Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of alumina nanoparticles role on the critical flux and performance of polyvinyl chloride membrane in a submerged membrane system for the removal of humic acid

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Polymer Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, the polyvinyl chloride/alumina (PVC/Al2O3) ultrafiltration (UF) nanocomposite membranes were prepared with different amounts of Al2O3 within a range of 0–2 wt.%. Neat PVC and optimum nanocomposite membranes were evaluated in a submerged membrane system for the removal of humic acid (HA). The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy confirmed the presence of hydroxyl group (OH) on the surface of the PVC nanocomposite membrane. Results revealed that the nanocomposite membrane with 1.5 wt.% of Al2O3 nanoparticles has the highest value in porosity and hydrophilicity when compared to other samples. The results obtained from the field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) images showed that as Al2O3 was added to the membrane structure, more pores and larger pores were formed on the membrane surface. A higher critical flux was obtained by the PVC/Al2O3 (1.5 wt.%) nanocomposite membrane due to change in the surface characteristics. Antifouling analysis under subcritical conditions for neat PVC membrane showed that the main portion of the total fouling ratio was irreversible fouling ratio (IFR), while the nanocomposite membrane with 1.5 wt.% of Al2O3 nanoparticles significantly decreased IFR. Finally, the nanocomposite membrane had a higher HA rejection than the neat PVC membrane.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Caprarescu S, Miron AR, Purcar V, Radu AL, Sarbu A, Ianchis R, Erbasu DI (2017) Commercial gooseberry buds extract containing membrane for removal of methylene blue dye from synthetic wastewaters. Rev Chim (Bucharest) 68:1757

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Caprarescu S, Radu AL, Purcar V, Sarbu A, Vaireanu DI, Ianchis R, Ghiurea M (2014) Removal of copper ions from simulated wastewaters using different bicomponent polymer membranes. Water Air Soil Pollut 225:2079

    Google Scholar 

  3. Caprarescu S, Miron AR, Purcar V, Radu AL, Sarbu A, Nicolae CA, Pascu M, Ion-Ebrasu D, Raditoiu V (2018) Treatment of Crystal violet from synthetic solution using membranes doped with natural fruit extract. Clean-Soil Air Water 46:1700413

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ion-Ebrasu D, Pollet BG, Spinu-Zaulet A, Soare A, Carcadea E, Varlam M, Caprarescu S (2019) Graphene modified fluorinated cation-exchange membranes for proton exchange membrane water electrolysis. Int J Hydrog Energy 44:10190–10196

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang H, Qu F, Liu B, Yu H, Li K, Shao S, Li G, Liang H (2015) Hydraulic irreversibility of ultrafiltration membrane fouling by humic acid: effects of membrane properties and backwash water composition. J Membr Sci 493:723–733

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jhaveri JH, Patel CM, Murthy Z (2017) Preparation, characterization and application of GO–TiO2/PVC mixed matrix membranes for improvement in performance. J Ind Eng Chem 52:138–146

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Caprarescu S, Miron AR, Purcar V, Radu AL, Sarbu A, Ion-Ebrasu D, Atanase LI, Ghiurea M (2016) Efficient removal of Indigo Carmine dye by a separation process. Water Sci Technol 74: 2462–2473.

  8. Costa AR, de Pinho MN (2005) Effect of membrane pore size and solution chemistry on the ultrafiltration of humic substances solutions. J Membr Sci 255:49–56

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Xia S, Yao L, Zhao Y, Li N, Zheng Y (2015) Preparation of graphene oxide modified polyamide thin film composite membranes with improved hydrophilicity for natural organic matter removal. Chem Eng J 280:720–727

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fu X, Maruyama T, Sotani T, Matsuyama H (2008) Effect of surface morphology on membrane fouling by humic acid with the use of cellulose acetate butyrate hollow fiber membranes. J Membr Sci 320:483–491

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hao Y, Moriya A, Maruyama T, Ohmukai Y, Matsuyama H (2011) Effect of metal ions on humic acid fouling of hollow fiber ultrafiltration membrane. J Membr Sci 376:247–253

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamid N, Ismail A, Matsuura T, Zularisam A, Lau W, Yuliwati E, Abdullah M (2011) Morphological and separation performance study of polysulfone/titanium dioxide (PSF/TiO2) ultrafiltration membranes for humic acid removal. Desalination 273:85–92

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Etemadi H, Yegani R, Babaeipour V (2017) Performance evaluation and antifouling analyses of cellulose acetate/nanodiamond nanocomposite membranes in water treatment. J Appl Polym Sci 134:21

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ekambaram K, Doraisamy M (2017) Fouling resistant PVDF/Carboxymethyl chitosan composite nanofiltration membranes for humic acid removal. Carbohydr Polym 173:431–440

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Behboudi A, Jafarzadeh Y, Yegani R (2018) Enhancement of antifouling and antibacterial properties of PVC hollow fiber ultrafiltration membranes using pristine and modified silver nanoparticles. J Environ Chem Eng 6:1764–1773

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rabiee H, Vatanpou V, Farahani MHDA, Zarrabi H (2015) Improvement in flux and antifouling properties of PVC ultrafiltration membranes by incorporation of zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles. Sep Purif Technol 156:299–310

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang SY, Fang LF, Cheng L, Jeon S, Kato N, Matsuyama H (2018) Novel ultrafiltration membranes with excellent antifouling properties and chlorine resistance using a poly (vinyl chloride)-based copolymer. J Membr Sci 549:101–110

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Behboudi A, Jafarzadeh Y, Yegani R (2016) Preparation and characterization of TiO2 embedded PVC ultrafiltration membranes. Chem Eng Res Des 114:96–107

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Demirel E, Zhang B, Papakyriakou M, Xia S, Chen Y (2017) Fe2O3 nanocomposite PVC membrane with enhanced properties and separation performance. J Membr Sci 529:170–184

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao Y, Lu J, Liu X, Wang Y, Lin J, Peng N, Li J, Zhao F (2016) Performance enhancement of polyvinyl chloride ultrafiltration membrane modified with graphene oxide. J Colloid Interface Sci 480:1–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Etemadi H, Shojaei A (2014) Characterization of reinforcing effect of alumina nanoparticles on the novolac phenolic resin. Polym Compos 35:1285–1293

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Homayoonfal M, Mehrnia MR, Rahmani S, Mojtahedi YM (2015) Fabrication of alumina/polysulfone nanocomposite membranes with biofouling mitigation approach in membrane bioreactors. J Ind Eng Chem 22:357–367

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Saleh TA, Gupta VK (2012) Synthesis and characterization of alumina nano-particles polyamide membrane with enhanced flux rejection performance. Sep Purif Technol 89:245–251

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yan L, Hong S, Li ML, Li YS (2009) Application of the Al2O3–PVDF nanocomposite tubular ultrafiltration (UF) membrane for oily wastewater treatment and its antifouling research. Sep Purif Technol 66:347–352

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ghazanfari D, Bastani D, Mousavi SA (2017) Preparation and characterization of poly (vinyl chloride)(PVC) based membrane for wastewater treatment. J Water Process Eng 16:98–107

    Google Scholar 

  26. Huang H, Lee N, Young T, Gary A, Lozier JC, Jacangelo JG (2007) Natural organic matter fouling of low-pressure, hollow-fiber membranes: Effects of NOM source and hydrodynamic conditions. Water Res 41:3823–3832

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rabiee H, Farahani MHDA, Vatanpour V (2014) Preparation and characterization of emulsion poly (vinyl chloride)(EPVC)/TiO2 nanocomposite ultrafiltration membrane. J Membr Sci 472:185–193

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang M, Field RW, Zhang K (2014) Biogenic silver nanocomposite polyethersulfone UF membranes with antifouling properties. J Membr Sci 471:274–284

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gesan-Guiziou G, Wakeman R, Daufin G (2002) Stability of latex crossflow filtration: cake properties and critical conditions of deposition. Chem Eng J 85:27–34

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Etemadi H, Yegani R, Seyfollahi M (2017) The effect of amino functionalized and polyethylene glycol grafted nanodiamond on anti-biofouling properties of cellulose acetate membrane in membrane bioreactor systems. Sep Purif Technol 177:350–362

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhao S, Wang P, Wang C, Sun X, Zhang L (2012) Thermostable PPESK/TiO2 nanocomposite ultrafiltration membrane for high temperature condensed water treatment. Desalination 299:35–43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Safarpour M, Khataee A, Vatanpour V (2015) Effect of reduced graphene oxide/TiO2 nanocomposite with different molar ratios on the performance of PVDF ultrafiltration membranes. Sep Purif Technol 140:32–42

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang F, Zhang W, Yu Y, Deng B, Li J, Jin J (2013) Sol–gel preparation of PAA-g-PVDF/TiO2 nanocomposite hollow fiber membranes with extremely high water flux and improved antifouling property. J Membr Sci 432:25–32

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Xu Z, Zhang J, Shan M, Li Y, Li B, Niu J, Zhou B, Qian X (2014) Organosilane-functionalized graphene oxide for enhanced antifouling and mechanical properties of polyvinylidene fluoride ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 458:1–13

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hong J, He Y (2014) Polyvinylidene fluoride ultrafiltration membrane blended with nano-ZnO particle for photo-catalysis self-cleaning. Desalination 332:67–75

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang Z, Yu H, Xia J, Zhang F, Li F, Xia Y, Li Y (2012) Novel GO-blended PVDF ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination 299:50–54

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Zinadini S, Zinatizadeh AA, Rahimi M, Vatanpour V, Zangeneh H (2014) Preparation of a novel antifouling mixed matrix PES membrane by embedding graphene oxide nanoplates. J Membr Sci 453:292–301

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Amini M, Etemadi H, Akbarzadeh A, Yegani R (2017) Preparation and performance evaluation of high-density polyethylene/silica nanocomposite membranes in membrane bioreactor system. Biochem Eng J 127:196–205

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Etemadi H, Yegani R, Seyfollahi M, Babaeipour V (2017) Preparation and performance evaluation of cellulose acetate/nanodiamond nanocomposite membrane in the treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater by membrane bioreactor. Desalin Water Treat 76:98–111

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Fox R, Stuckey D (2015) The effect of sparging rate on transmembrane pressure and critical flux in an AnMBR. J Environ Manag 151:280–285

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. He Y, Xu P, Li C, Zhang B (2005) High-concentration food wastewater treatment by an anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Water Res 39:4110–4118

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Vatanpour V, Naeeni RSE, Ghadimi A, Karami A, Sadatnia B (2018) Effect of detonation nanodiamond on the properties and performance of polyethersulfone nanocomposite membrane. Diam Relat Mater 90:244–255

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the University of Bonab (Grant no. 98/1041).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Habib Etemadi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Etemadi, H., Qazvini, H. Investigation of alumina nanoparticles role on the critical flux and performance of polyvinyl chloride membrane in a submerged membrane system for the removal of humic acid. Polym. Bull. 78, 2645–2662 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-020-03234-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-020-03234-z

Keywords

Navigation