Abstract
Polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) nanocomposites were melt-blended with two types of Turkish halloysite nanotubes (HN). Naturally occurring HN samples were used to produce PBT-based composites at the HN compositions of 1%, 3%, 5%, and 10%. Findings of neat and silane-coated HN-containing composite samples were compared to investigate the interfacial adhesion between polymer matrix and reinforcement material. According to test results, a 1% amount of HN was found to be the most suitable option in the case of mechanical and thermal properties of composites. Additionally, silane-modified grade displayed highly indicative improvements compared to pristine HN clay due to better interfacial adhesion of halloysite nanotubes to the PBT matrix was accomplished. Property enhancements achieved for composite samples containing low contents of HN were confirmed by morphological examinations. As a result, the PBT/ 1% HN-S composite sample was bookmarked as the most suitable option to fabricate HN-reinforced PBT-based nanocomposites in terms of mechanical, thermo-mechanical, morphological, thermal, and physical performances based on the findings in this study. Silane-modified halloysite grades exhibited better results, and they were found to be more suitable in the case of applications of PBT.
Graphical abstract
![](http://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00289-024-05173-5/MediaObjects/289_2024_5173_Figa_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Polymeric materials provide advantages such as lightweight, high durability, ease of processing, corrosion resistance, ductility, and low cost. Polymers have inferior thermal, electrical, and mechanical qualities when compared to other materials such as ceramics and metals [1]. Adding nanoparticles with a large surface area, anisotropic shape, and high surface energy reduces the distance between interparticles in the polymer matrix. Furthermore, the nanoscale additions improve the strength of the polymer matrix connection. Because of this, polymer nanocomposites with totally new characteristics are suitable for new application areas such as aviation, electronics, construction, and packaging [2,3,4,5]. The interaction between the polymer matrix and the nanofiller results in a molecular attraction effect between nanocomposites. Despite numerous studies on the fabrication of nanocomposites that have been published, attaining homogeneous dispersion of nanoparticles in polymeric matrix remains problematic. The van der Waals attraction between nanoparticles favors the development of clusters and agglomerates in many circumstances. Furthermore, hydrophilic nanoparticles and hydrophobic polymers are incoherent, resulting in weak interfacial adhesion, poor dispersion, and poor characteristics. As a result, nanocomposites occasionally exhibited inferior characteristics to regular polymers, limiting their application range [6,7,8,9].
Nanoscale clay additions induce novel phenomena that affect material characteristics. Halloysite nanotubes (HNs) are naturally occurring, harmless, and biocompatible tubular substances. Halloysite nanotubes have a high aspect ratio, large pores, a non-swelling nature, and the capacity to regenerate. The chemical formula of HNs can be defined as Al2Si2O5(OH)4. nH2O. HN clays are naturally formed in the earth's crust over millions of years and are constituted of a double layer of aluminum, silicon, hydrogen, and oxygen [10, 11]. HNs are naturally found in many different parts of the world, including Türkiye, Australia, the United States, New Zealand, Brazil, France, and China. Halloysite is most commonly found in weathered or hydrothermally altered rocks, saprolites, and soils [12,13,14]. Because of their distinctive hollow architecture and huge cavities, HNs are a suitable natural nano-carrier. The desirable interfacial affinity between the polymer and the halloysite clay, as well as adequate halloysite dispersion in the polymer matrix, is two important parameters for determining the performance of halloysite-polymer nanocomposites [15,16,17]. When compared to other materials, HNs offer several desirable properties, including a distinct micro-spatial structure, a large length-diameter ratio, a high lumen capacity, and chemical inertness. HNs have a similar structure to carbon nanotubes (CNTs), but they offer several compelling advantages, including broadly spreadable performance, enhanced water solubility, stronger biocompatibility, and environmental friendliness [18, 19]. HN, on the other hand, cannot be distributed in a polymer matrix due to the abundance of Al–OH groups, and their comparatively substantial surface energy associated with its large surface area induces agglomeration due to the existence of van der Waals interactions between tubes [20]. Furthermore, significant shear stresses induced by techniques such as ball mill homogenization or melt extrusion to obtain fine and homogeneous dispersion of HNs in a polymeric matrix may avoid agglomeration of HNs [21,22,23,24]. In addition, to use several types of silane-coupling agents, a range of chemical groups such as epoxy, methacrylate, urea, and amine may be grafted on the surface of HNs. Halloysite's electrophilic nature can be used to improve interfacial interactions in polymer composites [25,26,27].
Polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) is a substantial, well-known commercially accessible semicrystalline engineering thermoplastic of the polyester family. It is produced by the polycondensation reaction of 1,4-butanediol with terephthalic acid [28]. PBT has a structure that is comparable to that of other aromatic polyester like polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polytrimethylene terephthalate (PTT) [29]. PBT's overall behavior is similar to that of polyamides and PET. PBT is often recognized as polyamides' main competitor due to its superior physical properties, lower production costs, and great chemical resistance. On the other hand, it is widely acknowledged that PBT's high processability and exceptional properties make it simple to use in production lines [30,31,32,33]. PBT outperforms other polymeric materials in terms of water resistance, abrasion resistance, and solvent resistance, as well as mechanical strength, stiffness, and dimensional stability. PBT has a wide range of applications due to its remarkable qualities, including electric and electronic components, packaging, the automobile sector, notably vehicle parts in both under-the-hood and external applications, biomedical devices, and construction equipment [34,35,36,37].
Because of their nanoscale dimension and high aspect ratio, halloysite nanotubes are an excellent filler for a variety of polymers. Furthermore, halloysite nanotubes can improve a variety of polymer characteristics such as modulus, strength, stiffness, impact resistance, and mechanical performance of polymers at higher temperatures under both static and dynamic situations. In the high-temperature range of 900–1000 °C, halloysite shows exothermic action. This thermal event is thought to be caused by the creation of a separate alumina-rich phase and amorphous silica. Some studies show that traces of iron in halloysite improve composite inflammation resistance, and it may also be used as a flame-resistant material in varied polymers [38,39,40,41,42]. HNs can be intercalated with salts and organic compounds; this behavior has been thoroughly reviewed by Joussein et al. In contrast to organoclays, HNs did not need to be intercalated before their incorporation into polymers because HNs have a tubular microstructure and good dispersion [43]. Therefore, few works have focused on improving the effects of HNs on polymers using intercalation [44]. In a recent study, Akar et al. fabricated polyamide (PA) nanocomposites involving amino-silane-modified HN [45]. According to the results they obtained, low content (1% by weight) of HN additions yielded improvements in dynamic mechanical, thermal, tensile, and impact performances of composites. In their other publication, they conducted comprehensive research in which polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) and HN nano-additives were incorporated with thermoplastic polyurethane matrix both separately and in hybrid forms [46]. Their findings revealed that polyurethane nano-composite samples containing HN with a concentration of 1% by weight exhibited optimum performance among prepared formulations. Accordingly, the relationship between adding the amount of HN and property enhancements for its unsaturated polyester-based composites was examined by Kim et al. They reported that 1% wt content of HN displayed superior performances in terms of mechanical properties [47]. Moreover, the properties of PBT can be optimized by the integration of cross-linking agents, vitrimers, and etheric compounds [48,49,50].
Biodegradable poly (lactic acid) was compounded with HN, and produced composites were investigated by several research groups. For HN-containing PLA-based composites, it was found that strength, modulus, and toughness values were improved with the inclusion of HN clay [51, 52]. Adding a small amount of HNs to the PLA matrix led to an increase in crystallization rate, shortened the processing time, and improved the heat resistance of the fabricated nanocomposites [53]. During the melt-mixing of the HNs-polymer nanocomposite, the polymer chains can interact with the HNs due to the strong shear force, leading to interfacial compatibility. The surface treatment of HN can improve the interfacial interaction with polypropylene [54] and polyamide matrices during melt processing [55]. Jia et al. reported the effects of HN on flame resistance of low-density polyethylene (LDPE). According to their cone calorimetric data, HN inclusions showed a significant decrease in the flammability of LDPE [56]. Halloysite inclusions donated varied property improvements including antioxidant resistance and oxygen barrier behaviors in packaging, film, and bottling application fields in which polyethylene [57], polyvinyl alcohol [58], polylactide [59, 60], and oxidized starch [61, 62] were loaded with HN clay.
According to the literature survey, only one study was published related to PBT composites filled with HN clay performed by Oburoğlu et al. in which the influence of HN additions to the crystallization kinetics of PBT chains was examined by differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) analysis data [63]. This current study is different from that research work based on the characterization steps including mechanical, physical, thermo-mechanical, and morphological analyses in addition to comprehensive discussions based on the pristine and silane-modified grades and adding ratios of both HN clays. Accordingly, the investigation of silane modification of HN on the basic properties of the PBT/HN nanocomposite system makes this research a novel experimental study. This work is primarily focused on the enhancement of the basic properties of PBT with the help of the incorporation of HN clay. The effects of modification of HN were also examined to observe the interactions between HN and PBT matrix through the mechanical, thermal, thermo-mechanical, melt-flow, and morphological performance of composite samples. Research data of composites containing neat HN clay and silane-modified HN were compared according to characterized behaviors. Additionally, inclusions of pristine and modified HN into the PBT matrix were investigated individually for different concentrations.
Results and discussion
FTIR analysis of HN powders
FTIR spectra of HN and HN-S surfaces are visualized in Fig. 1. The main difference between the two spectra was obtained as a broad band at 1430 cm−1 which was attributed to the presence of zeolitic water on the HN surface. This water-related peak was found to disappear after modification [64]. The characteristic silicon-related strong peaks observed at 1008, 910, and 750 cm−1 wavenumbers were assigned to Si–O stretching, Si–H bending, and Si–O bending vibrations, respectively [65, 66]. The absorption peak located nearly at 3640 ascribed to stretching vibrations of the hydroxyl group on the HN-S surface.
Tensile properties of composites
Mechanical test data of PBT and its composites are listed in Table 1, and the stress versus percentage strain curves are given in Fig. 2. Based on the tensile test data in Table 1, the tensile strength of neat PBT was found to be increased by HN additions. However, silane-modified HN inclusions yielded remarkably higher tensile strength values compared to unmodified HN. The amount of increment in tensile strength of PBT with the addition of pristine HN was obtained at a very low level. For example, PBT/3 HN gave a 5% increase in the tensile strength of PBT. On the other hand, the degree of improvement in tensile strength was found to be relatively higher for HN-S containing composites in which approximately a 30% increase in strength value was obtained for PBT/3 HN-S candidate concerning unfilled PBT. In the case of adding amounts of HN and HN-S, tensile strength exhibited an increase of up to 3% content by the inclusion of both additives. Their further loadings caused dramatic reductions which indicated that more than 3% adding ratios of halloysite showed a negative effect on tensile strength of composites. Composites reinforced with 3% of HN and HN-S displayed the greatest strength values.
The difference between the tensile behaviors of composites loaded with modified and unmodified HN can easily be observed from their tensile curves in Fig. 2. The characteristic stress versus strain curve of PBT started to give a necking behavior with the addition of HN-S. The necking observation in stress versus strain curves is linked to the tendency of a brittle polymer to turn into a ductile characteristic. In other words, HN-S promoted ductility by reducing the brittleness of the PBT phase. The absence of necking in tensile curves of PBT and unmodified HN-filled PBT composites proposed that HN did not affect the brittle structure of the PBT matrix.
Strain at break values of neat PBT gave completely different trends by the additions of modified and unmodified HN as can be observed in Table 1. HN-S inclusions led to an increase in strain of PBT and the improvement carried on up to 5% concentration of HN-S. On the contrary, composites involving unmodified HN yielded a drop-down in the percentage strain of PBT. Strain values of composites reduced as the HN content increased. Relatively weak interactions between inert HN surface and PBT than that of silane-modified HN and PBT may be the main reason for the lowering of strain at break values. According to the tensile modulus data listed in Table 1, both additions of HN and HN-S increased the modulus of PBT. PBT/HN-S samples were found to be higher in terms of tensile modulus compared to PBT/HN for lower adding ratios, whereas nearly identical modulus values were reached for their higher contents. Similar results were reported in which modulus values of composites involving nanofillers [67,68,69]. According to the literature, in the case of HN clay inclusion with the 1% content, the highest level of mechanical behaviors was achieved [48, 50, 70] similar to mechanical test data previously reported in this study.
Hardness behaviors of composites
Shore hardness test data of PBT and its composites are listed in the last column of Table 1. The hardness of unfilled PBT was improved with halloysite inclusions. Silane-modified HN exhibited slightly higher hardness values compared to unmodified HN. Shore D hardness of composites was enhanced as the filling amounts of HN and HN-S increased. The overall change in the Shore D hardness parameter of PBT was found to be in a narrow range after HN additions regardless of the types of HN grades.
Impact performances of composites
Impact strength results of PBT/HN and PBT/HN-S composite samples are demonstrated as bar graphs in Fig. 3. Additionally, the impact strength values of each sample were indicated above its bar graph. According to the obtained impact values, HN and HN-S inclusions with low contents (1% and 3%) resulted in enhancements for the impact performance of neat PBT. However, high loading amounts of both HN grades reduced the impact energy of composites. Silane-modified HN-reinforced PBT yielded slightly higher impact energy values compared to composites containing unmodified HN clay which may be attributed to stronger interfacial adhesion of HN-S to PBT with respect to neat HN. The related weak bonding through the HN-PBT interphase resulted in a decrease in resistance against impact deformation. Based on these findings, it can be said that halloysite clay can act as an impact modifier for PBT with its low loading [71,72,73].
Thermo-mechanical analysis
Storage modulus curves that were derived from DMA data are illustrated in Fig. 4a. The dropping down of storage modulus curve of PBT in the temperature range of 50–100 °C is attributed to the relaxation of polymer chains due to the characteristic glass transition [74, 75]. Initially, composites displayed lower storage modulus values concerning PBT before this transition temperature. After that point, most of the composite samples reached an identical level of PBT in terms of storage modulus. As a different behavior, storage modulus values of composites involving HN with the highest content (10%) were found to be lower than that of unfilled PBT. Silane-modified HN addition with the adding amount of 1% gave a higher storage modulus than PBT beyond the transition temperature. The highest storage modulus value was obtained for the PBT/1 HN-S sample, as well.
Loss modulus curves represented in Fig. 4b implied that HN inclusions with low filling amounts exhibited a positive influence on the loss modulus of PBT. Loss modulus values of composites reduced as HN composition increased. Similar to storage modulus values, 1% content of HN-S compounded composite yielded a much higher loss modulus than other composites, and the highest result was achieved for the PBT/1 HN-S sample. Tan delta curves of PBT/HN and PBT/HN-S composites as the function of temperature are represented in Fig. 4c. According to Tan delta curves, the height of tan delta peak of composites filled with HN-S was found to be lower compared to unmodified HN-containing composites. Since the lowering in height of tan delta peak was linked to enhancement in interfacial adhesion of additive to polymer matrix in composite systems [76,77,78], silane-modified HN loadings resulted in a reduction in Tan delta peak height. Similarly, 1% HN-S incorporated PBT yielded the best result thanks to the compatibilizer effect of the silane layer on the polymer-additive interface adhesion [79,80,81]
Thermal stability of composites
The weight loss curves and derivative weight loss curves of PBT/HN and PBT/HN-S composites are shared in Fig. 5. Accordingly, thermal parameters of composites obtained by TGA analysis including temperature at 5% weight loss occur (T5%), the temperature in which 10% weight loss occurs (T10%), a temperature that maxima on weight loss achieved (Tmax%), and the ratio of char residue over the total amount of samples are listed in Table 2.
The weight loss of PBT occurs in a single step at nearly 400 °C. An ionic breakdown mechanism results in the development of tetrahydrofuran during the first degradation period of PBT. This is followed by concerted ester pyrolysis reactions that produce 1,3-butadiene via an intermediate cyclic transition state. In both decomposition regimes, simultaneous decarboxylation reactions occur. Finally, the development of CO and complex aromatic compounds such as toluene, benzoic acid, and terephthalic acid was seen in the latter phases of the decomposition of the PBT [82,83,84,85,86,87].
TGA thermographs in Fig. 5 revealed that the thermal stability of PBT was not affected by HN inclusions. However, the difference in thermal behaviors between PBT and composites was found to be more significant for DTGA curves relative to TGA curves. The peak temperature of the DTGA curve indicates the maximum mass loss rate achieved (Tmax) which corresponds to the thermal decomposition of the polymer. According to TGA parameters in Table 3, initial decomposition temperatures (T5% and T10%) of unfilled PBT increased with halloysite additions. Similarly, composites gave higher Tmax values than Tmax of PBT. The highest results were reached for 1% additive-containing composites as can be obtained from DTGA curves in Fig. 5. The shifting of these thermal parameters to higher temperatures corresponds to a reduction in the decomposition rate of the polymer as well as an improvement in thermal stability of macromolecules [88,89,90]. PBT/HN-S composites exhibited higher thermal stability compared to composite samples involving unmodified HN. In other words, the silane layer on the HN surface yielded enhancement in the thermal resistance of PBT. The decomposition of PBT was finalized at the end of the analysis by leaving a char with 5.8% residue content composed of organic compounds. The char yield value was found to be increased as the loading ratio of HN increased due to the thermally stable inorganic nature of halloysite clay.
MFR parameters of composites
MFR values of PBT and relevant composites are indicated in bar chart format in Fig. 6 and listed in Table 3. The inclusion of HN to PBT resulted in increments for MFR values regardless of HN grades. MFR of composites was extended as the amount of HN increased. Similarly, Mohamed et al. reported that HN additions caused improvement in the MFR value of the polyurethane matrix [91]. They postulated that the high aspect ratio of halloysite tubes was the main reason for that finding. Relatively higher MFR parameters were achieved with silane-modified HN-incorporated composites than the MFR of PBT/HN composites at their identical loading levels. Improved interface adhesion of HN clay to the PBT matrix displayed a positive effect on the melt-flow behavior of PBT.
Density measurements
The measured densities of PBT and its composites are represented in Table 3. The density of unfilled PBT increased slightly with 1% addition of halloysite clay. Prominent improvements were observed for further inclusions of HN and HN-S. Silane-modified HN grade exhibited higher density values than unmodified HN for their PBT-based composites.
Morphological studies of composites
SEM micro-images of composites based on HN and HN-S compositions of 1%, 3%, 5%, and 10% are displayed in Fig. 7. According to SEM micro-images of composites involving 1% and 3% HN, dispersions of HN clays were found to be homogeneous. Silane-modified layer of HN-S promoted dispersion uniformity of HN particles into the PBT phase stem from the enhanced interface interactions on the PBT-HN system.
SEM micro-images of composites containing highly loaded HN (5% and 10%) visualized that HN particles started to stick together and form bundles into the PBT matrix as their adding amounts increased. In contrast to composites involving a low amount of HN, the dispersion of clays was restricted as a result of the reduction in uniformity of mixing into the PBT phase. The resulting bundle regions of HN were observed as highly indicative compared to HN-S.
Conclusions
In this study, melt-blending method was applied to produce HN-reinforced PBT composites. Two grades of commercial halloysite clay were used in the forms of pristine and silane-modified. Compounding of both HN grades was taken place via four different contents using a lab-scale extruder. Tensile test results indicated that tensile strength, elongation, and tensile modulus values were improved with the low loading amounts of HN inclusions. Silane-modified grade displayed better performance compared to pristine HN based on the tensile parameters. Shore hardness of unfilled PBT was also enhanced after HN additions regardless of their grades. An increasing trend of hardness values was obtained as the amount of HN increased. Halloysite clay additions led to an increase in the impact strength of PBT. Similar to tensile properties, better impact performances were achieved for low concentrations of HN. Silane-modified HN gave slightly higher impact strength compared to unmodified HNT grade. DMA study revealed that the lowest adding ratio of HN displayed an increase in storage modulus as well as loss modulus. The relationship between the compatible silane layer of the HN surface and the PBT matrix was confirmed by lowering the height of Tan delta curves of PBT/HN-S composite samples. According to TGA test findings, HN inclusions yielded a positive impact on the thermal resistance of PBT by causing a reduction in the decomposition rate of neat PBT. Composites filled with pristine HN gave lower thermal performance compared to silane-modified HN clay containing PBT. A linear improvement in the MFR parameter of PBT was obtained stem from the high aspect ratio of tubular halloysite nanotube clay. Relatively higher MFR values were found for silane-modified HN than unmodified HN compounded composites. The density of PBT exhibited no dramatic change to the low amount of HN additions. However, highly filled composites showed a remarkable increase in the density of PBT. The uniform dispersion of HN particles into the PBT phase was observed. On the other hand, the dispersion homogeneity of HN clays reduced as their composition increased according to SEM images of highly filled composite samples. The use of PBT in the cable and wire sector can be extended by HN inclusions due to thermally stable nanocomposites being reported. Low loading amounts of HN had negligible impact on density and melt-flow parameters which are related to weight saving and ease of processing of PBT-based composites, respectively. The development of composite parts used in automobile production would be considered because of the low-cost, low-weight, and mechanically strong characteristics of HN-filled PBT composites.
Experimental methods
Materials
The commercial PBT thermoplastic polymer was purchased from Sasa Poliester Sanayi A.S. (Adana, Türkiye) in pellet form. The trade name of PBT is Advanite. It has a viscosity of 0.90 dL/g according to the producer. HN powders used in this study were supplied from Esan Eczacıbaşı Endüstriyel Hammaddeler A.Ş., Istanbul, Türkiye. Two kinds of HN grades were used with the commercial names of ESH HNT (HN) and ESH HNT S (HN-S) which refer to unmodified and silane-modified grades, respectively.
Preparation of composites
PBT pellets and HN powders were subjected to the drying stage at 100 °C in an oven for 2 h to avoid moisture contamination before processing steps. Polymer and powders were compounded by a lab-scale micro-compounder (MC 15 HT, Xplore Instrument Holland). Filling amounts of NC 130 and NC 140 into the PBT matrix were set as 1, 3, 5, and 10 by weight %. During the compounding process, an extrusion temperature of 240 °C, a mixing rate of 100 rpm, and a total compounding time of 5 min were applied and these parameters were kept constant for each composite sample. Composite samples were cut to pellet form after the melt-compounding step. Samples were injection molded and dogbone specimens were obtained using a lab-scale micro-injection molding device (Micro-injector, Daca Instruments). Processing parameters of injection molding were applied as a barrel temperature of 245 °C, an injection pressure of 800 kPa, a holding time of 4 min, and a mold temperature of 80 °C.
Characterization techniques
The characterization of surface properties of pristine and modified HN samples was performed by Shimadzu IRAffinity-1S FTIR Spectrometer. Analysis was carried out using attenuated total reflection (ATR) mode in the wavelength range of 4000–500 cm−1. Lloyd LR30K universal tensile testing equipment was conducted to perform tensile tests. 5 kN load cell and 10 mm/min were applied as crosshead speed. Tensile strength, percentage strain, and tensile modulus values were recorded by a minimum of three samples with standard deviations. Impact energy values of PBT and its composite samples were recorded by the Coesfeld material impact tester via the 4 J pendulum. The impact strength values in the unit of kJ/m2 were expressed from measured impact energy data in terms of Joules. Shore D type hardness values of test samples with the dimensions of 20 × 20 × 2.5 mm3 were recorded using a digital hardness device with the trade name R5LB041, Zwick Roell. TGA analysis was carried out using a PerkinElmer Diamond TG/DTA device with a heating rate of 10 °C/min and under the inert nitrogen atmosphere with a flow rate of 50 ml/min in a temperature range of 25–650 °C. Thermo-mechanical behavior of PBT-based nano-composites was examined by dynamic mechanical analysis in dual cantilever bending mode. DMA tests of PBT and composite samples with the dimensions of 50 × 7.5 × 2.5 mm3 were studied using Hitachi High-Technologies, Dynamic Mechanical Analyzer DMA7100. The temperature range of analysis was applied between 25 °C and 200 °C at the constant heating rate of 10 °C/min under the inert nitrogen atmosphere. MFR values of PBT and composite samples were evaluated using Meltfixer LT (Coesfeld Material Test). The measurements were conducted with the standard load of 2.16 kg at the processing temperature of 240 °C. The MFR parameters were calculated and expressed in the unit of g/10 min. The digital density meter (Easy D30, Mettler Toledo) was utilized to obtain density values of unfilled PBT and relevant composite samples. Density data were reported as an average of a minimum of three measurements for each sample. The fractured surfaces of composite samples obtained from the impact test were examined after coating a thin layer of gold. FEI Quanta 400F FESEM (Tokyo, Japan) device was used to capture high-resolution SEM micro-images.
Data availability
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.
References
Paul DR, Robeson LM (2008) Polymer nanotechnology: nanocomposites. Polymer 49(15):3187–3204
Athimoolam M, Moorthy TV (2012) Polymer nanocomposite materials and shape memory applications-a review. Proc Eng 38:3399–3408
Silvestre J, Silvestre N, De Brito J (2016) Polymer nanocomposites for structural applications: recent trends and new perspectives. Mech Adv Mater Struct 23:1263–1277
Bogue R (2011) Nanocomposites: a review of technology and applications. Assem Auto 31(2):106–112
Hussain F, Hojjati M, Okamoto M, Gorga RE (2006) Polymer-matrix nanocomposites, processing, manufacturing, and application: an overview. J Compos Mater 40(17):1511–1575
Viswanathan V, Laha T, Balani K, Agarwal A, Seal S (2006) Challenges and advances in nanocomposite processing techniques. Mater Sci Eng Rep 54(5–6):121–285
Ebrahimi F, Dabbagh A (2019) A comprehensive review on modeling of nanocomposite materials and structures. J Comput Appl Mech 50(1):197–209
Harito C, Bavykin DV, Yuliarto B, Dipojono HK, Walsh FC (2019) Polymer nanocomposites having a high filler content: synthesis, structures, properties, and applications. Nanoscale 11(11):4653–4682
Nazir MS, Mohamad Kassim MH, Mohapatra L, Gilani MA, Raza MR, Majeed K (2016) Characteristic properties of nanoclays and characterization of nanoparticulates and nanocomposites. Nanoclay reinforced polymer composites. Springer, Singapore, pp 35–55
Massaro M, Lazzara G, Noto R, Riela S (2020) Halloysite nanotubes: a green resource for materials and life sciences. Rend Lincei Sci Fis Nat 31(2):213–221
Hillier S, Brydson R, Delbos E, Fraser T, Gray N, Pendlowski H, Phillips I, Robertson J, Wilson I (2016) Correlations among the mineralogical and physical properties of halloysite nanotubes (HNTs). Clay Miner 51:325–350
Rawtani D, Agrawal YK (2012) Multifarious applications of halloysite nanotubes: a review. Rev Adv Mater Sci 30:282–295
Sagare RD, Dasankoppa FS, Sholapur HN, Burga K (2021) Halloysite nanotubes: design, characterization and applications a review. Farmacia 69(2):208–214
Yuan P, Tan D, Annabi-Bergaya F (2015) Properties and applications of halloysite nanotubes: recent research advances and future prospects. Appl Clay Sci 112:75–93
Huang J, Tang ZH, Zhang XH, Guo BC (2016) Halloysite polymer nanocomposites. Nanosized tubular clay minerals. Developments in clay science. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Idumah CI (2023) Halloysite nanotubes assisted design of polymeric nanoarchitectures for multifarious applications–a review. Polym Plast Technol Mater 62(15):2043–2062
Liu M, Jia Z, Jia D, Zhou C (2014) Recent advance in research on halloysite nanotubes-polymer nanocomposite. Prog Polym Sci 39(8):1498–1525
Erpek CEY, Ozkoc G, Yilmazer U (2017) Comparison of natural halloysite with synthetic carbon nanotubes in poly (lactic acid) based composites. Polym Compos 38(11):2337–2346
Ezenkwa OE, Hassan A, Samsudin SA (2022) Comparison of mechanical properties and thermal stability of graphene-based materials and halloysite nanotubes reinforced maleated polymer compatibilized polypropylene nanocomposites. Polym Compos 43(3):1852–1863
Owoseni O, Zhang Y, Su Y, He J, McPherson GL, Bose A, John VT (2015) Tuning the wettability of halloysite clay nanotubes by surface carbonization for optimal emulsion stabilization. Langmuir 31:13700–13707
Brantseva TV, Antonov SV, Gorbunova IY (2018) Adhesion properties of the nanocomposites filled with aluminosilicates and factors affecting them: a review. Int J Adhes Adhes 82:263–281
Cheng C, Song W, Zhao Q, Zhang H (2020) Halloysite nanotubes in polymer science: purification, characterization, modification and applications. Nanotechnol Rev 9(1):323–344
Kausar A (2018) Review on polymer/halloysite nanotube nanocomposite. Polym Plast Technol Eng 57(6):548–564
Doagou-Rad S, Islam A, Merca TD (2020) An application-oriented roadmap to select polymeric nanocomposites for advanced applications: a review. Polym Compos 41(4):1153–1189
Cheng ZL, Chang XY, Liu Z, Qin DZ (2018) Surface-modified halloysite nanotubes as fillers applied in reinforcing the performance of polytetrafluoroethylene. Clay Miner 53:643–656
Lun H, Ouyang J, Yang H (2014) Enhancing dispersion of halloysite nanotubes via chemical modification. Phys Chem Miner 41(4):281–288
Khunová V, Kelnar I, Kristóf J, Dybal J, Kratochvíl J, Kaprálková L (2015) The effect of urea and urea-modified halloysite on performance of PCL. J Therm Anal Calorim 120(2):1283–1291
Tsai HB, Li HC, Chang SJ, Yu HH (1991) Copolyesters: VI. Block copolyesters of poly (butylene terephthalate) and poly (butylene adipate). Polym Bullet 27:141–146
Ito EN, Ueki MM, Bretas RES, Hage Junior E (2008) Interfacial tension of PBT/SAN blends by the drop retraction method. Mater Res 11(2):165–169
Bährle-Rapp M (2007) Polybutylene terephthalate. Springer lexikon kosmetik und körperpflege. Springer, Berlin
Scheirs J, Long TE (2005) Modern polyesters: chemistry and technology of polyesters and copolyesters. Wiley, New York
Deshmukh GS, Peshwe DA, Pathak SU, Ekhe JD (2011) A study on effect of mineral additions on the mechanical, thermal, and structural properties of poly (butylene terephthalate) (PBT) composites. J Polym Res 18(5):1081–1090
McNally D, Gall JS (1986) The History of poly (butylene terephthalate) MOLDING RESINS. In: Seymour RB, Kirshenbaum GS (eds) High performance polymers: their origin and development. Springer, Dordrecht
Zhou Y, Goossens JG, Sijbesma RP, Heuts JP (2017) Poly (butylene terephthalate)/glycerol-based vitrimers via solid-state polymerization. Macromolecules 50(17):6742
Correia Diogo A (2015) Polymers in building and construction. Materials for construction and civil engineering. Springer, Cham
Vilela C, Sousa AF, Fonseca AC, Serra AC, Coelho JF, Freire CS, Silvestre AJ (2014) The quest for sustainable polyesters–insights into the future. Polym Chem 5(9):3119–3141
Park JM, Lee JY, Park YH (2010) Eco-friendly flame retardant poly (butylene terephthalate) copolymers with thermal stability and hydrolytic resistance. Macromol Res 18(6):539–544
Jasinski E, Bounor-Legaré V, Taguet A, Beyou E (2021) Influence of halloysite nanotubes onto the fire properties of polymer based composites: a review. Polym Degrad Stabil 183:109407
Duce C, Vecchio Ciprioti S, Ghezzi L, Ierardi V, Tine MR (2015) Thermal behavior study of pristine and modified halloysite nanotubes. J Therm Anal Calorim 121(3):1011–1019
Jing H, Higaki Y, Ma W, Wu H, Yah WO, Otsuka H, Lvov YM, Takahara A (2013) Internally modified halloysite nanotubes as inorganic nanocontainers for a flame retardant. Chem Lett 42(2):121–123
Goda ES, Yoon KR, El-sayed SH, Hong SE (2018) Halloysite nanotubes as smart flame retardant and economic reinforcing materials: a review. Thermochim Acta 669:173–184
Wu W, Zhao W, Gong X, Sun Q, Cao X, Su Y, Vellaisamy RA (2022) Surface decoration of halloysite nanotubes with POSS for fire-safe thermoplastic polyurethane nanocomposites. J Mater Sci Technol 101:107–117
Joussein E, Petit S, Churchman J, Theng B, Righi D, Delvaux B (2005) Halloysite clay minerals–a review. Clay Miner 40:383–426
Khunova V, Kristóf J, Kelnar I, Dybal J (2013) The effect of halloysite modification combined with in situ matrix modifications on the structure and properties of polypropylene/halloysite nanocomposites. Express Polym Lett 7(5):471–479
Akar AO, Yildiz UH, Tayfun U (2023) Halloysite nanotube loaded polyamide nanocomposites: structural, morphological, mechanical, thermal and processing behaviors. AIP Conf Proc 2607:070005
Akar AO, Yildiz UH, Tayfun U (2021) Investigations of polyamide nano-composites containing bentonite and organo-modified clays: mechanical, thermal, structural and processing performances. Rev Adv Mater Sci 60(1):293–302
Kim YH, Park SJ, Nakagaito AN (2017) Optimization of processing condition of manocomposites according to the structural changes of halloysite nanotubes under impact behavior. Metallur Mater Trans B 48(4):1933–1937
Gu L, Lan J, Yang Q, Shi K, Zheng W (2019) Synthesis and characterization of poly (butylene terephthalates) modified by hydroquinone bis (2-hydroxyethyl) ether. J Macromol Sci Part A 56(9):871–876
Fan ZY, Shi ZZ, Ma L, Gong P, Bao RY, Yang MB, Yang W (2023) Dynamic cross-linked poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) for high-performance green foam. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 11(45):16354–16364
Wu SS, Li YD, Hu Z, Zeng JB (2023) Fast upcycling of poly (ethylene terephthalate) into catalyst-free vitrimers. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 11(5):1974–1984
Prashantha K, Lecouvet B, Sclavons M, Lacrampe MF, Krawczak P (2013) Poly (lactic acid)/halloysite nanotubes nanocomposites: structure, thermal, and mechanical properties as a function of halloysite treatment. J Appl Polym Sci 128(3):1895–1903
Ertas M, Altuntas E, Donmez Cavdar A (2019) Effects of halloysite nanotube on the performance of natural fiber filled poly (lactic acid) composites. Polym Compos 40(11):4238–4247
Liu M, Zhang Y, Zhou C (2013) Nanocomposites of halloysite and polylactide. Appl Clay Sci 75:52–59
Liu M, Guo B, Zou Q, Du M, Jia D (2008) Interactions between halloysite nanotubes and 2, 5-bis (2-benzoxazolyl) thiophene and their effects on reinforcement of polypropylene/halloysite nanocomposites. Nanotechnology 19(20):205709
Guo B, Zou Q, Lei Y, Jia D (2009) Structure and performance of polyamide 6/halloysite nanotubes nanocomposites. Polymer 41(10):835–842
Jia Z, Luo Y, Guo B, Yang B, Du M, Jia D (2009) Reinforcing and flame-retardant effects of halloysite nanotubes on LLDPE. Polym Plast Technol Eng 48(6):607–613
Garcia-Escobar F, Bonilla-Rios J, Espinoza-Martinez AB, Cerda-Hurtado P (2021) Halloysite silanization in polyethylene terephthalate composites for bottling and packaging applications. J Mater Sci 56(29):16376–16386
Abdullah ZW, Dong Y (2020) Polyvinyl alcohol/halloysite nanotube bionanocomposites as biodegradable packaging materials. Springer, Singapore
Erpek CEY, Ozkoc G, Yilmazer U (2016) Effects of halloysite nanotubes on the performance of plasticized poly (lactic acid)-based composites. Polym Compos 11(37):3134–3148
Tham WL, Poh BT, Mohd Ishak ZA, Chow WS (2016) Transparent poly (lactic acid)/halloysite nanotube nanocomposites with improved oxygen barrier and antioxidant properties. J Therm Anal Calorim 126(3):1331–1337
Abdullah ZW, Dong Y (2018) Preparation and characterisation of poly (vinyl) alcohol (PVA)/starch (ST)/halloysite nanotube (HNT) nanocomposite films as renewable materials. J Mater Sci 53(5):3455–3469
Kong W, Wang W, Gao J, Liu T, Liu Y (2011) Oxidized starch films reinforced with natural halloysite. J Mater Res 26(23):2938–2944
Oburoğlu N, Ercan N, Durmus A, Kaşgöz A (2012) Effects of halloysite nanotube on the mechanical properties and nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of poly (butylene terephthalate) (PBT). J Macromol Sci Part B 51(5):860–879
Arat R, Uyanık N (2017) Surface modification of nanoclays with styrene-maleic anhydride copolymers. Nat Res 8(03):159
Moazeni N, Mohamad Z, Dehbari N (2015) Study of silane treatment on poly-lactic acid(PLA)/Sepiolite nanocomposite thin films. J Appl Polym Sci 132:41428
Dogan SD, Tayfun U, Dogan M (2016) New route for modifying cellulosic fibres with fatty acids and its application to polyethylene/jute fibre composites. J Compos Mater 50(18):2477–2485
Kaplan A, Erdem A, Arslan C, Savas S, Tayfun U, Dogan M (2023) The roles of filler amount and particle geometry on the mechanical, thermal, and tribological performance of polyamide 6 containing silicon-based nano-additives. Silicon 15(7):3165–3180
Chien AT, Felter T, LeMay JD, Balooch M (2000) Nanoscale mechanical properties of polymer composites: changes in elastic modulus and measurement of ion penetration depth due to α-radiation. J Mater Res 15:838–841
Xia L, Xu Z, Sun L, Caveney PM, Zhang M (2013) Nano-fillers to tune Young’s modulus of silicone matrix. J Nanopart Res 15:1570
Velmurugan R, Mohan TP (2004) Room temperature processing of epoxy-clay nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 39(24):7333–7339
Beake BD, Goodes SR, Smith JF, Gao F (2004) Nanoscale repetitive impact testing of polymer films. J Mater Res 19(1):237–247
Hage E, Hale W, Keskkula H, Paul DR (1997) Impact modification of poly (butylene terephthalate) by ABS materials. Polymer 38(13):3237–3250
Baxi RN, Pathak SU, Peshwe DR (2011) Impact modification of a PET–PBT blend using different impact modifiers. Polym J 43(9):801–808
Beaudoin O, Bergeret A, Quantin JC, Crespy A (1997) Viscoelastic behaviour of glass beads reinforced poly (butylene terephthalate): Experimental and theoretical approaches. Compos Interface 5(6):543–559
Ramakers-van Dorp E, Haenel T, Sturm F, Möginger B, Hausnerova B (2018) On merging DMA and microindentation to determine local mechanical properties of polymers. Polym Test 68:359–364
Tayfun U, Dogan M (2016) Improving the dyeability of poly (lactic acid) fiber using organoclay during melt spinning. Polym Bull 73:1581–1593
Ashok RB, Srinivasa CV, Basavaraju B (2019) Dynamic mechanical properties of natural fiber composites—a review. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater 2(4):586–607
Bashir MA (2021) Use of dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) for characterizing interfacial interactions in filled polymers. Solids 2(1):108–120
Yang K, Chi Q, Wang X, Jiang Y, Li F, Xue B (2019) The role of halloy site on crystallinity, ion conductivity, thermal and mechanical properties of poly (ethylene-oxide)/halloysite nanocomposites. J Polym Res 26(6):138
Dike AS, Yilmazer U (2020) Mechanical, thermal and rheological characterization of polystyrene/organoclay nanocomposites containing aliphatic elastomer modifiers. Mater Res Express 7(1):015055
Li D, Song S, Li C, Cao C, Sun S, Zhang H (2015) Compatibilization effect of MMA-co-GMA copolymers on the properties of polyamide 6/Poly (vinylidene fluoride) blends. J Polym Res 22:102
Passalacqua V, Pilati F, Zamboni V, Fortunato B, Manaresi P (1976) Thermal degradation of poly (butylene terephthalate). Polymer 17(12):1044–1048
Lum RM (1979) Thermal decomposition of poly (butylene terephthalate). J Polym Sci Polym Chem Ed 17(1):203–213
Botelho G, Queirós A, Liberal S, Gijsman P (2001) Studies on thermal and thermo-oxidative degradation of poly (ethylene terephthalate) and poly (butylene terephthalate). Polym Degrad Stabil 74(1):39–48
Motori A, Montanari GC, Saccani A, Giannoni S (2000) Effect of recrystallization on the oxidative stability of poly (butylene terephthalate). J Mater Res 15(1):243–247
Montaudo G, Puglisi C, Samperi F (1993) Primary thermal degradation mechanisms of PET and PBT. Polym Degradat Stabil 42(1):13–28
Giannoni S, Montanari GC, Motori A, Saccani A (2003) Thermal endurance evaluation of poly (butylene terephthalate) by conventional and analytical methods. J Mater Res 18(6):1342–1346
Wunderlich B (2007) Thermal analysis of macromolecules: a personal review. J Therm Anal Calorim 89(2):321–356
Cirmad H, Tirkes S, Tayfun U (2022) Evaluation of flammability, thermal stability and mechanical behavior of expandable graphite-reinforced acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene terpolymer. J Therm Anal Calorim 147:2229–2237
Leszczynska A, Pielichowski K (2008) Application of thermal analysis methods for characterization of polymer/montmorillonite nanocomposites. J Therm Anal Calorim 93(3):677–687
Mohamed ST, Tirkes S, Akar AO, Tayfun U (2020) Hybrid nanocomposites of elastomeric polyurethane containing halloysite nanotubes and POSS nanoparticles: tensile, hardness, damping and abrasion performance. Clay Miner 55(4):281–292
Funding
Open access funding provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MS contributed to formal analysis, experimental and data curation and writing—original draft; ASD contributed to supervision, investigation, validation, methodology, methodology and writing—review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors have no conflict of interest in the presented research study.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval is not applicable for this article.
Consent to participate
The authors confirm that all information they provide for this study is realistic experimental data and findings.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Senyel, M., Dike, A.S. Contribution of silane modification of halloysite nanotube to its poly (butylene terephthalate)-based nanocomposites: structural, mechanical and thermal properties. Polym. Bull. 81, 9851–9870 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-024-05173-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-024-05173-5