Comparison of Gene Expression Profiles Between Pansensitive and Multidrug-Resistant Strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
- 504 Downloads
Mycobacterium tuberculosis has developed resistance to anti-tuberculosis first-line drugs. Multidrug-resistant strains complicate the control of tuberculosis and have converted it into a worldwide public health problem. Mutational studies of target genes have tried to envisage the resistance in clinical isolates; however, detection of these mutations in some cases is not sufficient to identify drug resistance, suggesting that other mechanisms are involved. Therefore, the identification of new markers of susceptibility or resistance to first-line drugs could contribute (1) to specifically diagnose the type of M. tuberculosis strain and prescribe an appropriate therapy, and (2) to elucidate the mechanisms of resistance in multidrug-resistant strains. In order to identify specific genes related to resistance in M. tuberculosis, we compared the gene expression profiles between the pansensitive H37Rv strain and a clinical CIBIN:UMF:15:99 multidrug-resistant isolate using microarray analysis. Quantitative real-time PCR confirmed that in the clinical multidrug-resistant isolate, the esxG, esxH, rpsA, esxI, and rpmI genes were upregulated, while the lipF, groES, and narG genes were downregulated. The modified genes could be involved in the mechanisms of resistance to first-line drugs in M. tuberculosis and could contribute to increased efficiency in molecular diagnosis approaches of infections with drug-resistant strains.
KeywordsTuberculosis Intergenic Region H37Rv Strain BACTEC MGIT Pyrazinoic Acid
This study was supported by the National Council for Science and Technology (CONACyT), Mexico, Grant No. 99792.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Arnvig KB, Comas I, Thomson NR, Houghton J, Boshoff HI, Croucher NJ, Rose G, Perkins TT, Parkhill J, Dougan G, Young DB (2011) Sequence-based analysis uncovers an abundance of non-coding RNA in the total transcriptome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog 7(11):e1002342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Bailey SL, Roper MH, Huayta M, Trejos N, Lopez Alarcon V, Moore DA (2011) Missed opportunities for tuberculosis diagnosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 15(2):205–210, iGoogle Scholar
- 9.Fu LM, Shinnick TM (2007) Genome-wide analysis of intergenic regions of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv using Affymetrix GeneChips. EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol: 23054Google Scholar
- 16.Ilghari D, Lightbody KL, Veverka V, Waters LC, Muskett FW, Renshaw PS, Carr MD (2011) Solution structure of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis EsxG.EsxH complex: functional implications and comparisons with other M. tuberculosis Esx family complexes. J Biol Chem 286(34):29993–30002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Kamerbeek J, Schouls L, Kolk A, van Agterveld M, van Soolingen D, Kuijper S, Bunschoten A, Molhuizen H, Shaw R, Goyal M, van Embden J (1997) Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology. J Clin Microbiol 35(4):907–914PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Peñuelas-Urquides K, Villarreal-Treviño L, Silva-Ramírez B, Rivadeneyra-Espinoza L, Said-Fernández S, Bermúdez de León M (2013) Measuring of Mycobacterium tuberculosis growth. A correlation of the optical measurements with colony forming units. Brazilian J Microbiol (in press)Google Scholar
- 29.Smyth GK (2004) Linear models and empirical Bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 3: Article3Google Scholar
- 32.Subbian S, Tsenova L, O’Brien P, Yang G, Koo MS, Peixoto B, Fallows D, Dartois V, Muller G, Kaplan G (2011) Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibition alters gene expression and improves isoniazid-mediated clearance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in rabbit lungs. PLoS Pathog 7(9):e1002262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.WHO (2012) Global Tuberculosis Report 2012. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar