Abstract
The objective of this study is to investigate the value of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in the assessment of sacroiliitis in patients with established ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Paired plain radiographs and MDCT images of the 330 sacroiliac (SI) joints in 165 patients with definite or probable ankylosing spondylitis were analyzed for sacroiliitis. Sacroiliitis on plain radiographs were graded on a scale of 0–4 according to the modified New York (NY) criteria. For grading of sacroiliitis by MDCT, modified NY criteria were revised for MDCT application introducing the concept of quantification. The relationship between sacroiliitis grades by plain radiography and MDCT was analyzed by two radiologists, blinded for all clinical data. Of the 330 SI joints assessed, there was agreement between the sacroiliitis grading by plain radiography and MDCT in 73 (22.1 %) SI joints. Sacroiliitis grade by MDCT was higher in 250 (75.8 %) SI joints and lower in 7 (2.1 %) SI joints than that by plain radiography. Using the MDCT, 83.6 % of patients met the modified NY radiologic criteria for the classification of AS, compared with 58.2 % of the patients by plain radiography. Twenty-six percent of the patients, who did not meet the modified NY criteria for the classification of AS by plain radiography, met the criteria by MDCT. Disease durations in patients with grade 2 and grade 3 sacroiliitis were significantly shorter in patients evaluated by MDCT compared with plain radiography. MDCT is a useful imaging method that can be applied to the initial diagnosis of the AS, and by better visualization of SI joint changes, it can be used to predict the progress of the disease.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Braun J, Bollow M, Remlinger G, Eggens U, Rudwaleit M, Distler A, Sieper J (1998) Prevalence of spondylarthropathies in HLA-B27 positive and negative blood donors. Arthritis Rheum 41(1):58–67
Sieper J, Appel H, Braun J, Rudwaleit M (2008) Critical appraisal of assessment of structural damage in ankylosing spondylitis: implications for treatment outcomes. Arthritis Rheum 58(3):649–656
van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A (1984) Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 27(4):361–368
Mau W, Zeidler H, Mau R, Majewski A, Freyschmidt J, Stangel W, Deicher H (1988) Clinical features and prognosis of patients with possible ankylosing spondylitis. Results of a 10 year followup. J Rheumatol 15(7):1109–1114
Rudwaleit M, Khan MA, Sieper J (2005) The challenge of diagnosis and classification in early ankylosing spondylitis: do we need new criteria? Arthritis Rheum 52(4):1000–1008
Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Listing J, Akkoc N, Brandt J, Braun J, Chou CT, Collantes-Estevez E, Dougados M, Huang F, Gu J, Khan MA, Kirazli Y, Maksymowych WP, Mielants H, Sørensen IJ, Ozgocmen S, Roussou E, Valle-Oñate R, Weber U, Wei J, Sieper J (2009) The development of assessment of spondyloarthritis international society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis 68(6):777–783
Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, Brandt J, Braun J, Burgos-Vargas R, Dougados M, Hermann KG, Landewé R, Maksymowych W, van der Heijde D (2009) The assessment of spondyloarthritis international society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 68(Suppl 2):ii 1–ii 44
Wanders AJ, Landewé RB, Spoorenberg A, Dougados M, van der Linden S, Mielants H, van der Tempel H, van der Heijde DM (2004) What is the most appropriate radiologic scoring method for ankylosing spondylitis? A comparison of the available methods based on the outcome measures in rheumatology clinical trials filter. Arthritis Rheum 50(8):2622–2632
Lee YH, Hwang JY, Lee SW, Lee J (2007) The clinical usefulness of multidetector computed tomography of the sacroiliac joint for evaluating spondyloarthropathies. Korean J Intern Med 22(3):171–177
Geijer M, Göthlin GG, Göthlin JH (2007) The clinical utility of computed tomography compared to conventional radiography in diagnosing sacroiliitis. A retrospective study on 910 patients and literature review. J Rheumatol 34(7):1561–1565
Geijer M, Gadeholt Göthlin G, Göthlin JH (2009) The validity of the New York radiological grading criteria in diagnosing sacroiliitis by computed tomography. Acta Radiol 50(6):664–673
Muche B, Bollow M, Francois RJ, Sieper J, Hamm B, Braun J (2003) Anatomic structures involved in early–and late-stage sacroiliitis in spondylarthritis: a detailed analysis by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum 48(5):1374–1384
Fujii K, Aoyama T, Koyama S, Kawaura C (2007) Comparative evaluation of organ and effective doses for paediatric patients with those for adults in chest and abdominal CT examinations. Br J Radiol 80(956):657–667
Hohl C, Mahnken AH, Klotz E, Das M, Stargardt A, Mühlenbruch G, Schmidt T, Günther RW, Wildberger JE (2005) Radiation dose reduction to the male gonads during MDCT: the effectiveness of a lead shield. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(1):128–130
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Y.-H. Lee and Y.S. Hong contributed equally to this article as the first author.
J. Lee and J.Y. Hwang contributed equally to this article as the corresponding author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, YH., Hong, Y.S., Park, W. et al. Value of multidetector computed tomography for the radiologic grading of sacroiliitis in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int 33, 1005–1011 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-012-2450-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-012-2450-0