Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Biocontrol of Cladosporium cladosporioides of mango fruit with Bacillus atrophaeus TE7 and effects on storage quality

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the control effect of Bacillus atrophaeus TE7 on Cladosporium cladosporioides of mango fruit and how it effects quality attributes during ‘Tainong’ mango fruit storage. The results showed that strain TE7 had inhibition ability with the biocontrol efficacy of 85.56%. Furthermore, strain TE7 could produce lipopeptide substance, iturin A, and surfactants, which inhibited the growth and development of C. cladosporioides. Moreover, strain TE7 had the ability of improving the activities of defense response-related enzyme in mangoes. The changes of peel color, flesh firmness, contents of total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acid (TA), and ascorbic acid (Vc) were significantly delayed by strain TE7. The results demonstrated that B. atrophaeus TE7 could be applied as a biocontrol agent for the pathogen C. cladosporioides of mango fruit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang H, Wei YX, Liu XM, Mei ZD, Yu QF, Qi YX, Pu JJ (2015) List of Mango Diseases. Plant Protection 63:58–64

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang H, Liu XM, Yu QF, Qi YX, Xie YX, Pu JJ (2013) Preliminary studies of mango sooty blotch of Cladosporium cladosporioides in Hainan province. J Guangdong Agric Sci 7:75–77

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yang YL, Zhang H, Liu XM, Zhou BH, Wang SG, Pu JJ (2015) Sensitivity of Cladosporium cladosporioides causing mango new disease sooty blotch to fungicides. J Fruit Sci 32:123–127

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rana H, Jean R, Olivier B (2016) Screening and modes of action of antagonistic bacteria to control the fungal pathogen Phaeomoniella chlamydospora involved in grapevine trunk diseases. Microbiol Res 192:172–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cazorla FM, Dukett SB, Berström ET, Noreen S, Odijk R, Lugtenberg BJJ, Thomas-Oates JE, Bloemberg GV (2006) Biocontrol of avocado Dematophora root rot by antagonistic Pseudomonas fluorescens PCL1606 correlates with the production of 2-hexyl 5 propyl resorcinol. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 10:79–86

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wicaksono WA, Jones EE, Casonato S, Monk J, Ridgway HJ (2018) Biological control of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa), the causal agent of bacterial canker of kiwifruit, using endophytic bacteria recovered from a medicinal plant. Biol Control 116:103–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Siripornvisal S (2010) Biocontrol efficacy of Bacillus subtilis BCB3-19 against tomato gray mold. KMITL Sci Tech J 10:37–44

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ongena M, Jacques P (2008) Bacillus lipopeptides: versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol. Trends Microbiol 16:115–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Romero D, Pérez-García A, Rivera ME, Cazorla FM (2004) Isolation and evaluation of antagonistic bacteria towards the cucurbit powdery mildew fungus Podosphaera fusca. Appl Microbiol Biot 64:263–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shoda M (2000) Bacterial control of plant disease. J Biosci Bio Eng 89:515–521

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Blackburn D, Shapiro-Ilan DI, Adams BJ (2016) Biological control and nutrition: food for thought. Biol Control 97:131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xiao YS, Zeng WA, Zeng GQ (2010) Control effect experiment of pesticide against tobacco black shank. Tobacco Sci Tech 7:62–64

    Google Scholar 

  13. Janahiraman V, Anandham R, Kwon SW (2016) Control of wilt and rot pathogens of tomato by antagonistic pink pigmented facultative methylotrophic delftia lacustris and Bacillus spp. Front Plant Sci 7:1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang LY, de Anne J, Elrike F (2017) Comparative transcriptomics of Bacillus mycoides strains in response to potato-Root exudates reveals different genetic adaptation of endophytic and soil isolates. Front Microbiol 8:1487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kanchana S, Angsana A (2014) Bacillus subtilis LBF02 as biocontrol agent against leaf spot diseases caused by Cercospora lactucae-sativae in lettuce. J Agric Sci 6:151–158

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dennis C, Webster J (1971) Antagonistic properties of species-groups of Trichoderma. II Production of volatile antibiotics. Trans Br Mycol Soc 57:41–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stadnik MJ, Buchenaue RH (2000) Inhibition of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase suppresses the resistance induced by benzothiadiazole in wheat to Blumeria graminis f. sp. Tritici. Physiol Mol Plant P 57:25-34

  18. Tian SP, Fan Q, Xu Y, Jiang AL (2002) Effects of caLcium on biocontrol activity of yeast antagonists against the postharvest fungal pathogen Rhizopus stolonifer. Plant Pathol 51:352–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Assis JS, Maldonado R, Munoz T, Escribano M, Merodio C (2001) Effect of high carbon dioxide concentration on PAL activity and phenolic contents in ripening cherimoya fruit. Postharv Biol Technol 23:33–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cao JK, Jiang WB, Zhao YM (2007) Experiment guidance of postharvest physiology and biochemistry of fruits and vegetables. Light Industry Publishing, Beijing, pp 144–147

    Google Scholar 

  21. Larrigaudiere C, Pons J, Torres R, Usall J (2002) Storage performance of clementines treated with hot water, sodium carbonate and sodium bicarbonate dips. J Hortic Sci Biotech 77:314–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Broggini GAL, Duffy B, Holliger E, Scharer HJ, Gessler C, Patocchi A (2005) Detection of the fire blight biocontrol agent Bacillus subtilis BD170 (Biopro®) in a Swiss apple orchard. Eur J Plant Path 111:93–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Li YH, Wu YJ, Wu B, Zou MH, Zhang Z, Sun GM (2011) Exogenous gibberellic acid increases the fruit weight of ‘Comte de Paris’ pineapple by enlarging flesh cells without negative effects on fruit quality. Acta Physiol Plant 33:1715–1722

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. María LP, María LC, Mariana C, Ana D, Sofía C (2011) Biocontrol as a strategy to reduce the impact of ochratoxin A and Aspergillus section Nigri in grapes. Int J Food Microbiol 151:70–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Iglesias MB, Abadias M, Anguera M, Sabata J, Vinas I (2017) Antagonistic effect of probiotic bacteria against food borne pathogens on fresh-cut pear. LWT-Food Sci Technol 81:243–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Stein T (2005) Bacillus subtilis antibiotics: structure, syntheses and specific functions. Mol Microbiol 56:845–857

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jasim B, Sreelakshmi KS, Jyothis M, Radhakrishnan EK (2016) Surfactin, Iturin, and Fengycin biosynthesis by endophytic Bacillus sp. from Bacopa monnieri. Environ Microbiol 72:106–119

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Diego R, de Antonio V, Rivo HR (2007) The iturin and fengycin families of lipopeptides are key factors in antagonism of Bacillus subtilis toward podosphaera fusca. Am Phytopath Soc 20:430–440

    Google Scholar 

  29. Natalia M, Laurent CF, Ben L, Vladimir C (2012) Marc Ong Cyclic lipopeptide profile of the plant-beneficial endophytic bacterium Bacillus subtilis HC8. Arch Microbiol 194:893–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chandrasekaran M, Belachew ST, Yoon E, Chun SC (2017) Expression of β-1,3-glucanase (GLU) and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) genes and their enzymes in tomato plants induced after treatment with Bacillus subtilis CBR05 against Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. J Gen Plant Pathol 83:7–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tokpah DP, Li HW, Wang LY, Liu XY, Mulbah QS, Liu HX (2016) An assessment system for screening effective bacteria as biological control agents against Magnaporthe grisea on rice. Biol Control 103:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Farkas GL, Stahmann A (1996) On the nature of change in peroxidase isoenzymes in bean leaves infected by southern bean mosaic virus. Phytopathology 56:669–677

    Google Scholar 

  33. Guo J, Fang W, Lu H, Zhu R, Lu L, Zheng X, Yu T (2014) Inhibition of green mold disease in mandarins by preventive applications of methyl jasmonate and antagonistic yeast Cryptococcus laurentii. Postharvest Biol Technol 88:72–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wisniewski ME, Wilson CL (1992) Biogical control of postharvest of fruits and vegetables: recent advances. HortScience 27:94–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Schlumbaum A, Mauch F, Vogeli U (1986) Plant chitinase are potent inhibitors of fungal growth. Nature 324:365–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Chalfoun NR, Castagnaro AP, Díaz Ricci JC (2011) Induced resistance activated by a culture filtrate derived from an avirulent pathogen as a mechanism of biological control of anthracnose in strawberry. Biol Control 58:319–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dunlap CA, Lueschow S, Carrillo D, Rooney AP (2017) Screening of bacteria for antagonistic activity against phytopathogens of avocados. Plant Gene 11:17–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Haidar R, Roudet J, Bonnard O, Dufoura MC, Corio-Costet MF, Fert M, Fermaud M (2016) Screening and modes of action of antagonistic bacteria to control thefungal pathogen Phaeomoniella chlamydospora involved in grape vinetrunk diseases. Microbiol Res 192:172–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Perez MF, Ibarreche JP, Isas AS, Sepulveda M, Ramallo J, Dib JR (2017) Antagonistic yeasts for the biological control of Penicillium digitatum on lemons stored under export conditions. Biol Control 115:135–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Food Science, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, China

    Minmin Jing & Yuanzhi Shao

  2. College of Horticulture, Hainan University, Haikou, 570228, China

    Wen Li & Jiaoke Zeng

  3. South Subtropical Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Zhanjiang, 524091, China

    Minmin Jing & Bingyu Huang

Authors
  1. Minmin Jing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bingyu Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wen Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jiaoke Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yuanzhi Shao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MJ and YS conceived and designed the experiments. MJ conducted experiments and composed the articles. BH carried out a part of material collection, physiology parameters determination, and a part of the data analysis. WL was mainly responsible for article correction and revision. JZ performed a part of data analysis. All of authors in this study read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wen Li or Yuanzhi Shao.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jing, M., Huang, B., Li, W. et al. Biocontrol of Cladosporium cladosporioides of mango fruit with Bacillus atrophaeus TE7 and effects on storage quality. Curr Microbiol 78, 765–774 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-020-02343-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-020-02343-2

Search

Navigation