Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Phase II and pharmacokinetic trial of rebeccamycin analog in advanced biliary cancers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Advanced cancers of the bile duct and gallbladder carry an ominous prognosis. Rebeccamycin analogue (RA) is a novel antitumor antibiotic where phase I trials suggested clinical efficacy in patients with biliary cancers.

Methods

The primary objective was to determine the response rate to RA in patients with advanced gallbladder and bile duct tumors. Secondary endpoints were survival and pharmacokinetic characterization. RA was given at a dose 165 mg/(m2 day) × 5 days every 3 weeks.

Results

Forty-six patients were enrolled. Nine patients were removed from study before their first planned imaging study for response. Two patients had partial responses and 16 had stable disease. On an intent-to-treat analysis the median survival was 6.3 months. A >20% drop in CA19.9 was seen in 43% of patients with initial high levels. Grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were seen in 35 and 5% of patients, respectively. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 16% of patients. The pharmacokinetic profile of this trial closely resembles those of prior phase I trials. Measured biliary concentrations of RA were as much as 100× greater than simultaneous plasma concentration.

Conclusion

Although RA has a response rate of 5% in advanced biliary cancers, it is associated with significant numbers of patients experiencing prolonged stable disease. Biliary concentrations of RA are significantly greater than plasma concentrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society (2005) Cancer facts and figures. American Cancer Society, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  2. de Groen PC, Gores GJ, LaRusso NF et al (1999) Biliary tract cancers. N Engl J Med 341:1368–1378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Perpetuo MD, Valdivieso M, Heilbrun LK et al (1978) Natural history study of gallbladder cancer: a review of 36 years experience at M.D. Anderson Hospital and Tumor Institute. Cancer 42:330–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Henson DE, Albores-Saavedra J, Corle D (1992) Carcinoma of the gallbladder, histologic types, stage of disease, grade and survival rates. Cancer 70:1493–1497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Manfredi S, Benhamiche AM, Isambert N et al (2000) Trends in incidence and management of gallbladder carcinoma: a population-based study in France. Cancer 89:757–762

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Daines WP, Rajagopalan V, Grossbard ML et al (2004) Gallbladder and biliary tract carcinoma: a comprehensive update, Part 2. Oncology (Williston Park) 18:1049–1059 [discussion 1060, 1065–1066, 1068 (review)]

    Google Scholar 

  7. Glimelius B, Hoffman K, Sjoden PO et al (1996) Chemotherapy improves survival and quality of life in advanced pancreatic and biliary cancer. Ann Oncol 7:593–600

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones DV Jr, Lozano R, Hoque A et al (1996) Phase II study of paclitaxel therapy for unresectable biliary tree carcinomas. J Clin Oncol 14:2306–2310

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Papakostas P, Kouroussis C, Andoulakis N et al (2001) First-line chemotherapy with docetaxel for unresectable or metastatic carcinoma of the biliary tract. A multicenter phase II study. Eur J Cancer 37:1833–1838

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Eng C, Ramamathan RK, Wong MK et al (2004) A Phase II trial of fixed dose rate gemcitabine in patients with advanced biliary tree carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 27:565–569

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Malik IA, Aziz Z, Zaidi SH et al (2003) Gemcitabine and cisplatin is a highly effective combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced cancer of the gallbladder. Am J Clin Oncol 26:174–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Carraro S, Servienti PJ, Bruno MF (2001) Gemcitabine and cisplatin in locally advanced or metastatic gallbladder and bile duct adenocarcinoms. ASCO 20 (abstract 2333)

  13. National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment, Investigators Brochure (1999) Rebeccamycin Analog NSC 655649. Bethesda, Maryland

  14. Dowlati A, Hoppel CL, Ingalls ST et al (2001) Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of rebeccamycin analog NSC 655649 given daily for five consecutive days. J Clin Oncol 19:2309–2318

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Therase P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Simon R (1989) Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 10:1–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Akaike H (1976) An information criterion (AIC). Math Sci 14:5–9

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported in part by grants U01 CA62502, MO1-RR-00080, 5K23 CA109348-01 (to AD) and TRF 23XS087A (to AD) from the National Institutes of Health to Case Western Reserve University and by grants P30CA47904 and M01-RR-00056 from the National Institutes of Health to the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute and Medical Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Afshin Dowlati.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dowlati, A., Posey, J., Ramanathan, R.K. et al. Phase II and pharmacokinetic trial of rebeccamycin analog in advanced biliary cancers. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 65, 73–78 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-1005-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-1005-x

Keywords

Navigation