohort [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49] and 3 were case–control studies [14, 50, 51]. There were no RCTs or prospective interventional studies yielded from our search. Eleven studies had cohorts with East Asian ethnicity, 9 studies had European cohorts and the remaining 9 had North American cohorts. The mean age of participants across all study designs were over 60 years, with an overall average of 64.4 (38.0–75.6) years. The average mean BMI was found to be 26.4 (23.1–30.3), the mean percentage of females included in the studies was 62.4 (0–79.9)% and an average mean of 15.5 (7.1–63.8)% were smokers.

Just under half of the studies (n = 14) determined OA by radiographic diagnosis, with Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) grade 2 or greater as the diagnostic threshold (Supplementary Table 1). Eight studies evaluated self-reported OA, seven of which reported a previous clinician diagnosis of OA [25, 27, 34, 37, 40, 41, 45], but did not report the criteria used by clinicians to make a diagnosis [26]. Two studies used clinical symptoms as a basis for diagnosis, one of which employed the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria [51], and the other employed the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria [30]. Twelve studies assessed OA in the knee, four in the hand, three in the hip and two in the spine. Five studies had cohorts with OA in various joints and four studies did not specify the joint site. Alcohol consumption patterns were stratified as weekly or more frequently, monthly, and as undefined current drinkers. Most studies specified drinkers that consumed alcohol weekly or more frequently and did not further define the upper limit of consumption. The characteristics of each individual study are shown in supplementary Table 1.

Primary analyses of alcohol consumption and osteoarthritis

The meta-analysis of all 29 included studies reported an overall reduced odds of OA in people who consumed alcohol, compared to those who did not (OR, 95% CI: 0.79, 0.68–0.93), suggesting that alcohol has a protective effect (Fig. 2). Out of 29 studies, only 2 studies [27, 47] reported a statistically significant positive point estimate between alcohol use and OA, one study categorised alcohol use as > 1 g weekly [47], and the other employed the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)-C score [27]. Conversely, ten studies [24, 25, 32, 34,35,36, 38, 41, 48, 51] found a statistically significant negative association.

When grouped by study design, the case–control studies reported a non-significant point estimate between alcohol use and OA. Within this group, only one study in which hand and foot OA were diagnosed through the ACR criteria, and alcohol use was categorised as > 1 glass weekly [51], found a significant and large protective effect associated with alcohol use.

The analysis of cohort studies included ten studies, which did not show a statistically significant association with an OR of 0.90 (0.72–1.12). Within this group, two studies reported a statistically significant negative association [41, 48] and one study reported a positive association [47]. Of the two studies that showed a negative association, one classified alcohol use as > 5 g of ethanol per day in a European population [41], and the other use a classification of > 1 drink per month in a Japanese population [48]. The study that demonstrated a positive association classified alcohol use as > 1 g of ethanol per week in a Japanese population [47]. The remainder of studies did not show a significant association. Despite the appearance of a uniform distribution of study effects based on visual inspection of the forest plot, a significant degree of heterogeneity was present (I2 = 86.6%, p < 0.0001).

Sixteen cross-sectional designs were included in our meta-analysis. Within this subgroup, seven studies showed a statistically significant negative association between alcohol use and OA and one study showed a significant positive association. It is, therefore, not unexpected that a significant degree of heterogeneity was present (I2 = 95.0%). An overall odds ratio of 0.75 (0.59–0.94) was shown, suggesting that the negative association seen in the primary analysis of all 29 studies is likely attributed to data from cross-sectional studies.

Analyses of subject characteristics as covariates

Ethnicity was examined as a covariate, with only North American subjects showing a negative association between alcohol use and OA (Table 2). When stratified for gender, analysis of studies (n = 6) that had majority male subjects showed no significant association. Conversely, a significant negative association (0.72, 0.59–0.88) was observed in the analysis of the 23 studies with majority female subjects. Regressing the odds ratios by the average BMI of subjects did not reveal any significant associations (Table 3).

Table 2 Subgroup meta-analyses of the association between alcohol consumption and osteoarthritis by study variables
Full size table
Table 3 Meta-regression analyses of select covariates
Full size table

Osteoarthritis diagnosis and site

Only OA diagnosed radiographically showed a significantly negative association (0.83, 0.70–0.98). This group also had the greatest number of studies (n = 14) and included 9782 subjects. When analysing studies that combined both clinical and radiographic evidence as diagnostic criteria, no significant association was found (0.66, 0.41–1.08).

Studies of knee OA predominated in our study, with 12,765 subjects across 12 studies. Meta-analyses grouped by this covariate, along with hand OA (0.80, 0.66–0.95) and site-unspecified OA (0.56, 0.36–0.85) found significant negative associations. There were no significant associations reported in the pooled analysis of hip OA, spine OA or multi-site OA subgroups.

Analyses of alcohol consumption pattern and risk of osteoarthritis

Owing to the differences in study design and heterogeneity among studies, the amount of alcohol use in the exposed subjects was further stratified into three categories: weekly or more frequent (n = 15 studies), monthly (n = 7), and undefined current drinkers (n = 9). Only the group that included weekly or more frequent drinkers, which encompassed 14,292 subjects (Table 2), found a statistically significant point estimate of 0.79 (0.65–0.97) and with an I2 value of 94% (p < 0.0001). The other two categories did not identify any significant association. It was not possible to determine the upper limit of alcohol consumed in terms of ethanol units per time, as this was not detailed within nearly all of the studies.

Meta-analyses of confounding factors

We found that a large study sample size (n > 500 and n > 1000) was related to significantly negative associations between alcohol use and OA. Whereas stratifying for studies with cohort sizes less than 500 (n = 13) did not show a significant association. The negative association found in the primary analyses was present on subgroup analysis of studies that did not adjust for covariates (0.70, 0.55–0.89) but did not remain after adjustment for any confounders (BMI, age, gender or smoking).

Meta-regression analyses

Regression analyses showed that mean age, % female within the study and sample size were covariates that demonstrated a significant association with the ORs of association between alcohol use and OA reported by individual studies (Table 3). A negative association was seen with increasing age (Fig. 5b), increasing % female (Fig. 5d) within the cohort samples and with increasing sample size (Fig. 5a), this was consistent with the subgroup meta-analyses performed on these covariates.

Risk of bias

We determined the number of studies with adjustments for confounding factors in their individual analyses and found that data extracted from 15 studies were unadjusted. Fourteen studies adjusted for either BMI, age, gender or smoking as confounding variables. A funnel plot of the summary meta-analysis (Fig. 3) demonstrated relative symmetry in study distribution through visual inspection, but when displayed as a Galbraith plot for Egger’s test (Fig. 4), the y-intercept value and negative gradient suggested a bias towards studies reporting negative associations. Risk of bias assessment was carried out using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) [23]. The mean scores within all three study designs exceeded 70% of the maximum score (Supplementary Tables 2, 3, 4) suggesting overall good study quality [23]. Five studies were rated with a total score of five or less, and these were attributed to poor adherence to the recommendations in the selection section of the NOS.

Discussion

Although our primary analysis revealed a statistically significant negative association between alcohol use and OA, subgroup analyses revealed that this is likely to be an unreliable conclusion. When studies were grouped by adjustment, an analysis of the 16 studies that contributed unadjusted data revealed an OR of 0.70 (0.55–0.89). This was a more negative association than that of the primary analysis which reported an OR of 0.79 (0.68–0.93). When grouped by any adjustment, this negative association was no longer observed.

These results suggest that any negative association seen in the summary analysis was probably due to a lack of confounder adjustment in individual studies. We found that there were several covariates which could explain this. When exploring cohort characteristics, a negative association was seen in weekly or more frequent drinkers, radiographically diagnosed OA, hand OA, knee OA, and site-unspecified OA. It was also seen in North American cohorts and cohorts with female-predominant subjects. When grouped by cohort size, studies that contributed over 500 or over 1000 subjects appeared to show a significant negative association. Consistent with results of the meta-analyses, our meta-regression analyses found negative associations with age, female gender, and study sample size.

It also appeared that study design played a significant role. The subgroup analysis for cross-sectional studies supported the negative association observed in the primary analysis, whereas no association was seen when stratified by other study designs.

Strengths of the study

To our knowledge, this meta-analysis is the first to provide a pooled estimate of the association between alcohol consumption and risk of OA. Other meta-analyses have employed similar methodology to assess the association between alcohol consumption and rheumatoid arthritis [12], and between smoking and OA [52], but not between alcohol consumption and OA. No eligible RCTs were identified, and analyses of published observational studies included both cross-sectional and prospective studies. This allowed bias relating to study design to be determined [53]. We further conducted meta-regression analyses for several study characteristics. Inclusion of referent groups from multiple study designs and geography may allow for the effects of inter-study uncontrolled confounding factors such as population health profiles that vary according to geography, to be mitigated. Indeed, alcohol consumption varies significantly between countries [54], but may also vary within a population [55]. We also included studies that provided both adjusted and unadjusted data, and so allowed for the influence of adjustment to be observed in the subgroup analyses. For grouped analyses, a threshold of I2 = 25% or lower was adopted for the application of a fixed-effects model in meta-analyses. Use of higher thresholds may erroneously report statistically significant associations [56]. To confirm results of the I2 test, a Q-statistic was calculated for our primary analysis.

The frequency of alcohol consumption was categorised to determine whether any associations observed may be dose-related and specific to a pattern of use. This is important as referent cohorts are likely biased towards common habits of alcohol consumption, which tends to be more frequent than monthly use [57].

In addition to this, we stratified OA by method of diagnosis. This may be informative as the use of alcohol could potentially interfere with clinical symptoms of OA and thereby obscure any association seen with clinical OA. On the contrary, radiographic assessment allows the degree of structural OA changes to be quantified. Interestingly, when grouped into such classifications, our analysis showed that only radiographic OA had a negative association with alcohol consumption. A potential explanation for this could be that individuals with symptomatic OA are more likely to consume alcohol as a means of analgesia [7].

Interpretation of findings and implications for policy

In our meta-analysis, we show that the reported negative associations between alcohol use and OA are likely untrue. In support of this, analysis of studies adjusted for confounders eradicated any significant associations and suggested that alcohol had no significant association with OA. We further attempted to reduce heterogeneity by assessing adjustment by different covariates but were not successful. Most of the heterogeneity seem to arise from the OA joint of interest, as hand OA and hip OA groups both demonstrated low heterogeneity alone and did not show a significant association.

The basis for how alcohol affects OA can be primary or secondary. There is no clear consensus on what the primary biological effects may be. It is known that alcohol use can increase uric acid levels and thus increase the risk of inflammatory joint conditions such as gout [58]. In OA, synovial fluid uric acid levels appear to correlate with pro-inflammatory cytokines and radiographic OA severity [59], suggesting a possible causal link. In vivo studies support this, as alcohol consumption in mice seem to drive structural OA changes over time [19]. Conversely, resveratrol which is present in wine has been shown to exhibit chondroprotective effects in vitro [60, 61] and so may explain the findings in Muthuri’s study [14]. This, rather than alcohol itself is a possible explanation for the suggested protective effects of alcoholic beverages. Alcohol can also have secondary effects that contribute to OA risk. For example, alcohol use is associated with obesity [62, 63], and this may inadvertently promote joint loading and increased risk of OA in healthy individuals [64]. Conversely, appropriate joint-use and loading is recommended in individuals with existing OA to attenuate symptoms [65] without causing structural disease progression [66]. Physical activity, among other interventions, aimed at certain muscle groups such as femoral strengthening exercise for knee OA, may be beneficial for OA in particular joints [67]. The potential effects of heavy alcohol consumption on reduced muscle strength [68] could also reduce the potential benefits of exercise on early OA. Existing literature does not agree on the relationship between alcohol use and OA, with some reporting no association [69] and others reporting a positive association [17]. The contention extends to other aspects of the musculoskeletal system, with studies reporting beneficial effects of light to moderate alcohol consumption on bone mineral density and detrimental effects of heavy alcohol consumption [70]. Other literature suggests that like heavy drinkers, non-drinkers are also at greater risk of osteoporosis compared with light drinkers [71].

Limitations of the study

The majority of the meta-analyses displayed a substantial degree of heterogeneity, and so interpretations should be made with caution [53]. As only observational studies were identified, there was inherently low internal validity. In addition, our primary analysis was biased towards cross-sectional and cohort studies which comprised the bulk of included studies [72]. Whilst publication bias was not obvious on a funnel plot, Egger’s test was conducted as an adjunct to improve the reliability of bias assessment [73]. This revealed a bias towards negative associations and was consistent with the point estimate observed in the primary analysis. Whilst we analysed studies grouped by absence or presence of confounder adjustment, the adjustment methodology varied significantly between individual studies. This heterogeneity can have greater impact on pooled estimates that report a weak association [74], which consistent with the findings in this meta-analysis. Objective stratification of studies by the comprehensiveness of the adjustment methodology may, therefore, be beneficial [75], but this was not done, due to the small number of studies that performed covariate adjustment, and to avoid multiplicity. The quality assessment carried out in accordance with the NOS suggested that the majority of studies were subject to selection bias (Supplementary Tables 2, 3 and 4). To overcome limitations in previous studies, future research should aim to account for non-responders in all groups and employ previously validated tools to assess OA.

Estimates of alcohol use were largely subjective and self-reported. Therefore, alcohol consumption is likely to be underestimated, especially in heavy use [76]. This probably exaggerates the effect of any observed association. While our analysis did stratify alcohol consumption, the upper limits of alcohol consumption were poorly defined in the studies and a dose–response relationship was not assessed beyond weekly or more frequent use. Some meta-analyses have found that alcohol consumption beyond a certain amount confers risk, whereas moderate quantities may be protective for particular diseases [2]. As the amount of alcohol consumed weekly can vary significantly, we were unable to evaluate such relationships in our study. The predominance of cross-sectional studies in our meta-analyses is another source of inaccuracy in estimating alcohol use, which is known to vary seasonally [77]. In addition to this, there is literature to suggest that symptoms of musculoskeletal disease may lead to greater alcohol consumption as a means of analgesia [7]. Chronic musculoskeletal pain can be comorbid to depressive mood disorder [78] which can also be associated with heavier use [79]. These influences are likely to generate bias towards a positive association between alcohol use and OA. As none of the included studies conducted quantitative adjustments for mental health status and pain as a covariate, it is an important consideration for future research. Indeed, the study in this meta-analysis that reported the greatest positive association derived their results from a cohort of subjects exclusively with adverse levels of alcohol use [27]. Gender also plays a role in alcohol consumption, with significantly less heavy-users in female cohorts [47]. Female gender is also known to have a positive association with OA [80], and so an analysis with a greater proportion of female subjects may polarise towards a negative association. An important limitation in this study pertains to the differing bioactive contents between alcoholic beverages. One study [14] assessed both beer and wine consumption and reported that the former was a risk factor whereas the latter was protective for OA. Inferences from a pooled analysis could, therefore, be susceptible to bias by confounders such as socio-economic status which can influence choice of alcohol beverage [81]. Regardless, as it is known that particular constituents in wine can influence cardiovascular disease risk, their possible effects in musculoskeletal disease cannot be disregarded.

It is difficult to determine the most suitable inclusion criteria for the presence of OA. Structural changes can be reliably determined radiographically [82], whereas the clinical relevance of a meta-analysis may be enhanced if focused on clinically diagnosed disease. Self-reported OA is unreliable as subjective recollection of a previous clinical diagnosis, which most of the studies in this meta-analysis relied on, can potentially be biased, and self-reported symptoms may not be robust indicators of disease, and symptoms may even be absent in the presence of structural disease [83]. These factors contributed to the heterogeneity of our analysis, with there being the greatest heterogeneity within the self-reported OA group, and least in the clinical OA group. Future studies should aim to adopt case–control designs to delineate dose–response relationships between alcohol use and joint-specific OA diagnosed through validated clinical and radiographic criteria. Covariate adjustment should be based on possible confounders to joint disease and symptoms such as diet and degree of activity level as well as baseline health characteristics such as age, gender and BMI. As the inter-ethnic effects of alcohol on health can be discordant [84], partly due to underlying variations in genetic polymorphisms that affect alcohol metabolism [85], we recommend analysing ethnicity as a factor in future studies.

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis shows that previous reports of a protective effect of alcohol consumption on risk of osteoarthritis are likely to be inaccurate. The suggested protective effect is likely to have been observed due to lack of confounder adjustment. Alcohol use is a public health issue and with mounting global disease burden attributable to alcohol misuse [54] it is increasingly important that recommendations for safe consumption are supported by robust research. Failure in this avenue can result in harm at a population level [86]. It is probable that most individuals will be deterred from alcohol use in attempt to alleviate joint disease [8]. In contrast, certain individuals who suffer from joint pain may increase alcohol use for temporary symptom relief [7]. For this group, it is important that advice on consumption is not based on misinterpretations of falsely reported negative associations between alcohol and OA. This meta-analysis provides evidence to dispel notions that alcohol use may protect against OA.

References

  1. Griswold MG, Fullman N, Hawley C, Arian N, Zimsen SRM, Tymeson HD et al (2018) Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 392(10152):1015–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31310-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ronksley PE, Brien SE, Turner BJ, Mukamal KJ, Ghali WA (2011) Association of alcohol consumption with selected cardiovascular disease outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 342(7795):479. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berger K, Ajani UA, Kase CS, Gaziano JM, Buring JE, Glynn RJ et al (1999) Light-to-moderate alcohol consumption and the risk of stroke among US male physicians. N Engl J Med 341(21):1557–1564. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199911183412101

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Horvat P, Stefler D, Murphy M, King L, McKee M, Bobak M (2018) Alcohol, pattern of drinking and all-cause mortality in Russia, Belarus and Hungary: a retrospective indirect cohort study based on mortality of relatives. Addiction 113(7):1252–1263. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wood AM, Kaptoge S, Butterworth A, Nietert PJ, Warnakula S, Bolton T et al (2018) Risk thresholds for alcohol consumption: combined analysis of individual-participant data for 599 912 current drinkers in 83 prospective studies. Lancet 391(10129):1513–1523. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30134-X

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim CH, Vincent A, Clauw DJ, Luedtke CA, Thompson JM, Schneekloth TD et al (2013) Association between alcohol consumption and symptom severity and quality of life in patients with fibromyalgia. Arthritis Res Ther 15(2):R42. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar4200

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Witkiewitz K, Vowles KE, McCallion E, Frohe T, Kirouac M, Maisto SA (2015) Pain as a predictor of heavy drinking and any drinking lapses in the COMBINE study and the UK Alcohol Treatment Trial. Addiction 110(8):1262–1271. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12964

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Larsson I, Andersson MLE, Ajeganova S, Bala V, Svensson B, Bergman S et al (2018) Reasons to stop drinking alcohol among patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Sweden: a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024367

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lu B, Solomon DH, Costenbader KH, Keenan BT, Chibnik LB, Karlson EW (2010) Alcohol consumption and markers of inflammation in women with preclinical rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 62(12):3554–3559. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.27739

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Scott IC, Tan R, Stahl D, Steer S, Lewis CM, Cope AP (2013) The protective effect of alcohol on developing rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatol (Oxf) 52(5):856–867. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kes376

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Di Giuseppe D, Alfredsson L, Bottai M, Askling J, Wolk A (2012) Long term alcohol intake and risk of rheumatoid arthritis in women: a population based cohort study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e4230

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Jin Z, Xiang C, Cai Q, Wei X, He J (2014) Alcohol consumption as a preventive factor for developing rheumatoid arthritis: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Ann Rheum Dis 73(11):1962–1967. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lu B, Rho YH, Cui J, Iannaccone CK, Frits ML, Karlson EW et al (2014) Associations of smoking and alcohol consumption with disease activity and functional status in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 41(1):24–30. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.130074

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Muthuri SG, Zhang W, Maciewicz RA, Muir K, Doherty M (2015) Beer and wine consumption and risk of knee or hip osteoarthritis: a case control study. Arthritis Res Ther 17(1):23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-015-0534-4

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang L, Lee IM, Manson JAE, Buring JE, Sesso HD (2010) Alcohol consumption, weight gain, and risk of becoming overweight in middle-aged and older women. Arch Intern Med 170(5):453–461. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.527

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lukasiewicz E, Mennen LI, Bertrais S, Arnault N, Preziosi P, Galan P et al (2005) Alcohol intake in relation to body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio: the importance of type of alcoholic beverage. Public Health Nutr 8(3):315–320. https://doi.org/10.1079/phn2004680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Piazza-Gardner AK, Barry AE (2012) Examining physical activity levels and alcohol consumption: are people who drink more active? Am J Health Promot 26(3):e95-104. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.100929-LIT-328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Drawer S, Fuller CW (2001) Propensity for osteoarthritis and lower limb joint pain in retired professional soccer players. Br J Sports Med 35(6):402–408. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.35.6.402

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kc R, Voigt R, Li X, Forsyth CB, Ellman MB, Summa KC et al (2015) Induction of osteoarthritis-like pathologic changes by chronic alcohol consumption in an experimental mouse model. Arthritis Rheumatol 67(6):1678–1680. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39090

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Spitaels D, Mamouris P, Vaes B, Smeets M, Luyten F, Hermens R et al (2020) Epidemiology of knee osteoarthritis in general practice: a registry-based study. BMJ Open 10(1):e031734. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031734

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, Nolte S, Ackerman I, Fransen M et al (2014) The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis 73(7):1323–1330. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D et al (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. J Am Med Assoc 283(15):2008–2012. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.15.2008

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality if nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.htm

  24. Aslam I, Perjar I, Shi XA, Renner JB, Kraus VB, Golightly YM et al (2014) Associations between biomarkers of joint metabolism, hand osteoarthritis, and hand pain and function: the johnston county osteoarthritis project. J Rheumatol 41(5):938–944. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.130904

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Bae YH, Shin JS, Lee J, Kim MR, Park KB, Cho JH et al (2015) Association between hypertension and the prevalence of low back pain and osteoarthritis in Koreans: a cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138790

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Punjani N, Flannigan R, Oliffe JL, McCreary DR, Black N, Goldenberg SL (2018) Unhealthy behaviors among canadian men are predictors of comorbidities: implications for clinical practice. Am J Mens Health 12(6):2183–2193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988318799022

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Schuring N, Aoki H, Gray J, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, Lambert M, Gouttebarge V (2017) Osteoarthritis is associated with symptoms of common mental disorders among former elite athletes. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 25(10):3179–3185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4255-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sudo A, Miyamoto N, Horikawa K, Urawa M, Yamakawa T, Yamada T et al (2008) Prevalence and risk factors for knee osteoarthritis in elderly Japanese men and women. J Orthop Sci 13(5):413–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-008-1254-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tian W, Lv Y, Liu Y, Xiao B, Han X (2014) The high prevalence of symptomatic degenerative lumbar Osteoarthritis in Chinese adults: a population-based study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39(16):1301–1310. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vasilic-Brasnjevic S, Marinkovic J, Vlajinac H, Vasiljevic N, Jakovljevic B, Nikic M et al. (2020) Association of body mass index and waist circumference with severity of knee osteoarthritis. Acta Reumatol Port 41(3): 226–231. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27682419. Accessed 27 May 2020

  31. Zhang Y, Zeng C, Li H, Yang T, Han Deng Z, Yang Y et al (2015) Relationship between cigarette smoking and radiographic knee osteoarthritis in Chinese population a cross-sectional study. Rheumatol Int. 35(7):1211–1217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-014-3202-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bang CH, Kim C, Kim JH, Choi SJ, Song GG, Jung JH (2019) Is knee osteoarthritis related to coffee drinking? A nationwide cross-sectional observational study. Clin Rheumatol 38(3):817–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-018-4354-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Callahan LF, Shreffler J, Siaton BC, Helmick CG, Schoster B, Schwartz TA et al (2010) Limited educational attainment and radiographic and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional analysis using data from the Johnston County (North Carolina) Osteoarthritis Project. Arthritis Res Ther 12(2):R46. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar2956

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Holbrook TL, Wingard DL, Barrett-Connor E (1990) Self-reported arthritis among men and women in an adult community. J Community Health 15(3):195–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01350257

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hong JY, Han K, Shin DH, Chun EM (2016) Quality of life analysis and smoking correlation in symptomatic spine osteoarthritis: a nationwide health survey analysis of an elderly population with EQ-5D. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151315

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Kalichman L, Kobyliansky E (2009) Hand osteoarthritis in Chuvashian population: prevalence and determinants. Rheumatol Int 30(1):85–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-009-0920-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kaplan MS, Huguet N, Newsom JT, McFarland BH (2003) Characteristics of physically inactive older adults with arthritis: results of a population-based study. Prev Med (Baltim) 37(1):61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-7435(03)00059-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee BJ, Yang S, Kwon S, Choi KH, Kim W (2019) Association between metabolic syndrome and knee osteoarthritis: A cross-sectional nationwide survey study. J Rehabil Med 51(6):464–470. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Magnusson K, Mathiessen A, Hammer HB, Kvien TK, Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Natvig B et al (2017) Smoking and alcohol use are associated with structural and inflammatory hand osteoarthritis features. Scand J Rheumatol 46(5):388–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009742.2016.1257736

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cheng Y, Macera CA, Davis DR, Ainsworth BE, Troped PJ, Blair SN (2000) Physical activity and self-reported, physician-diagnosed osteoarthritis: is physical activity a risk factor? J Clin Epidemiol 53(3):315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00168-7

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. García-Esquinas E, Ortolá R, Galán I, Soler-Vila H, Laclaustra M, Rodríguez-Artalejo F (2018) Moderate alcohol drinking is not associated with risk of depression in older adults. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29985-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Haugen IK, Ramachandran VS, Misra D, Neogi T, Niu J, Yang T et al (2015) Hand osteoarthritis in relation to mortality and incidence of cardiovascular disease: data from the Framingham Heart Study. Ann Rheum Dis 74(1):74–81. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203789

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Haugen IK, Magnusson K, Turkiewicz A, Englund M (2017) The prevalence, incidence, and progression of hand osteoarthritis in relation to body mass index, smoking, and alcohol consumption. J Rheumatol 44(9):1402–1409. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.170026

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Juhakoski R, Heliövaara M, Impivaara O, Kröger H, Knekt P, Lauren H et al (2009) Risk factors for the development of hip osteoarthritis: a population-based prospective study. Rheumatol (Oxf) 48(1):83–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ken427

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Seavey WG, Kurata JH, Cohen RD (2003) Risk factors for incident self-reported arthritis in a 20 year followup of the Alameda County Study Cohort. J Rheumatol 30(10):2103–2111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Muraki S, Akune T, Oka H, Ishimoto Y, Nagata K, Yoshida M et al (2012) Incidence and risk factors for radiographic knee osteoarthritis and knee pain in Japanese men and women: a longitudinal population-based cohort study. Arthritis Rheum 64(5):1447–1456. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.33508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Takiguchi R, Komatsu R, Kitamura K, Watanabe Y, Takahashi A, Kobayashi R et al (2019) Modifiable factors associated with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: the Murakami cohort study. Maturitas 128:53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.06.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Yoshimura N, Muraki S, Oka H, Kawaguchi H, Nakamura K, Akune T (2011) Association of knee osteoarthritis with the accumulation of metabolic risk factors such as overweight, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and impaired glucose tolerance in Japanese men and women: The ROAD study. J Rheumatol 38(5):921–930. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.100569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Yoshimura N, Muraki S, Oka H, Tanaka S, Kawaguchi H, Nakamura K et al (2015) Mutual associations among musculoskeletal diseases and metabolic syndrome components: a 3-year follow-up of the road study. Mod Rheumatol 25(3):438–448. https://doi.org/10.3109/14397595.2014.972607

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Cooper C, Inskip H, Croft P, Campbell L, Smith G, McLaren M et al (1998) Individual risk factors for hip osteoarthritis: obesity, hip injury, and physical activity. Am J Epidemiol 147(6):516–522. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009482

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Huidekoper AL, van Deroude D, Knevel R, van Helm-Mil AHM, Cannegieter SC, Rosendaal FR et al (2013) Patients with early arthritis consume less alcohol than controls, regardless of the type of arthritis. Rheumatol (Oxf). 52(9):1701–1707. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ket212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Hui M, Doherty M, Zhang W (2011) Does smoking protect against osteoarthritis? Meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann Rheum Dis 70(7):1231–1237. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2010.142323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Egger M, Schneider M (1998) Meta-analysis spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ 316(7125):140. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7125.140

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Graham K, Bernards S, Knibbe R, Kairouz S, Kuntsche S, Wilsnack SC et al (2011) Alcohol-related negative consequences among drinkers around the world. Addiction 106(8):1391–1405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03425.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Sordo L, Barrio G, Bravo MJ, Villalbí JR, Espelt A, Neira M et al (2016) Estimating average alcohol consumption in the population using multiple sources: the case of Spain. Popul Health Metr 14(1):21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-016-0090-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Schroll JB, Moustgaard R, Gøtzsche PC (2011) Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. cross-sectional study. BMC Med Res Methodol 11:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-22

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Chaiyasong S, Huckle T, Mackintosh AM, Meier P, Parry CDH, Callinan S et al (2018) Drinking patterns vary by gender, age and country-level income: cross-country analysis of the International Alcohol Control Study. Drug Alcohol Rev 37(Suppl 2):S53–S62. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.12820

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Choi HK, Atkinson K, Karlson EW, Willett W, Curhan G (2004) Alcohol intake and risk of incident gout in men: a prospective study. Lancet 363(9417):1277–1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16000-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Denoble AE, Huffman KM, Stabler TV, Kelly SJ, Hershfield MS, McDaniel GE et al (2011) Uric acid is a danger signal of increasing risk for osteoarthritis through inflammasome activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(5):2088–2093. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1012743108

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Csaki C, Keshishzadeh N, Fischer K, Shakibaei M (2008) Regulation of inflammation signalling by resveratrol in human chondrocytes in vitro. Biochem Pharmacol 75(3):677–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2007.09.014

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Liu FC, Hung LF, Wu WL, Chang DM, Huang CY, Lai JH et al (2010) Chondroprotective effects and mechanisms of resveratrol in advanced glycation end products-stimulated chondrocytes. Arthritis Res Ther. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar3127

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Shelton NJ, Knott CS (2014) Association between alcohol calorie intake and overweight and obesity in english adults. Am J Public Health 104(4):629–631. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301643

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. O’Donovan G, Stamatakis E, Hamer M (2018) Associations between alcohol and obesity in more than 100 000 adults in England and Scotland. Br J Nutr 119(2):222–227. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000711451700352X

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Chang SH, Mori D, Kobayashi H, Mori Y, Nakamoto H, Okada K et al (2019) Excessive mechanical loading promotes osteoarthritis through the gremlin-1–NF-κB pathway. Nat Commun 10(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09491-5

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Hurwitz DE, Ryals AR, Block JA, Sharma L, Schnitzer TJ, Andriacchi TP (2000) Knee pain and joint loading in subjects with osteoarthritis of the knee. J Orthop Res 18(4):572–579. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100180409

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Henriksen M, Hunter DJ, Dam EB, Messier SP, Andriacchi TP, Lohmander LS et al (2013) Is increased joint loading detrimental to obese patients with knee osteoarthritis? A secondary data analysis from a randomized trial. Osteoarthr Cartil 21(12):1865–1875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2013.10.003

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Georgiev T, Angelov AK (2019) Modifiable risk factors in knee osteoarthritis: treatment implications. Rheumatol Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-019-04290-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Cui Y, Huang C, Momma H, Sugiyama S, Niu K, Nagatomi R (2019) The longitudinal association between alcohol consumption and muscle strength: a population-based prospective study. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 19(3):249–299. http://www.ismni.org. Accessed 23 Feb 2021

  69. Conroy DE, Ram N, Pincus AL, Coffman DL, Lorek AE, Rebar AL et al (2015) Daily physical activity and alcohol use across the adult lifespan. Heal Psychol 34(6):653–660. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Gaddini GW, Turner RT, Granftt KA, Iwaniec UT (2016) Alcohol: a simple nutrient with complex actions on bone in the adult skeleton. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.13000 (Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp. 657–671)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Jang H-D, Hong J-Y, Han K, Lee JC, Shin B-J, Choi S-W et al (2017) Relationship between bone mineral density and alcohol intake: a nationwide health survey analysis of postmenopausal women. PLoS ONE 12(6):e0180132. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180132

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Metelli S, Chaimani A (2020) Challenges in meta-analyses with observational studies. Evid Based Ment Health 23(2):83–87. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2019-300129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L (2005) The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol 58(9):882–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.01.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Liu T, Nie X, Wu Z, Zhang Y, Feng G, Cai S et al (2017) Can statistic adjustment of or minimize the potential confounding bias for meta-analysis of case-control study? A secondary data analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0454-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Thompson S, Ekelund U, Jebb S, Lindroos AK, Mander A, Sharp S et al (2011) A proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies. Int J Epidemiol 40:765–777. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyq248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Stockwell T, Zhao J, Sherk A, Rehm J, Shield K, Naimi T (2018) Underestimation of alcohol consumption in cohort studies and implications for alcohol’s contribution to the global burden of disease. Addiction 113(12):2245–2249. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Foster S, Gmel G, Estévez N, Bähler C, Mohler-Kuo M (2015) Temporal patterns of alcohol consumption and alcohol-related road accidents in young swiss men: seasonal, weekday and public holiday effects. Alcohol Alcohol. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agv037

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Melkevik O, Clausen T, Pedersen J, Garde AH, Holtermann A, Rugulies R (2018) Comorbid symptoms of depression and musculoskeletal pain and risk of long term sickness absence. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5740-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. ​Kuria MW, Ndetei DM, Obot IS, Khasakhala LI, Bagaka BM, Mbugua MN, Kamau J (2012) The Association between Alcohol Dependence and Depression before and after Treatment for Alcohol Dependence. ISRN Psychiatry 2012:482802. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/482802

  80. Srikanth VK, Fryer JL, Zhai G, Winzenberg TM, Hosmer D, Jones G (2005) A meta-analysis of sex differences prevalence, incidence and severity of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 13(9):769–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2005.04.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Gartner A, Trefan L, Moore S, Akbari A, Paranjothy S, Farewell D (2019) Drinking beer, wine or spirits - Does it matter for inequalities in alcohol-related hospital admission? A record-linked longitudinal study in Wales. BMC Public Health 19(1):1651. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8015-3

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Riddle DL, Jiranek WA, Hull JR (2013) Validity and reliability of radiographic knee osteoarthritis measures by arthroplasty surgeons. Orthopedics. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20121217-14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Neogi T, Felson D, Niu J, Nevitt M, Lewis CE, Aliabadi P et al (2009) Association between radiographic features of knee osteoarthritis and pain: Results from two cohort studies. BMJ 339(7719):498–501. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Zhang G, Mai R, Huang B (2010) ADH1B Arg47His polymorphism is associated with esophageal cancer risk in high-incidence asian population: evidence from a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 5(10):e13679. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013679

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Duranceaux NCE, Schuckit MA, Luczak SE, Eng MY, Carr LG, Wall TL (2008) Ethnic differences in level of response to alcohol between Chinese Americans and Korean Americans. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 69(2):227–234. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2008.69.227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Nichols M, Scarborough P, Allender S, Rayner M (2012) What is the optimal level of population alcohol consumption for chronic disease prevention in England Modelling the impact of changes in average consumption levels. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000957

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of Versus Arthritis (Formerly Arthritis Research UK) through Versus Arthritis Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Therapies Centre (Grant 21156).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK

    Kendrick To & Wasim Khan

  2. School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK

    Christopher Mak, Chen Zhang & Yuhui Zhou

  3. Department of Physiotherapy, Centre for Health Exercise and Sports Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia

    Stephanie Filbay

  4. Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK

    Stephanie Filbay

Authors
  1. Kendrick To
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christopher Mak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chen Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuhui Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Stephanie Filbay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wasim Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KT and WK conceptualised the study and drafted the manuscript. SF contributed to the conception and design of the study, and revised the manuscript. CM, CZ and YZ were involved in acquisition of the data through literature search and revision of the work. KT and CM performed data analysis. All the authors were involved in finalising the manuscript. KT and CM contributed equally to the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wasim Khan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no support and no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work, no other relationships or activities that could have influenced the submitted work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 31 KB)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

To, K., Mak, C., Zhang, C. et al. The association between alcohol consumption and osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of observational studies. Rheumatol Int 41, 1577–1591 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-04844-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-04844-0

Keywords

  • Osteoarthritis
  • Epidemiology
  • Alcohol
  • Meta-analysis