Skip to main content
Log in

Predictive scoring system for distinguishing Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia from Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia in patients with hematological malignancies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Difficulties in immediately distinguishing Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (SM) bacteremia from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) bacteremia in the clinical setting can lead to treatment delay. We aimed to develop a scoring system to immediately distinguish SM bacteremia from PA bacteremia using clinical indicators. We enrolled cases of SM and PA bacteremia in adult patients with hematological malignancies between January 2011 and June 2018. The patients were randomized into derivation and validation cohorts (2:1), and a clinical prediction tool for SM bacteremia was developed and verified. In total, 88 SM and 85 PA bacteremia cases were identified. In the derivation cohort, the following independent predictors of SM bacteremia were identified: no evidence of PA colonization, antipseudomonal β-lactam breakthrough bacteremia, and central venous catheter insertion. We scored each of the three predictors according to their regression coefficient (2, 2, and 1, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis confirmed the score’s predictive performance, with an area under the curve of 0.805. The combined sensitivity and specificity (0.655 and 0.821) was highest with a cut-off value of 4 points. Positive and negative predictive values were 79.2% (19/24) and 69.7% (23/33), respectively. This novel predictive scoring system is potentially useful for distinguishing SM bacteremia from PA bacteremia, which would facilitate immediate administration of appropriate antimicrobial therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

SM:

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

SMX-TMP:

Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim

PA:

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

AUC:

Area under the ROC curve

PCP:

Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia

CVC:

Central venous catheter

MALDI TOF-MS:

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry

References

  1. Araoka H, Baba M, Yoneyama A (2010) Risk factors for mortality among patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia in Tokyo, Japan, 1996–2009. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 29(5):605–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-0882-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim EJ, Kim YC, Ahn JY, Jeong SJ, Ku NS, Choi JY et al (2019) Risk factors for mortality in patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia and clinical impact of quinolone-resistant strains. BMC Infect Dis 19(1):754. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4394-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bao H, Qiao Y, Liu D, Chen J, Wu X, Hu X et al (2020) The clinical impact of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia on the 30-day mortality rate in patients with hematologic disorders: a single-institution experience. Infection 48(2):205–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-019-01369-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Looney WJ, Narita M, Mühlemann K (2009) Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: an emerging opportunist human pathogen. Lancet Infect Dis 9(5):312–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(09)70083-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Freifeld AG, Bow EJ, Sepkowitz KA, Boeckh MJ, Ito JI, Mullen CA et al (2011) Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of america. Clin Infect Dis 52(4):e56-93. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ho JM, Juurlink DN (2011) Considerations when prescribing trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. CMAJ 183(16):1851–1858. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.111152

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2022)Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 32nd ed. CLSI supplement M100. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, USA

  8. Shankar-Hari M, Phillips GS, Levy ML, Seymour CW, Liu VX, Deutschman CS et al (2016) Developing a new definition and assessing new clinical criteria for septic shock: for the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 315(8):775–787. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48(3):452–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim SH, Cho SY, Kang CI, Seok H, Huh K, Ha YE et al (2018) Clinical predictors of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia in adult patients with hematologic malignancy. Ann Hematol 97(2):343–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-017-3178-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Karaba SM, Goodman KE, Amoah J, Cosgrove SE, Tamma PD (2021) StenoSCORE: predicting Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bloodstream infections in the hematologic malignancy population. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 65(8):e0079321. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.00793-21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sumida K, Chong Y, Miyake N, Akahoshi T, Yasuda M, Shimono N et al (2015) Risk factors associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia: a matched case-control study. PLoS One 10(7):e0133731. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133731

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Narimatsu H, Kami M, Miyakoshi S, Yuji K, Matusmura T, Uchida N et al (2007) Value of pretransplant screening for colonization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in reduced-intensity umbilical cord blood transplantation for adult patients. Ann Hematol 86(6):449–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-007-0260-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sidler JA, Frei R, Tschudin-Sutter S, Dangel M, Battegay M, Weisser M et al (2015) Is admission screening for Pseudomonas aeruginosa useful in haematologic patients? A prospective study with 1310 patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 21(6):572-e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2015.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Furuichi M, Ito K, Miyairi I (2016) Characteristics of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia in children. Pediatr Int 58(2):113–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/ped.12745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hanes SD, Demirkan K, Tolley E, Boucher BA, Croce MA, Wood GC et al (2002) Risk factors for late-onset nosocomial pneumonia caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in critically ill trauma patients. Clin Infect Dis 35(3):228–235. https://doi.org/10.1086/341022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Imoto W, Yamada K, Kuwabara G, Yamairi K, Shibata W, Oshima K et al (2021) In which cases of pneumonia should we consider treatments for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia? J Hosp Infect 111:169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2021.01.011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Boktour M, Hanna H, Ansari S, Bahna B, Hachem R, Tarrand J et al (2006) Central venous catheter and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia in cancer patients. Cancer 106(9):1967–1973. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Masayuki Yamanouchi and Dr. Junichi Hoshino (Nephrology Center, Toranomon Hospital, Japan) for randomizing the data and giving valuable comments on the statistical analysis.

Funding

This work was supported in part by a Research Grant from Okinaka Memorial Institute for Medical Research, Tokyo, Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception: All authors.

Study design: Takashi Sakoh, Muneyoshi Kimura, Hideki Araoka.

Data collection: Takashi Sakoh.

Data analysis: Takashi Sakoh, Muneyoshi Kimura.

Investigation: all authors.

Writing (first draft): Takashi Sakoh, Muneyoshi Kimura, Hideki Araoka.

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hideki Araoka.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Toranomon Hospital (approval number #1917, 2019/11/27).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sakoh, T., Kimura, M., Takagi, S. et al. Predictive scoring system for distinguishing Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia from Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia in patients with hematological malignancies. Ann Hematol 102, 1239–1246 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-023-05185-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-023-05185-7

Keywords

Navigation