Skip to main content
Log in

Das apokrine Porom

Ein wenig bekannter Hauttumor mit adnexieller Mischdifferenzierung

Apocrine poroma

A relatively little known skin tumor with multilineage differentiation

  • Schwerpunkt
  • Published:
Der Pathologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Porome wurden ursprünglich in die Gruppe ekkriner Tumoren eingeordnet, die überwiegend aus poroiden duktalen Zellen bestehen, welche in Richtung des Schweißdrüsenausführungsgangs differenzieren. Inzwischen sind jedoch zahlreiche Fälle von Poromen mit zusätzlichen sebozytären und/oder follikulären und/oder apokrin-glandulären Differenzierungsmerkmalen beschrieben und unter dem Begriff des apokrinen Poroms zusammengefasst worden. Die Kombination unterschiedlicher Differenzierungsrichtungen ist durch die embryologisch bedingte Assoziation des Schweißdrüsenausführungsgangs mit anderen Strukturen der sog. follikulo-sebozytären-apokrinen Einheit zu erklären. Die klinischen und histopathologischen Merkmale des apokrinen Poroms werden anhand der Literatur und von 7 eigenen Fällen dargestellt und dem ekkrinen Porom gegenübergestellt. Die Abgrenzung des apokrinen Poroms von einem Sebazeom und von einem Basalzellkarzinom mit sebozytärer Differenzierung ist von Bedeutung, da die Diagnosen therapeutische Konsequenzen für den Patienten haben. Daher wird zusätzlich auf die histopathologische Unterscheidung des apokrinen Poroms von diesen Tumoren eingegangen.

Abstract

Poromas were originally classified as eccrine tumors which predominantly consist of poroid ductal cells and differentiate in the direction of sweat gland ducts. However, there have now been many reports on poromas with additional differential characteristics differentiating in the direction of sebaceous and/or apocrine glands and/or hair follicles. These tumors have been termed apocrine poromas. Multilineage differentiation within a poroma can be explained by the embryological association of the sweat duct with the so-called folliculo-sebaceous-apocrine unit. The clinical and histopathological features of apocrine poromas are reviewed in comparison to classical eccrine poromas by taking into account seven own cases of apocrine poroma and a review of the literature. It is important for histopathologists not to confuse apocrine poroma with other tumors with multilineage differentiation. Apocrine poroma needs to be distinguished from sebaceoma and from basal cell carcinoma with sebaceous differentiation, in particular, because these tumors have therapeutic consequences for the patient. The main histopathological differences between apocrine poroma, sebaceoma and basal cell carcinoma with sebaceous differentiation are explained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7

Literatur

  1. Abenoza P, Ackerman B (1990) Ackerman’s histologic diagnostic of neoplastic skin diseases: a method by pattern analysis. Neoplasms with ekkrine differentiation. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia

  2. Kazakov DV, Michal M, Kacerovska D, McKee PH (2012) Cutaneous adnexal tumors. Wolters Kluwer, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

  3. Steffen C, Ackerman B (1994) Ackerman’s histologic diagnostic of neoplastic skin diseases: a method by pattern analysis. Neoplasms with sebaceous differentiation. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia

  4. Hanau D, Grosshans E, Laplanche G (1984) A complex poroma-like adnexal adenoma. Am J Dermatopathol 6:567–572

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zaim MT (1988) Sebocrine adenoma. An adnexal adenoma with sebaceous and apocrine poroma-like differentiation. Am J Dermatopathol 10:311–318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldmann P, Pinkus H, Rogin JR (1956) Eccrine poroma; tumors exhibiting features of the epidermal sweat duct unit. AMA Arch Derm 74:511–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harvell JD, Kerschmann RL, Leboit PE (1996) Eccrine or apocrine poroma? Six poromas with divergent adnexal differentiation. Am J Dermatopathol 18:1–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gianotti R, Coggi A, Alessi E (1998) Cutaneous apocrine mixed tumor: derived from the apocrine duct of the folliculo-sebaceous-apocrine unit? Am J Dermatopathol 20:323–325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Groben PA, Hitchcock MG, Leshin B, White WL (1999) Apocrine poroma: a distinctive case in a patient with nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome. J Dermatopathol 21:31–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee NH, Lee SH, Ahn SK (2000) Aopcrine poroma with sebaceous differentiation. Am J Dermatopathol 22:261–263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kamiya H, Oyama Z, Kitajima Y (2001) „Apocrine“ poroma: review of the literature and case report. J Cutan Pathol 28:101–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Santoz-Briz A, Rodriguez-Peralto JL, Miguelez A, Lopez-Rios F (2002) Trichoblastoma arising within an apocrine poroma. Am J Dermatopathol 24:59–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kazakov DV, Kutzner H, Spagnolo DV et al (2008) Sebaceous differentiation in poroid neoplasms: report of 11 cases, including a case of metaplastic carcinoms associated with apocrine poroma (sarcomatoid apocrine porocarcinoma). Am J Dermatopathol 30:21–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eckert F, Nilles M, Betke M et al (1991) Das ekkrine Porom – Eine klinisch-pathologische und immunhistologische Studie unter Berücksichtigung der Tumorzelldifferenzierung. Hautarzt 42:692–699

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Troy H, Ackerman AB (1984) Sebaceoma. A distinctive benign neoplasm of adnexal epithelium differentiating toward sebaceous cells. Am J Dermatopathol 6:7–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ponti G, Ponzde Leon M (2005) Muir-Torre syndrome. Lancet Oncol 6:980–987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ponti G, Di Gregorio C, Roncucci L et al (2005) Identification of Muir-Torre syndrome among patients with sebaceous tumors and keratoakanthomas: role of clinnical features, microsatellite instability, and immunohistochemistry. Cancer 103:1018–1025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Misago N, Mihara I, Ansai S et al (2002) Sebaceoma and related neoplasms with sebaceous differentiation: a clinicopathologic study of 30 cases. Am J Dermatopathol 24:294–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Misago N, Narisawa Y (2011) Ripple/carcinoid pattern sebaceoma with apocrine differentiation. Am J Dermatopathol 33:94–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tanahashi J, Kashima K, Daa T et al (2008) A case of sebaceoma with extensive apocrine differentiation. Am J Dermatopathol 30:408–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Misago N, Suse T, Uemura T et al (2004) Basal cell carcinoma with sebaceous differentiation. Am J Dermatopathol 26:298–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Misago N, Satoh T, Narisawa Y (2004) Basal cell carcinoma with ductal and glandular differentiation: a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study of 10 cases. Eur J Dermatol 14:383–387

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Böer-Auer A (2014) Fundamentals of cutaneous adnexal tumors. Hautarzt 65:353–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Crowson AN, Magro CM, Mihm MC (2006) Malignant adnexal neoplasms. Mod Pathol 19:93–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Grosshans E, Hanau D (1981) L’adenome infundibulalaire. Ann Dermatol Venereol 108:59–66

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kurashige Y, Yamamoto T, Okubo Y, Tsuboi R (2010) Poroma with sebaceous differentiation: report of 3 cases. Australas J Dermatol 51:131–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Iwasaki J, Yoshida Y, Yamamoto O et al (2008) Poroma with sebaceous differentiation of the eyelid: a rare site of occurrence. Acta Derm Venereol 88:166–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Futagami A, Aoki M, Niimi Y, Ohnishi T et al (2002) Apocrine poroma with follicular differentiation: a case report and immunohistochemical study. Br J Dermatol 147:825–827

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Azma A, Tawfik O, Casparian JM (2001) Apocrine poroma of the breast. Breast J 7:195–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hashizume S, Ansai S, Matsuoka Y et al (2014) Case of multiple apocrine poroma in a patient without receiving radiation or chemotherapy. J Dermatol 41:174–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sakuma T, Itou Y, Shibata A (2014) Large pedunculated poroma with apocrine differentiation. Int J Dermatol 53:234–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. K. Flux und F. Eggert geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Flux M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Flux, K., Eckert, F. Das apokrine Porom. Pathologe 35, 456–461 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-014-1931-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-014-1931-1

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation