Abstract
Since its discovery in the early 70s, the 2 micron plasmid of Saccharomyces cerevisiae continues to intrigue researchers with its high protein-coding capacity and a selfish nature yet high stability, earning it the title of a ‘miniaturized selfish genetic element’. It codes for four proteins (Rep1, Rep2, Raf1, and Flp) vital for its own survival and recruits several host factors (RSC2, Cohesin, Cse4, Kip1, Bik1, Bim1, and microtubules) for its faithful segregation during cell division. The plasmid maintains a high-copy number with the help of Flp-mediated recombination. The plasmids organize in the form of clusters that hitch-hike the host chromosomes presumably with the help of the plasmid-encoded Rep proteins and host factors such as microtubules, Kip1 motor, and microtubule-associated proteins Bik1 and Bim1. Although there is no known yeast cell phenotype associated with the 2 micron plasmid, excessive copies of the plasmid are lethal for the cells, warranting a tight control over the plasmid copy number. This control is achieved through a combination of feedback loops involving the 2 micron encoded proteins. Thus, faithful segregation and a concomitant tightly controlled plasmid copy number ensure an optimized benign parasitism of the 2 micron plasmid within budding yeast.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- PCN:
-
Plasmid copy number
- SPB:
-
Spindle pole body
- TAP:
-
Tandem affinity purification
References
Ahn YT, Wu XL, Biswal S et al (1997) The 2 micron-plasmid-encoded Rep1 and Rep2 proteins interact with each other and colocalize to the nucleus. J Bacteriol 179:7479–7506
Amin AA, Sadowski PD (1989) Synthesis of an enzymatically active FLP recombinase in vitro: search for a DNA-binding domain. Mol Cell Biol 9:1987–1995. doi:10.1128/MCB.9.5.1987.Updated
Ananthasubramaniam B, Herzel H (2014) Positive feedback promotes oscillations in negative feedback loops. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0104761
Andrews BJ, Proteau GA, Beatty LG, Sadowski PD (1985) The FLP recombinase of the 2µ circle DNA of yeast: interaction with its target sequences. Cell 40:795–803
Andrews BJ, McLeod M, Broach J, Sadowski PD (1986) Interaction of the FLP recombinase of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae 2 µm plasmid with mutated target sequences. Mol Cell Biol 6:2482–2489
Azam N, Dixon JE, Paul D (1997) Topological analysis of the role of homology in Flp-mediated recombination. J Biol Chem 272:8731–8738
Bastien N, McBride AA (2000) Interaction of the papillomavirus E2 protein with mitotic chromosomes. Virology 270:124–134. doi:10.1006/viro.2000.0265
Beggs JD (1978) Transformation of yeast by a replicating hybrid plasmid. Nature 275:104–109. doi:10.1038/275104a0
Biggins S (2013) The composition, functions, and regulation of the budding yeast kinetochore. Genetics 194:817–846. doi:10.1534/genetics.112.145276
Black BE, Jansen LET, Foltz DR, Cleveland DW (2010) Centromere identity, function, and epigenetic propagation across cell divisions. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 75:403–418. doi:10.1101/sqb.2010.75.038
Boach JR (1983) Construction of high copy yeast vectors using 2-µm circle sequences. Methods Enzymol 101:307–325
Broach JR (1982) The yeast plasmid 2µ circle. Cell 28:203–204
Broach JR, Hickst JB (1980) Replication and recombination functions associated with the yeast plasmid, 2µ circle. Cell 21:501–508
Broach JR, Atkins JF, Mcgill C, Chow L (1979) Identification and mapping of the transcriptional and translational products of the yeast plasmid 2µ circle. Cell 16:827–839
Broach JR, Guarascio VR, Jayaram M (1982) Recombination within the yeast plasmid 2µ circle is site-specific. Cell 29:227–234. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(82)90107-6
Cairns BR, Lorch Y, Li Y et al (1996) RSC, an essential, abundant chromatin-remodeling complex. Cell 87:1249–1260. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81820-6
Cashmore AM, Hadfield C, Albury MS, Meacock PA (1986) Genetic analysis of partitioning functions encoded by the 2 µm circle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet 203:154–162
Cashmore AM, Albury MS, Hadfield C, Meacock PA (1988) The 2 µm D region plays a role in yeast plasmid maintenance. Mol Gen Genet 212:426–431
Chan K-M, Liu Y-T, Ma C-H et al (2013) The 2 micron plasmid of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a miniaturized selfish genome with optimized functional competence. Plasmid 70:2–17. doi:10.1016/j.plasmid.2013.03.001
Chen XL, Reindle A, Johnson ES (2005) Misregulation of 2 µm circle copy number in a SUMO pathway mutant. Mol Cell Biol 25:4311–4320. doi:10.1128/MCB.25.10.4311
Choy JS, Acuña R, Au WC, Basrai MA (2011) A role for histone H4K16 hypoacetylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinetochore function. Genetics 189:11–21. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.130781
Clark-Walker GD, Miklos GL (1974) Localization and quantification of circular DNA in yeast. Eur J Biochem 41:359–365
Cui H, Ghosh SK, Jayaram M (2009) The selfish yeast plasmid uses the nuclear motor Kip1p but not Cin8p for its localization and equal segregation. J Cell Biol 185:251–264. doi:10.1083/jcb.200810130
Dobson MJ, Pickett AJ, Velmurugan S et al (2005) The 2 µm plasmid causes cell death in Saccharomyces cerevisiae with a mutation in Ulp1 protease. Mol Cell Biol 25:4299–4310. doi:10.1128/MCB.25.10.4299
Fridman V, Gerson-Gurwitz A, Shapira O et al (2013) Kinesin-5 Kip1 is a bi-directional motor that stabilizes microtubules and tracks their plus-ends in vivo. J Cell Sci 126:4147–4159. doi:10.1242/jcs.125153
Furuyama T, Henikoff S (2009) Centromeric nucleosomes induce positive DNA supercoils. Cell 138:104–113. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.049
Futcher AB (1986) Copy number amplification of the 2 micron circle plasmid of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Theor Biol 119:197–204
Futcher AB, Cox BS (1983) Maintenance of the 2 microns circle plasmid in populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 154:612–622
Gates CA, Cox MM (1988) FLP recombinase is an enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:4628–4632
Gehlen LR, Nagai S, Shimada K et al (2011) Nuclear geometry and rapid mitosis ensure asymmetric episome segregation in yeast. Curr Biol 21:25–33. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.12.016
George AA, Walworth NC (2016) Microtubule dynamics decoded by the epigenetic state of centromeric chromatin. Curr Genet 62:691–695. doi:10.1007/s00294-016-0588-0
Gerbaud C, Fournier P, Blanc H et al (1979) High frequency of yeast transformation by plasmids carrying part or entire 2-micron yeast plasmid. Gene 5:233–253
Ghosh SK, Hajra S, Jayaram M (2007) Faithful segregation of the multicopy yeast plasmid through cohesin-mediated recognition of sisters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:13034–13039. doi:10.1073/pnas.0702996104
Ghosh SK, Huang CC, Hajra S, Jayaram M (2009) Yeast cohesin complex embraces 2 micron plasmid sisters in a tri-linked catenane complex. Nucleic Acids Res 38:570–584. doi:10.1093/nar/gkp993
Gronostajskil RM, Sadowski PD (1985) The FLP recombinase of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae 2 µm plasmid attaches covalently to DNA via phosphotyrosyl linkage. Microbiology 5:3274–3279
Hadfield C, Mount RC, Cashmore AM (1995) Protein binding interactions at the STB locus of the yeast 2 µm plasmid. Nucleic Acids Res 23:995–1002
Haering CH, Farcas A-M, Arumugam P et al (2008) The cohesin ring concatenates sister DNA molecules. Nature 454:297–301. doi:10.1038/nature07098
Hajra S, Ghosh SK, Jayaram M (2006) The centromere-specific histone variant Cse4p (CENP-A) is essential for functional chromatin architecture at the yeast 2-micron circle partitioning locus and promotes equal plasmid segregation. J Cell Biol 174:779–790. doi:10.1083/jcb.200603042
Hartley JL, Donelson JE (1980) Nucleotide sequence of the yeast plasmid. Nature 286:860–865
Holdorf MM, Cooper SB, Yamamoto KR, Miranda JJL (2011) Occupancy of chromatin organizers in the Epstein-Barr virus genome. Virology 415:1–5. doi:10.1016/j.virol.2011.04.004
Holm C (1982) Clonal lethality caused by the yeast plasmid 2μ DNA. Cell 29:585–594. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(82)90174-X
Huang J, Hsu JM, Laurent BC (2004) The RSC nucleosome-remodeling complex is required for cohesin’s association with chromosome arms. Mol Cell 13:739–750. doi:10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00103-0
Huang C-C, Hajra S, Ghosh SK, Jayaram M (2011) Cse4 (CenH3) association with the Saccharomyces cerevisiae plasmid partitioning locus in its native and chromosomally integrated states: implications in centromere evolution. Mol Cell Biol 31:1030–1040. doi:10.1128/MCB.01191-10
Ivanov D, Nasmyth K (2005) A topological interaction between cohesin rings and a circular minichromosome. Cell 122:849–860. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.018
Ivanov D, Nasmyth K (2007) A physical assay for sister chromatid cohesion in vitro. Mol Cell 27:300–310. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2007.07.002
Jayaram M, Li YY, Broach JR (1983) The yeast plasmid 2µ circle encodes components required for its high copy propagation. Cell 34:95–104
Johnson ES, Blobel G (1999) Cell cycle-regulated attachment of the ubiquitin-related protein SUMO to the yeast septins. J Cell Biol 147:981–994
Kanda T, Kamiya M, Maruo S, Iwakiri D, Takada K (2007) Symmetrical localization of extrachromosomally replicating viral genomes on sister chromatids. J cell sci 120:1529–1539
Kapoor P, Frappier L (2003) EBNA1 partitions Epstein-Barr virus plasmids in yeast cells by attaching to human EBNA1-binding protein 2 on mitotic chromosomes. J Virol 77:6946–6956. doi:10.1128/JVI.77.12.6946-6956.2003
Kapoor P, Lavoie BD, Frappier L (2005) EBP2 plays a key role in Epstein-Barr virus mitotic segregation and is regulated by aurora family kinases. Mol Cell Biol 25:4934–4945
Khmelinskii A, Meurer M, Knop M, Schiebel E (2011) Artificial tethering to nuclear pores promotes partitioning of extrachromosomal DNA during yeast asymmetric cell division. Curr Biol 21:R17–R18
Kikuchi Y (1983) Yeast plasmid requires a cis-acting locus and two plasmid proteins for its stable maintenance. Cell 35:487–493
Li SJ, Hochstrasser M (2000) The yeast ULP2 (SMT4) gene encodes a novel protease specific for the ubiquitin-like Smt3 protein. Mol Cell Biol 20:2367–2377. doi:10.1128/MCB.20.7.2367-2377.2000
Liu YT, Ma CH, Jayaram M (2013) Co-segregation of yeast plasmid sisters under monopolin-directed mitosis suggests association of plasmid sisters with sister chromatids. Nucleic Acids Res 41:4144–4158. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt096
Liu Y-T, Fan H-F, Kachroo AH, Jayaram M, Rowley PA, Sau S, Chang K-M, Ma C-H (2014) The partitioning and copy number control systems of the selfish yeast plasmid: an optimized molecular design for stable persistence in host cells. Microbiol Spectr 2(5). doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.PLAS-0003-2013
Liu Y-T, Chang K-M, Ma C-H, Jayaram M (2016) Replication-dependent and independent mechanisms for the chromosome-coupled persistence of a selfish genome. Nucleic Acids Res. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw694
Ma C-H, Cui H, Hajra S et al (2013) Temporal sequence and cell cycle cues in the assembly of host factors at the yeast 2 micron plasmid partitioning locus. Nucleic Acids Res 41:2340–2353. doi:10.1093/nar/gks1338
Ma C-H, Liu Y-T, Savva CG et al (2014) Organization of DNA partners and strand exchange mechanisms during Flp Site-specific recombination analyzed by difference topology, single molecule FRET and single molecule TPM. J Mol Biol 426:793–815. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2013.11.017
Malik HS (2006) A hitchhiker’s guide to survival finally makes CENs. J Cell Biol 174:747–749. doi:10.1083/jcb.200608107
Mann C, Davis RW (1983) Instability of dicentric plasmids in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:228–232
McAinsh AD, Tytell JD, Sorger PK (2003) Structure, function, and regulation of budding yeast kinetochores. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 19:519–539. doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.111301.155607
McLeod M, Craft S, Broach JR (1986) Identification of the crossover site during FLP-mediated recombination in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae plasmid 2 µm circle. Mol Cell Biol 6:3357–3367
McPhillips MG, Ozato K, McBride AA (2005) Interaction of bovine papillomavirus E2 protein with Brd4 stabilizes its association with chromatin. J virol 79:8920–8932
Mead DJ, Gardner DC, Oliver SG (1986) The yeast 2 µ plasmid: strategies for the survival of a selfish DNA. Mol Gen Genet 205:417–421
Mehta S, Yang XM, Chan CS et al (2002) The 2 micron plasmid purloins the yeast cohesin complex: a mechanism for coupling plasmid partitioning and chromosome segregation? J Cell Biol 158:625–637. doi:10.1083/jcb.200204136
Mehta S, Yang X, Jayaram M, Velmurugan S (2005) A novel role for the mitotic spindle during DNA segregation in yeast: promoting 2 µm plasmid-cohesin association. Mol Cell Biol 25:4283–4298. doi:10.1128/MCB.25.10.4283
Mehta GD, Agarwal MP, Ghosh SK (2010) Centromere identity: a challenge to be faced. Mol Genet Genom 284:75–94. doi:10.1007/s00438-010-0553-4
Mehta GD, Rizvi SMA, Ghosh SK (2012) Cohesin: a guardian of genome integrity. Biochim Biophys Acta 1823:1324–1342. doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.05.027
Mehta K, Gunasekharan V, Satsuka A, Laimins LA (2015) Human papilloma viruses activate and recruit SMC1 cohesin proteins for the differentiation-dependent life cycle through association with CTCF insulators. PLoS Pathog 11:1–25. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004763
Miller RK, D’Silva S, Moore JK, Goodson HV (2006) The CLIP-170 orthologue Bik1p and positioning the mitotic spindle in yeast. Curr Top Dev Biol 76:49–87. doi:10.1016/S0070-2153(06)76002-1
Mir M, Wang Z, Shen Z et al (2011) Optical measurement of cycle-dependent cell growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:13124–13129. doi:10.1073/pnas.1100506108
Murray JAH, Cesareni G (1986) Functional analysis of the yeast plasmid partition locus STB. EMBO J 5:3391–3399
Murray AW, Szostak JW (1983) Pedigree analysis of plasmid segregation in yeast. Cell 34:961–970
Murray JAH, Scarpal M, Rossi N, Cesareni G (1987) Antagonistic controls regulate copy number of the yeast 2µ plasmid. EMBO J 6:4205–4212
Nasmyth K, Haering CH (2009) Cohesin: its roles and mechanisms. Annu Rev Genet 43:525–558. doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134233
Novák B, Tyson JJ (2008) Design principles of biochemical oscillators. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9:981–991. doi:10.1038/nrm2530
Pan G, Luetke K, Sadowski PD (1993) Mechanism of cleavage and ligation by FLP recombinase: classification of mutations in FLP protein by in vitro complementation analysis. Mol Cell Biol 13:3167–3175. doi:10.1128/MCB.13.6.3167.Updated
Papacs LA, Sun Y, Anderson EL et al (2004) REP3-mediated silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 166:79–87
Petes TD, Williamson DH (1975) Replicating circular DNA molecules in yeast. Cell 4:249–253. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(75)90172-5
Petes TD, Williamson DH (1994) A novel structural form of the 2 micron plasmid of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 10:1341–1345. doi:10.1002/yea.320101011
Pinder JB, McQuaid ME, Dobson MJ (2013) Deficient sumoylation of yeast 2-micron plasmid proteins Rep1 and Rep2 associated with their loss from the plasmid-partitioning locus and impaired plasmid inheritance. PLoS One 8:e60384. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060384
Prajapati HK, Rizvi SMA, Rathore I, Ghosh SK (2017) Microtubule-associated proteins, Bik1 and Bim1, are required for faithful partitioning of the endogenous 2 micron plasmids in budding yeast. Mol Microbiol 103:1046–1064. doi:10.1111/mmi.13608
Prasad PV, Young LJ, Jayaram M (1987) Mutations in the 2-microns circle site-specific recombinase that abolish recombination without affecting substrate recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:2189–2193
Reynolds AE, Murray AW, Szostak JW (1987) Roles of the 2 µm gene products in stable maintenance of the 2 µm plasmid of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 7:3566–3573
Rizvi SMA, Prajapati HK, Nag P, Ghosh SK (2017) The 2-μm plasmid encoded protein Raf1 regulates both stability and copy number of the plasmid by blocking the formation of the Rep1–Rep2 repressor complex. Nucleic Acids Res. doi:10.1093/nar/gkx316
Sadowski PD (1995) The Flp recombinase of th 2-μm plasmid of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 51:53–91
Sau S, Conrad MN, Lee C-Y et al (2014) A selfish DNA element engages a meiosis-specific motor and telomeres for germ-line propagation. J Cell Biol 205:643–661. doi:10.1083/jcb.201312002
Scott-Drew S, Murray JAH (1998) Localisation and interaction of the protein components of the yeast 2µ circle plasmid partitioning system suggest a mechanism for plasmid inheritance. J Cell Sci 111:1779–1789
Scott-Drew S, Wong CMVL, Murray JAH (2002) DNA plasmid transmission in yeast is associated with specific sub-nuclear localisation during cell division. Cell Biol Int 26:393–405
Senecoff JF, Bruckner RC, Cox MM (1985) The FLP recombinase of the yeast 2-µm plasmid: characterization of its recombination site. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:7270–7274
Sengupta A, Blomqvist K, Pickett AJ et al (2001) Functional domains of yeast plasmid-encoded Rep proteins. J Bacteriol 183:2306–2314. doi:10.1128/JB.183.7.2306
Shcheprova Z, Baldi S, Frei SB et al (2008) A mechanism for asymmetric segregation of age during yeast budding. Nature 454:728–734. doi:10.1038/nature07212
Som T, Armstrong KA, Broach JF, Volkert C (1988) Autoregulation of 2 µm circle gene expression provides a model for maintenance of stable plasmid copy levels. Cell 52:27–37
Stevens BJ, Moustacchi E (1971) γ Satellite DNA and small twisted circular molecules in yeast. Exp Cell Res 64:259–266
Tsuchiya E, Hosotani T, Miyakawa T (1998) A mutation in NPS1/STH1, an essential gene encoding a component of a novel chromatin-remodeling complex RSC, alters the chromatin structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae centromeres. Nucleic Acids Res 26:3286–3292. doi:10.1093/nar/26.13.3286
Velmurugan S, Ahn YT, Yang XM et al (1998) The 2 µm plasmid stability system: analyses of the interactions among plasmid- and host-encoded components. Mol Cell Biol 18:7466–7477
Velmurugan S, Yang XM, Chan CS et al (2000) Partitioning of the 2-µm circle plasmid of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: functional coordination with chromosome segregation and plasmid-encoded rep protein distribution. J Cell Biol 149:553–566
Volkert FC, Broach JR (1986) Site-specific recombination promotes plasmid amplification in yeast. Cell 46:541–550
Wei XA, Pelcher LE, Rank GH (1991) DNA sequence divergence and functional conservation at the STB locus of yeast 2 µm circle variants. J Bacteriol 173:1181–1186
Westermann S, Drubin DG, Barnes G (2007) Structures and functions of yeast kinetochore complexes. Ann Rev Biochem 76:563–591. doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.052705.160607
Wong MCVL, Scott-Drew SRS, Hayes MJ et al (2002) RSC2, encoding a component of the RSC nucleosome remodeling complex, is essential for 2 microm plasmid maintenance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 22:4218–4229. doi:10.1128/MCB.22.12.4218-4229.2002
Wu LCC, Fisher PA, Broach JR (1987) A yeast plasmid partitioning protein is a karyoskeletal component. J Biol Chem 262:883–891
Xiao W, Pelcher LE, Rank GH (1991) Sequence diversity of yeast 2 µm RAF gene and its co-evolution with STB and REP1. Gene 101:75–80
Xiong L, Chen XL, Silver HR et al (2009) Deficient SUMO attachment to Flp recombinase leads to homologous recombination-dependent hyperamplification of the yeast 2 µm circle plasmid. Mol Biol Cell 20:1241–1251. doi:10.1091/mbc.E08
Yamagishi Y, Sakuno T, Goto Y, Watanabe Y (2014) Kinetochore composition and its function: lessons from yeasts. FEMS Microbiol Rev 38:185–200
Yang X-M, Mehta S, Uzri D et al (2004) Mutations in a partitioning protein and altered chromatin structure at the partitioning locus prevent cohesin recruitment by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae plasmid and cause plasmid missegregation. Mol Cell Biol 24:5290–5303. doi:10.1128/MCB.24.12.5290-5303.2004
You J, Croyle JL, Nishimura A, Ozato K, Howley PM (2004) Interaction of the bovine papillomavirus E2 protein with Brd4 tethers the viral DNA to host mitotic chromosomes. Cell 117:349–360
Zakian VA, Brewer BJ, Fangman WL (1979) Replication of each copy of the yeast 2 micron DNA plasmid occurs during the S phase. Cell 17:923–934
Zhao X, Wu CY, Blobel G (2004) Mlp-dependent anchorage and stabilization of a desumoylating enzyme is required to prevent clonal lethality. J Cell Biol 167:605–611. doi:10.1083/jcb.200405168
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
This work is funded by DST (SB/SO/BB-0125/2013) Govt. of India, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research [38/1267/10/EMR-II] Govt. of India. HKP and SMAR are supported by MHRD and UGC (Ref. no: 20-06/2010(i)EU-IV) fellowship, respectively.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by M. Kupiec.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rizvi, S.M.A., Prajapati, H.K. & Ghosh, S.K. The 2 micron plasmid: a selfish genetic element with an optimized survival strategy within Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Curr Genet 64, 25–42 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-017-0719-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-017-0719-2