Abstract
Organelles such as endosomes and the Golgi apparatus play a critical role in regulating signal transmission to the nucleus. Recent experiments have shown that appropriate positioning of these organelles within the intracellular space is critical for effective signal regulation. To understand the mechanism behind this observation, we consider a reaction-diffusion model of an intracellular signaling cascade and investigate the effect on the signaling of intracellular regulation in the form of a small release of phosphorylated signaling protein, kinase, and/or phosphatase. Variational analysis is applied to characterize the most effective regions for the localization of this intracellular regulation. The results demonstrate that signals reaching the nucleus are most effectively regulated by localizing the release of phosphorylated substrate protein and kinase near the nucleus. Phosphatase release, on the other hand, is nearly equally effective throughout the intracellular space. The effectiveness of the intracellular regulation is affected strongly by the characteristics of signal propagation through the cascade. For signals that are amplified as they propagate through the cascade, reactions in the upstream levels of the cascade exhibit much larger sensitivities to regulation by release of phosphorylated substrate protein and kinase than downstream reactions. On the other hand, for signals that decay through the cascade, downstream reactions exhibit larger sensitivity than upstream reactions. For regulation by phosphatase release, all reactions within the cascade show large sensitivity for amplified signals but lose this sensitivity for decaying signals. We use the analysis to develop a simple model of endosome-mediated regulation of cell signaling. The results demonstrate that signal regulation by the modeled endosome is most effective when the endosome is positioned in the vicinity of the nucleus. The present findings may explain at least in part why endosomes in many cell types localize near the nucleus.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asthagiri AR, Lauffenburger DA (2001) A computational study of feedback effects on signal dynamics in a mitogen-activated protein kinase (mapk) pathway model. Biotechnol Prog 17:227–239
Bhalla US, Ram PT, Iyengar R (2002) Map kinase phosphatase as a locus of flexibility in a mitogen-activated protein kinase siganling network. Science 297:1018–1023
Birtwistle MR, Kholodenko BN (2009) Endocytosis and signalling: a meeting with mathematics. Mol Oncol 3:308–320
Bivona TG, de Castro IP, Ahearn IM, Grana TM, Chiu VK, Lockyer PJ, Cullen PJ, Pellicer A, Cox AD, Philips MR (2003) Phospholipase c-gamma activates ras on the golgi apparatus by means of rasgrp1. Nature 424:694–698
Brightman FA, Fell DA (2000) Differential feedback regulation of the mapk cascade underlies the quantitative differences in egf and ngf signaling in pc12 cells. FEBS Lett 482:169–174
Brown GC, Kholodenko BN (1999) Spatial gradients of cellular phospho-proteins. FEBS Lett. 457:452–454
Burkhardt JK, Echeverri CJ, Nilsson T, Vallee RB (1997) Over-expression of the dunamitin (p50) subunit of the dynactin complex disrupts dynein-depedent maintenance of membrane organelle distribution. J Cell Bio 139:469–484
Chang L, Karin M (2001) Mammalian map kinase signaling cascades. Nature 410:37–40
Ferrell JE (1997) How responses get more switch-like as you move down a protein kinase cascade. Trends Biochem Sci 78:288–289
Flore PPD, Camilli PD (2001) Endocytosis and signaling: an inseparable partnership. Cell 106:1–4
Goldbeter A, Koshland DE (1981) An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 78:6840–6844
Gunzburger MD (2003) Perspectives in flow control and optimization. SIAM, Philadelphia
Harada A, Takei Y, Kanai Y, Tanaka Y, Nanoka S, Hirokawa N (1998) Golgi vesiculation and lysosome dispersion in cells lacking cytoplasmic dynein. J Cell Bio 141:51–59
Hoepfner S, Severin F, Cabezas A, Habermann B, Runge A, Gillooly D, Stenmark H, Zerial M (2005) Modulation of receptor recycling and degradation by the endosomal kinesin kif216b. Cell 121:437–450
Howe CL, Mobley WC (2004) Signaling endosome hypothesis: a cellular mechanism for long distance communication. J Neurobiol 58:207–216
Kalab P, Weis K, Heald R (2002) Visualization of a ran-gtp gradient in interphase and mitotic xenopus egg extracts. Science 295:2452–2456
Kholodenko BN (2002) Map kinase cascade signalling and endocytic trafficking: a marriage of convenience? Trends Cell Biol. 12:173–177
Kholodenko BN (2003) Four-dimensional organization of protein kinase signaling cascades: the roles of diffusion, endocytosis and molecular motors. J Exp Biol 206:2073–2082
Kholodenko BN (2006) Cell-signaling dynamics in time and space. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:165–176
Kholodenko BN (2010) Signaling ballet in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:165–176
Koenig JA, Edwardson JM (1997) Endocytosis and recycling of g protein-coupled receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci 18:276–287
Maeder CI, Hink MA, Kinkhabwala A, Mayr R, Bastiaens PI (2007) Spatial regulation of fus3 map kinase activity through a reaction-diffusion mechanism in yeast pheroment signaling. Nat Cell Biol 9:1319–1326
Markevich NI, Tsyganov MA, Hoek JB, Kholodenko BN (2006) Long-range signaling by phosphoprotein waves arising from bistability in protein kinase cascades. Mol Sys Biol 2:61
Marshall CJ (1995) Specificity of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: transient versus sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation. Cell 80:179–185
Miaczynska M, Pelkmans L, Zerial M (2004) Not just a sink: endosomes in control of signal transduction. Curr Opin Cell Biol 16:400–406
Munoz-Garcia J, Neufeld Z, Kholodenko BN (2009) Positional information generated by spatially distributed signaling cascades. Plos Comp Biol 5(3):e100330
Munoz-Garcia J, Neufeld Z, Kholodenko BN (2010) Signaling over a distance: gradient patterns and phosphorylation waves within single cells. Biochem Soc Trans 38(5):1231–1241
Nakayama K, Satoh T, Igari A, Kageyama R, Nishida E (2008) Fgf induces oscillations of hes1 expression and ras/erk activation. Curr Biol 18:R332–334
Niethammer P, Bastiaens P, Karsenti E (2004) Stathmin-tublin interaction gradient in motile and mitotic cells. Science 303:1862–1866
Perlson E, Hanz S, Ben-Yaakov K, Segal-Ruder Y, Seger R, Fainzilber M (2005) Vimentin-dependent spatial translocation of an activated map kinase in injured nerve. Neuron 45:715–726
Pierce KL, Maudsley S, Daaka Y, Luttrell LM, Lefkowitz RJ (2000) Role of endocytosis in the activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase cascade by sequestering and nonsequestering g protein-coupled receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97(4):1489–1494
Sadowski L, Pilecka I, Miaczynska M (2009) Signaling from endosomoes: location makes a difference. Exp Cell Res 315:1601–1609
Stadtman ER, Chock PB (1977) Superiority of interconvertible enzyme cascades in metabolic regulation: analysis of monocyclic systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 74:2761–2765
Stelling J, Kholodenko BN (2009) Signaling cascades as cellular devices for spatial computations. J Math Biol 58:35–55
Takahashi K, Tanase-Nicola S, ten Wolde PR (2010) Sptatio-temporal correlations can drastically change the response of a mapk pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(6):2473–2478
Takai L, Sasaki T, Matazaki T (2001) Small gtp-binding proteins. Physiol Rev 81:153–208
Taub N, Teis D, Ebner HL, Hess MW, Huber LA (2007) Late endosomal traffic of the epidermal growth factor receptor ensures spatial and temporal fidelity of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling. Mol Biol Cell 18(12):4698–4710
Tyson JJ, Chen KC, Novak B (2003) Sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell. Curr Opin Cell Biol 15:221–231
Warren DT, Tajsic T, Mellad JA, Searles R, Zhang Q, Shanahan CM (2010) Novel nuclear nesprin-2 variant tether active extracellular signal-regulated mapk1 and mapk2 at promyelocytic leukimia protein nuclear bodies and act to regulate smoothe muscle cell proliferation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio 10:75–82
Wu C, Lai CF, Mobley WC (2001) Nerve growth factor activates persistent rap1 signaling in endosomes. J Neurosci 21(15):5406–5416
Xiong W, Ferrell JE (2003) A positive-feedback-based bistable ‘memory module’ that governs a cell fate decision. Nature 426:460–465
Zhao Q, Yi M, Liu Y (2011) Spatial distribution and dose-response relationship for different operation modes in a reaction-diffusion model of the mapk cascade. Phys Biol 8:055004
Acknowledgments
This work was funded in part by an endowment in Cardiovascular Cellular Engineering from the AXA Research Fund.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Normalization of the model
Appendix: Normalization of the model
The reaction-diffusion equations for the signaling cascade in Fig. 1 are given as follows (Munoz-Garcia et al. 2009):
with boundary conditions,
where the reaction terms are given as
Here, \(k_{cat,n}^{kin}\) is the catalytic constant (turnover number), \(V_{max,1}^{kin}\) the maximal rate for the kinase at the cell membrane, \(V_{max,n}^{phos}\) the maximal rate for the phosphatase at level n of the cascade, \(K_n^{kin}\) the Michaelis constant for the kinase at level n, and \(K_n^{phos}\) the Michaelis constant for the phosphatase at level n. Normalization of Eq. (1) by \(C_{tot}\) leads to the normalized reaction terms as in Eq. (4), where \(v_n^{kin}=V_1^{kin}/C_{tot}\) and \(v_n^{phos}=V_n^{phos}/C_{tot}\) for all \(n\). The apparent first-order rate constants in Eq. (4) are readily obtained as:
Similarly, the normalized (dimensionless) Michaelis constants in Eq. (4) are given as:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hwang, Y., Kumar, P. & Barakat, A.I. Intracellular regulation of cell signaling cascades: how location makes a difference. J. Math. Biol. 69, 213–242 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-013-0701-7
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-013-0701-7