Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of Growth Conditions of Acinetobacter sp. Cr1 for Removal of Heavy Metal Cr Using Central Composite Design

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Growth conditions can significantly affect the removal efficiency of heavy metals by microorganisms. The goal of this study was enhancing the removal efficiency of Cr(VI) and improving the application of Acinetobacter sp. Cr1 (GenBank accession number of 16S rDNA sequence, MN900681). This study focused on pH, Cr(VI) concentration and culture time, which were the major influence factors for removal efficiency of Cr(VI). A central composite design was employed to optimize the removal efficiency by optimizing three variables. The optimum growth conditions were as: pH of 9.52, Cr(VI) concentration of 128.55 mg l−1, culture time of 43.30 h, and the predicted and actual maxima were 65.13% and 67.26%, respectively. Therefore, it is suggested that the strain Acinetobacter sp. Cr1 had a promising potential to be used for bioremediation of Cr(VI).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sun X, Li B, Han F, Xiao E, Wang Q, Xiao T, Sun W (2019) Vegetation type impacts microbial interaction with antimony contaminants in a mining-contaminated soil environment. Environ Pollut 252:1872–1881

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Errington I, King CK, Wilkins D, Spedding T, Hose GC (2018) Ecosystem effects and the management of petroleum-contaminated soils on subantarctic islands. Chemosphere 194:200–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Praveena SM, Cheema MS, Guo HR (2019) Non-nutritive artificial sweeteners as an emerging contaminant in environment: a global review and risks perspectives. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 170:699–707

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Konduracka E (2019) A link between environmental pollution and civilization disorders: a mini review. Rev Environ Health 34:227–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen L, Liao Y, Ma X (2019) Heavy metals volatilization characteristics and risk evaluation of co-combusted municipal solid wastes and sewage sludge without and with calcium-based sorbents. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 182:109370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu J, Wang H, Liu Y, Ma M, Zhang T, Zheng X, Zong M (2016) Ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in soils surrounding oil waste disposal areas. Environ Monit Assess 188:125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Xu G, Hou L, Chen Y, Feng Y (2019) Thallium contamination in farmlands and common vegetables in a pyrite mining city and potential health risks. Environ Pollut 248:906–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu J, Luo X, Wang J, Xiao T, Chen D, Sheng G, Yin M, Lippold H, Wang C, Chen Y (2017) Thallium contamination in arable soils and vegetables around a steel plant-A newly-found significant source of Tl pollution in South China. Environ Pollut 224:445–453

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu J, Li N, Zhang W, Wei X, Tsang DCW, Sun Y, Luo X, Bao Z, Zheng W, Wang J, Xu G, Hou L, Chen Y, Feng Y (2019) Thallium contamination in farmlands and common vegetables in a pyrite mining city and potential health risks. Environ Pollut 248:906–915

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rager JE, Suh M, Chappell GA, Thompson CM, Proctor DM (2019) Review of transcriptomic responses to hexavalent chromium exposure in lung cells supports a role of epigenetic mediators in carcinogenesis. Toxicol Lett 305:40–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Derakhshan Nejad Z, Jung MC, Kim KH (2018) Remediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals with an emphasis on immobilization technology. Environ Geochem Health 40:927–953

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Liang Y, Cao X, Zhao L, Arellano E (2014) Biochar- and phosphate-induced immobilization of heavy metals in contaminated soil and water: implication on simultaneous remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 21:4665–4674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bolan N, Kunhikrishnan A, Thangarajan R, Kumpiene J, Park J, Makino T, Kirkham MB, Scheckel K (2014) Remediation of heavy metal(loid)s contaminated soils-to mobilize or to immobilize? J Hazard Mater 266:141–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. He L, Zhong H, Liu G, Dai Z, Brookes PC, Xu J (2019) Remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils by biochar: Mechanisms, potential risks and applications in China. Environ Pollut 252:846–855

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Verma N, Sharma R (2017) Bioremediation of toxic heavy metals: a patent review. Recent Pat Biotechnol 11:171–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bano A, Hussain J, Akbar A, Mehmood K, Anwar M, Hasni MS, Ullah S, Sajid S, Ali I (2018) Biosorption of heavy metals by obligate halophilic fungi. Chemosphere 199:218–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mishra GK (2017) Microbes in heavy metal remediation: a review on current trends and patents. Recent Pat Biotechnol 11(2017):188–196

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ojuederie OB, Babalola OO (2017a) Microbial and plant-assisted bioremediation of heavy metal polluted environments: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14:E1504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Phieler R, Voit A, Kothe E (2014) Microbially supported phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soils: strategies and applications. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 141:211–235

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu SH, Zeng GM, Niu QY, Liu Y, Zhou L, Jiang LH, Tan XF, Xu P, Zhang C, Cheng M (2017) Bioremediation mechanisms of combined pollution of PAHs and heavy metals by bacteria and fungi: A mini review. Bioresour Technol 224:25–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chaturvedi AD, Pal D, Penta S, Kumar A (2015) Ecotoxic heavy metals transformation by bacteria and fungi in aquatic ecosystem. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 31:1595–1603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li L, Long M, Islam F, Farooq MA, Wang J, Mwamba TM, Shou J, Zhou W (2019) Synergistic effects of chromium and copper on photosynthetic inhibition, subcellular distribution, and related gene expression in Brassica napus cultivars. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 26:11827–11845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Li L, Zhang K, Gill RA, Islam F, Farooq MA, Wang J, Zhou W (2018) Ecotoxicological and interactive effects of copper and chromium on physiochemical, ultrastructural, and molecular profiling in Brassica napus L. Biomed Res Int 2018:9248123

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Gill RA, Ali B, Cui P, Shen E, Farooq MA, Islam F, Ali S, Mao B, Zhou W (2016) Comparative transcriptome profiling of two Brassica napus cultivars under chromium toxicity and its alleviation by reduced glutathione. BMC Genomics 17:885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tiquia-Arashiro SM (2018) Lead absorption mechanisms in bacteria as strategies for lead bioremediation. Appl Microbiol Biot 102:5437–5444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Das S, Dash HR, Chakraborty J (2016) Genetic basis and importance of metal resistant genes in bacteria for bioremediation of contaminated environments with toxic metal pollutants. Appl Microbiol Biot 100:2967–2984

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin D, Ji R, Wang D, Xiao M, Zhao J, Zou J, Li Y, Qin T, Xing B, Chen Y, Liu P, Wu Z, Wang L, Zhang Q, Chen H, Qin W, Wu D, Liu Y, Liu Y, Li S (2019) The research progress in mechanism and influence of biosorption between lactic acid bacteria and Pb(II): a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 59:395–410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rahman KSM, Rahman TJ, Kourkoutas Y, Petsas I, Marchant R, Banat IM (2003) Enhanced bioremediation of n-alkane in petroleum sludge using bacterial consortium amended with rhamnolipid and micronutrients. Bioresource Technol 90:159–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee DW, Lee H, Kwon BO, Khim JS, Yim UH, Kim BS, Kim JJ (2018) Biosurfactant-assisted bioremediation of crude oil by indigenous bacteria isolated from Taean beach sediment. Environ Pollut 241:254–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Roychowdhury R, Roy M, Rakshit A, Sarkar S, Mukherjee P (2018) Arsenic bioremediation by indigenous heavy metal resistant bacteria of fly ash pond. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 101:527–535

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ganapathy B, Yahya A, Ibrahim N (2019) Bioremediation of palm oil mill effluent (POME) using indigenous Meyerozyma guilliermondii. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 26:11113–11125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lace A, Ryan D, Bowkett M, Cleary J (2019) Chromium monitoring in water by colorimetry using optimised 1,5-diphenylcarbazide method. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16:E1803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ram Talib NS, Halmi MIE, Abd Ghani SS, Zaidan UH, Shukor MYA (2019) Artificial neural networks (ANNs) and response surface methodology (RSM) approach for modelling the optimization of chromium (VI) reduction by newly isolated Acinetobacter radioresistens strain NS-MIE from agricultural soil. Biomed Res Int 2019:5785387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Francisco R, Alpoim MC, Morais PV (2002) Diversity of chromium-resistant and -reducing bacteria in a chromium-contaminated activated sludge. J. Appl. Microbiol. 92:837–843

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang HK, Lu H, Wang J, Zhou JT, Sui M (2014) Cr(VI) reduction and Cr(III) immobilization by Acinetobacter sp. HK-1 with the assistance of a novel quinone/graphene oxide composite. Environ Sci Technol 48:12876–12885

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bhattacharya A, Gupta A, Kaur A, Malik D (2014) Efficacy of Acinetobacter sp. B9 for simultaneous removal of phenol and hexavalent chromium from co-contaminated system. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:9829–9841

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Zakaria ZA, Zakaria Z, Surif S, Ahmad WA (2007) Hexavalent chromium reduction by Acinetobacter haemolyticus isolated from heavy-metal contaminated wastewater. J Hazard Mater 146:30–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Narayani M, Vidya Shetty K (2012) Characteristics of a novel Acinetobacter sp. and its kinetics in hexavalent chromium bioreduction. J Microbiol Biotechnol 22:690–698

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ojuederie OB, Babalola OO (2017b) Microbial and plant-assisted bioremediation of heavy metal polluted environments: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14:1504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jan AT, Azam M, Ali A, Haq QMR (2014) Prospects for exploiting bacteria for bioremediation of metal pollution. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 44:519–560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31860010), Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Zhuang autonomous region (No. 2018GXNSFAA138008), Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China (No. 201804010155), Scientific Research Project of Guangxi Normal University (No. 2020CX001 and 2019YR004), Foundation of Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and Endangered Species and Environmental Protection (Guangxi Normal University), Ministry of Education, China (No. ERESEP2020Z04) and Ecological Doctoral Program Construction of Guangxi Normal University (No. EDPC 2018001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BP and LL wrote the main part of the paper and performed the experiments. BP and LL contributed equally to this work. CP and FY wrote the less part of the paper. CS conceived the experiments and proofread the paper. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changhua Shang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

We have obtained the appropriate permission from the responsible authority for collecting heavy metals contaminated soil samples from mining areas.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(DOCX 22 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pang, B., Lv, L., Pang, C. et al. Optimization of Growth Conditions of Acinetobacter sp. Cr1 for Removal of Heavy Metal Cr Using Central Composite Design. Curr Microbiol 78, 316–322 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-020-02278-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-020-02278-8

Navigation