Skip to main content
Log in

Direct competition results from strong competition for limited resource

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study a model of competition for resource through a chemostat-type model where species consume the common resource that is constantly supplied. We assume that the species and resources are characterized by a continuous trait. As already proved, this model, although more complicated than the usual Lotka–Volterra direct competition model, describes competitive interactions leading to concentrated distributions of species in continuous trait space. Here we assume a very fast dynamics for the supply of the resource and a fast dynamics for death and uptake rates. In this regime we show that factors that are independent of the resource competition become as important as the competition efficiency and that the direct competition model is a good approximation of the chemostat. Assuming these two timescales allows us to establish a mathematically rigorous proof showing that our resource-competition model with continuous traits converges to a direct competition model. We also show that the two timescales assumption is required to mathematically justify the corresponding classic result on a model consisting of only finite number of species and resources (MacArthur in, Theor Popul Biol 1:1–11, 1970). This is performed through asymptotic analysis, introducing different scales for the resource renewal rate and the uptake rate. The mathematical difficulty relies in a possible initial layer for the resource dynamics. The chemostat model comes with a global convex Lyapunov functional. We show that the particular form of the competition kernel derived from the uptake kernel, satisfies a positivity property which is known to be necessary for the direct competition model to enjoy the related Lyapunov functional.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams PA, Rueffler C (2009) Coexistence and limiting similarity of consumer species competing for a linear array of resources. Ecology 90:812–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams PA, Rueffler C, Dinnage R (2008) Competition-similarity relationships and the nonlinearity of competitive effects in consumer-resource systems. Am Nat 172:463–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barles G, Mirrahimi S, Perthame B (2009) Concentration in Lotka–Volterra parabolic or integral equations: a general convergence result. Methods Appl Anal 16(3):321–340

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Barles G, Perthame B (2007) Concentrations and constrained Hamilton–Jacobi equations arising in adaptive dynamics. Contemp Math 439:57–68

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Calsina A, Cuadrado S (2004) Small mutation rate and evolutionarily stable strategies in infinite dimensional adaptive dynamics. J Math Biol 48(2):135–159

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Champagnat N (2006) A microscopic interpretation for adaptive dynamics trait substitution sequence models. Stoch Process Appl 116(8):1127–1160

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Champagnat N, Ferrière R, Méléard S (2006) Unifying evolutionary dynamics: from individual stochastic processes to macroscopic models. Theor Popul Biol 69(3):297–321

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Champagnat N, Ferrière R, Méléard S (2008) From individual stochastic processes to macroscopic models in adaptive evolution. Stoch Models 24(1):2–44

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Champagnat N, Jabin P-E, Raoul G (2010) Convergence to equilibrium in competitive Lotka–Volterra and chemostat systems. C R Acad Sci 348(23–24):1267–1272

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Champagnat N, Méléard S (2011) Polymorphic evolution sequence and evolutionary branching. Probab Theor Relat Fields 151(1–2):45–94

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Desvillettes L, Jabin P-E, Mischler S (2008) Raoul G On mutation-selection dynamics. Commun Math Sci 6(3):729–747

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann O (2004) A beginner’s guide to adaptive dynamics. In: Mathematical modelling of population dynamics, volume 63 of Banach Center Publ. Polish Acad. Sci., Warsaw, pp 47–86

  • Diekmann O, Jabin P-E, Mischler S, Perthame B (2005) The dynamics of adaptation: an illuminating example and a Hamilton–Jacobi approach. Theor Popul Biol 67(4):257–271

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Geritz SAH, Kisdi E, Mészena G, Metz JAJ (1998) Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evol Ecol 12:35–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gyllenberg M, Meszéna G (2005) On the impossibility of coexistence of infinitely many strategies. J Math Biol 50:133–166

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jabin P-E, Raoul G (2011) On selection dynamics for competitive interactions. J Math Biol 63(3):493–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorz A, Mirrahimi S, Perthame B (2011) Dirac mass dynamics in multidimensional nonlocal parabolic equations. Comm Partial Differen Equ 36(6):1071–1098

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH (1970) Species packing and competitive equilibria for many species. Theor Popul Biol 1:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Méléard S (2011) Random modeling of adaptive dynamics and evolutionary branching. In: Rodrigues JF, Chalub F (eds) The mathematics of Darwin’s legacy. Mathematics and biosciences in interaction. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 175–192

  • Mirrahimi S, Perthame B, Wakano JY (2012) Evolution of species trait through resource competition. J Math Biol 64(7):1189–1223

    Google Scholar 

  • Perthame B, Barles G (2008) Dirac concentrations in Lotka–Volterra parabolic PDEs. Indiana Univ Math J 57(7):3275–3301

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki A, Ellner S (1995) The evolutionarily stable phenotype distribution in a random environment. Evolution 49(2):337–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002) Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The three authors thank Readilab, LIA 197 CNRS, for supporting their collaborations and also Meiji University and UPMC. J.Y.W. is partly supported by Glocal COE program “Formation and Development of Mathematical Sciences Based on Modeling and Analysis”. S. M. benefits from a 2 year “Fondation Mathématique Jacques Hadamard” (FMJH) postdoc scholarship. She would like to thank Ecole Polytechnique for its hospitality. The authors would like also to thank Géza Meszéna for careful review of this paper, valuable comments, several references and interpretations. We borrowed some sentences from the report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benoît Perthame.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mirrahimi, S., Perthame, B. & Wakano, J.Y. Direct competition results from strong competition for limited resource. J. Math. Biol. 68, 931–949 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-013-0659-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-013-0659-5

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

Navigation