X-ray is the fundamental imaging technique in both diagnosis and follow-up of rheumatic diseases. As patients often require sequential X-rays over many years, dose reduction is of great importance. New advanced noise reduction algorithms allow for a dose reduction of up to 50%. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether quality of low-dose images is non-inferior to standard-dose images and, therefore, application of this technique is possible in the context of imaging of rheumatic diseases.
A total of 298 patients with known or suspected rheumatic disease were enrolled prospectively into this study, separated into three consecutive groups: 80%, 64% and 50% tube charge reduction. All patients received imaging of one hand (laterality randomly assigned) with low-dose technique and imaging of the contralateral hand with standard-dose protocol. Images were evaluated by two independent readers who scored (on a scale of 1–5) the visualization of bony cortex, trabeculae and joint spaces of fingers and wrist separately. Additionally, soft tissue and overall contrast were evaluated on the same scale.
Overall image quality (expressed by mean sum score out of 40) of the 50% low-dose images was 31.52 (SD 1.94) vs. 31.66 (SD 1.82) for standard images (p = 0.068). Bony contours as well as trabeculae were equally well visualized in both image sets. Median scores for soft tissue visualization was slightly lower for low dose compared to standard images [4 (IQR 3.5–4) vs. 4 (IQR 3.88–4); p = 0.001].
Overall image quality of low-dose images was not inferior to standard-dose images. Therefore, the application of low-dose technology based on advanced noise estimation algorithms in the context of imaging of rheumatic diseases is possible.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Smolen JS, Landewe R, Breedveld FC, Dougados M, Emery P, Gaujoux-Viala C, Gorter S, Knevel R, Nam J, Schoels M, Aletaha D, Buch M, Gossec L, Huizinga T, Bijlsma JW, Burmester G, Combe B, Cutolo M, Gabay C, Gomez-Reino J, Kouloumas M, Kvien TK, Martin-Mola E, McInnes I, Pavelka K, van Riel P, Scholte M, Scott DL, Sokka T, Valesini G, van Vollenhoven R, Winthrop KL, Wong J, Zink A, van der Heijde D (2010) EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Ann Rheum Dis 69(6):964–975. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.126532
Drosos AA, Pelechas E, Voulgari PV (2019) Conventional radiography of the hands and wrists in rheumatoid arthritis: what a rheumatologist should know and how to interpret the radiological findings. Rheumatol Int 2019:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-019-04326-4
Mouterde G, Rincheval N, Lukas C, Daien C, Saraux A, Dieude P, Morel J, Combe B (2019) Outcome of patients with early arthritis without rheumatoid factor and ACPA and predictors of rheumatoid arthritis in the ESPOIR cohort. Arthritis Res Ther 21(1):140. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-1909-8
Verhoeven MM, de Hair MJ, Tekstra J, Bijlsma JW, van Laar JM, Pethoe-Schramm A, Borm ME, Ter Borg EJ, Linn-Rasker SP, Teitsma XM, Lafeber FP, Jacobs JW, Welsing PM (2019) Initiating tocilizumab, with or without methotrexate, compared with starting methotrexate with prednisone within step-up treatment strategies in early rheumatoid arthritis: an indirect comparison of effectiveness and safety of the U-Act-Early and CAMERA-II treat-to-target trials. Ann Rheum Dis. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215304
Ravindran V, Rachapalli S (2011) An overview of commonly used radiographic scoring methods in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Clin Rheumatol 30(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-010-1554-8
Wassenberg S (2015) Radiographic scoring methods in psoriatic arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 33(5 Suppl 93):S55–59
Colebatch AN, Edwards CJ, Ostergaard M, van der Heijde D, Balint PV, D'Agostino MA, Forslind K, Grassi W, Haavardsholm EA, Haugeberg G, Jurik AG, Landewe RB, Naredo E, O'Connor PJ, Ostendorf B, Potocki K, Schmidt WA, Smolen JS, Sokolovic S, Watt I, Conaghan PG (2013) EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging of the joints in the clinical management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 72(6):804–814. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203158
Fiehn C, Holle J, Iking-Konert C, Leipe J, Weseloh C, Frerix M, Alten R, Behrens F, Baerwald C, Braun J, Burkhardt H, Burmester G, Detert J, Gaubitz M, Gause A, Gromnica-Ihle E, Kellner H, Krause A, Kuipers J, Lorenz HM, Muller-Ladner U, Nothacker M, Nusslein H, Rubbert-Roth A, Schneider M, Schulze-Koops H, Seitz S, Sitter H, Specker C, Tony HP, Wassenberg S, Wollenhaupt J, Kruger K (2018) S2e guideline: treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with disease-modifying drugs. Z Rheumatol 77(Suppl 2):35–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-018-0481-y
Venegas-Pont M, Davis JM 3rd, Crowson CS, Gabriel SE, Matteson EL (2015) Frequency of radiologic procedures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Rheumatol 21(1):15–18. https://doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0000000000000164
Favalli EG, Biggioggero M, Crotti C, Becciolini A, Raimondo MG, Meroni PL (2019) Sex and management of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 56(3):333–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-018-8672-5
Symmons DP (2002) Epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis: determinants of onset, persistence and outcome. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 16(5):707–722
Schaefer-Prokop C, Uffmann M (2009) Update on digital radiography. Eur J Radiol 72(2):193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.056
Guo H, Liu WY, He XY, Zhou XS, Zeng QL, Li BY (2013) Optimizing imaging quality and radiation dose by the age-dependent setting of tube voltage in pediatric chest digital radiography. Korean J Radiol 14(1):126–131. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2013.14.1.126
Dietrich TJ, Pfirrmann CW, Schwab A, Pankalla K, Buck FM (2013) Comparison of radiation dose, workflow, patient comfort and financial break-even of standard digital radiography and a novel biplanar low-dose X-ray system for upright full-length lower limb and whole spine radiography. Skeletal Radiol 42(7):959–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1600-0
Seeram E, Davidson R, Bushong S, Swan H (2016) Optimizing the exposure indicator as a dose management strategy in computed radiography. Radiol Technol 87(4):380–391
Kloth JK, Neumann R, von Stillfried E, Stiller W, Burkholder I, Kauczor HU, Ewerbeck V, Weber MA (2016) Quality-controlled dose-reduction of pelvic X-ray examinations in infants with hip dysplasia. Eur J Radiol 85(1):233–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.11.018
Kloth JK, Rickert M, Gotterbarm T, Stiller W, Burkholder I, Kauczor HU, Ewerbeck V, Weber MA (2015) Pelvic X-ray examinations in follow-up of hip arthroplasty or femoral osteosynthesis—dose reduction and quality criteria. Eur J Radiol 84(5):915–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.02.001
Kloth JK, Tanner M, Stiller W, Burkholder I, Kauczor HU, Ewerbeck V, Weber MA (2015) Radiation dose reduction in digital plain radiography of the knee after total knee arthroplasty. Rofo 187(8):685–690. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1399559
Andre F, Fortner P, Vembar M, Mueller D, Stiller W, Buss SJ, Kauczor HU, Katus HA, Korosoglou G (2017) Improved image quality with simultaneously reduced radiation exposure: knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction algorithms for coronary CT angiography in a clinical setting. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 11(3):213–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2017.02.007
Iyama Y, Nakaura T, Kidoh M, Oda S, Utsunomiya D, Sakaino N, Tokuyasu S, Osakabe H, Harada K, Yamashita Y (2016) Submillisievert radiation dose coronary CT angiography: clinical impact of the knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction. Acad Radiol 23(11):1393–1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.07.005
Hart D, Hillier M, Wall B (2002) Doses to patients from medical X-ray examinations in the UK-2000 review. United Kingdom
Fatouros PPG, Skubic SE, Rao GUV (1984) Imaging characteristics of new screen/film systems for cephalometric radiography. Angle Orthod 54(1):36–54. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(1984)054%3c0036:Iconfs%3e2.0.Co;2
Chambers JM (1983) Graphical methods for data analysis. Wadsworth International Group
Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA (2018) Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg 126(5):1763–1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864
Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropract Med 15(2):155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
Bossew P, Tollefsen T, Cinelli G, Gruber V, De Cort M (2015) Status of the European atlas of natural radiation. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 167(1–3):29–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv216
Hart D, Wall B, Hillier M, Shrimpton P (2010) HPA-CRCE-012: Frequency and collective dose for medical and dental X-ray examinations in the UK, 2008. United Kingdom
Jeon MR, Park HJ, Lee SY, Kang KA, Kim EY, Hong HP, Youn I (2017) Radiation dose reduction in plain radiography of the full-length lower extremity and full spine. Br J Radiol 90(1080):20170483. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170483
Ahmadzadeh A, Dehghan P, Rajaee A, Emam M, Enteshari K, Gachkar L (2013) Assessing rheumatologists and radiologists agreement rate regarding the diagnosis of focal bone erosions and osteopenic changes using hand X-rays radiography in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int 33(8):2019–2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-012-2645-4
The Department of Radiology of Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin has a master research agreement with Samsung Health Medical Corporation for the further development of radiography technologies. Bernd Hamm receives honoraria from Canon Medical Systems. Kay-Geert Hermann receives funding from the Berlin Institute of Health (Clinical Fellow Programme). All other authors have no funding to report.
Part of the data included in this manuscript here was presented at the Congress of the European League Against Rheumatism 2019 in Madrid as K. Ziegeler, S. Siepmann, A. Beck, A. Lembcke, B. Hamm, K.G.A. Hermann, FRI0629. Application of an advanced noise reduction algorithm for imaging of hands in rheumatic diseases—evaluation of image quality compared to standard-dose images, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 78(Suppl 2) (2019) 1012–1012.
Conflict of interest
The authors’ department has a master research agreement with Samsung Health Medical Corporation for the further development of radiography technologies. All authors declare to have no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
imaging examples. 1a: standard dose image. 1b: 64% low-dose image of the same patient as 1a. 2a: 80% low-dose image. 2b: standard dose image of the same patient as 2a (TIF 10062 kb)
About this article
Cite this article
Ziegeler, K., Siepmann, S., Hermann, S. et al. Application of an advanced noise reduction algorithm for imaging of hands in rheumatic diseases: evaluation of image quality compared to standard-dose images. Rheumatol Int 40, 893–899 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-020-04560-1
- Dose reduction
- Rheumatic diseases