Skip to main content
Log in

Optimized Production of Medically Significant Enzyme L-Asparaginase Under Submerged and Solid-State Fermentation From Agricultural Wastes

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

L-asparaginase has prime medical significance due to its chemotherapeutic applications and action against a wide range of diseases. L-asparaginase obtained from commercial producer bacterial strains causes anaphylaxis, some sensitive reactions, and other side effects. To overcome these issues, eukaryotes like fungi can be used to produce L-asparaginase. Penicillium lilacinum was explored for its enhanced production through a statistically optimized fermentation approach. Firstly, the significant fermentation parameters (influencing the production) were screened through the Plackett–Burman approach. Thereafter, Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was employed for achieving higher production of L-asparaginase under specified fermentation conditions. The study explored both submerged (SmF) and solid-state (SSF) fermentation conditions to put forward a comparative analysis of the best suitable fermentation condition for the enhanced production of L-asparaginase. The Plackett–Burman optimization result suggested that pH, L-asparagine, ammonium nitrate, and temperature were significantly affecting enzyme production in SmF conditions, whereas wheat bran, arhar bran, kulthi bran, and temperature were identified as significant process parameters for SSF. The final enzyme activity obtained in SmF was 82.29 IU/mL and 190.439 U/gds in SSF after the implication of RSM. The statistical optimization tool fosters 2.47-fold and 6.36-fold enzyme activity in SmF and SSF, respectively. The study suggested that L-asparaginase can be efficiently produced using P. lilacinum at an optimized SSF condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Vimal A, Kumar A (2017) Biotechnological production and practical application of L-asparaginase enzyme. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 33:40–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/02648725.2017.1357294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Castro D, Marques ASC, Almeida MR et al (2021) L-asparaginase production review: bioprocess design and biochemical characteristics. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 105:4515–4534. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00253-021-11359-Y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Abd El Baky HH (2016) El Baroty GS (2016) Optimization of growth conditions for purification and production of L-Asparaginase by Spirulina maxima. Evidence-Based Complement Altern Med 17859:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1785938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baruch M, Hertzog BB, Ravins M et al (2014) Induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress and unfolded protein response constitutes a pathogenic strategy of group A streptococcus. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4:1–5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2014.00105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Reiff A, Zastrow M, Sun BC et al (2001) Treatment of collagen induced arthritis in DBA/1 mice with L-asparaginase. Clin Exp Rheumatol 19:639–646

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu F, Oruna-Concha MJ, Elmore JS (2016) The use of asparaginase to reduce acrylamide levels in cooked food. Food Chem 210:163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.04.105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. El-Naggar N (2015) Extracellular production of the oncolytic enzyme, l-asparaginase, by newly isolated Streptomyces sp. Strain NEAE-95 as potential microbial cell factories: optimization of culture conditions using Response Surface Methodology. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 16:162–178. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389201015666141113123910

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lanvers-Kaminsky C (2017) Asparaginase pharmacology: challenges still to be faced. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 79:439–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-3236-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fonseca MHG, da Fiúza T, S, Morais SB de, et al (2021) Circumventing the side effects of L-asparaginase. Biomed Pharmacother 139:111616. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOPHA.2021.111616

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Souza PM, de Freitas MM, Cardoso SL et al (2017) Optimization and purification of l -asparaginase from fungi: A systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 120:194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.11.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tong WH, van der Sluis IM, Alleman CJM et al (2013) Cost-analysis of treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia with asparaginase preparations: the impact of expensive chemotherapy. Haematologica 98:753–759. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2012.073510

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hymavathi M, Sathish T, Rao CS (2009) Enhancement of l-asparaginase production by isolated Bacillus circulans ( MTCC 8574) Using Response Surface Methodology. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-008-8438-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Suresh JV, Raju KJ (2013) Studies on the production of L-asparaginase by Aspergillus terreus MTCC 1782 using agro-residues under mixed substrate solid State fermentation. J Chem Biol Phys Sci 3:314–325

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Venkateswarlu C, Kiran K, Eswari JS (2012) A hierarchical artificial neural system for genera classification and species identification in mosquitoes. Appl Artif Intell 26:903–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2012.731342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar S, Pakshirajan K, Venkata Dasu V (2009) Development of medium for enhanced production of glutaminase-free l-asparaginase from Pectobacterium carotovorum MTCC 1428. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 84:477–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-1973-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vimal A, Kumar A (2017) In vitro screening and in silico validation revealed key microbes for higher production of significant therapeutic enzyme l-asparaginase. Enzyme Microb Technol 98:9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2016.12.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Khuri AI, Cornell JA (1987) Response surfaces : designs and analyses. Marcel Dekker

    Google Scholar 

  18. El-naggar NE, Moawad H, Abdelwahed NAM (2017) Optimization of fermentation conditions for enhancing extracellular production of L -asparaginase, an anti-leukemic agent, by newly isolated Streptomyces brollosae NEAE-115 using solid state fermentation. Ann Microbiol 67:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-016-1231-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ghosh S, Murthy S, Govindasamy S, Chandrasekaran M (2013) Optimization of L-asparaginase production by Serratia marcescens (NCIM 2919) under solid state fermentation using coconut oil cake. Sustain Chem Process 1:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2043-7129-1-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mishra A (2006) Production of L -Asparaginase, an anticancer agent, from Aspergillus niger using agricultural waste. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 135:33–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hymavathi M, Sathish T, Brahmaiah P, Prakasham RS (2010) Impact of carbon and nitrogen sources on l-asparaginase production by isolated Bacillus circulans ( MTCC 8574): Application of Saturated Plackett-Burman Design. Chem Biochem Eng 24:473–480

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mashburn LT, Wriston JC (1964) Tumor inhibitory effect of l-aaparaginase from Escherichia coli. Arch Biochem Biophys 105:450–452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Morales-Álvarez ED, Rivera-Hoyos CM, Cardozo-Bernal ÁM et al (2017) Plackett-Burman design for rgilcc1 laccase activity enhancement in Pichia pastoris : Concentrated Enzyme Kinetic Characterization. Enzyme Res 2017:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5947581

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fang H, Zhao C, Song X-Y (2010) Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-exploded corn stover by two approaches: Response surface methodology or using cellulase from mixed cultures of Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30 and Aspergillus niger NL02. Bioresour Technol 101:4111–4119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.078

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ma H, Liu W-W, Chen X et al (2009) Enhanced enzymatic saccharification of rice straw by microwave pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 100:1279–1284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.08.045

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Usha R, Mala KK, Venil CK (2011) Screening of actinomycetes from mangrove ecosystem for l-asparaginase activity and optimization by Response Surface Methodology. Polish J Microbiol 60:213–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Abdel-Fattah YR, Olama ZA (2002) L-asparaginase production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in solid-state culture: evaluation and optimization of culture conditions using factorial designs. Process Biochem 38:115–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00067-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Doriya K, Kumar DS (2016) Isolation and screening of l-asparaginase free of glutaminase and urease from fungal sp. 3 Biotech 6:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-016-0544-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lincoln L, More SS (2018) Comparative evaluation of extracellular β- d -fructofuranosidase in submerged and solid-state fermentation produced by newly identified Bacillus subtilis strain. J Appl Microbiol in press: https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. da Silva MB, Rossi DM, Ayub MAZ (2017) Screening of filamentous fungi to produce xylanase and xylooligosaccharides in submerged and solid-state cultivations on rice husk, soybean hull, and spent malt as substrates. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 33:58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-017-2226-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Salihu A, Bala M, Bala SM (2013) Application of Plackett-Burman experimental design for lipase production by Aspergillus niger Using Shea Butter Cake. ISRN Biotechnol 2013:1–5. https://doi.org/10.5402/2013/718352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the parent institute NIT Raipur, India for continuous support and assistance during research work and scientific writing.

Funding

No funding is received by the authors for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AV contributed toward design, experiment, analysis, and writing manuscript; AwK contributed toward design, analysis, and writing manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Awanish Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

Not Required.

Consent For Publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 674 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vimal, A., Kumar, A. Optimized Production of Medically Significant Enzyme L-Asparaginase Under Submerged and Solid-State Fermentation From Agricultural Wastes. Curr Microbiol 79, 394 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-022-03095-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-022-03095-x

Navigation