Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Increased expression and function of P-glycoprotein in peripheral blood CD56+ cells is associated with the chemoresistance of non-small-cell lung cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Chemoresistance is common among non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), P-glycoprotein (P-gp), encoded by the human multi-drug-resistant MDR1 gene, and multidrug-resistance protein 1 (MRP1) might be major contributors. The aim of the present study was to develop an effective method to investigate the expression and function of P-gp in the peripheral CD56+ cells in order to clarify their correlation with the chemoresistance in NSCLC.

Methods

Using microbead technology and a RT-qPCR methodology, we evaluated the expression levels of P-gp and MRP1 in the purified CD56+ cells in the chemoresistance and chemo-naive NSCLC patients compared with that in the healthy volunteers. Flow cytometric analysis was used to investigate the changes of P-gp function in the CD56+ cells between the three cohorts.

Results

The MDR1 gene expression was elevated markedly (twofold–tenfold), and P-gp function was increased in the chemoresistance cohort compared with the chemo-naive and the healthy cohorts; whereas there was only about two times averagely elevated for the MRP1 gene expression. No statistical significance (p > 0.05) was seen with respect to the expression of MDR1 and MRP1, the function of P-gp between the chemo-naive and the healthy cohorts.

Conclusions

P-gp in peripheral CD56+ cells demonstrated possible clinical relevance as predictive biomarkers for the identification of chemoresistance in NSCLC, while MRP1 may not play a significant role in the drug resistance in NSCLC. The potential applications for this finding are provided evidence to screen the potential P-gp reversors and to diagnose and manage the chemoresistance in NSCLC patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM et al (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61(2):69–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Molina JR, Yang P, Cassivi SD et al (2008) Non-small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship. Mayo Clin Proc 83(5):584–594

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Roy S, Kenny E, Kennedy S et al (2007) MDR1/P-glycoprotein and MRP-1 mRNA and protein expression in non-small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res 27(3A):1325–1330

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berger W, Setinek U, Hollaus P et al (2005) Multidrug resistance markers P-glycoprotein, multidrug resistance protein 1, and lung resistance protein in non-small cell lung cancer: prognostic implications. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 131(6):355–363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Scheper RJ, Broxterman HJ, Scheffer GL et al (1993) Overexpression of a M(r) 110,000 vesicular protein in non-P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance. Cancer Res 53(7):1475–1479

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Merk J, Rolff J, Dorn C et al (2011) Chemoresistance in non-small-cell lung cancer: can multidrug resistance markerspredict the response of xenograft lung cancer models to chemotherapy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 40(1):e29–e33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lanier LL, Testi R, Bindl J et al (1989) Identity of Leu-19 (CD56) leukocyte differentiation antigen and neural celladhesion molecule. J Exp Med 169(6):2233–2238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Robertson MJ, Ritz J (1990) Biology and clinical relevance of human natural killer cells. Blood 76(12):2421–2438

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Woll PJ, O’Brien M, Fossella F, Shah M, Clinch Y (2010) Phase I study of lorvotuzumab mertansine (IMGN901) in patients with CD56-positive solid tumors. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol 21(Suppl. 8):viii175

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jusufovic E, Iljazovic E, Kosnik M et al (2011) Local CD4+, CD8+ and CD56+ reactions to lung cancer in regard topathohistological type and clinical stage. Med Glas Ljek komore Zenicko-doboj kantona 8(1):101–108

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Al OSY, Marshall E, Middleton D, et al (2012) Increased numbers but functional defects of CD56+ CD3+ cells in lung cancer. Int Immunol 24(7):409–415

    Google Scholar 

  12. Egashira M, Kawamata N, Sugimoto K et al (1999) P-glycoprotein expression on normal and abnormally expanded natural killer cells and inhibition of P-glycoprotein function by cyclosporin A and its analogue, PSC833. Blood 93(2):599–606

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Abraham J, Edgerly M, Wilson R et al (2009) A phase I study of the P-glycoprotein antagonist tariquidar in combination with vinorelbine. Clin Cancer Res 15(10):3574–3582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Morschhauser F, Zinzani PL, Burgess M et al (2007) Phase I/II trial of a P-glycoprotein inhibitor, Zosuquidar.3HCl trihydrochloride (LY335979), given orally in combination with the CHOP regimen in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 48(4):708–715

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Strati A, Markou A, Parisi C et al (2011) Gene expression profile of circulating tumor cells in breast cancer by RT-qPCR. BMC Cancer 11:422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou J, Liu M, Aneja R et al (2006) Reversal of P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance in cancer cells by the c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase. Cancer Res 66(1):445–452

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hu X, Wu N, Xia P et al (2012) Correlation between low-level expression of the tumor suppressor gene TAp73 and the chemoresistance of human glioma stem cells. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 69(5):1205–1212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ (2008) Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc 3(6):1101–1108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stewart A, Steiner J, Mellows G et al (2000) Phase I trial of XR9576 in healthy volunteers demonstrates modulation of P-glycoprotein in CD56+ lymphocytes after oral and intravenous administration. Clin Cancer Res 6(11):4186–4191

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. d’Amato TA, Landreneau RJ, McKenna RJ et al (2006) Prevalence of in vitro extreme chemotherapy resistance in resected nonsmall-cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 81(2):440–446 (discussion 446–447)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Carr LL, Finigan JH, Kern JA (2011) Evaluation and treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Med Clin North Am 95(6):1041–1054

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schena M, Guarrera S, Buffoni L et al (2012) DNA repair gene expression level in peripheral blood and tumour tissue from non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck squamous cell cancer patients. DNA Repair (Amst) 11(4):374–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang LE, Yin M, Dong Q et al (2011) DNA repair capacity in peripheral lymphocytes predicts survival of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 29(31):4121–4128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kelly RJ, Draper D, Chen CC et al (2011) A pharmacodynamic study of docetaxel in combination with the P-glycoprotein antagonist tariquidar (XR9576) in patients with lung, ovarian, and cervical cancer. Clin Cancer Res 17(3):569–580

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bates SE, Bakke S, Kang M et al (2004) A phase I/II study of infusional vinblastine with the P-glycoprotein antagonist valspodar (PSC 833) in renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 10(14):4724–4733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Moon YJ, Zhang S, Morris ME (2007) Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction for BCRP, MDR1, and MRP1 mRNA levels in lymphocytes and monocytes. Acta Haematol 118(3):169–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Robey R, Bakke S, Stein W et al (1999) Efflux of rhodamine from CD56+ cells as a surrogate marker for reversal of P-glycoprotein-mediated drug efflux by PSC 833. Blood 93(1):306–314

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Filipits M, Haddad V, Schmid K et al (2007) Multidrug resistance proteins do not predict benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer: international Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial Biologic Program. Clin Cancer Res 13(13):3892–3898

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Liang G, Tang A, Lin X et al (2010) Green tea catechins augment the antitumor activity of doxorubicin in an in vivo mouse model for chemoresistant liver cancer. Int J Oncol 37(1):111–123

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gyemant N, Engi H, Schelz Z et al (2010) In vitro and in vivo multidrug resistance reversal activity by a Betti-base derivative of tylosin. Br J Cancer 103(2):178–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Daoud R, Kast C, Gros P et al (2000) Rhodamine 123 binds to multiple sites in the multidrug resistance protein (MRP1). Biochemistry 39(50):15344–15352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Leite DF, Echevarria-Lima J, Salgado LT et al (2006) In vivo and in vitro modulation of MDR molecules in murine thymocytes. Int Immunopharmacol 6(2):204–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Meaden ER, Hoggard PG, Khoo SH et al (2002) Determination of P-gp and MRP1 expression and function in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vivo. J Immunol Methods 262(1–2):159–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Nemoto K, Yoshida K, Nisimura M et al (1991) The effects of Cepharanthin on the recovery of hematopoietic stem cells after X-ray irradiation. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 18(1):81–84

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Furusawa S, Wu J (2007) The effects of biscoclaurine alkaloid cepharanthine on mammalian cells: implications for cancer, shock, and inflammatory diseases. Life Sci 80(12):1073–1079

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Igari R, Iseki K, Abe S et al (2010) Binocular diplopia and ptosis due to snakebite (Agkistrodon blomhoffi “mamushi”)—a case report. Brain Nerve 62(3):273–277

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Enokida H, Gotanda T, Oku S et al (2002) Reversal of P-glycoprotein-mediated paclitaxel resistance by new synthetic isoprenoids in human bladder cancer cell line. Jpn J Cancer Res 93(9):1037–1046

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Song YC, Xia W, Jiang JH et al (2005) Reversal of multidrug resistance in drug-resistant cell line EAC/ADR by cepharanthine hydrochloride and its mechanism. Yao Xue Xue Bao 40(3):204–207

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Li H, Yan Z, Ning W et al (2011) Using rhodamine 123 accumulation in CD8 cells as a surrogate indicator to study the P-glycoprotein modulating effect of cepharanthine hydrochloride in vivo. J Biomed Biotechnol 2011:281651

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the participating patients, volunteers, and their families, and the clinical doctors. This study was supported by grants from social welfare projects for scientific research of Henan Province, China.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qing Duan Wang.

Additional information

Li Han and Ya Feng Wang contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Han, L., Wang, Y.F., Zhang, Y. et al. Increased expression and function of P-glycoprotein in peripheral blood CD56+ cells is associated with the chemoresistance of non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 70, 365–372 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-012-1915-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-012-1915-x

Keywords

Navigation