Biodegradation, the disintegration of organic matter by microorganism, is essential for the cycling of environmental organic matter. Understanding and predicting the dynamics of this biodegradation have increasingly gained attention from the industries and government regulators. Since changes in environmental organic matter are strenuous to measure, mathematical models are essential in understanding and predicting the dynamics of organic matters. Empirical evidence suggests that grazers’ preying activity on microorganism helps to facilitate biodegradation. In this paper, we formulate and investigate a stoichiometry-based organic matter decomposition model in a chemostat culture that incorporates the dynamics of grazers. We determine the criteria for the uniform persistence and extinction of the species and chemicals. Our results show that (1) if at the unique internal steady state, the per capita growth rate of bacteria is greater than the sum of the bacteria’s death and dilution rates, then the bacteria will persist uniformly; (2) if in addition to this, (a) the grazers’ per capita growth rate is greater than the sum of the dilution rate and grazers’ death rate, and (b) the death rate of bacteria is less than some threshold, then the grazers will persist uniformly. These conditions can be achieved simultaneously if there are sufficient resources in the feed bottle. As opposed to the microcosm decomposition models’ results, in a chemostat culture, chemicals always persist. Besides the transcritical bifurcation observed in microcosm models, our chemostat model exhibits Hopf bifurcation and Rosenzweig’s paradox of enrichment phenomenon. Our sensitivity analysis suggests that the most effective way to facilitate degradation is to decrease the dilution rate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Barsdate R, Prentki R, Fenchel T (1974) Phosphorus cycle of model ecosystems: significance for decomposer food chains and effect of bacterial grazers. Oikos 25:239–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratbak G (1985) Bacterial biovolume and biomass estimations. Appl Environ Microbiol 49(6):1488–1493Google Scholar
Caron DA, Goldman JC, Andersen OK, Dennett MR (1985) Nutrient cycling in a microflagellate food chain: II. population dynamics and carbon cycling. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 24:243–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chitnis N, Hyman JM, Cushing JM (2008) Determining important parameters in the spread of malaria through the sensitivity analysis of a mathematical model. Bull Math Biol 70(5):1272–1296MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
Cross WF, Benstead JP, Frost PC, Thomas SA (2005) Ecological stoichiometry in freshwater benthic systems: recent progress and perspectives. Freshw Biol 50(11):1895–1912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Giorgio PA, Cole JJ (1998) Bacterial growth efficiency in natural aquatic systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29(1):503–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Der Yang R, Humphrey AE (1975) Dynamic and steady state studies of phenol biodegradation in pure and mixed cultures. Biotechnol Bioeng 17(8):1211–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhooge A, Govaerts W, Kuznetsov YA, Mestrom W, Riet A, Sautois B (2006) MATCONT and CL MATCONT: continuation toolboxes in matlab. Universiteit Gent, Belgium and Utrecht University, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Ekelund F, Rønn R (1994) Notes on protozoa in agricultural soil with emphasis on heterotrophic flagellates and naked amoebae and their ecology. FEMS Microbiol Rev 15(4):321–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenchel T (1975) The quantitative importance of the benthic microfauna of an arctic tundra pond. Hydrobiologia 46(4):445–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenchel T, Harrison P (1976) The significance of bacterial grazing and mineral cycling for the decomposition of particulate detritus. In: Symposium of the British Ecological Society, pp 285–299Google Scholar
Goldman JC, Caron DA, Andersen OK, Dennett MR (1985) Nutrient cycling in a microflagellate food chain: I. Nitrogen dynamics. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 24:231–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habte M, Alexander M (1975) Protozoa as agents responsible for the decline of Xanthomonas campestris in soil. Appl Microbiol 29(2):159–164Google Scholar
Herbert D, Elsworth R, Telling R (1956) The continuous culture of bacteria: a theoretical and experimental study. Microbiology 14(3):601–622Google Scholar