Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of critical micelle concentration of sodium dodecyl sulfate in butyl acrylate emulsions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Polymer Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A series of monodispersed (PDI <0.05) butyl acrylate emulsions with different sizes (100–500 nm) and solid contents (22, 17, 12 and 7 wt%) were prepared using a semibatch seeded emulsion polymerization method. Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was used as an emulsifier and potassium persulfate as an initiator. Surface tensions of the emulsions were investigated and the relationship of the emulsion stability, particle size and solid content was examined. The critical micelle concentration (CMC) of the emulsifier SDS was determined by the intersection of two tangents to surface tension curves. We found that the surface tension at CMC as high as 65.99 mN/m for the emulsion with a solid content of 22 % and a particle size of 115 nm, very close to the value of it for pure water. The surface tension decreased from 65.99 to 54.74 mN/m with an increase in particle size from 115 to 494 nm concomitantly with a decrease in the CMC of SDS from 56.10 to 19.83 mmol/l for the emulsion with a solid content of 22 wt%. As to the emulsions with the same particle size, CMC value was positively correlated with solid content. The minimum value of CMC was 9.12 mmol/l for the emulsion with a solid content of 7 % and a particle size of 494 nm, whereas the maximum CMC was 56.10 mmol/l for the emulsion with a solid content of 22 wt% and a particle size of 115 nm. As a result, an equation describing the relationship between CMC and solid content was deduced. This model yielded the same trends as the experimental results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee DI (1990) The control of structure in emulsion polymerization. Makromol Chem Macromol Symp 33:117–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Xia Y, Gates B, Yin Y et al (2000) Monodispersed colloidal spheres: old materials with new applications. Adv Mater 12(10):693–713

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sparks DL (2003) Environmental soil chemistry. UK, pp 150–172

  4. Wang L, Li X, Zhang G, Dong J, Eastoe J (2007) Oil-in-water nanoemulsions for pesticide formulations. J Colloid Interface Sci 314:230–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. El-Din MRN, Al Sabagh AM, Miller R (2010) Preparation of water-in-jet fuel nano-emulsions using a high-energy method. Int J Green Nanotechnol Phys Chem 2(1):20–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sole I, Maestro A, Solans C, Jose M (2006) Optimization of nano-emulsion preparation by low-energy methods in an ionic surfactant system. Langmuir 22:8326–8332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Noor El-Din MR (2011) Study on the stability of water-in-kerosene nano-emulsion and their dynamic surface properties. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Aspects B90:189–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Solans C, Izquierdo P, Nolla J, Azemar N, Garcia-Celma MJ (2005) Nano-emulsions. J Colloid Interface Sci 10(3):102–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fernandez P, André V, Riegger J, Kühnle A (2004) Nano-emulsion formation by emulsion phase inversion. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Aspects 251:53–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Landfester K, Willert M, Antonietti M (2000) Preparation of polymer particles in non-aqueous direct and inverse miniemulsions. Macromolecules 33(7):2370–2376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu H, Ramachandran C, Weiner ND, Roessler BJ (2001) Topical transport of hydrophilic compounds using water-in-oil nanoemulsions. Int J Pharm 220:63–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Garcia MJ, Solans C (2004) Formation of water-in-oil (w/o) nano-emulsions in a water/mixed non-ionic surfactant/oil system prepared by a low-energy emulsification method. Colloid Surf A Physicochem Eng Aspects 250:415–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tadros TF, Izquierdo P, Esquena J, Solans C (2004) Formation and stability of nano-emulsions. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 108–109:303–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Forgiarini A, Esquena J, Gonzalez C, Solans C (2001) Formation and stability of nano emulsions in mixed non ionic surfactant systems. Prog Colloid Polym Sci 118:184–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ruckenstein E, Park JS (1992) Stable concentrated emulsions as precursors for hydrophilic–hydrophobic polymer composites. Polymer 33(2):405–417

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schuler B, Baumstark R, Krisch S, Pfau A, Samdor M, Zosel A (2000) Prog Org Coat 40:1258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wettig SD, Verrall RE (2001) Studies of the interaction of cationic gemini surfactants with polymers and triblock copolymers in aqueous solution. J Colloid Interface Sci 244(2):377–385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu BJ, Zhang MY, Zhou C, Ren L, Cheng HL, Ao YH, Zhang HX (2013) Synthesis of monodisperse, large scale and high solid content latexes of poly(n-butyl acrylate) by a one-step batch emulsion polymerization. Colloid Polym Sci 291:2385–2398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Anton N, Benoit JP, Saulnier P (2008) Design and production of nanoparticles formulated from nano-emulsion templates-a review. J Controlled Release 128(3):185–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shinoda K, Kunieda H (1983) Phase properties of emulsions: PIT and HLB. In: Becher P (ed) Encyclopedia of emulsion technology. NY, pp 337–367

  21. Sajjadi S, Brooks BW (2001) Semibatch emulsion polymerization of butyl acrylate. II: effects of emulsifier distribution. J Appl Polym Sci 79:582–597

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The project was supported by NSFC (51173020, 50800300 and 51003007).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guangfeng Wu.

Appendix

Appendix

When the concentration of emulsifier reaches CMC equilibrium, the total number of emulsifier molecules is the sum of the number of free molecules and adsorbed molecules, that is:

$$\frac{m}{{M_{0} }} \times N_{\text{A}} = a + b$$
(7)

where m is the mass of emulsifier, M 0 is molar mass of emulsifier, a is the number of free molecules, b is the number of adsorbed molecules.

We can solve the value of a and b, respectively, are

$$b = a_{0} \times A$$
(8)

where a 0 is the adsorption density, A is the total surface area of particles, \(A = \alpha .\pi .D^{2}\), where α is the number of particles and D is the effective grain size.

Assumes that the experiment uses 100 ml of the emulsion, at CMC point, C = C 0, thus,

$$a = C_{0} \times V_{\text{water}} \times N_{\text{A}} = C_{0} \frac{{\left( {100 - \frac{1}{6}\alpha \cdot \pi \cdot D^{3} } \right)}}{{M_{ 0} }}N_{\text{A}} .$$
(9)

So, substituting Eqs. (8) and (9) into (7), we get

$$nN_{\text{A}} = C_{0} \frac{{\left( {100 - \frac{1}{6}\alpha \cdot \pi \cdot D^{3} } \right)}}{{M_{0} }} \times N_{\text{A}} + a_{0} \cdot \alpha \cdot \pi \cdot D^{2} .$$
(10)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, T., Lu, Q., Lü, Y. et al. Determination of critical micelle concentration of sodium dodecyl sulfate in butyl acrylate emulsions. Polym. Bull. 72, 2215–2225 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-015-1399-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-015-1399-z

Keywords

Navigation